summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/llvm/lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCTOCRegDeps.cpp
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* [AIX]Lowering global address for 32/64bit small/large code modelsXiangling Liao2019-08-131-2/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | | This patch implements global address lowering for 32/64 bit with small/large code models. 1.For 32bit large code model on AIX, there are newly added pseudo opcode LWZtocL & ADDIStocHA32, the support of which on MC layer will be provided by future patches. 2.The default code model on AIX should be small code model. 3.Since AIX does not have medium code model, "report_fatal_error" when users specify it. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63547 llvm-svn: 368744
* [PowerPC] Add initialization for some ppc passesKang Zhang2019-04-121-4/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: Some llc debug options need pass-name as the parameters. But if we use the pass-name ppc-early-ret, we will get below error: llc test.ll -stop-after ppc-early-ret LLVM ERROR: "ppc-early-ret" pass is not registered. Below pass-names have the pass is not registered error: ppc-ctr-loops ppc-ctr-loops-verify ppc-loop-preinc-prep ppc-toc-reg-deps ppc-vsx-copy ppc-early-ret ppc-vsx-fma-mutate ppc-vsx-swaps ppc-reduce-cr-ops ppc-qpx-load-splat ppc-branch-coalescing ppc-branch-select Reviewed By: jsji Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60248 llvm-svn: 358271
* Revert "[PowerPC] Add initialization for some ppc passes"Eric Christopher2019-04-121-0/+4
| | | | | | | This reverts commit 6f8f98ce8de7c0e4ebd7fa2e1fd9507fe8d1c317 as it is breaking nearly every bot. llvm-svn: 358260
* [PowerPC] Add initialization for some ppc passesKang Zhang2019-04-121-4/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: Some llc debug options need pass-name as the parameters. But if we use the pass-name ppc-early-ret, we will get below error: llc test.ll -stop-after ppc-early-ret LLVM ERROR: "ppc-early-ret" pass is not registered. Below pass-names have the pass is not registered error: ppc-ctr-loops ppc-ctr-loops-verify ppc-loop-preinc-prep ppc-toc-reg-deps ppc-vsx-copy ppc-early-ret ppc-vsx-fma-mutate ppc-vsx-swaps ppc-reduce-cr-ops ppc-qpx-load-splat ppc-branch-coalescing ppc-branch-select Reviewed By: jsji Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60248 llvm-svn: 358256
* Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepoChandler Carruth2019-01-191-4/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | to reflect the new license. We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach. Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and repository. llvm-svn: 351636
* Sort the remaining #include lines in include/... and lib/....Chandler Carruth2017-06-061-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every line with a #include and let it re-sort things according to the precise LLVM rules for include ordering baked into clang-format these days. I've reverted a number of files where the results of sorting includes isn't healthy. Either places where we have legacy code relying on particular include ordering (where possible, I'll fix these separately) or where we have particular formatting around #include lines that I didn't want to disturb in this patch. This patch is *entirely* mechanical. If you get merge conflicts or anything, just ignore the changes in this patch and run clang-format over your #include lines in the files. Sorry for any noise here, but it is important to keep these things stable. I was seeing an increasing number of patches with irrelevant re-ordering of #include lines because clang-format was used. This patch at least isolates that churn, makes it easy to skip when resolving conflicts, and gets us to a clean baseline (again). llvm-svn: 304787
* [NFC] Header cleanupMehdi Amini2016-04-181-3/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Removed some unused headers, replaced some headers with forward class declarations. Found using simple scripts like this one: clear && ack --cpp -l '#include "llvm/ADT/IndexedMap.h"' | xargs grep -L 'IndexedMap[<]' | xargs grep -n --color=auto 'IndexedMap' Patch by Eugene Kosov <claprix@yandex.ru> Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19219 From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com> llvm-svn: 266595
* Revert r240137 (Fixed/added namespace ending comments using clang-tidy. NFC)Alexander Kornienko2015-06-231-1/+1
| | | | | | Apparently, the style needs to be agreed upon first. llvm-svn: 240390
* Fixed/added namespace ending comments using clang-tidy. NFCAlexander Kornienko2015-06-191-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch is generated using this command: tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \ -checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \ llvm/lib/ Thanks to Eugene Kosov for the original patch! llvm-svn: 240137
* [PowerPC] Add extra r2 read deps on @toc@l relocationsHal Finkel2015-05-181-0/+156
If some commits are happy, and some commits are sad, this is a sad commit. It is sad because it restricts instruction scheduling to work around a binutils linker bug, and moreover, one that may never be fixed. On 2012-05-21, GCC was updated not to produce code triggering this bug, and now we'll do the same... When resolving an address using the ELF ABI TOC pointer, two relocations are generally required: one for the high part and one for the low part. Only the high part generally explicitly depends on r2 (the TOC pointer). And, so, we might produce code like this: .Ltmp526: addis 3, 2, .LC12@toc@ha .Ltmp1628: std 2, 40(1) ld 5, 0(27) ld 2, 8(27) ld 11, 16(27) ld 3, .LC12@toc@l(3) rldicl 4, 4, 0, 32 mtctr 5 bctrl ld 2, 40(1) And there is nothing wrong with this code, as such, but there is a linker bug in binutils (https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18414) that will misoptimize this code sequence to this: nop std r2,40(r1) ld r5,0(r27) ld r2,8(r27) ld r11,16(r27) ld r3,-32472(r2) clrldi r4,r4,32 mtctr r5 bctrl ld r2,40(r1) because the linker does not know (and does not check) that the value in r2 changed in between the instruction using the .LC12@toc@ha (TOC-relative) relocation and the instruction using the .LC12@toc@l(3) relocation. Because it finds these instructions using the relocations (and not by scanning the instructions), it has been asserted that there is no good way to detect the change of r2 in between. As a result, this bug may never be fixed (i.e. it may become part of the definition of the ABI). GCC was updated to add extra dependencies on r2 to instructions using the @toc@l relocations to avoid this problem, and we'll do the same here. This is done as a separate pass because: 1. These extra r2 dependencies are not really properties of the instructions, but rather due to a linker bug, and maybe one day we'll be able to get rid of them when targeting linkers without this bug (and, thus, keeping the logic centralized here will make that straightforward). 2. There are ISel-level peephole optimizations that propagate the @toc@l relocations to some user instructions, and so the exta dependencies do not apply only to a fixed set of instructions (without undesirable definition replication). The test case was reduced with the help of bugpoint, with minimal cleaning. I'm looking forward to our upcoming MI serialization support, and with that, much better tests can be created. llvm-svn: 237556
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud