| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 332522
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 332521
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
function symbols.
The getAtom() method wasn't doing what we needed in all cases. We want
the symbols for the function which defines that section. We can compute
this easily enough and we know that we have at most one function in each
section.
Once this lands I will revert rL331412 which is no longer needed.
Fixes PR37409
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46970
llvm-svn: 332517
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The cost computation assumes we do this correctly, but the actual
lowering was wrong.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46923
llvm-svn: 332514
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 332510
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46887
llvm-svn: 332508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This is needed for the continuation of D46504,
to be able to store the timings.
Reviewers: george.karpenkov, NoQ, alexfh, sbenza
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: llvm-commits, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46939
llvm-svn: 332506
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This is needed for the continuation of D46504,
to be able to store the timings.
Reviewers: george.karpenkov, NoQ, alexfh, sbenza
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: llvm-commits, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46938
llvm-svn: 332505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Although this is not stricly required, i would very much prefer
not to have known random precision losses along the way.
Reviewers: george.karpenkov, NoQ, alexfh, sbenza
Reviewed By: george.karpenkov
Subscribers: llvm-commits, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46937
llvm-svn: 332504
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: We have just used `.sys` suffix for the previous timer, this is clearly a typo
Reviewers: george.karpenkov, NoQ, alexfh, sbenza
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: llvm-commits, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46936
llvm-svn: 332503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
32-bit targets
As i64 types are not legal on 32-bit targets, insert these into a suitable zero vector and use the packed vXi64<->FP conversion instructions instead.
Fixes PR3163.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43441
llvm-svn: 332498
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Before this patch, signal handling wasn't signal safe. This leads to real-world
crashes. It used ManagedStatic inside of signals, this can allocate and can lead
to unexpected state when a signal occurs during llvm_shutdown (because
llvm_shutdown destroys the ManagedStatic). It also used cl::opt without custom
backing storage. Some de-allocation was performed as well. Acquiring a lock in a
signal handler is also a great way to deadlock.
We can't just disable signals on llvm_shutdown because the signals might do
useful work during that shutdown. We also can't just disable llvm_shutdown for
programs (instead of library uses of clang) because we'd have to then mark the
pointers as not leaked and make sure all the ManagedStatic uses are OK to leak
and remain so.
Move all of the code to lock-free datastructures instead, and avoid having any
of them in an inconsistent state. I'm not trying to be fancy, I'm not using any
explicit memory order because this code isn't hot. The only purpose of the
atomics is to guarantee that a signal firing on the same or a different thread
doesn't see an inconsistent state and crash. In some cases we might miss some
state (for example, we might fail to delete a temporary file), but that's fine.
Note that I haven't touched any of the backtrace support despite it not
technically being totally signal-safe. When that code is called we know
something bad is up and we don't expect to continue execution, so calling
something that e.g. sets errno is the least of our problems.
A similar patch should be applied to lib/Support/Windows/Signals.inc, but that
can be done separately.
Fix r332428 which I reverted in r332429. I originally used double-wide CAS
because I was lazy, but some platforms use a runtime function for that which
thankfully failed to link (it would have been bad for signal handlers
otherwise). I use a separate flag to guard the data instead.
<rdar://problem/28010281>
Reviewers: dexonsmith
Subscribers: steven_wu, llvm-commits
llvm-svn: 332496
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As part of merging stores we check that fusing the nodes does not
cause a cycle due to one candidate store being indirectly dependent on
another store (this may happen via chained memory copies). This is
done by searching if a store is a predecessor to another store's
value.
Prune the search at the candidate search's root node which is a
predecessor to all candidate stores. This reduces the
size of the subgraph searched in large basic blocks.
Reviewers: jyknight
Subscribers: llvm-commits, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46955
llvm-svn: 332490
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 332489
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
execution.
No longer require the queue pointer to be passed in in fixed SGPRs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46769
llvm-svn: 332485
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For regular SVE vector operands, this patch introduces a more
sensible diagnostic when the vector has a wrong suffix (e.g. z0.s vs z0.b).
For example:
add z0.s, z1.s, z2.b -> invalid element width
^_____^
mismatch
For the vector-with-shift/extend (e.g. z0.s, uxtw #2) this patch takes
a slightly different approach and instead returns a 'invalid operand'
if the element size is not as expected. This is because the diagnostics
are more specificied to suggest using the right shift/extend suffix. This
is a trade-off not to introduce more operand classes and still provide
useful diagnostics for LD1 and PRF instructions.
For example:
ld1w z1.s, p0/z, [x0, z0.s] -> invalid shift/extend specified, expected 'z[0..31].s, (uxtw|sxtw)'
ld1w z1.d, p0/z, [x0, z0.s] -> invalid operand
^________________^
mismatch
For gather prefetches, both 'z0.s' and 'z0.d' would be allowed:
prfw #0, p0, [x0, z0.s] -> invalid shift/extend specified, expected 'z[0..31].s, (uxtw|sxtw) #2'
prfw #0, p0, [x0, z0.d] -> invalid shift/extend specified, expected 'z[0..31].d, (lsl|uxtw|sxtw) #2'
Without this change, the diagnostic would unnecessarily suggest a
different element size:
prfw #0, p0, [x0, z0.s] -> invalid shift/extend specified, expected 'z[0..31].d, (lsl|uxtw|sxtw) #2'
Reviewers: SjoerdMeijer, aemerson, fhahn, samparker, javed.absar
Reviewed By: SjoerdMeijer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46688
llvm-svn: 332483
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Keep loads and stores together (target defines how many loads
and stores to gang up), such that it will help in pairing
and vectorization.
Differential Revision https://reviews.llvm.org/D46477
llvm-svn: 332482
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The canonicalization was restricted to shuffle masks with
a 1-to-1 mapping to the constant vector, but that disqualifies
the common splat pattern. This is part of solving PR37463:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37463
llvm-svn: 332479
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewers: rengolin, fhahn, samparker, SjoerdMeijer, javed.absar
Reviewed By: SjoerdMeijer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46686
llvm-svn: 332472
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
A recent patch ([[ https://reviews.llvm.org/rL331587 | rL331587 ]]) to Capture Tracking taught it that the `launder_invariant_group` intrinsic captures its argument only by returning it. Unfortunately, BasicAA still considered every call instruction as a possible escape source and hence concluded that the result of a `launder_invariant_group` call cannot alias any local non-escaping value. This led to [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37458 | bug 37458 ]].
This patch updates the relevant check for escape sources in BasicAA.
Reviewers: Prazek, kuhar, rsmith, hfinkel, sanjoy, xbolva00
Reviewed By: hfinkel, xbolva00
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46900
llvm-svn: 332466
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
instructions (NFCI)
llvm-svn: 332464
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 332462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Avoids stack access.
Also handle extract hi elt pattern from truncate + shift
to avoid a couple test regressions.
llvm-svn: 332453
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: If file stream arg is not captured and source is fopen, we could replace IO calls by unlocked IO ("_unlocked" function variants) to gain better speed,
Reviewers: efriedma, RKSimon, spatel, sanjoy, hfinkel, majnemer, lebedev.ri, rja
Reviewed By: rja
Subscribers: rja, srhines, efriedma, lebedev.ri, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45736
llvm-svn: 332452
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A lot of the models still have too many InstRW overrides for these new classes - this needs cleaning up but I wanted to get the classes in first
llvm-svn: 332451
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
So that it can be shared with other passes that may end up doing the same
thing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45874
llvm-svn: 332450
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We currently handle all aggregates by creating one large LLT, and letting the
legalizer deal with splitting them up. However using this approach means that
we can't support big endian code correctly.
This patch changes the way that the IRTranslator deals with aggregate values,
by splitting them up into their constituent element values. To do this, parts
of the translator need to be modified to deal with multiple VRegs for a single
Value.
A new Value to VReg mapper is introduced to help keep compile time under
control, currently there is no measurable impact on CTMark despite the extra
code being generated in some cases.
Patch is based on the original work of Tim Northover.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46018
llvm-svn: 332449
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add support for this target hook, covering MIPS, microMIPS and MIPSR6, along
with some tests. Also add missing getOppositeBranchOpc() cases exposed by the
tests.
Reviewers: atanasyan, abeserminji, smaksimovic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46794
llvm-svn: 332446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch re-introduces the "S" inline assembler constraint. This matches
an absolute symbolic address or a label reference. The primary use case is
asm("adrp %0, %1\n\t"
"add %0, %0, :lo12:%1" : "=r"(addr) : "S"(&var));
I say re-introduces as it seems like "S" was implemented in the original
AArch64 backend, but it looks like it wasn't carried forward to the merged
backend. The original implementation had A and L modifiers that could be
used to print ":lo12:" to the string. It looks like gcc doesn't use these
and :lo12: is expected to be written in the inline assembly string so I've
not implemented A and L. Clang already supports the S modifier.
Fixes PR37180
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46745
llvm-svn: 332444
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
load instructions.
Reviewers: rengolin, fhahn, samparker, SjoerdMeijer, javed.absar
Reviewed By: fhahn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46679
llvm-svn: 332442
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
SelectionDAGLegalize::ExpandNode() inserts an ISD::MUL when lowering a
BR_JT opcode. While many backends optimize this multiply into a shift, e.g.
the MIPS backend currently always lowers this into a sequence of
load-immediate+multiply+mflo in MipsSETargetLowering::lowerMulDiv().
I initially changed the multiply to a shift in the MIPS backend but it
turns out that would not have handled the MIPSR6 case and was a lot more
code than doing it in LegalizeDAG.
