| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
reg->mem DenseMaps in favor of binary search.
With the static tables sorted we can binary search them directly for reg->mem lookups. This removes 6 DenseMaps that had to be created when X86InstrInfo is constructed.
We still have one Mem->Reg DenseMap for the reverse direction. This is created just as before by walking the reg->mem arrays to populate it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48527
llvm-svn: 335501
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
for Intel syntax.
llvm-svn: 335500
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This removes debug locations from ConstantSDNode and ConstantSDFPNode.
When this kind of node is materialized we no longer create a line table
entry which jumps back to the constant's first point of use. This makes
single-stepping behavior smoother, and it matches the model used by IR,
where Constants have no locations. See this thread for more context:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-June/124164.html
I'd like to handle constant BuildVectorSDNodes and to try to eliminate
passing SDLocs to SelectionDAG::getConstant*() in follow-up commits.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48468
llvm-svn: 335497
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There are quite a few if statements that enumerate all these cases. It gets
even worse in our fork of LLVM where we also have a Triple::cheri (which
is mips64 + CHERI instructions) and we had to update all if statements that
check for Triple::mips64 to also handle Triple::cheri. This patch helps to
reduce our diff to upstream and should also make some checks more readable.
Reviewed By: atanasyan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48548
llvm-svn: 335493
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Note a normal select test is not currently possible because this
relies on input registers tracked in SIMachineFunctionInfo which
are not currently serializable in MIR, but this does work end-to-end
from the IR.
llvm-svn: 335490
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I thought I fixed this in r308673, but that fix was
very broken. The assumption that any frame index can be used
in place of another was more widespread than I realized.
Even when stack slot sharing was disabled, this was still
replacing frame index uses with a different ID with a different
stack slot.
Really fix this by doing the coloring per-stack ID, so all of
the coloring logically done in a separate namespace. This is a lot
simpler than trying to figure out how to change the color if
the stack ID is different.
llvm-svn: 335488
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 335486
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 335485
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If a function has sample to use, but cannot use them because of no debug
information, currently a warning will be issued to inform the missing
opportunity.
This warning assumes the binary generating the profile and the binary using
the profile are similar enough. It is not always the case. Sometimes even
if the binaries are not quite similar, we may still get some benefit by
using sampleFDO. In those cases, we may still want to apply sampleFDO but
not want to see a lot of such warnings pop up.
The patch adds an option for the warning.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48510
llvm-svn: 335484
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We can prove that some delinearized subscripts do not wrap around to become
negative by the fact that they are from inbound geps of load/store locations.
This helps improve the delinearisation in cases where we can't prove that they
are non-negative from SCEV alone.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48481
llvm-svn: 335481
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This should avoid relying on the pointee type
to get the alignment, particularly since pointee
types are supposed to be removed at some point.
Also fixes not getting the alignment for unsized types.
llvm-svn: 335478
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Not only should SafepointIRVerifier ignore unreachable blocks (as suggested in https://reviews.llvm.org/D47011) but it also has to ignore dead blocks.
In @test2 (see the new tests):
br i1 true, label %right, label %left
left:
...
right:
...
merge:
%val = phi i8 addrspace(1)* [ ..., %left ], [ ..., %right ]
use %val
both left and right branches are reachable.
If they collide then SafepointIRVerifier reports an error.
Because of the foldable branch condition GVN finds the left branch dead and removes the phi node entry that merges values from right and left. Then the use comes from the right branch. This results in no collision.
So, SafepointIRVerifier ends up in different results depending on either GVN is run or not.
To solve this issue this patch adds Dead Block detection to SafepointIRVerifier which can ignore dead blocks while validating IR. The Dead Block detection algorithm is taken from GVN but modified to not split critical edges. That is needed to keep CFG unchanged by SafepointIRVerifier.
Patch by Yevgeny Rouban.
Reviewed By: anna, apilipenko, DaniilSuchkov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47441
llvm-svn: 335473
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Testcases provided by Tim Renouf.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48102
llvm-svn: 335472
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
progress from remat specifically for STATEPOINT"
This change caused widespread assertion failures in our downstream testing:
lib/CodeGen/LiveInterval.cpp:409: bool llvm::LiveRange::overlapsFrom(const llvm::LiveRange&, llvm::LiveRange::const_iterator) const: Assertion `!empty() && "empty range"' failed.
llvm-svn: 335462
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
bits" MSVC warning (again). NFCI.
llvm-svn: 335457
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
bits" MSVC warning. NFCI.
llvm-svn: 335454
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 335451
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
findThreeSrcCommutedOpIndices. Remove uncommutable returns from getThreeSrcCommuteCase/getFMA3OpcodeToCommuteOperands.
We should be blocking the operand while we are in the routine that tries to find commutable operand indices. Doing it later means we might have missed out on another valid set of operands we could have commuted.
The intrinsic case was the only case that could really prevent commuting in getFMA3OpcodeToCommuteOperands. All the other cases in getThreeSrcCommuteCase were not reachable conditions as they were protected by findThreeSrcCommutedOpIndices.
With that abort case pushed earlier, we can remove all the abort checks and replace with asserts.
llvm-svn: 335446
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It's easy for domination numbers to get out-of-date, and this is no more
costly than any of the other verifiers we already have, so it seems nice
to have.
A stage3 build with this Works On My Machine, so this hasn't caught any
bugs... yet. :)
llvm-svn: 335444
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
A WebAssemblyException object contains BBs that belong to a 'catch' part
of the try-catch-end structure. Because CFGSort requires all the BBs
within a catch part to be sorted together as it does for loops, this
pass calculates the nesting structure of catch part of exceptions in a
function. Now this assumes the use of Windows EH instructions.
Reviewers: dschuff, majnemer
Subscribers: jfb, mgorny, sbc100, jgravelle-google, sunfish, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44134
llvm-svn: 335439
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Add WebAssemblyLateEHPrepare pass that does several small jobs for
exception handling. This runs before CFGSort, and is different from
WasmEHPrepare pass that runs before ISel, even though the names are
similar.
Reviewers: dschuff, majnemer
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, sunfish, mgorny, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46803
llvm-svn: 335438
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 335437
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
They appear to be untested other than the test case for p37879.ll and I believe we should be using SimplifyDemandedElts here to handle these cases.
llvm-svn: 335436
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
The scalar to vector on the mask register should not be part of the patterns.
llvm-svn: 335435
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewers: atanasyan
Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31557
llvm-svn: 335434
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch has the same motivating example as D48466:
define void @foo(i64 %x, i32 %c.0282.in, i32 %d.0280, i32* %ptr0, i32* %ptr1) {
%c.0282 = and i32 %c.0282.in, 268435455
%a16 = lshr i64 32508, %x
%a17 = and i64 %a16, 1
%tobool = icmp eq i64 %a17, 0
%. = select i1 %tobool, i32 1, i32 2
%.286 = select i1 %tobool, i32 27, i32 26
%shr97 = lshr i32 %c.0282, %.
%shl98 = shl i32 %c.0282.in, %.286
%or99 = or i32 %shr97, %shl98
%shr100 = lshr i32 %d.0280, %.
%shl101 = shl i32 %d.0280, %.286
%or102 = or i32 %shr100, %shl101
store i32 %or99, i32* %ptr0
store i32 %or102, i32* %ptr1
ret void
}
...but I'm trying to kill the setcc bool math sooner rather than later.
By matching a larger pattern that includes both the low-bit mask and the trailing add/sub,
we can create a universally good fold because we always eliminate the condition code
intermediate value.
Here are Alive proofs for these (currently instcombine folds the 'add' variants, but
misses the 'sub' patterns):
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/Gsyp
Name: sub of zext cmp mask
%a = and i8 %x, 1
%c = icmp eq i8 %a, 0
%z = zext i1 %c to i32
%r = sub i32 C1, %z
=>
%optional_cast = zext i8 %a to i32
%r = add i32 %optional_cast, C1-1
Name: add of zext cmp mask
%a = and i32 %x, 1
%c = icmp eq i32 %a, 0
%z = zext i1 %c to i8
%r = add i8 %z, C1
=>
%optional_cast = trunc i32 %a to i8
%r = sub i8 C1+1, %optional_cast
All of the tests look like improvements or neutral to me. But it is possible that x86
test+set+bitop is better than what we now show here. I suspect we could do better by
adding another fold for the 'sub' variants.
We start with select-of-constant in IR in the larger motivating test, so that's why I
included tests with selects. Proofs for those variants:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/Bx1
Name: true const is bigger
Pre: C2 == (C1 + 1)
%a = and i8 %x, 1
%c = icmp eq i8 %a, 0
%r = select i1 %c, i64 C2, i64 C1
=>
%z = zext i8 %a to i64
%r = sub i64 C2, %z
Name: false const is bigger
Pre: C2 == (C1 + 1)
%a = and i8 %x, 1
%c = icmp eq i8 %a, 0
%r = select i1 %c, i64 C1, i64 C2
=>
%z = zext i8 %a to i64
%r = add i64 C1, %z
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48466
llvm-svn: 335433
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
For some reason the 64-bit patterns were separated from their 8/16/32-bit friends, but only for add/sub/mul. For and/or/xor they were together.
llvm-svn: 335429
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
a Z to match other EVEX instructions.
llvm-svn: 335428
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 335426
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
SmallVectorStorage is empty when its size is 1; use inheritance so that
the empty base class optimization kicks in.
llvm-svn: 335421
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Use the WithColor helper from support to print errors and warnings.
llvm-svn: 335415
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
some test CHECK lines.
llvm-svn: 335414
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
used on a rip-relative address.
llvm-svn: 335413
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
-Ensure EIP isn't used with an index reigster.
