| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Reduce include dependencies by no longer including Pass.h from
DataLayout.h. That include seemed irrelevant to DataLayout, as
well as being irrelevant to several users of DataLayout.
Reviewers: rnk
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69261
llvm-svn: 375436
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
dyn_cast<> null dereference warning. NFCI.
The static analyzer is warning about a potential null dereference, but we should be able to use cast<> directly and if not assert will fire for us.
llvm-svn: 375430
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
hasEHOrLoadsOnPath call. NFCI.
The static analyzer is warning about a potential null dereference, but we should be able to use cast<> directly and if not assert will fire for us.
llvm-svn: 375429
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
assertion. NFCI.
llvm-svn: 375428
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The static analyzer is warning about a potential null dereference, but we should be able to use cast<> directly and if not assert will fire for us.
llvm-svn: 375427
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
warning. NFCI.
The static analyzer is warning about a potential null dereference, but we should be able to use cast<> directly and if not assert will fire for us.
llvm-svn: 375426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit message from D66935:
This patch fixes a bug exposed by D65653 where a subsequent invocation
of `determineCalleeSaves` ends up with a different size for the callee
save area, leading to different frame-offsets in debug information.
In the invocation by PEI, `determineCalleeSaves` tries to determine
whether it needs to spill an extra callee-saved register to get an
emergency spill slot. To do this, it calls 'estimateStackSize' and
manually adds the size of the callee-saves to this. PEI then allocates
the spill objects for the callee saves and the remaining frame layout
is calculated accordingly.
A second invocation in LiveDebugValues causes estimateStackSize to return
the size of the stack frame including the callee-saves. Given that the
size of the callee-saves is added to this, these callee-saves are counted
twice, which leads `determineCalleeSaves` to believe the stack has
become big enough to require spilling an extra callee-save as emergency
spillslot. It then updates CalleeSavedStackSize with a larger value.
Since CalleeSavedStackSize is used in the calculation of the frame
offset in getFrameIndexReference, this leads to incorrect offsets for
variables/locals when this information is recalculated after PEI.
This patch fixes the lldb unit tests in `functionalities/thread/concurrent_events/*`
Changes after D66935:
Ensures AArch64FunctionInfo::getCalleeSavedStackSize does not return
the uninitialized CalleeSavedStackSize when running `llc` on a specific
pass where the MIR code has already been expected to have gone through PEI.
Instead, getCalleeSavedStackSize (when passed the MachineFrameInfo) will try
to recalculate the CalleeSavedStackSize from the CalleeSavedInfo. In debug
mode, the compiler will assert the recalculated size equals the cached
size as calculated through a call to determineCalleeSaves.
This fixes two tests:
test/DebugInfo/AArch64/asan-stack-vars.mir
test/DebugInfo/AArch64/compiler-gen-bbs-livedebugvalues.mir
that otherwise fail when compiled using msan.
Reviewed By: omjavaid, efriedma
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68783
llvm-svn: 375425
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Clean up PPCAsmPrinter with IsPPC64 and IsDarwin.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69259
llvm-svn: 375420
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: hiraditya, asbirlea, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69253
llvm-svn: 375419
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69256
llvm-svn: 375416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This adds some new qdadd patterns to go along with the other recently added
qadd's.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68999
llvm-svn: 375414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This lowers a sadd_sat to a qadd by treating it as legal. Also adds qsub at the
same time.
The qadd instruction sets the q flag, but we already have many cases where we
do not model this in llvm.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68976
llvm-svn: 375411
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69248
llvm-svn: 375410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Expected<section_iterator>
It returns just a section_iterator currently and have a report_fatal_error call inside.
This change adds a way to return errors and handle them on caller sides.
The patch also changes/improves current users and adds test cases.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69167
llvm-svn: 375408
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
TargetLowering::getABIAlignmentForCallingConv
Summary:
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: sdardis, hiraditya, jrtc27, atanasyan, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69243
llvm-svn: 375407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
When MemCpyOpt is handling aggregate type values, if an instruction (let's call it P) between the targeting load (L) and store (S) clobbers the source pointer of L, it will try to hoist S before P. This process will also hoist S's data dependency instructions.
However, the current implementation has a bug that if one of S's dependency instructions is //also// a user of P, MemCpyOpt will not prevent it from being hoisted above P and cause a use-before-define error. For example, in the newly added test file (i.e. `aggregate-type-crash.ll`), it will try to hoist both `store %my_struct %1, %my_struct* %3` and its dependent, `%3 = bitcast i8* %2 to %my_struct*`, above `%2 = call i8* @my_malloc(%my_struct* %0)`. Creating the following BB:
```
entry:
%1 = bitcast i8* %4 to %my_struct*
%2 = bitcast %my_struct* %1 to i8*
%3 = bitcast %my_struct* %0 to i8*
call void @llvm.memcpy.p0i8.p0i8.i64(i8* align 4 %2, i8* align 4 %3, i64 8, i1 false)
%4 = call i8* @my_malloc(%my_struct* %0)
ret void
```
Where there is a use-before-define error between `%1` and `%4`.
Update: The compiler for the Pony Programming Language [also encounter the same bug](https://github.com/ponylang/ponyc/issues/3140)
Patch by Min-Yih Hsu (myhsu)
Reviewers: eugenis, pcc, dblaikie, dneilson, t.p.northover, lattner
Reviewed By: eugenis
Subscribers: lenary, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66060
llvm-svn: 375403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Lower the target independent signed saturating intrinsics to qadd8 and qadd16.
This custom lowers them from a sadd_sat, catching the node early before it is
promoted. It also adds a QADD8b and QADD16b node to mean the bottom "lane" of a
qadd8/qadd16, so that we can call demand bits on it to show that it does not
use the upper bits.
Also handles QSUB8 and QSUB16.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68974
llvm-svn: 375402
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: arsenm, dschuff, jyknight, sdardis, jvesely, nhaehnle, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, aheejin, fedor.sergeev, jrtc27, atanasyan, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69216
llvm-svn: 375398
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As noted in post-commit review of rL375378375378.
llvm-svn: 375397
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
`ConstantRange::makeGuaranteedNoWrapRegion()` knows how to deal with `mul`
since rL335646, there is exhaustive test coverage.
This is already used by CVP's `processOverflowIntrinsic()`,
and by SCEV's `StrengthenNoWrapFlags()`
That being said, currently, this doesn't help much in the end:
| statistic | old | new | delta | percentage |
| correlated-value-propagation.NumMulNSW | 4 | 275 | 271 | 6775.00% |
| correlated-value-propagation.NumMulNUW | 4 | 1323 | 1319 | 32975.00% |
| correlated-value-propagation.NumMulNW | 8 | 1598 | 1590 | 19875.00% |
| correlated-value-propagation.NumNSW | 5715 | 5986 | 271 | 4.74% |
| correlated-value-propagation.NumNUW | 9193 | 10512 | 1319 | 14.35% |
| correlated-value-propagation.NumNW | 14908 | 16498 | 1590 | 10.67% |
| instcount.NumAddInst | 275871 | 275869 | -2 | 0.00% |
| instcount.NumBrInst | 708234 | 708232 | -2 | 0.00% |
| instcount.NumMulInst | 43812 | 43810 | -2 | 0.00% |
| instcount.NumPHIInst | 316786 | 316784 | -2 | 0.00% |
| instcount.NumTruncInst | 62165 | 62167 | 2 | 0.00% |
| instcount.NumUDivInst | 2528 | 2526 | -2 | -0.08% |
| instcount.TotalBlocks | 842995 | 842993 | -2 | 0.00% |
| instcount.TotalInsts | 7376486 | 7376478 | -8 | 0.00% |
(^ test-suite plain, tests still pass)
Reviewers: nikic, reames, luqmana, sanjoy, timshen
Reviewed By: reames
Subscribers: hiraditya, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69203
llvm-svn: 375396
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Allow for ignoring the check for a single use in SimplifyDemandedVectorElts
to be able to simplify operands if DemandedElts is known to contain
the union of elements used by all users.
It is a responsibility of a caller of SimplifyDemandedVectorElts to
supply correct DemandedElts.
Simplify a series of extractelement instructions if only a subset of
elements is used.
Reviewers: reames, arsenm, majnemer, nhaehnle
Reviewed By: nhaehnle
Subscribers: wdng, jvesely, nhaehnle, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67345
llvm-svn: 375395
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Current implementation of Instruction::mayReadFromMemory()
returns !doesNotAccessMemory() which is !ReadNone. This
does not take into account that the writeonly attribute
also indicates that the call does not read from memory.
The patch changes the predicate to !doesNotReadMemory()
that reflects the intended behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69086
llvm-svn: 375389
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently, for indirect call, the assembly code printed out as
callx <imm>
This is not right, it should be
callx <reg>
Fixed the issue with proper format.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69229
llvm-svn: 375386
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 375384
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
AAReturnedValues, AAMemoryBehavior, and AANoUnwind, can provide
information that helps during the tracking or even justifies no-capture.
We now use this information and enable no-capture in some test cases
designed a long while a ago for these cases.
llvm-svn: 375382
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
emitting X86ISD::FHADD in LowerUINT_TO_FP_i64.
This was a regression from r375341.
Fixes PR43729.
llvm-svn: 375381
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Nikita pointed out an oppurtunity, might as well document it in the code.
llvm-svn: 375380
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We can end up with two loop exits whose exit counts are equivalent, but whose textual representation is different and non-obvious. For the sub-case where we have a series of exits which dominate one another (common), eliminate any exits which would iterate *after* a previous exit on the exiting iteration.
As noted in the TODO being removed, I'd always thought this was a good idea, but I've now seen this in a real workload as well.
Interestingly, in review, Nikita pointed out there's let another oppurtunity to leverage SCEV's reasoning. If we kept track of the min of dominanting exits so far, we could discharge exits with EC >= MDE. This is less powerful than the existing transform (since later exits aren't considered), but potentially more powerful for any case where SCEV can prove a >= b, but neither a == b or a > b. I don't have an example to illustrate that oppurtunity, but won't be suprised if we find one and return to handle that case as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69009
llvm-svn: 375379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In this pattern, all the "magic" bits that we'd `add` are all
high sign bits, and in the value we'd be adding to they are all unset,
not unexpectedly, so we can have an `or` there:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/ups
It is possible that `haveNoCommonBitsSet()` should be taught about this
pattern so that we never have an `add` variant, but the reasoning would
need to be recursive (because of that `select`), so i'm not really sure
that would be worth it just yet.
llvm-svn: 375378
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 375375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This adds folds for comparing uadd.sat/usub.sat with zero:
* uadd.sat(a, b) == 0 => a == 0 && b == 0 => (a | b) == 0
* usub.sat(a, b) == 0 => a <= b
And inverted forms for !=.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69224
llvm-svn: 375374
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 375373
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This problem consists of several parts:
* Basic sign bit extraction - `trunc? (?shr %x, (bitwidth(x)-1))`.
This is trivial, and easy to do, we have a fold for it.
* Shift amount reassociation - if we have two identical shifts,
and we can simplify-add their shift amounts together,
then we likely can just perform them as a single shift.
But this is finicky, has one-use restrictions,
and shift opcodes must be identical.
But there is a super-pattern where both of these work together.
to produce sign bit test from two shifts + comparison.
We do indeed already handle this in most cases.
But since we get that fold transitively, it has one-use restrictions.
And what's worse, in this case the right-shifts aren't required to be
identical, and we can't handle that transitively:
If the total shift amount is bitwidth-1, only a sign bit will remain
in the output value. But if we look at this from the perspective of
two shifts, we can't fold - we can't possibly know what bit pattern
we'd produce via two shifts, it will be *some* kind of a mask
produced from original sign bit, but we just can't tell it's shape:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/cM0 https://rise4fun.com/Alive/9IN
But it will *only* contain sign bit and zeros.
So from the perspective of sign bit test, we're good:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/FRz https://rise4fun.com/Alive/qBU
Superb!
