|  | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines | 
|---|
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | assume_safety implies that loads under "if's" can be safely executed
speculatively (unguarded, unmasked). However this assumption holds only for the
original user "if's", not those introduced by the compiler, such as the
fold-tail "if" that guards us from loading beyond the original loop trip-count.
Currently the combination of fold-tail and assume-safety pragmas results in
ignoring the fold-tail predicate that guards the loads, generating unmasked
loads. This patch fixes this behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66106
Reviewers: Ayal, hsaito, fhahn
llvm-svn: 368973 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | by CoroBegin" problem.
Summary:
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36578 and https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36296.
Supersedes: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55966
One of the fundamental transformation that CoroSplit pass performs before splitting the coroutine is to find which values need to survive between suspend and resume and provide a slot for them in the coroutine frame to spill and restore the value as needed.
Coroutine frame becomes available once the storage for it was allocated and that point is marked in the pre-split coroutine with a llvm.coro.begin intrinsic.
FE normally puts all of the user-authored code that would be accessing those values after llvm.coro.begin, however, sometimes instructions accessing those values would end up prior to coro.begin. For example, writing out a value of the parameter into the alloca done by the FE or instructions that are added by the optimization passes such as SROA when it rewrites allocas.
Prior to this change, CoroSplit pass would try to move instructions that may end up accessing the values in the coroutine frame after CoroBegin. However it would run into problems (report_fatal_error) if some of the values would be used both in the allocation function (for example allocator is passed as a parameter to a coroutine) and in the use-authored body of the coroutine.
To handle this case and to simplify the instruction moving logic, this change removes all of the instruction moving. Instead, we only change the uses of the spilled values that are dominated by coro.begin and leave other instructions intact.
Before:
```
%var = alloca i32
%1 = getelementptr .. %var; ; will move this one after coro.begin
%f = call i8* @llvm.coro.begin(
```
After:
```
%var = alloca i32
%1 = getelementptr .. %var; stays put
%f = call i8* @llvm.coro.begin(
```
If we discover that there is a potential write into an alloca, prior to coro.begin we would copy its value from the alloca into the spill slot in the coroutine frame.
Before:
```
%var = alloca i32
store .. %var ; will move this one after coro.begin
%f = call i8* @llvm.coro.begin(
```
After:
```
%var = alloca i32
store .. %var ;stays put
%f = call i8* @llvm.coro.begin(
%tmp = load %var
store %tmp, %spill.slot.for.var
```
Note: This change does not handle array allocas as that is something that C++ FE does not produce, but, it can be added in the future if need arises
Reviewers: llvm-commits, modocache, ben-clayton, tks2103, rjmccall
Reviewed By: modocache
Subscribers: bartdesmet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66230
llvm-svn: 368949 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lld-x86_64-darwin13/builds/35674/steps/build_Lld/logs/stdio
llvm-svn: 368938 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| | llvm-svn: 368931 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| | llvm-svn: 368930 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| | llvm-svn: 368928 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| | llvm-svn: 368927 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66146
llvm-svn: 368925 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | Summary:
Instead of constantly keeping track of the nonnull status with the
dereferenceable information we can simply query the nonnull attribute
whenever we need the information (debug + manifest).
Reviewers: sstefan1, uenoku
Subscribers: hiraditya, bollu, jfb, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66113
llvm-svn: 368924 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | Summary:
As one of the first attributes, and one of the complex ones,
AAReturnedValues was not using liveness but we filtered the result after
the fact. This change adds liveness usage during the creation. The
algorithm is also improved and shorter.
The new algorithm will collect returned values over time using the
generic facilities that work with liveness already, e.g.,
genericValueTraversal which does not look at dead PHI node predecessors.
A test to show how this leads to better results is included.
Note: Unresolved calls and resolved calls are now tracked explicitly.
Reviewers: uenoku, sstefan1
Subscribers: hiraditya, bollu, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66120
llvm-svn: 368922 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | Summary:
If the associated context instruction is assumed dead we do not need to
update or manifest the state.
Reviewers: sstefan1, uenoku
Subscribers: hiraditya, bollu, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66116
llvm-svn: 368921 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | Summary:
The next attempt to clean up the Attributor interface before we grow it
further.
Before, we used a combination of two values (associated + anchor) and an
argument number (or -1) to determine a location. This was very fragile.
The new system uses exclusively IR positions and we restrict the
generation of IR positions to special constructor methods that verify
internal constraints we have. This will catch misuse early.
The auto-conversion, e.g., in getAAFor, is now performed through the
SubsumingPositionIterator. This iterator takes an IR position and allows
to visit all IR positions that "subsume" the given one, e.g., function
attributes "subsume" argument attributes of that function. For a
detailed breakdown see the class comment of SubsumingPositionIterator.
This patch also introduces the IRPosition::getAttrs() to extract IR
attributes at a certain position. The method knows how to look up in
different positions that are equivalent, e.g., the argument position for
call site arguments. We also introduce three new positions kinds such
that we have all IR positions where attributes can be placed and one for
"floating" values.
Reviewers: sstefan1, uenoku
Subscribers: hiraditya, bollu, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65977
llvm-svn: 368919 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | indexes.
llvm-svn: 368906 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | exit count
We already supported rewriting loop exit values for multiple exit loops, but if any of the loop exits were not computable, we gave up on all loop exit values. This patch generalizes the existing code to handle individual computable loop exits where possible.
As discussed in the review, this is a starting point for figuring out a better API.  The code is a bit ugly, but getting it in lets us test as we go.  
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65544
llvm-svn: 368898 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | I'm planning on handling intrinsics that will benefit from checking
the address space enums. Don't bother moving the address collection
for now, since those won't need th enums.
llvm-svn: 368895 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | The IR is invalid if this isn't a constant since immarg was added.
llvm-svn: 368893 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | Reviewers: jdoerfert, reames
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66161
llvm-svn: 368884 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | Summary: I think this is better solution than annotating callsites in IC/SLC.
Reviewers: jdoerfert
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: MaskRay, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66217
llvm-svn: 368875 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | Summary:
We can't speculate around indirect branches: indirectbr and invoke. The
callbr instruction needs to be included here.
Reviewers: nickdesaulniers, manojgupta, chandlerc
Reviewed By: chandlerc
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66200
llvm-svn: 368873 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| | llvm-svn: 368831 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| | llvm-svn: 368830 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| | llvm-svn: 368829 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | canonicalizeCmpWithConstant(), NFCI
I'd like to use it elsewhere, hopefully without reinventing the wheel.
No functional change intended so far.
llvm-svn: 368820 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | This is the compiler-flag equivalent of the Predicate pragma
(https://reviews.llvm.org/D65197), to direct the vectorizer to fold the
remainder-loop into the main-loop using predication.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66108
Reviewers: Ayal, hsaito, fhahn, SjoerdMeije
llvm-svn: 368801 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | This reverts r368526 (git commit 7e71aa24bc0788690fea7f0d7eab400c6a784deb)
This reverts r368542 (git commit cb5a90fd314a7914cf293797bb4fd7a6841052cf)
llvm-svn: 368800 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | CallSite has been removed in favour of CallBase.  Adjust the coroutine split to
account for that.
llvm-svn: 368798 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | Potentially addresses rdar://49022293.
llvm-svn: 368797 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | The suspend-crossing algorithm is not correct in the presence of uses
that cannot be reached on some successor path from their defs.
llvm-svn: 368796 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | The support for swifterror allocas should work in all lowerings.
The support for swifterror arguments only really works in a lowering
with prototypes where you can ensure that the prototype also has a
swifterror argument; I'm not really sure how it could possibly be
made to work in the switch lowering.
llvm-svn: 368795 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | the linkage of the prototype or the exact types of the yielded values.
llvm-svn: 368793 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| | llvm-svn: 368792 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | These rely on having an allocator provided to the coroutine and thus,
for now, only work in retcon lowerings.
llvm-svn: 368791 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | dump() is not guaranteed to be defined in all builds.
llvm-svn: 368790 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | arguments to be passed back to the continuation function.
llvm-svn: 368789 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | A quick contrast of this ABI with the currently-implemented ABI:
- Allocation is implicitly managed by the lowering passes, which is fine
  for frontends that are fine with assuming that allocation cannot fail.
  This assumption is necessary to implement dynamic allocas anyway.
- The lowering attempts to fit the coroutine frame into an opaque,
  statically-sized buffer before falling back on allocation; the same
  buffer must be provided to every resume point.  A buffer must be at
  least pointer-sized.
- The resume and destroy functions have been combined; the continuation
  function takes a parameter indicating whether it has succeeded.
- Conversely, every suspend point begins its own continuation function.
- The continuation function pointer is directly returned to the caller
  instead of being stored in the frame.  The continuation can therefore
  directly destroy the frame when exiting the coroutine instead of having
  to leave it in a defunct state.
- Other values can be returned directly to the caller instead of going
  through a promise allocation.  The frontend provides a "prototype"
  function declaration from which the type, calling convention, and
  attributes of the continuation functions are taken.
- On the caller side, the frontend can generate natural IR that directly
  uses the continuation functions as long as it prevents IPO with the
  coroutine until lowering has happened.  In combination with the point
  above, the frontend is almost totally in charge of the ABI of the
  coroutine.
- Unique-yield coroutines are given some special treatment.
llvm-svn: 368788 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | Summary:
Should be fine for memcpy, strcpy, strncpy.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, efriedma
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: uenoku, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66135
llvm-svn: 368724 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| | llvm-svn: 368715 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | Summary:
Given a pattern like:
```
%old_cmp1 = icmp slt i32 %x, C2
%old_replacement = select i1 %old_cmp1, i32 %target_low, i32 %target_high
%old_x_offseted = add i32 %x, C1
%old_cmp0 = icmp ult i32 %old_x_offseted, C0
%r = select i1 %old_cmp0, i32 %x, i32 %old_replacement
```
it can be rewritten as more canonical pattern:
```
%new_cmp1 = icmp slt i32 %x, -C1
%new_cmp2 = icmp sge i32 %x, C0-C1
%new_clamped_low = select i1 %new_cmp1, i32 %target_low, i32 %x
%r = select i1 %new_cmp2, i32 %target_high, i32 %new_clamped_low
```
Iff `-C1 s<= C2 s<= C0-C1`
Also, `ULT` predicate can also be `UGE`; or `UGT` iff `C0 != -1` (+invert result)
Also, `SLT` predicate can also be `SGE`; or `SGT` iff `C2 != INT_MAX` (+invert result)
If `C1 == 0`, then all 3 instructions must be one-use; else at most either `%old_cmp1` or `%old_x_offseted` can have extra uses.
NOTE: if we could reuse `%old_cmp1` as one of the comparisons we'll have to build, this could be less limiting.
So there are two icmp's, each one with 3 predicate variants, so there are 9 fold variants:
|     | ULT                            | UGE                             | UGT                             |
| SLT | https://rise4fun.com/Alive/yIJ | https://rise4fun.com/Alive/5BfN | https://rise4fun.com/Alive/INH  |
| SGE | https://rise4fun.com/Alive/hd8 | https://rise4fun.com/Alive/Abk  | https://rise4fun.com/Alive/PlzS |
| SGT | https://rise4fun.com/Alive/VYG | https://rise4fun.com/Alive/oMY  | https://rise4fun.com/Alive/KrzC |
{F9730206}
This fold was brought up in https://reviews.llvm.org/D65148#1603922 by @dmgreen, and is needed to unblock that patch.
This patch requires D65530.
Reviewers: spatel, nikic, xbolva00, dmgreen
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits, dmgreen
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65765
llvm-svn: 368687 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | As per https://reviews.llvm.org/D65530#inline-592325
llvm-svn: 368686 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | all users are freely invertible
Summary:
This is rather unconventional..
As the comment there says, we don't have much folds for xor-of-icmps,
we try to turn them into an and-of-icmps, for which we have plenty of folds.
But if the ICmp we need to invert is not single-use - we give up.
As discussed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D65148#1603922,
we may have a non-canonical CLAMP pattern, with bit match and
select-of-threshold that we'll potentially clamp.
As it can be seen in `canonicalize-clamp-with-select-of-constant-threshold-pattern.ll`,
out of all 8 variations of the pattern, only two are **not** canonicalized into
the variant with and+icmp instead of bit math.
The reason is because the ICmp we need to invert is not single-use - we give up.
We indeed can't perform this fold at will, the general rule is that
we should not increase instruction count in InstCombine,
But we wouldn't end up increasing instruction count if we can adapt every other
user to the inverted value. This way the `not` we create **will** get folded,
and in the end the instruction count did not increase.
For that, of course, we need to look at the users of a Value,
which is again rather unconventional for InstCombine :S
Thus i'm proposing to be a little bit more insistive in `foldXorOfICmps()`.
The alternatives would be to not create that `not`, but add duplicate code to
manually invert all users; or to add some even less general combine to handle
some more specific pattern[s].
Reviewers: spatel, nikic, RKSimon, craig.topper
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: hiraditya, jdoerfert, dmgreen, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65530
llvm-svn: 368685 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | Summary:
int mm(char *a, char *b) {
    return memcmp(a,b,16);
}
Currently:
define dso_local i32 @mm(i8* nocapture readonly %a, i8* nocapture readonly %b) local_unnamed_addr #1 {
entry:
  %call = tail call i32 @memcmp(i8* %a, i8* %b, i64 16)
  ret i32 %call
}
After patch:
define dso_local i32 @mm(i8* nocapture readonly %a, i8* nocapture readonly %b) local_unnamed_addr #1 {
entry:
  %call = tail call i32 @memcmp(i8* dereferenceable(16)  %a, i8* dereferenceable(16)  %b, i64 16)
  ret i32 %call
}
Reviewers: jdoerfert, efriedma
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: javed.absar, spatel, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66079
llvm-svn: 368657 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | This removes the warning by using the new DL member.
It also simplifies the code.
llvm-svn: 368625 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| | llvm-svn: 368622 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | The functionality is not changed but the interfaces are simplified and
repetition is removed.
llvm-svn: 368621 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | backends
Summary:
This commit fixed a race condition from multi-threaded thinLTO backends that causes non-deterministic memory corruption for a data structure used only by AutoFDO with compact binary profile.
GUIDToFuncNameMap, a static data member of type DenseMap in FunctionSamples is used as a per-module mapping from function name MD5 to name string when input AutoFDO profile is in compact binary format. However with ThinLTO, we can have parallel backends modifying and accessing the class static map concurrently. The fix is to make GUIDToFuncNameMap a member of SampleProfileLoader instead of a file static data.
Reviewers: wmi, davidxl, danielcdh
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, hiraditya, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65848
llvm-svn: 368596 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | Summary:
x / fabs(x) -> copysign(1.0, x)
fabs(x) / x -> copysign(1.0, x)
Reviewers: spatel, foad, RKSimon, efriedma
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: lebedev.ri, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65898
llvm-svn: 368570 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | constantexpr pitfail (PR42962)
Instead of matching value and then blindly casting to BinaryOperator
just to get the opcode, just match instruction and do no cast.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42962
llvm-svn: 368554 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | Expected to address buildbot failure http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-debian-fast/builds/16285 caused by D65060.
llvm-svn: 368542 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | Summary:
Hoisting/sinking instruction out of a loop isn't always beneficial. Hoisting an instruction from a cold block inside a loop body out of the loop could hurt performance. This change makes Loop ICM profile aware - it now checks block frequency to make sure hoisting/sinking anly moves instruction to colder block.
Test Plan:
ninja check
Reviewers: asbirlea, sanjoy, reames, nikic, hfinkel, vsk
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Subscribers: fhahn, vsk, davidxl, xbolva00, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65060
llvm-svn: 368526 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | SimplifyBinOp(Instruction::BinaryOps::Add, )
llvm-svn: 368521 |