-Ensure EIP isn't used as index register.
-Ensure base register isn't a vector register.
-Ensure eiz/riz usage matches the size of their base register.
llvm-svn: 335412
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
FDiv is replaced with multiplication by reciprocal and invariant
reciprocal is hoisted out of the loop, while multiplication remains
even if invariant.
Switch checks for all invariant operands and only invariant
denominator to fix the issue.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48447
llvm-svn: 335411
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 335409
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 335408
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Implements PR34259
Intrinsics.h is a very popular header. Most LLVM TUs care about things
like dbg_value, but they don't care how they are implemented. After I
split these out, IntrinsicImpl.inc is 1.7 MB, so this saves each LLVM TU
from scanning 1.7 MB of source that gets pre-processed away.
It also means we can modify intrinsic properties without triggering a
full rebuild, but that's probably less of a win.
I think the next best thing to do would be to split out the target
intrinsics into their own header. Very, very few TUs care about
target-specific intrinsics. It's very hard to split up the target
independent intrinsics like llvm.expect, assume, and dbg.value, though.
llvm-svn: 335407
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
in/out instructions.
Previously, to support (%dx) we left a wide open hole in our 16-bit memory address checking. This let this address value be used with any instruction without error in the parser. It would later fail in the encoder with an assertion failure on debug builds and who knows what on release builds.
This patch passes the mnemonic down to the memory operand parsing function so we can allow the (%dx) form only on specific instructions.
llvm-svn: 335403
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Prerequisite for https://reviews.llvm.org/D47211 which improves our ELF
large PIC codegen.
llvm-svn: 335402
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This gets rid of a bunch of weird special cases; instead, just use SCEV
rewriting for everything. In addition to being simpler, this fixes a
bug where we would use the wrong stride in certain edge cases.
The one bit I'm not quite sure about is the trip count handling,
specifically the FIXME about overflow. In general, I think we need to
widen the exit condition, but that's probably not profitable if the new
type isn't legal, so we probably need a check somewhere. That said, I
don't think I'm making the existing problem any worse.
As a followup to this, a bunch of IV-related code in root-finding could
be cleaned up; with SCEV-based rewriting, there isn't any reason to
assume a loop will have exactly one or two PHI nodes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45191
llvm-svn: 335400
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 335399
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
parsing an address in Intel syntax. Use it for improved error checking.
This allows us to check these:
-16-bit addressing doesn't support scale so we should error if we find one there.
-Multiplying ESP/RSP by a scale even if the scale is 1 should be an error because ESP/RSP can't be an index.
llvm-svn: 335398
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
second register in memory expressions like [EAX+ESP].
By default, the second register gets assigned to the index register slot. But ESP can't be an index register so we need to swap it with the other register.
There's still a slight bug that we allow [EAX+ESP*1]. The existence of the multiply even though its with 1 should force ESP to the index register and trigger an error, but it doesn't currently.
llvm-svn: 335394
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since we are now producing a summary also for regular LTO builds, we
need to run the NameAnonGlobals pass in those cases as well (the
summary cannot handle anonymous globals).
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D34156 for details on the original change.
This reverts commit 6c9ee4a4a438a8059aacc809b2dd57128fccd6b3.
llvm-svn: 335385
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The second register is the index register and should only be %si or %di if used with a base register. And in that case the base register should be %bp or %bx.
This makes us compatible with gas.
We do still need to support both orders with Intel syntax which uses [bp+si] and [si+bp]
llvm-svn: 335384
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
zero displacement.
(%bp) can't be encoded without a displacement. The encoding is instead used for displacement alone. So a 1 byte displacement of 0 must be used. But if there is an index register we can encode without a displacement.
llvm-svn: 335379
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 335373
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes PR37892
llvm-svn: 335370
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
In LoopUnswitch when replacing a branch Parent -> Succ with a conditional
branch Parent -> True & Parent->False, the DomTree updates should insert an edge for
each of True/False if True/False are different than Succ, and delete Parent->Succ edge
if both are different. The comparison with Succ appears to be incorect,
it's comparing with Parent instead.
There is no test failing either before or after this change, but it seems to me this is
the right way to do the update.
Reviewers: chandlerc, kuhar
Subscribers: sanjoy, jlebar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48457
llvm-svn: 335369
|