summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopInstSimplify.cpp
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* [LoopInstSimplify] Move MemorySSA verification under flag.Alina Sbirlea2019-11-211-1/+2
| | | | | | The verification inside loop passes should be done under the VerifyMemorySSA flag (enabled by EXPESIVE_CHECKS or explicitly with opt), in order to not add to compile time during regular builds.
* Sink all InitializePasses.h includesReid Kleckner2019-11-131-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This file lists every pass in LLVM, and is included by Pass.h, which is very popular. Every time we add, remove, or rename a pass in LLVM, it caused lots of recompilation. I found this fact by looking at this table, which is sorted by the number of times a file was changed over the last 100,000 git commits multiplied by the number of object files that depend on it in the current checkout: recompiles touches affected_files header 342380 95 3604 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h 314730 234 1345 llvm/include/llvm/InitializePasses.h 307036 118 2602 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/APInt.h 213049 59 3611 llvm/include/llvm/Support/MathExtras.h 170422 47 3626 llvm/include/llvm/Support/Compiler.h 162225 45 3605 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/Optional.h 158319 63 2513 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/Triple.h 140322 39 3598 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/StringRef.h 137647 59 2333 llvm/include/llvm/Support/Error.h 131619 73 1803 llvm/include/llvm/Support/FileSystem.h Before this change, touching InitializePasses.h would cause 1345 files to recompile. After this change, touching it only causes 550 compiles in an incremental rebuild. Reviewers: bkramer, asbirlea, bollu, jdoerfert Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70211
* Change TargetLibraryInfo analysis passes to always require FunctionTeresa Johnson2019-09-071-1/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: This is the first change to enable the TLI to be built per-function so that -fno-builtin* handling can be migrated to use function attributes. See discussion on D61634 for background. This is an enabler for fixing handling of these options for LTO, for example. This change should not affect behavior, as the provided function is not yet used to build a specifically per-function TLI, but rather enables that migration. Most of the changes were very mechanical, e.g. passing a Function to the legacy analysis pass's getTLI interface, or in Module level cases, adding a callback. This is similar to the way the per-function TTI analysis works. There was one place where we were looking for builtins but not in the context of a specific function. See FindCXAAtExit in lib/Transforms/IPO/GlobalOpt.cpp. I'm somewhat concerned my workaround could provide the wrong behavior in some corner cases. Suggestions welcome. Reviewers: chandlerc, hfinkel Subscribers: arsenm, dschuff, jvesely, nhaehnle, mehdi_amini, javed.absar, sbc100, jgravelle-google, eraman, aheejin, steven_wu, george.burgess.iv, dexonsmith, jfb, asbirlea, gchatelet, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66428 llvm-svn: 371284
* [MemorySSA] Loop passes should mark MSSA preserved when available.Alina Sbirlea2019-08-171-1/+1
| | | | | | | | This patch applies only to the new pass manager. Currently, when MSSA Analysis is available, and pass to each loop pass, it will be preserved by that loop pass. Hence, mark the analysis preserved based on that condition, vs the current `EnableMSSALoopDependency`. This leaves the global flag to affect only the entry point in the loop pass manager (in FunctionToLoopPassAdaptor). llvm-svn: 369181
* Only passes that preserve MemorySSA must mark it as preserved.Alina Sbirlea2019-06-111-0/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: The method `getLoopPassPreservedAnalyses` should not mark MemorySSA as preserved, because it's being called in a lot of passes that do not preserve MemorySSA. Instead, mark the MemorySSA analysis as preserved by each pass that does preserve it. These changes only affect the new pass mananger. Reviewers: chandlerc Subscribers: mehdi_amini, jlebar, Prazek, george.burgess.iv, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62536 llvm-svn: 363091
* Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepoChandler Carruth2019-01-191-4/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | to reflect the new license. We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach. Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and repository. llvm-svn: 351636
* Update MemorySSA in LoopInstSimplify.Alina Sbirlea2018-08-221-6/+38
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: Add MemorySSA as a depency to LoopInstInstSimplify and preserve it. Disabled by default until all passes preserve MemorySSA. Reviewers: chandlerc Subscribers: sanjoy, jlebar, Prazek, george.burgess.iv, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50906 llvm-svn: 340444
* Move Analysis/Utils/Local.h back to TransformsDavid Blaikie2018-06-041-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | Review feedback from r328165. Split out just the one function from the file that's used by Analysis. (As chandlerc pointed out, the original change only moved the header and not the implementation anyway - which was fine for the one function that was used (since it's a template/inlined in the header) but not in general) llvm-svn: 333954
* [LoopInstSimplify] Re-implement the core logic of loop-instsimplify toChandler Carruth2018-05-291-104/+102
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | be both simpler and substantially more efficient. Rather than use a hand-rolled iteration technique that isn't quite the same as RPO, use the pre-built RPO loop body traversal utility. Once visiting the loop body in RPO, we can assert that we visit defs before uses reliably. When this is the case, the only need to iterate is when simplifying a def that is used by a PHI node along a back-edge. With this patch, the first pass over the loop body is just a complete simplification of every instruction across the loop body. When we encounter a use of a simplified instruction that stems from a PHI node in the loop body that has already been visited (due to some cyclic CFG, potentially the loop itself, or a nested loop, or unstructured control flow), we recall that specific PHI node for the second iteration. Nothing else needs to be preserved from iteration to iteration. On the second and later iterations, only instructions known to have simplified inputs are considered, each time starting from a set of PHIs that had simplified inputs along the backedges. Dead instructions are collected along the way, but deleted in a batch at the end of each iteration making the iterations themselves substantially simpler. This uses a new batch API for recursively deleting dead instructions. This alsa changes the routine to visit subloops. Because simplification is fundamentally transitive, we may need to visit the entire loop body, including subloops, to handle knock-on simplification. I've added a basic test file that helps demonstrate that all of these changes work. It includes both straight-forward loops with simplifications as well as interesting PHI-structures, CFG-structures, and a nested loop case. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47407 llvm-svn: 333461
* Restore the LoopInstSimplify pass, reverting r327329 that removed it.Chandler Carruth2018-05-251-0/+223
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The plan had always been to move towards using this rather than so much in-pass simplification within the loop pipeline, but we never got around to it.... until only a couple months after it was removed due to disuse. =/ This commit is just a pure revert of the removal. I will add tests and do some basic cleanup in follow-up commits. Then I'll wire it into the loop pass pipeline. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47353 llvm-svn: 333250
* Remove the LoopInstSimplify pass (-loop-instsimplify)Vedant Kumar2018-03-121-223/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | LoopInstSimplify is unused and untested. Reading through the commit history the pass also seems to have a high maintenance burden. It would be best to retire the pass for now. It should be easy to recover if we need something similar in the future. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44053 llvm-svn: 327329
* [Transforms] Fix some Clang-tidy modernize and Include What You Use ↵Eugene Zelenko2017-10-161-5/+20
| | | | | | warnings; other minor fixes (NFC). llvm-svn: 315940
* Kill off the old SimplifyInstruction API by converting remaining users.Daniel Berlin2017-04-281-1/+1
| | | | llvm-svn: 301673
* [PM] Introduce an analysis set used to preserve all analyses overChandler Carruth2017-01-151-1/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | a function's CFG when that CFG is unchanged. This allows transformation passes to simply claim they preserve the CFG and analysis passes to check for the CFG being preserved to remove the fanout of all analyses being listed in all passes. I've gone through and removed or cleaned up as many of the comments reminding us to do this as I could. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28627 llvm-svn: 292054
* [PM] Separate the LoopAnalysisManager from the LoopPassManager and moveChandler Carruth2017-01-111-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | the latter to the Transforms library. While the loop PM uses an analysis to form the IR units, the current plan is to have the PM itself establish and enforce both loop simplified form and LCSSA. This would be a layering violation in the analysis library. Fundamentally, the idea behind the loop PM is to *transform* loops in addition to running passes over them, so it really seemed like the most natural place to sink this was into the transforms library. We can't just move *everything* because we also have loop analyses that rely on a subset of the invariants. So this patch splits the the loop infrastructure into the analysis management that has to be part of the analysis library, and the transform-aware pass manager. This also required splitting the loop analyses' printer passes out to the transforms library, which makes sense to me as running these will transform the code into LCSSA in theory. I haven't split the unittest though because testing one component without the other seems nearly intractable. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28452 llvm-svn: 291662
* [PM] Rewrite the loop pass manager to use a worklist and augmented runChandler Carruth2017-01-111-14/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | arguments much like the CGSCC pass manager. This is a major redesign following the pattern establish for the CGSCC layer to support updates to the set of loops during the traversal of the loop nest and to support invalidation of analyses. An additional significant burden in the loop PM is that so many passes require access to a large number of function analyses. Manually ensuring these are cached, available, and preserved has been a long-standing burden in LLVM even with the help of the automatic scheduling in the old pass manager. And it made the new pass manager extremely unweildy. With this design, we can package the common analyses up while in a function pass and make them immediately available to all the loop passes. While in some cases this is unnecessary, I think the simplicity afforded is worth it. This does not (yet) address loop simplified form or LCSSA form, but those are the next things on my radar and I have a clear plan for them. While the patch is very large, most of it is either mechanically updating loop passes to the new API or the new testing for the loop PM. The code for it is reasonably compact. I have not yet updated all of the loop passes to correctly leverage the update mechanisms demonstrated in the unittests. I'll do that in follow-up patches along with improved FileCheck tests for those passes that ensure things work in more realistic scenarios. In many cases, there isn't much we can do with these until the loop simplified form and LCSSA form are in place. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28292 llvm-svn: 291651
* Revert @llvm.assume with operator bundles (r289755-r289757)Daniel Jasper2016-12-191-4/+12
| | | | | | | This creates non-linear behavior in the inliner (see more details in r289755's commit thread). llvm-svn: 290086
* Remove the AssumptionCacheHal Finkel2016-12-151-12/+4
| | | | | | | | | After r289755, the AssumptionCache is no longer needed. Variables affected by assumptions are now found by using the new operand-bundle-based scheme. This new scheme is more computationally efficient, and also we need much less code... llvm-svn: 289756
* Consistently use LoopAnalysisManagerSean Silva2016-08-091-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | One exception here is LoopInfo which must forward-declare it (because the typedef is in LoopPassManager.h which depends on LoopInfo). Also, some includes for LoopPassManager.h were needed since that file provides the typedef. Besides a general consistently benefit, the extra layer of indirection allows the mechanical part of https://reviews.llvm.org/D23256 that requires touching every transformation and analysis to be factored out cleanly. Thanks to David for the suggestion. llvm-svn: 278079
* [PM] Convert LoopInstSimplify Pass to new PMDehao Chen2016-07-151-60/+88
| | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: Convert LoopInstSimplify to new PM. Unfortunately there is no exisiting unittest for this pass. Reviewers: davidxl, silvas Subscribers: silvas, llvm-commits, mzolotukhin Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22280 llvm-svn: 275576
* Re-commit optimization bisect support (r267022) without new pass manager ↵Andrew Kaylor2016-04-221-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | support. The original commit was reverted because of a buildbot problem with LazyCallGraph::SCC handling (not related to the OptBisect handling). Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19172 llvm-svn: 267231
* Revert "Initial implementation of optimization bisect support."Vedant Kumar2016-04-221-1/+1
| | | | | | | | This reverts commit r267022, due to an ASan failure: http://lab.llvm.org:8080/green/job/clang-stage2-cmake-RgSan_check/1549 llvm-svn: 267115
* Initial implementation of optimization bisect support.Andrew Kaylor2016-04-211-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | This patch implements a optimization bisect feature, which will allow optimizations to be selectively disabled at compile time in order to track down test failures that are caused by incorrect optimizations. The bisection is enabled using a new command line option (-opt-bisect-limit). Individual passes that may be skipped call the OptBisect object (via an LLVMContext) to see if they should be skipped based on the bisect limit. A finer level of control (disabling individual transformations) can be managed through an addition OptBisect method, but this is not yet used. The skip checking in this implementation is based on (and replaces) the skipOptnoneFunction check. Where that check was being called, a new call has been inserted in its place which checks the bisect limit and the optnone attribute. A new function call has been added for module and SCC passes that behaves in a similar way. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19172 llvm-svn: 267022
* Simplify logic. NFC.Chad Rosier2016-04-061-7/+5
| | | | llvm-svn: 265537
* [LPM] Factor all of the loop analysis usage updates into a common helperChandler Carruth2016-02-191-9/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | routine. We were getting this wrong in small ways and generally being very inconsistent about it across loop passes. Instead, let's have a common place where we do this. One minor downside is that this will require some analyses like SCEV in more places than they are strictly needed. However, this seems benign as these analyses are complete no-ops, and without this consistency we can in many cases end up with the legacy pass manager scheduling deciding to split up a loop pass pipeline in order to run the function analysis half-way through. It is very, very annoying to fix these without just being very pedantic across the board. The only loop passes I've not updated here are ones that use AU.setPreservesAll() such as IVUsers (an analysis) and the pass printer. They seemed less relevant. With this patch, almost all of the problems in PR24804 around loop pass pipelines are fixed. The one remaining issue is that we run simplify-cfg and instcombine in the middle of the loop pass pipeline. We've recently added some loop variants of these passes that would seem substantially cleaner to use, but this at least gets us much closer to the previous state. Notably, the seven loop pass managers is down to three. I've not updated the loop passes using LoopAccessAnalysis because that analysis hasn't been fully wired into LoopSimplify/LCSSA, and it isn't clear that those transforms want to support those forms anyways. They all run late anyways, so this is harmless. Similarly, LSR is left alone because it already carefully manages its forms and doesn't need to get fused into a single loop pass manager with a bunch of other loop passes. LoopReroll didn't use loop simplified form previously, and I've updated the test case to match the trivially different output. Finally, I've also factored all the pass initialization for the passes that use this technique as well, so that should be done regularly and reliably. Thanks to James for the help reviewing and thinking about this stuff, and Ben for help thinking about it as well! Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17435 llvm-svn: 261316
* Scalar: Remove remaining ilist iterator implicit conversionsDuncan P. N. Exon Smith2015-10-131-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Remove remaining `ilist_iterator` implicit conversions from LLVMScalarOpts. This change exposed some scary behaviour in lib/Transforms/Scalar/SCCP.cpp around line 1770. This patch changes a call from `Function::begin()` to `&Function::front()`, since the return was immediately being passed into another function that takes a `Function*`. `Function::front()` started to assert, since the function was empty. Note that `Function::end()` does not point at a legal `Function*` -- it points at an `ilist_half_node` -- so the other function was getting garbage before. (I added the missing check for `Function::isDeclaration()`.) Otherwise, no functionality change intended. llvm-svn: 250211
* [PM] Port ScalarEvolution to the new pass manager.Chandler Carruth2015-08-171-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This change makes ScalarEvolution a stand-alone object and just produces one from a pass as needed. Making this work well requires making the object movable, using references instead of overwritten pointers in a number of places, and other refactorings. I've also wired it up to the new pass manager and added a RUN line to a test to exercise it under the new pass manager. This includes basic printing support much like with other analyses. But there is a big and somewhat scary change here. Prior to this patch ScalarEvolution was never *actually* invalidated!!! Re-running the pass just re-wired up the various other analyses and didn't remove any of the existing entries in the SCEV caches or clear out anything at all. This might seem OK as everything in SCEV that can uses ValueHandles to track updates to the values that serve as SCEV keys. However, this still means that as we ran SCEV over each function in the module, we kept accumulating more and more SCEVs into the cache. At the end, we would have a SCEV cache with every value that we ever needed a SCEV for in the entire module!!! Yowzers. The releaseMemory routine would dump all of this, but that isn't realy called during normal runs of the pipeline as far as I can see. To make matters worse, there *is* actually a key that we don't update with value handles -- there is a map keyed off of Loop*s. Because LoopInfo *does* release its memory from run to run, it is entirely possible to run SCEV over one function, then over another function, and then lookup a Loop* from the second function but find an entry inserted for the first function! Ouch. To make matters still worse, there are plenty of updates that *don't* trip a value handle. It seems incredibly unlikely that today GVN or another pass that invalidates SCEV can update values in *just* such a way that a subsequent run of SCEV will incorrectly find lookups in a cache, but it is theoretically possible and would be a nightmare to debug. With this refactoring, I've fixed all this by actually destroying and recreating the ScalarEvolution object from run to run. Technically, this could increase the amount of malloc traffic we see, but then again it is also technically correct. ;] I don't actually think we're suffering from tons of malloc traffic from SCEV because if we were, the fact that we never clear the memory would seem more likely to have come up as an actual problem before now. So, I've made the simple fix here. If in fact there are serious issues with too much allocation and deallocation, I can work on a clever fix that preserves the allocations (while clearing the data) between each run, but I'd prefer to do that kind of optimization with a test case / benchmark that shows why we need such cleverness (and that can test that we actually make it faster). It's possible that this will make some things faster by making the SCEV caches have higher locality (due to being significantly smaller) so until there is a clear benchmark, I think the simple change is best. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12063 llvm-svn: 245193
* Revert r240137 (Fixed/added namespace ending comments using clang-tidy. NFC)Alexander Kornienko2015-06-231-1/+1
| | | | | | Apparently, the style needs to be agreed upon first. llvm-svn: 240390
* Fixed/added namespace ending comments using clang-tidy. NFCAlexander Kornienko2015-06-191-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch is generated using this command: tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \ -checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \ llvm/lib/ Thanks to Eugene Kosov for the original patch! llvm-svn: 240137
* DataLayout is mandatory, update the API to reflect it with references.Mehdi Amini2015-03-101-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: Now that the DataLayout is a mandatory part of the module, let's start cleaning the codebase. This patch is a first attempt at doing that. This patch is not exactly NFC as for instance some places were passing a nullptr instead of the DataLayout, possibly just because there was a default value on the DataLayout argument to many functions in the API. Even though it is not purely NFC, there is no change in the validation. I turned as many pointer to DataLayout to references, this helped figuring out all the places where a nullptr could come up. I had initially a local version of this patch broken into over 30 independant, commits but some later commit were cleaning the API and touching part of the code modified in the previous commits, so it seemed cleaner without the intermediate state. Test Plan: Reviewers: echristo Subscribers: llvm-commits From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com> llvm-svn: 231740
* Make DataLayout Non-Optional in the ModuleMehdi Amini2015-03-041-2/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: DataLayout keeps the string used for its creation. As a side effect it is no longer needed in the Module. This is "almost" NFC, the string is no longer canonicalized, you can't rely on two "equals" DataLayout having the same string returned by getStringRepresentation(). Get rid of DataLayoutPass: the DataLayout is in the Module The DataLayout is "per-module", let's enforce this by not duplicating it more than necessary. One more step toward non-optionality of the DataLayout in the module. Make DataLayout Non-Optional in the Module Module->getDataLayout() will never returns nullptr anymore. Reviewers: echristo Subscribers: resistor, llvm-commits, jholewinski Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7992 From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com> llvm-svn: 231270
* [LPM] Stop using the string based preservation API. It is anChandler Carruth2015-01-281-1/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | abomination. For starters, this API is incredibly slow. In order to lookup the name of a pass it must take a memory fence to acquire a pointer to the managed static pass registry, and then potentially acquire locks while it consults this registry for information about what passes exist by that name. This stops the world of LLVMs in your process no matter how little they cared about the result. To make this more joyful, you'll note that we are preserving many passes which *do not exist* any more, or are not even analyses which one might wish to have be preserved. This means we do all the work only to say "nope" with no error to the user. String-based APIs are a *bad idea*. String-based APIs that cannot produce any meaningful error are an even worse idea. =/ I have a patch that simply removes this API completely, but I'm hesitant to commit it as I don't really want to perniciously break out-of-tree users of the old pass manager. I'd rather they just have to migrate to the new one at some point. If others disagree and would like me to kill it with fire, just say the word. =] llvm-svn: 227294
* [PM] Split the LoopInfo object apart from the legacy pass, creatingChandler Carruth2015-01-171-3/+3
| | | | | | | | | | a LoopInfoWrapperPass to wire the object up to the legacy pass manager. This switches all the clients of LoopInfo over and paves the way to port LoopInfo to the new pass manager. No functionality change is intended with this iteration. llvm-svn: 226373
* [PM] Separate the TargetLibraryInfo object from the immutable pass.Chandler Carruth2015-01-151-3/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | The pass is really just a means of accessing a cached instance of the TargetLibraryInfo object, and this way we can re-use that object for the new pass manager as its result. Lots of delta, but nothing interesting happening here. This is the common pattern that is developing to allow analyses to live in both the old and new pass manager -- a wrapper pass in the old pass manager emulates the separation intrinsic to the new pass manager between the result and pass for analyses. llvm-svn: 226157
* [PM] Move TargetLibraryInfo into the Analysis library.Chandler Carruth2015-01-151-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | While the term "Target" is in the name, it doesn't really have to do with the LLVM Target library -- this isn't an abstraction which LLVM targets generally need to implement or extend. It has much more to do with modeling the various runtime libraries on different OSes and with different runtime environments. The "target" in this sense is the more general sense of a target of cross compilation. This is in preparation for porting this analysis to the new pass manager. No functionality changed, and updates inbound for Clang and Polly. llvm-svn: 226078
* [PM] Split the AssumptionTracker immutable pass into two separate APIs:Chandler Carruth2015-01-041-5/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | a cache of assumptions for a single function, and an immutable pass that manages those caches. The motivation for this change is two fold. Immutable analyses are really hacks around the current pass manager design and don't exist in the new design. This is usually OK, but it requires that the core logic of an immutable pass be reasonably partitioned off from the pass logic. This change does precisely that. As a consequence it also paves the way for the *many* utility functions that deal in the assumptions to live in both pass manager worlds by creating an separate non-pass object with its own independent API that they all rely on. Now, the only bits of the system that deal with the actual pass mechanics are those that actually need to deal with the pass mechanics. Once this separation is made, several simplifications become pretty obvious in the assumption cache itself. Rather than using a set and callback value handles, it can just be a vector of weak value handles. The callers can easily skip the handles that are null, and eventually we can wrap all of this up behind a filter iterator. For now, this adds boiler plate to the various passes, but this kind of boiler plate will end up making it possible to port these passes to the new pass manager, and so it will end up factored away pretty reasonably. llvm-svn: 225131
* Update SetVector to rely on the underlying set's insert to return a ↵David Blaikie2014-11-191-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | pair<iterator, bool> This is to be consistent with StringSet and ultimately with the standard library's associative container insert function. This lead to updating SmallSet::insert to return pair<iterator, bool>, and then to update SmallPtrSet::insert to return pair<iterator, bool>, and then to update all the existing users of those functions... llvm-svn: 222334
* Make use of @llvm.assume in ValueTracking (computeKnownBits, etc.)Hal Finkel2014-09-071-1/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This change, which allows @llvm.assume to be used from within computeKnownBits (and other associated functions in ValueTracking), adds some (optional) parameters to computeKnownBits and friends. These functions now (optionally) take a "context" instruction pointer, an AssumptionTracker pointer, and also a DomTree pointer, and most of the changes are just to pass this new information when it is easily available from InstSimplify, InstCombine, etc. As explained below, the significant conceptual change is that known properties of a value might depend on the control-flow location of the use (because we care that the @llvm.assume dominates the use because assumptions have control-flow dependencies). This means that, when we ask if bits are known in a value, we might get different answers for different uses. The significant changes are all in ValueTracking. Two main changes: First, as with the rest of the code, new parameters need to be passed around. To make this easier, I grouped them into a structure, and I made internal static versions of the relevant functions that take this structure as a parameter. The new code does as you might expect, it looks for @llvm.assume calls that make use of the value we're trying to learn something about (often indirectly), attempts to pattern match that expression, and uses the result if successful. By making use of the AssumptionTracker, the process of finding @llvm.assume calls is not expensive. Part of the structure being passed around inside ValueTracking is a set of already-considered @llvm.assume calls. This is to prevent a query using, for example, the assume(a == b), to recurse on itself. The context and DT params are used to find applicable assumptions. An assumption needs to dominate the context instruction, or come after it deterministically. In this latter case we only handle the specific case where both the assumption and the context instruction are in the same block, and we need to exclude assumptions from being used to simplify their own ephemeral values (those which contribute only to the assumption) because otherwise the assumption would prove its feeding comparison trivial and would be removed. This commit adds the plumbing and the logic for a simple masked-bit propagation (just enough to write a regression test). Future commits add more patterns (and, correspondingly, more regression tests). llvm-svn: 217342
* Revert "[C++11] Add predecessors(BasicBlock *) / successors(BasicBlock *) ↵Duncan P. N. Exon Smith2014-07-211-1/+3
| | | | | | | | | iterator ranges." This reverts commit r213474 (and r213475), which causes a miscompile on a stage2 LTO build. I'll reply on the list in a moment. llvm-svn: 213562
* [C++11] Add predecessors(BasicBlock *) / successors(BasicBlock *) iterator ↵Manuel Jacob2014-07-201-3/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ranges. Summary: This patch introduces two new iterator ranges and updates existing code to use it. No functional change intended. Test Plan: All tests (make check-all) still pass. Reviewers: dblaikie Reviewed By: dblaikie Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4481 llvm-svn: 213474
* RecursivelyDeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions() could removeGerolf Hoflehner2014-04-261-1/+9
| | | | | | | | | | | more than 1 instruction. The caller need to be aware of this and adjust instruction iterators accordingly. rdar://16679376 Repaired r207302. llvm-svn: 207309
* Revert commit r207302 since build failuresGerolf Hoflehner2014-04-261-9/+1
| | | | | | have been reported. llvm-svn: 207303
* RecursivelyDeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions() could removeGerolf Hoflehner2014-04-261-1/+9
| | | | | | | | | more than 1 instruction. The caller need to be aware of this and adjust instruction iterators accordingly. rdar://16679376 llvm-svn: 207302
* [C++] Use 'nullptr'. Transforms edition.Craig Topper2014-04-251-2/+2
| | | | llvm-svn: 207196
* [Modules] Fix potential ODR violations by sinking the DEBUG_TYPEChandler Carruth2014-04-221-1/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | definition below all of the header #include lines, lib/Transforms/... edition. This one is tricky for two reasons. We again have a couple of passes that define something else before the includes as well. I've sunk their name macros with the DEBUG_TYPE. Also, InstCombine contains headers that need DEBUG_TYPE, so now those headers #define and #undef DEBUG_TYPE around their code, leaving them well formed modular headers. Fixing these headers was a large motivation for all of these changes, as "leaky" macros of this form are hard on the modules implementation. llvm-svn: 206844
* [C++11] Add range based accessors for the Use-Def chain of a Value.Chandler Carruth2014-03-091-3/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This requires a number of steps. 1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation detail 2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User* iterator. 3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the Use to the User. 4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs. 5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users(). 6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally opaque. Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would touch all of the same lies of code. The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have. I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right move. However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =] llvm-svn: 203364
* [C++11] Add 'override' keyword to virtual methods that override their base ↵Craig Topper2014-03-051-2/+2
| | | | | | class. llvm-svn: 202953
* Make DataLayout a plain object, not a pass.Rafael Espindola2014-02-251-1/+2
| | | | | | | Instead, have a DataLayoutPass that holds one. This will allow parts of LLVM don't don't handle passes to also use DataLayout. llvm-svn: 202168
* Rename a few more DataLayout variables.Rafael Espindola2014-02-211-2/+2
| | | | llvm-svn: 201833
* Disable most IR-level transform passes on functions marked 'optnone'.Paul Robinson2014-02-061-0/+3
| | | | | | | | | Ideally only those transform passes that run at -O0 remain enabled, in reality we get as close as we reasonably can. Passes are responsible for disabling themselves, it's not the job of the pass manager to do it for them. llvm-svn: 200892
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud