summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/llvm/lib/Transforms
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJordan Rupprecht <rupprecht@google.com>2019-07-01 21:10:43 +0000
committerJordan Rupprecht <rupprecht@google.com>2019-07-01 21:10:43 +0000
commita7972dc04a7ec87894704b3927952dbf993ca14a (patch)
treed183723619fd17ae870ac2de85f8d5e08313b5d6 /llvm/lib/Transforms
parentd7fcee62f114c5f96bc0d8430af40ce198231daa (diff)
downloadbcm5719-llvm-a7972dc04a7ec87894704b3927952dbf993ca14a.tar.gz
bcm5719-llvm-a7972dc04a7ec87894704b3927952dbf993ca14a.zip
Revert [SLP] Look-ahead operand reordering heuristic.
This reverts r364478 (git commit 574cb0eb3a7ac95e62d223a60bef891171dfe321) The patch is causing compilation timeouts. llvm-svn: 364846
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/lib/Transforms')
-rw-r--r--llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/SLPVectorizer.cpp282
1 files changed, 46 insertions, 236 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/SLPVectorizer.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/SLPVectorizer.cpp
index b6065c8d5eb..c47f6980a36 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/SLPVectorizer.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/SLPVectorizer.cpp
@@ -147,12 +147,6 @@ static cl::opt<unsigned> MinTreeSize(
"slp-min-tree-size", cl::init(3), cl::Hidden,
cl::desc("Only vectorize small trees if they are fully vectorizable"));
-// The maximum depth that the look-ahead score heuristic will explore.
-// The higher this value, the higher the compilation time overhead.
-static cl::opt<int> LookAheadMaxDepth(
- "slp-max-look-ahead-depth", cl::init(2), cl::Hidden,
- cl::desc("The maximum look-ahead depth for operand reordering scores"));
-
static cl::opt<bool>
ViewSLPTree("view-slp-tree", cl::Hidden,
cl::desc("Display the SLP trees with Graphviz"));
@@ -714,7 +708,6 @@ public:
const DataLayout &DL;
ScalarEvolution &SE;
- const BoUpSLP &R;
/// \returns the operand data at \p OpIdx and \p Lane.
OperandData &getData(unsigned OpIdx, unsigned Lane) {
@@ -740,211 +733,6 @@ public:
std::swap(OpsVec[OpIdx1][Lane], OpsVec[OpIdx2][Lane]);
}
- // The hard-coded scores listed here are not very important. When computing
- // the scores of matching one sub-tree with another, we are basically
- // counting the number of values that are matching. So even if all scores
- // are set to 1, we would still get a decent matching result.
- // However, sometimes we have to break ties. For example we may have to
- // choose between matching loads vs matching opcodes. This is what these
- // scores are helping us with: they provide the order of preference.
-
- /// Loads from consecutive memory addresses, e.g. load(A[i]), load(A[i+1]).
- static const int ScoreConsecutiveLoads = 3;
- /// Constants.
- static const int ScoreConstants = 2;
- /// Instructions with the same opcode.
- static const int ScoreSameOpcode = 2;
- /// Instructions with alt opcodes (e.g, add + sub).
- static const int ScoreAltOpcodes = 1;
- /// Identical instructions (a.k.a. splat or broadcast).
- static const int ScoreSplat = 1;
- /// Matching with an undef is preferable to failing.
- static const int ScoreUndef = 1;
- /// Score for failing to find a decent match.
- static const int ScoreFail = 0;
- /// User exteranl to the vectorized code.
- static const int ExternalUseCost = 1;
- /// The user is internal but in a different lane.
- static const int UserInDiffLaneCost = ExternalUseCost;
-
- /// \returns the score of placing \p V1 and \p V2 in consecutive lanes.
- static int getShallowScore(Value *V1, Value *V2, const DataLayout &DL,
- ScalarEvolution &SE) {
- auto *LI1 = dyn_cast<LoadInst>(V1);
- auto *LI2 = dyn_cast<LoadInst>(V2);
- if (LI1 && LI2)
- return isConsecutiveAccess(LI1, LI2, DL, SE)
- ? VLOperands::ScoreConsecutiveLoads
- : VLOperands::ScoreFail;
-
- auto *C1 = dyn_cast<Constant>(V1);
- auto *C2 = dyn_cast<Constant>(V2);
- if (C1 && C2)
- return VLOperands::ScoreConstants;
-
- auto *I1 = dyn_cast<Instruction>(V1);
- auto *I2 = dyn_cast<Instruction>(V2);
- if (I1 && I2) {
- if (I1 == I2)
- return VLOperands::ScoreSplat;
- InstructionsState S = getSameOpcode({I1, I2});
- // Note: Only consider instructions with <= 2 operands to avoid
- // complexity explosion.
- if (S.getOpcode() && S.MainOp->getNumOperands() <= 2)
- return S.isAltShuffle() ? VLOperands::ScoreAltOpcodes
- : VLOperands::ScoreSameOpcode;
- }
-
- if (isa<UndefValue>(V2))
- return VLOperands::ScoreUndef;
-
- return VLOperands::ScoreFail;
- }
-
- /// Holds the values and their lane that are taking part in the look-ahead
- /// score calculation. This is used in the external uses cost calculation.
- SmallDenseMap<Value *, int> InLookAheadValues;
-
- /// \Returns the additinal cost due to uses of \p LHS and \p RHS that are
- /// either external to the vectorized code, or require shuffling.
- int getExternalUsesCost(const std::pair<Value *, int> &LHS,
- const std::pair<Value *, int> &RHS) {
- int Cost = 0;
- SmallVector<std::pair<Value *, int>, 2> Values = {LHS, RHS};
- for (int Idx = 0, IdxE = Values.size(); Idx != IdxE; ++Idx) {
- Value *V = Values[Idx].first;
- // Calculate the absolute lane, using the minimum relative lane of LHS
- // and RHS as base and Idx as the offset.
- int Ln = std::min(LHS.second, RHS.second) + Idx;
- assert(Ln >= 0 && "Bad lane calculation");
- for (User *U : V->users()) {
- if (const TreeEntry *UserTE = R.getTreeEntry(U)) {
- // The user is in the VectorizableTree. Check if we need to insert.
- auto It = llvm::find(UserTE->Scalars, U);
- assert(It != UserTE->Scalars.end() && "U is in UserTE");
- int UserLn = std::distance(UserTE->Scalars.begin(), It);
- assert(UserLn >= 0 && "Bad lane");
- if (UserLn != Ln)
- Cost += UserInDiffLaneCost;
- } else {
- // Check if the user is in the look-ahead code.
- auto It2 = InLookAheadValues.find(U);
- if (It2 != InLookAheadValues.end()) {
- // The user is in the look-ahead code. Check the lane.
- if (It2->second != Ln)
- Cost += UserInDiffLaneCost;
- } else {
- // The user is neither in SLP tree nor in the look-ahead code.
- Cost += ExternalUseCost;
- }
- }
- }
- }
- return Cost;
- }
-
- /// Go through the operands of \p LHS and \p RHS recursively until \p
- /// MaxLevel, and return the cummulative score. For example:
- /// \verbatim
- /// A[0] B[0] A[1] B[1] C[0] D[0] B[1] A[1]
- /// \ / \ / \ / \ /
- /// + + + +
- /// G1 G2 G3 G4
- /// \endverbatim
- /// The getScoreAtLevelRec(G1, G2) function will try to match the nodes at
- /// each level recursively, accumulating the score. It starts from matching
- /// the additions at level 0, then moves on to the loads (level 1). The
- /// score of G1 and G2 is higher than G1 and G3, because {A[0],A[1]} and
- /// {B[0],B[1]} match with VLOperands::ScoreConsecutiveLoads, while
- /// {A[0],C[0]} has a score of VLOperands::ScoreFail.
- /// Please note that the order of the operands does not matter, as we
- /// evaluate the score of all profitable combinations of operands. In
- /// other words the score of G1 and G4 is the same as G1 and G2. This
- /// heuristic is based on ideas described in:
- /// Look-ahead SLP: Auto-vectorization in the presence of commutative
- /// operations, CGO 2018 by Vasileios Porpodas, Rodrigo C. O. Rocha,
- /// Luís F. W. Góes
- int getScoreAtLevelRec(const std::pair<Value *, int> &LHS,
- const std::pair<Value *, int> &RHS, int CurrLevel,
- int MaxLevel) {
-
- Value *V1 = LHS.first;
- Value *V2 = RHS.first;
- // Get the shallow score of V1 and V2.
- int ShallowScoreAtThisLevel =
- std::max((int)ScoreFail, getShallowScore(V1, V2, DL, SE) -
- getExternalUsesCost(LHS, RHS));
- int Lane1 = LHS.second;
- int Lane2 = RHS.second;
-
- // If reached MaxLevel,
- // or if V1 and V2 are not instructions,
- // or if they are SPLAT,
- // or if they are not consecutive, early return the current cost.
- auto *I1 = dyn_cast<Instruction>(V1);
- auto *I2 = dyn_cast<Instruction>(V2);
- if (CurrLevel == MaxLevel || !(I1 && I2) || I1 == I2 ||
- ShallowScoreAtThisLevel == VLOperands::ScoreFail ||
- (isa<LoadInst>(I1) && isa<LoadInst>(I2) && ShallowScoreAtThisLevel))
- return ShallowScoreAtThisLevel;
- assert(I1 && I2 && "Should have early exited.");
-
- // Keep track of in-tree values for determining the external-use cost.