So the simplest solution is to extend `reassociateShiftAmtsOfTwoSameDirectionShifts()` to also have a
sudo-analysis mode that will ignore extra-uses, and will only check
whether a) those are two right shifts and b) they end up with bitwidth(x)-1
shift amount and return either the original value that we sign-checking,
or null.
This does not have any functionality change for
the existing `reassociateShiftAmtsOfTwoSameDirectionShifts()`.
All that being said, as disscussed in the review, this yet again
increases usage of instsimplify in instcombine as utility.
Some day that may need to be reevaluated.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43595
Reviewers: spatel, efriedma, vsk
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: xbolva00, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68930
llvm-svn: 375371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
If all the shifts amount are already poison-producing,
then we can add more poison-producing flags ontop:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/Ocwi
Otherwise, we should only consider the possible range of shift amts that don't result in poison.
For unsigned range not not overflow, we must not shift out any set bits,
and the actual limit for `x` can be computed by backtransforming
the maximal value we could ever get out of the `shl` - `-1` through
`lshr`. If the `x` is any larger than that then it will overflow.
Likewise for signed range, but just in signed domain..
This is based on the general idea outlined by @nikic in https://reviews.llvm.org/D68672#1714990
Reviewers: nikic, sanjoy
Reviewed By: nikic
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits, nikic
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69217
llvm-svn: 375370
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Avoids a test regression in a future patch. Also add debug printing on
this case, so I waste less time debugging folds in the future.
llvm-svn: 375367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We handle it this way for some other address spaces.
Since r349196, SILoadStoreOptimizer has been trying to do this. This
is after SIFoldOperands runs, which can change the addressing
patterns. It's simpler to just split this earlier.
llvm-svn: 375366
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 375365
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It's already available in the class.
llvm-svn: 375363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch tries to resolve problems faced in D68943
and uses some of the code written by Konrad Wilhelm Kleine
in that patch.
Previously, yaml2obj tool always created a .symtab section.
This patch changes that. With it we only create it when
have a "Symbols:" tag in the YAML document or when
we need to create it because it is used by another section(s).
obj2yaml follows the new behavior and does not print "Symbols:"
anymore when there is no symbol table.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69041
llvm-svn: 375361
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 375357
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Calls to constants should probably be generally handled.
llvm-svn: 375356
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a common idiom which arises after induction variables are widened, and we have two or more exit conditions. Interestingly, we don't have instcombine or instsimplify support for this either.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69006
llvm-svn: 375349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
'Zeroable' known undef/zero bits. NFCI.
Renamed 'resolveTargetShuffleAndZeroables' to 'resolveTargetShuffleFromZeroables' to match.
llvm-svn: 375348
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(1/2)
Provides a TLI hook to allow targets to relax the emission of shifts, thus enabling
codegen improvements on targets with no multiple shift instructions and cheap selects
or branches.
Contributes to a Fix for PR43559:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43559
Patch by: @joanlluch (Joan LLuch)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69116
llvm-svn: 375347
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
tryToWidenViaDuplication lowers using the shuffle_v8i16(unpack_v16i8(shuffle_v8i16(x),shuffle_v8i16(x))) pattern, but the unpack only needs the even/odd 16i8 args if the original v16i8 shuffle mask references the even/odd elements - which isn't true for many extension style shuffles.
llvm-svn: 375342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We were always generating a single source HADDPD, but really we should only do this if shouldUseHorizontalOp says its a good idea.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69175
llvm-svn: 375341
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Move the types needed out so they can be forward declared instead.
llvm-svn: 375325
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Now X86ISelLowering doesn't depend on many IR analyses.
llvm-svn: 375320
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Only forward declarations are needed here. Follow-on to r375311.
llvm-svn: 375319
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Works on this dependency chain:
ArrayRef.h ->
Hashing.h -> --CUT--
Host.h ->
StringMap.h / StringRef.h
ArrayRef is very popular, but Host.h is rarely needed. Move the
IsBigEndianHost constant to SwapByteOrder.h. Clients of that header are
more likely to need it.
llvm-svn: 375316
|