I believe performing this simple optimization in LegalizeDAG instead of
each individual backend is the better solution since this also fixes other
backeds such as MSP430 which calls the multiply runtime function
__mspabi_mpyi without this patch.
Reviewers: sdardis, atanasyan, pftbest, asl
Reviewed By: sdardis
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45760
llvm-svn: 332439
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewers: rengolin, fhahn, samparker, SjoerdMeijer, javed.absar
Reviewed By: SjoerdMeijer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46682
llvm-svn: 332433
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 332432
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The unused variable caused a compilation warning:
../lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp:34614:17: error: unused variable 'SMax' [-Werror,-Wunused-variable]
if (SDValue SMax = MatchMinMax(SMin, ISD::SMAX, C1))
^
1 error generated.
llvm-svn: 332431
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A catchswitch must be the only non-phi instruction in its basic block;
attempting to move a retain or release into a catchswitch basic block
will result in invalid IR. Explicitly mark a CFG hazard in this case to
prevent the code motion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46482
llvm-svn: 332430
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Some bots don't have double-pointer width compare-and-exchange. Revert for now.q
llvm-svn: 332429
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Before this patch, signal handling wasn't signal safe. This leads to real-world
crashes. It used ManagedStatic inside of signals, this can allocate and can lead
to unexpected state when a signal occurs during llvm_shutdown (because
llvm_shutdown destroys the ManagedStatic). It also used cl::opt without custom
backing storage. Some de-allocation was performed as well. Acquiring a lock in a
signal handler is also a great way to deadlock.
We can't just disable signals on llvm_shutdown because the signals might do
useful work during that shutdown. We also can't just disable llvm_shutdown for
programs (instead of library uses of clang) because we'd have to then mark the
pointers as not leaked and make sure all the ManagedStatic uses are OK to leak
and remain so.
Move all of the code to lock-free datastructures instead, and avoid having any
of them in an inconsistent state. I'm not trying to be fancy, I'm not using any
explicit memory order because this code isn't hot. The only purpose of the
atomics is to guarantee that a signal firing on the same or a different thread
doesn't see an inconsistent state and crash. In some cases we might miss some
state (for example, we might fail to delete a temporary file), but that's fine.
Note that I haven't touched any of the backtrace support despite it not
technically being totally signal-safe. When that code is called we know
something bad is up and we don't expect to continue execution, so calling
something that e.g. sets errno is the least of our problems.
A similar patch should be applied to lib/Support/Windows/Signals.inc, but that
can be done separately.
<rdar://problem/28010281>
Reviewers: dexonsmith
Subscribers: aheejin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46858
llvm-svn: 332428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The instructions using registers should be DBG_VALUE and normal
instructions. Use isDebugValue() to filter out DBG_VALUE and add
an assert to ensure there is no other kind of debug instructions
using the registers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46739
Patch by Hsiangkai Wang.
llvm-svn: 332427
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Limit number of reassociations in GenerateReassociationsImpl.
Reviewers: qcolombet, mkazantsev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46039
From: Evgeny Stupachenko <evstupac@gmail.com>
<evgeny.v.stupachenko@intel.com>
llvm-svn: 332426
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
IsLittleEndian is already a field of ARMAsmBackend.
llvm-svn: 332420
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 332419
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It doesn't matter much this late in the pipeline, but one place that
does check for it is the function alignment code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46373
llvm-svn: 332415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It is legal for the type passed to isLegalAddressingMode to be
unsized or, more specifically, VoidTy. In this case, we must
check the legality of load / stores for all legal types. Directly
trying to call getTypeStoreSize is incorrect, and leads to breakage
in e.g. Loop Strength Reduction. This change guards against that
behaviour.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40405
llvm-svn: 332409
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 332407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
WasmObjectWriter mostly operates with function segments offsets that do
not include their size fields. WasmObjectFile needs to have and provide
this information to the lld to maintain proper
R_WEBASSEMBLY_FUNCTION_OFFSET_I32 relocations entries.
Patch by Yury Delendik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46763
llvm-svn: 332406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Author: Samuel Pitoiset
Without this patch, it appears to me that we are selecting
the wrong operand when inverting conditions. In the attached
test, it will select %tmp3 instead of %tmp4. To fix it, just
use 'A' as everywhere.
This fixes a regression introduced by
"[PatternMatch] define m_Not using m_Xor and cst_pred_ty"
https://reviews.llvm.org/D46351
llvm-svn: 332403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: Instrument masked store/load intrinsics.
Reviewers: kcc
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46785
llvm-svn: 332402
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 332400
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 332399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When storing the 0th lane of a vector, use a simpler and usually more
efficient scalar store instead. In this case, also using the unscaled
offset.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46762
llvm-svn: 332394
|