- InLookAheadValues[V1] = Lane1;
- InLookAheadValues[V2] = Lane2;
-
- // Contains the I2 operand indexes that got matched with I1 operands.
- SmallSet<unsigned, 4> Op2Used;
-
- // Recursion towards the operands of I1 and I2. We are trying all possbile
- // operand pairs, and keeping track of the best score.
- for (unsigned OpIdx1 = 0, NumOperands1 = I1->getNumOperands();
- OpIdx1 != NumOperands1; ++OpIdx1) {
- // Try to pair op1I with the best operand of I2.
- int MaxTmpScore = 0;
- unsigned MaxOpIdx2 = 0;
- bool FoundBest = false;
- // If I2 is commutative try all combinations.
- unsigned FromIdx = isCommutative(I2) ? 0 : OpIdx1;
- unsigned ToIdx = isCommutative(I2)
- ? I2->getNumOperands()
- : std::min(I2->getNumOperands(), OpIdx1 + 1);
- assert(FromIdx <= ToIdx && "Bad index");
- for (unsigned OpIdx2 = FromIdx; OpIdx2 != ToIdx; ++OpIdx2) {
- // Skip operands already paired with OpIdx1.
- if (Op2Used.count(OpIdx2))
- continue;
- // Recursively calculate the cost at each level
- int TmpScore = getScoreAtLevelRec({I1->getOperand(OpIdx1), Lane1},
- {I2->getOperand(OpIdx2), Lane2},
- CurrLevel + 1, MaxLevel);
- // Look for the best score.
- if (TmpScore > VLOperands::ScoreFail && TmpScore > MaxTmpScore) {
- MaxTmpScore = TmpScore;
- MaxOpIdx2 = OpIdx2;
- FoundBest = true;
- }
- }
- if (FoundBest) {
- // Pair {OpIdx1, MaxOpIdx2} was found to be best. Never revisit it.
- Op2Used.insert(MaxOpIdx2);
- ShallowScoreAtThisLevel += MaxTmpScore;
- }
- }
- return ShallowScoreAtThisLevel;
- }
-
- /// \Returns the look-ahead score, which tells us how much the sub-trees
- /// rooted at \p LHS and \p RHS match, the more they match the higher the
- /// score. This helps break ties in an informed way when we cannot decide on
- /// the order of the operands by just considering the immediate
- /// predecessors.
- int getLookAheadScore(const std::pair<Value *, int> &LHS,
- const std::pair<Value *, int> &RHS) {
- InLookAheadValues.clear();
- return getScoreAtLevelRec(LHS, RHS, 1, LookAheadMaxDepth);
- }
-
// Search all operands in Ops[*][Lane] for the one that matches best
// Ops[OpIdx][LastLane] and return its opreand index.
// If no good match can be found, return None.
@@ -962,6 +750,9 @@ public:
// The linearized opcode of the operand at OpIdx, Lane.
bool OpIdxAPO = getData(OpIdx, Lane).APO;
+ const unsigned BestScore = 2;
+ const unsigned GoodScore = 1;
+
// The best operand index and its score.
// Sometimes we have more than one option (e.g., Opcode and Undefs), so we
// are using the score to differentiate between the two.
@@ -990,19 +781,41 @@ public:
// Look for an operand that matches the current mode.
switch (RMode) {
case ReorderingMode::Load:
+ if (isa<LoadInst>(Op)) {
+ // Figure out which is left and right, so that we can check for
+ // consecutive loads
+ bool LeftToRight = Lane > LastLane;
+ Value *OpLeft = (LeftToRight) ? OpLastLane : Op;
+ Value *OpRight = (LeftToRight) ? Op : OpLastLane;
+ if (isConsecutiveAccess(cast<LoadInst>(OpLeft),
+ cast<LoadInst>(OpRight), DL, SE))
+ BestOp.Idx = Idx;
+ }
+ break;
+ case ReorderingMode::Opcode:
+ // We accept both Instructions and Undefs, but with different scores.
+ if ((isa<Instruction>(Op) && isa<Instruction>(OpLastLane) &&
+ cast<Instruction>(Op)->getOpcode() ==
+ cast<Instruction>(OpLastLane)->getOpcode()) ||
+ (isa<UndefValue>(OpLastLane) && isa<Instruction>(Op)) ||
+ isa<UndefValue>(Op)) {
+ // An instruction has a higher score than an undef.
+ unsigned Score = (isa<UndefValue>(Op)) ? GoodScore : BestScore;
+ if (Score > BestOp.Score) {
+ BestOp.Idx = Idx;
+ BestOp.Score = Score;
+ }
+ }
+ break;
case ReorderingMode::Constant:
- case ReorderingMode::Opcode: {
- bool LeftToRight = Lane > LastLane;
- Value *OpLeft = (LeftToRight) ? OpLastLane : Op;
- Value *OpRight = (LeftToRight) ? Op : OpLastLane;
- unsigned Score =
- getLookAheadScore({OpLeft, LastLane}, {OpRight, Lane});
- if (Score > BestOp.Score) {
- BestOp.Idx = Idx;
- BestOp.Score = Score;
+ if (isa<Constant>(Op)) {
+ unsigned Score = (isa<UndefValue>(Op)) ? GoodScore : BestScore;
+ if (Score > BestOp.Score) {
+ BestOp.Idx = Idx;
+ BestOp.Score = Score;
+ }
}
break;
- }
case ReorderingMode::Splat:
if (Op == OpLastLane)
BestOp.Idx = Idx;
@@ -1133,8 +946,8 @@ public:
public:
/// Initialize with all the operands of the instruction vector \p RootVL.
VLOperands(ArrayRef<Value *> RootVL, const DataLayout &DL,
- ScalarEvolution &SE, const BoUpSLP &R)
- : DL(DL), SE(SE), R(R) {
+ ScalarEvolution &SE)
+ : DL(DL), SE(SE) {
// Append all the operands of RootVL.
appendOperandsOfVL(RootVL);
}
@@ -1356,8 +1169,7 @@ private:
SmallVectorImpl<Value *> &Left,
SmallVectorImpl<Value *> &Right,
const DataLayout &DL,
- ScalarEvolution &SE,
- const BoUpSLP &R);
+ ScalarEvolution &SE);
struct TreeEntry {
using VecTreeTy = SmallVector<std::unique_ptr<TreeEntry>, 8>;
TreeEntry(VecTreeTy &Container) : Container(Container) {}
@@ -2559,7 +2371,7 @@ void BoUpSLP::buildTree_rec(ArrayRef<Value *> VL, unsigned Depth,
// Commutative predicate - collect + sort operands of the instructions
// so that each side is more likely to have the same opcode.
assert(P0 == SwapP0 && "Commutative Predicate mismatch");
- reorderInputsAccordingToOpcode(VL, Left, Right, *DL, *SE, *this);
+ reorderInputsAccordingToOpcode(VL, Left, Right, *DL, *SE);
} else {
// Collect operands - commute if it uses the swapped predicate.
for (Value *V : VL) {
@@ -2604,7 +2416,7 @@ void BoUpSLP::buildTree_rec(ArrayRef<Value *> VL, unsigned Depth,
// have the same opcode.
if (isa<BinaryOperator>(VL0) && VL0->isCommutative()) {
ValueList Left, Right;
- reorderInputsAccordingToOpcode(VL, Left, Right, *DL, *SE, *this);
+ reorderInputsAccordingToOpcode(VL, Left, Right, *DL, *SE);
buildTree_rec(Left, Depth + 1, {TE, 0});
buildTree_rec(Right, Depth + 1, {TE, 1});
return;
@@ -2773,7 +2585,7 @@ void BoUpSLP::buildTree_rec(ArrayRef<Value *> VL, unsigned Depth,
// Reorder operands if reordering would enable vectorization.
if (isa<BinaryOperator>(VL0)) {
ValueList Left, Right;
- reorderInputsAccordingToOpcode(VL, Left, Right, *DL, *SE, *this);
+ reorderInputsAccordingToOpcode(VL, Left, Right, *DL, *SE);
buildTree_rec(Left, Depth + 1, {TE, 0});
buildTree_rec(Right, Depth + 1, {TE, 1});
return;
@@ -3490,15 +3302,13 @@ int BoUpSLP::getGatherCost(ArrayRef<Value *> VL) const {
// Perform operand reordering on the instructions in VL and return the reordered
// operands in Left and Right.
-void BoUpSLP::reorderInputsAccordingToOpcode(ArrayRef<Value *> VL,
- SmallVectorImpl<Value *> &Left,
- SmallVectorImpl<Value *> &Right,
- const DataLayout &DL,
- ScalarEvolution &SE,
- const BoUpSLP &R) {
+void BoUpSLP::reorderInputsAccordingToOpcode(
+ ArrayRef<Value *> VL, SmallVectorImpl<Value *> &Left,
+ SmallVectorImpl<Value *> &Right, const DataLayout &DL,
+ ScalarEvolution &SE) {
if (VL.empty())
return;
- VLOperands Ops(VL, DL, SE, R);
+ VLOperands Ops(VL, DL, SE);
// Reorder the operands in place.
Ops.reorder();
Left = Ops.getVL(0);
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud