| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
loop.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63477
llvm-svn: 364993
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 364969
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: This patch introduces a new heuristic for guiding operand reordering. The new "look-ahead" heuristic can look beyond the immediate predecessors. This helps break ties when the immediate predecessors have identical opcodes (see lit test for an example).
Reviewers: RKSimon, ABataev, dtemirbulatov, Ayal, hfinkel, rnk
Reviewed By: RKSimon, dtemirbulatov
Subscribers: hiraditya, phosek, rnk, rcorcs, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60897
llvm-svn: 364964
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
If LTOUnit splitting is disabled, the module summary analysis computes
the summary information necessary to perform single implementation
devirtualization during the thin link with the index and no IR. The
information collected from the regular LTO IR in the current hybrid WPD
algorithm is summarized, including:
1) For vtable definitions, record the function pointers and their offset
within the vtable initializer (subsumes the information collected from
IR by tryFindVirtualCallTargets).
2) A record for each type metadata summarizing the vtable definitions
decorated with that metadata (subsumes the TypeIdentiferMap collected
from IR).
Also added are the necessary bitcode records, and the corresponding
assembly support.
The follow-on index-based WPD patch is D55153.
Depends on D53890.
Reviewers: pcc
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, Prazek, inglorion, eraman, steven_wu, dexonsmith, arphaman, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54815
llvm-svn: 364960
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Partially solves https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42190
Reviewers: spatel, nikic, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: efriedma, nikic, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63038
llvm-svn: 364940
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61738
llvm-svn: 364937
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I was actually wondering if there was some nicer way than m_Value()+cast,
but apparently what i was really "subconsciously" thinking about
was correctness issue.
hasNoUnsignedWrap()/hasNoUnsignedWrap() exist for Instruction,
not for BinaryOperator, so let's just use m_Instruction(),
thus both avoiding a cast, and a crash.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42484,
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=15587
llvm-svn: 364915
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes verifier errors encountered in PR42413.
Reviewers: xur, t.p.northover, inglorion, gbiv, george.burgess.iv
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63842
llvm-svn: 364861
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Extends the transform from:
rL364341
...to include another (more common?) pattern that tests whether a
value is a power-of-2 (including or excluding zero).
llvm-svn: 364856
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts r364478 (git commit 574cb0eb3a7ac95e62d223a60bef891171dfe321)
The patch is causing compilation timeouts.
llvm-svn: 364846
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
To be noted, this pattern is not unhandled by instcombine per-se,
it is somehow does end up being folded when one runs opt -O3,
but not if it's just -instcombine. Regardless, that fold is
indirect, depends on some other folds, and is thus blind
when there are extra uses.
This does address the regression being exposed in D63992.
https://godbolt.org/z/7DGltU
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/EPO0
Fixes [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42459 | PR42459 ]]
Reviewers: spatel, nikic, huihuiz
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63993
llvm-svn: 364792
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Given pattern:
`icmp eq/ne (and ((x shift Q), (y oppositeshift K))), 0`
we should move shifts to the same hand of 'and', i.e. rewrite as
`icmp eq/ne (and (x shift (Q+K)), y), 0` iff `(Q+K) u< bitwidth(x)`
It might be tempting to not restrict this to situations where we know
we'd fold two shifts together, but i'm not sure what rules should there be
to avoid endless combine loops.
We pick the same shift that was originally used to shift the variable we picked to shift:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/6x1v
Should fix [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42399 | PR42399]].
Reviewers: spatel, nikic, RKSimon
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63829
llvm-svn: 364791
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This was added in D63390 / rL364286 to backend,
but it makes sense to also handle it in middle-end.
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/Zsln
llvm-svn: 364738
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
SwitchInst
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60606
llvm-svn: 364734
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is the opposite direction of D62158 (we have to choose 1 form or the other).
Now that we have FMF on the select, this becomes more palatable. And the benefits
of having a single IR instruction for this operation (less chances of missing folds
based on extra uses, etc) overcome my previous comments about the potential advantage
of larger pattern matching/analysis.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62414
llvm-svn: 364721
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 364720
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
What we want to know here is whether we're already using this value
for the loop condition, so make the query about that. We can extend
this to a more general "based-on" relationship, rather than a direct
icmp use later.
llvm-svn: 364715
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This transform came up in D62414, but we should deal with it first.
We have LLVM intrinsics that correspond exactly to libm calls (unlike
most libm calls, these libm calls never set errno).
This holds without any fast-math-flags, so we should always canonicalize
to those intrinsics directly for better optimization.
Currently, we convert to fcmp+select only when we have FMF (nnan) because
fcmp+select does not preserve the semantics of the call in the general case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63214
llvm-svn: 364714
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The whole indvars pass works on loops in simplified form, so there
is always a unique latch. Convert the condition into an assertion
in needsLFTR (though we also assert this in later LFTR functions).
Additionally update the comment on getLoopTest() now that we are
dealing with multiple exits.
llvm-svn: 364713
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Given pattern:
`(x shiftopcode Q) shiftopcode K`
we should rewrite it as
`x shiftopcode (Q+K)` iff `(Q+K) u< bitwidth(x)`
This is valid for any shift, but they must be identical.
* https://rise4fun.com/Alive/9E2
* exact on both lshr => exact https://rise4fun.com/Alive/plHk
* exact on both ashr => exact https://rise4fun.com/Alive/QDAA
* nuw on both shl => nuw https://rise4fun.com/Alive/5Uk
* nsw on both shl => nsw https://rise4fun.com/Alive/0plg
Should fix [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42391 | PR42391]].
Reviewers: spatel, nikic, RKSimon
Reviewed By: nikic
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63812
llvm-svn: 364712
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41998. Usually when we
have a truncated exit count we'll truncate the IV when comparing
against the limit, in which case exit count overflow in post-inc
form doesn't matter. However, for pointer IVs we don't do that, so
we have to be careful about incrementing the IV in the wide type.
I'm fixing this by removing the IVCount variable (which was
ExitCount or ExitCount+1) and replacing it with a UsePostInc flag,
and then moving the actual limit adjustment to the individual cases
(which are: pointer IV where we add to the wide type, integer IV
where we add to the narrow type, and constant integer IV where we
add to the wide type).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63686
llvm-svn: 364709
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
SCEV is more than capable of folding (add x, trunc(0)) to x.
llvm-svn: 364693
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63933
llvm-svn: 364680
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63900
llvm-svn: 364678
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63470
llvm-svn: 364665
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
of taking the function's address.
This shaves an instruction (and a GOT entry in PIC code) off prologues of
functions with stack variables.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63472
llvm-svn: 364608
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63896
llvm-svn: 364592
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch introduces a new function attribute, willreturn, to indicate
that a call of this function will either exhibit undefined behavior or
comes back and continues execution at a point in the existing call stack
that includes the current invocation.
This attribute guarantees that the function does not have any endless
loops, endless recursion, or terminating functions like abort or exit.
Patch by Hideto Ueno (@uenoku)
Reviewers: jdoerfert
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, hiraditya, steven_wu, dexonsmith, lebedev.ri, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62801
llvm-svn: 364555
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
FunctionComparator attempts to produce a stable comparison of two Function
instances by looking at all available properties. Since ByVal attributes now
contain a Type pointer, they are not trivially ordered and FunctionComparator
should use its own Type comparison logic to sort them.
llvm-svn: 364523
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Adding nounwind deduction in new attributor framework.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, uenoku
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63379
llvm-svn: 364521
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 364482
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: This patch introduces a new heuristic for guiding operand reordering. The new "look-ahead" heuristic can look beyond the immediate predecessors. This helps break ties when the immediate predecessors have identical opcodes (see lit test for an example).
Reviewers: RKSimon, ABataev, dtemirbulatov, Ayal, hfinkel, rnk
Reviewed By: RKSimon, dtemirbulatov
Subscribers: rnk, rcorcs, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60897
llvm-svn: 364478
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This diff enables address sanitizer on Emscripten.
On Emscripten, real memory starts at the value passed to --global-base.
All memory before this is used as shadow memory, and thus the shadow mapping
function is simply dividing by 8.
Reviewers: tlively, aheejin, sbc100
Reviewed By: sbc100
Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63742
llvm-svn: 364468
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 364449
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 364441
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
opt pipeline."
Breaks sanitizers:
libFuzzer :: cxxstring.test
libFuzzer :: memcmp.test
libFuzzer :: recommended-dictionary.test
libFuzzer :: strcmp.test
libFuzzer :: value-profile-mem.test
libFuzzer :: value-profile-strcmp.test
llvm-svn: 364416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This allows later passes (in particular InstCombine) to optimize more
cases.
One that's important to us is `memcmp(p, q, constant) < 0` and memcmp(p, q, constant) > 0.
llvm-svn: 364412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch generalizes the UnrollLoop utility to support loops that exit
from the header instead of the latch. Usually, LoopRotate would take care
of must of those cases, but in some cases (e.g. -Oz), LoopRotate does
not kick in.
Codesize impact looks relatively neutral on ARM64 with -Oz + LTO.
Program master patch diff
External/S.../CFP2006/447.dealII/447.dealII 629060.00 627676.00 -0.2%
External/SPEC/CINT2000/176.gcc/176.gcc 1245916.00 1244932.00 -0.1%
MultiSourc...Prolangs-C/simulator/simulator 86100.00 86156.00 0.1%
MultiSourc...arks/Rodinia/backprop/backprop 66212.00 66252.00 0.1%
MultiSourc...chmarks/Prolangs-C++/life/life 67276.00 67312.00 0.1%
MultiSourc...s/Prolangs-C/compiler/compiler 69824.00 69788.00 -0.1%
MultiSourc...Prolangs-C/assembler/assembler 86672.00 86696.00 0.0%
Reviewers: efriedma, vsk, paquette
Reviewed By: paquette
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61962
llvm-svn: 364398
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
-> icmp eq/ne (and %x, (lshr -C1, C2)), 0.
Simplify 'shl' inequality test into 'and' equality test.
This pattern happens in the middle-end while simplifying bitfield access,
Exposed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D63505
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/6uz
Reviewers: lebedev.ri, efriedma
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Subscribers: spatel, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63675
llvm-svn: 364348
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 364346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This follows up the transform from rL363956 to use the ctpop intrinsic when checking for power-of-2-or-zero.
This is matching the isPowerOf2() patterns used in PR42314:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42314
But there's at least 1 instcombine follow-up needed to match the alternate form:
(v & (v - 1)) == 0;
We should have all of the backend expansions handled with:
rL364319
(x86-specific changes still needed for optimal code based on subtarget)
And the larger patterns to exclude zero as a power-of-2 are joining with this change after:
rL364153 ( D63660 )
rL364246
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63777
llvm-svn: 364341
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: cloneLoopWithPreheader() currently only support innermost loop,
and assert otherwise.
Reviewers: Meinersbur, fhahn, kbarton
Reviewed By: Meinersbur
Subscribers: hiraditya, jsji, llvm-commits
Tag: LLVM
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63446
llvm-svn: 364310
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Split off from D60318.
llvm-svn: 364281
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
u</u>= (-C) earlier.
Summary:
To generate simplified IR, make sure fold
(X & ~C) ==/!= 0 --> X u</u>= C+1
is scheduled before fold
((X << Y) & C) == 0 -> (X & (C >> Y)) == 0.
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/7ZN
Reviewers: lebedev.ri, efriedma, spatel, craig.topper
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63505
llvm-svn: 364255
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is the Demorgan'd 'not' of the pattern handled in:
D63660 / rL364153
This is another intermediate IR step towards solving PR42314:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42314
We can test if a value is not a power-of-2 using ctpop(X) > 1,
so combining that with an is-zero check of the input is the
same as testing if not exactly 1 bit is set:
(X == 0) || (ctpop(X) u> 1) --> ctpop(X) != 1
llvm-svn: 364246
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 364237
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Alive says this is OK.
llvm-svn: 364235
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Alive says this is OK.
llvm-svn: 364234
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Alive says this is OK.
llvm-svn: 364233
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Inference of nowrap flags in CVP has been disabled, because it
triggered a bug in LFTR (https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31181).
This issue has been fixed in D60935, so we should be able to reenable
nowrap flag inference now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62776
llvm-svn: 364228
|