| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
As currently written, -target powerpcspe will enable SPE regardless of
disabling the feature later on in the command line. Instead, change
this to just set a default CPU to 'e500' instead of a generic CPU.
As part of this, add FeatureSPE to the e500 definition.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72673
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a fix for https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40554
Some CPU's trap to the kernel on unaligned floating point access and there are
kernels that do not handle the interrupt. The program then fails with a SIGBUS
according to the PR. This just switches the default for unaligned access to only
allow it on recent server CPUs that are known to allow this.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71954
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
processor definition more clear
The old processor design assume that, all the old processor's feature must be
inherited into future processor. That is not true as instruction fusion or some
implementation defined features are not inheritable.
What this patch did:
* Rename the old "specific features" to "additional features" that keep the new added inheritable features.
* Use the "specific features" to keep those features only for specific processor.
* Add the "inheritable features" to keep all the features that inherited from early processor.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70768
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The Power 9 CPU has some features that are unlikely to be passed on to future
versions of the CPU. This patch separates this out so that future CPU does not
inherit them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70466
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a continuation of D70262
The previous patch as listed above added the future CPU in clang. This patch
adds the future CPU in the PowerPC backend. At this point the patch simply
assumes that a future CPU will have the same characteristics as pwr9. Those
characteristics may change with later patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This patch renames the DarwinDirective (used to identify which CPU was defined)
to CPUDirective. It also adds the getCPUDirective() method and replaces all uses
of getDarwinDirective() with getCPUDirective().
Once this patch lands and downstream users of the getDarwinDirective() method
have switched to the getCPUDirective() method, the old getDarwinDirective()
method will be removed.
Reviewers: nemanjai, hfinkel, power-llvm-team, jsji, echristo, #powerpc, jhibbits
Reviewed By: hfinkel, jsji, jhibbits
Subscribers: hiraditya, shchenz, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70352
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
FeatureFusion bits was first introduced in
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL253724. for add/load integer fusion for P8.
The only use of `hasFusion` was https://reviews.llvm.org/rL255319.
However, this was removed later in https://reviews.llvm.org/rL280440.
So, there is NO any reference to fusion in code now.
Leaving it there is misleading and confusing, so remove it for now.
We can alwasy add back if we ever support fusion in the future.
llvm-svn: 364581
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 363987
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The single-constant algorithm produces infinities on a lot of denormal values.
The precision of the two-constant algorithm is actually sufficient across the
range of denormals. We will switch to that algorithm for now to avoid the
infinities on denormals. In the future, we will re-evaluate the algorithm to
find the optimal one for PowerPC.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60037
llvm-svn: 360144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch lays the groundwork for extending the generic machine scheduler by providing a PPC-specific implementation.
There are no functional changes as this is an incremental patch that simply provides the necessary overrides which just
encapsulate the behavior of the generic scheduler. Subsequent patches will add specific behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59284
llvm-svn: 357047
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For the power9 CPU, vector operations consume a pair of execution units rather
than one execution unit like a scalar operation. Update the target transform
cost functions to reflect the higher cost of vector operations when targeting
Power9.
Patch by RolandF.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55461
llvm-svn: 352261
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
unbound CPUs for a target.
Summary:
This simplifies the code and moves everything to tablegen for consistency. This
also prepares the ground for adding issue counters.
Reviewers: gchatelet, john.brawn, jsji
Subscribers: nemanjai, mgorny, javed.absar, kbarton, tschuett, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54297
llvm-svn: 346489
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
The Signal Processing Engine (SPE) is found on NXP/Freescale e500v1,
e500v2, and several e200 cores. This adds support targeting the e500v2,
as this is more common than the e500v1, and is in SoCs still on the
market.
This patch is very intrusive because the SPE is binary incompatible with
the traditional FPU. After discussing with others, the cleanest
solution was to make both SPE and FPU features on top of a base PowerPC
subset, so all FPU instructions are now wrapped with HasFPU predicates.
Supported by this are:
* Code generation following the SPE ABI at the LLVM IR level (calling
conventions)
* Single- and Double-precision math at the level supported by the APU.
Still to do:
* Vector operations
* SPE intrinsics
As this changes the Callee-saved register list order, one test, which
tests the precise generated code, was updated to account for the new
register order.
Reviewed by: nemanjai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44830
llvm-svn: 337347
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44828
llvm-svn: 337345
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch supports secure PLT mode for PowerPC 32 architecture.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42112
llvm-svn: 328617
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Add a target option AllowRegisterRenaming that is used to opt in to
post-register-allocation renaming of registers. This is set to 0 by
default, which causes the hasExtraSrcRegAllocReq/hasExtraDstRegAllocReq
fields of all opcodes to be set to 1, causing
MachineOperand::isRenamable to always return false.
Set the AllowRegisterRenaming flag to 1 for all in-tree targets that
have lit tests that were effected by enabling COPY forwarding in
MachineCopyPropagation (AArch64, AMDGPU, ARM, Hexagon, Mips, PowerPC,
RISCV, Sparc, SystemZ and X86).
Add some more comments describing the semantics of the
MachineOperand::isRenamable function and how it is set and maintained.
Change isRenamable to check the operand's opcode
hasExtraSrcRegAllocReq/hasExtraDstRegAllocReq bit directly instead of
relying on it being consistently reflected in the IsRenamable bit
setting.
Clear the IsRenamable bit when changing an operand's register value.
Remove target code that was clearing the IsRenamable bit when changing
registers/opcodes now that this is done conservatively by default.
Change setting of hasExtraSrcRegAllocReq in AMDGPU target to be done in
one place covering all opcodes that have constant pipe read limit
restrictions.
Reviewers: qcolombet, MatzeB
Subscribers: aemerson, arsenm, jyknight, mcrosier, sdardis, nhaehnle, javed.absar, tpr, arichardson, kristof.beyls, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, jordy.potman.lists, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, escha, nemanjai, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43042
llvm-svn: 325931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
PWR9 processor model for instruction scheduling. A subsequent patch will migrate
PWR9 to Post RA MIScheduler.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D24525
llvm-svn: 290102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This change enables soft-float for PowerPC64, and also makes soft-float disable
all vector instruction sets for both 32-bit and 64-bit modes. This latter part
is necessary because the PPC backend canonicalizes many Altivec vector types to
floating-point types, and so soft-float breaks scalarization support for many
operations. Both for embedded targets and for operating-system kernels desiring
soft-float support, it seems reasonable that disabling hardware floating-point
also disables vector instructions (embedded targets without hardware floating
point support are unlikely to have Altivec, etc. and operating system kernels
desiring not to use floating-point registers to lower syscall cost are unlikely
to want to use vector registers either). If someone needs this to work, we'll
need to change the fact that we promote many Altivec operations to act on
v4f32. To make it possible to disable Altivec when soft-float is enabled,
hardware floating-point support needs to be expressed as a positive feature,
like the others, and not a negative feature, because target features cannot
have dependencies on the disabling of some other feature. So +soft-float has
now become -hard-float.
Fixes PR26970.
llvm-svn: 283060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There is currently no codegen for Power9 that depends on the directive
so this is NFC for now but will be important in the future. This was
missed in r268950 so I'm adding it now.
llvm-svn: 281473
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The "long call" option forces the use of the indirect calling sequence for all
calls (even those that don't really need it). GCC provides this option; This is
helpful, under certain circumstances, for building very-large binaries, and
some other specialized use cases.
Fixes PR19098.
llvm-svn: 280040
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 273526
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch corresponds to review:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D19683
Simply adds the bits for being able to specify -mcpu=pwr9 to the back end.
llvm-svn: 268950
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch corresponds to review:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D17850
This patch implements the following instructions:
cmprb, cmpeqb, cnttzw, cnttzw., cnttzd, cnttzd.
llvm-svn: 266228
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch corresponds to review:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D18032
This patch provides asm implementation for the following instructions:
lwat, ldat, stwat, stdat, ldmx, mcrxrx
llvm-svn: 265022
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Instead of using two feature bits, one to indicate the availability of the
popcnt[dw] instructions, and another to indicate whether or not they're fast,
use a single enum. This allows more consistent control via target attribute
strings, and via Clang's command line.
llvm-svn: 264690
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The A2 cores support the popcntw/popcntd instructions, but they're microcoded,
and slower than our default software emulation. Specifically, popcnt[dw] take
approximately 74 cycles, whereas our software emulation takes only 24-28
cycles.
I've added a new target feature to indicate a slow popcnt[dw], instead of just
removing the existing target feature from the a2/a2q processor models, because:
1. This allows us to return more accurate information via the TTI interface
(I recognize that this currently makes no practical difference)
2. Is hopefully easier to understand (it allows the core's features to match
its manual while still having the desired effect).
llvm-svn: 264600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This change implements the following vsx instructions:
Quad/Double-Precision Compare:
xscmpoqp xscmpuqp
xscmpexpdp xscmpexpqp
xscmpeqdp xscmpgedp xscmpgtdp xscmpnedp
xvcmpnedp(.) xvcmpnesp(.)
Quad-Precision Floating-Point Conversion
xscvqpdp(o) xscvdpqp
xscvqpsdz xscvqpswz xscvqpudz xscvqpuwz xscvsdqp xscvudqp
xscvdphp xscvhpdp xvcvhpsp xvcvsphp
xsrqpi xsrqpix xsrqpxp
28 instructions
Phabricator: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16709
llvm-svn: 262068
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch corresponds to review:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D15117
In preparation for supporting IEEE Quad precision floating point,
this patch simply defines a feature to specify the target supports this.
For now, nothing is done with the target feature, we just don't want
warnings from the Clang FE when a user specifies -mfloat128.
Calling convention and other related work will add to this patch in
the near future.
llvm-svn: 255642
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is the second in a set of patches for soft float support for ppc32,
it enables soft float operations.
Patch by Strahinja Petrovic.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13700
llvm-svn: 255516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The e500mc does not actually support the mfocrf instruction; update the
processor definitions to reflect that fact.
Patch by Tom Rix (with some test-case cleanup by me).
llvm-svn: 254064
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
pairs that use the same register to execute as a single instruction.
No Functional Change
Patch by Kyle Butt!
llvm-svn: 253724
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 252439
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The mftb instruction was incorrectly marked as deprecated in the PPC
Backend. Instead, it should not be treated as deprecated, but rather be
implemented using the mfspr instruction. A similar patch was put into GCC last
year. Details can be found at:
https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2014-11/msg00383.html.
This change will replace instances of the mftb instruction with the mfspr
instruction for all CPUs except 601 and pwr3. This will also be the default
behaviour.
Additional details can be found in:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=23680
Phabricator review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10419
llvm-svn: 239827
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As it turns out, even though these are part of ISA 2.06, the P7 does not
support them (or, at least, not any P7s we're tested so far).
llvm-svn: 234686
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch corresponds to review:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D8928
It adds direct move instructions to/from VSX registers to GPR's. These are
exploited for FP <-> INT conversions.
llvm-svn: 234682
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
ISA 2.06
This is the patch corresponding to review:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D8406
It adds some missing instructions from ISA 2.06 to the PPC back end.
llvm-svn: 234546
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch adds Hardware Transaction Memory (HTM) support supported by ISA 2.07
(POWER8). The intrinsic support is based on GCC one [1], but currently only the
'PowerPC HTM Low Level Built-in Function' are implemented.
The HTM instructions follows the RC ones and the transaction initiation result
is set on RC0 (with exception of tcheck). Currently approach is to create a
register copy from CR0 to GPR and comapring. Although this is suboptimal, since
the branch could be taken directly by comparing the CR0 value, it generates code
correctly on both test and branch and just return value. A possible future
optimization could be elimitate the MFCR instruction to branch directly.
The HTM usage requires a recently newer kernel with PPC HTM enabled. Tested on
powerpc64 and powerpc64le.
This is send along a clang patch to enabled the builtins and option switch.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/PowerPC-Hardware-Transactional-Memory-Built-in-Functions.html
Phabricator Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8247
llvm-svn: 233204
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
http://reviews.llvm.org/D8090#inline-67337
llvm-svn: 231843
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7955
llvm-svn: 231285
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 231257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This required changing how the computation of the ABI is handled
and how some of the checks for ABI/target are done.
llvm-svn: 229471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Patch by Kit Barton.
Add the vector population count instructions for byte, halfword, word,
and doubleword sizes. There are two major changes here:
PPCISelLowering.cpp: Make CTPOP legal for vector types.
PPCRegisterInfo.td: Added v2i64 to the VRRC register
definition. This is needed for the doubleword variations of the
integer ops that were added in P8.
Test Plan
Test the instruction vpcnt* encoding/decoding in ppc64-encoding-vmx.s
Test the generation of the vpopcnt instructions for various vector
data types. When adding the v2i64 type to the Vector Register set, I
also needed to add the appropriate bit conversion patterns between
v2i64 and the existing vector types. Testing for these conversions
were also added in the test case by passing a different vector type as
a parameter into the test functions. There is also a run step that
will ensure the vpopcnt instructions are generated when the vsx
feature is disabled.
llvm-svn: 228046
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Test by Nemanja Ivanovic.
Since ppc64le implies POWER8 as a minimum, it makes sense that the
same features are included. Since the pwr8 processor model will likely
be getting new features until the implementation is complete, I
created a new list to add these updates to. This will include them in
both pwr8 and ppc64le.
Furthermore, it seems that it would make sense to compose the feature
lists for other processor models (pwr3 and up). Per discussion in the
review, I will make this change in a subsequent patch.
In order to test the changes, I've added an additional run step to
test cases that specify -march=ppc64le -mcpu=pwr8 to omit the -mcpu
option. Since the feature lists are the same, the behaviour should be
unchanged.
llvm-svn: 227053
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Function pointers under PPC64 ELFv1 (which is used on PPC64/Linux on the
POWER7, A2 and earlier cores) are really pointers to a function descriptor, a
structure with three pointers: the actual pointer to the code to which to jump,
the pointer to the TOC needed by the callee, and an environment pointer. We
used to chain these loads, and make them opaque to the rest of the optimizer,
so that they'd always occur directly before the call. This is not necessary,
and in fact, highly suboptimal on embedded cores. Once the function pointer is
known, the loads can be performed ahead of time; in fact, they can be hoisted
out of loops.
Now these function descriptors are almost always generated by the linker, and
thus the contents of the descriptors are invariant. As a result, by default,
we'll mark the associated loads as invariant (allowing them to be hoisted out
of loops). I've added a target feature to turn this off, however, just in case
someone needs that option (constructing an on-stack descriptor, casting it to a
function pointer, and then calling it cannot be well-defined C/C++ code, but I
can imagine some JIT-compilation system doing so).
Consider this simple test:
$ cat call.c
typedef void (*fp)();
void bar(fp x) {
for (int i = 0; i < 1600000000; ++i)
x();
}
$ cat main.c
typedef void (*fp)();
void bar(fp x);
void foo() {}
int main() {
bar(foo);
}
On the PPC A2 (the BG/Q supercomputer), marking the function-descriptor loads
as invariant brings the execution time down to ~8 seconds from ~32 seconds with
the loads in the loop.
The difference on the POWER7 is smaller. Compiling with:
gcc -std=c99 -O3 -mcpu=native call.c main.c : ~6 seconds [this is 4.8.2]
clang -O3 -mcpu=native call.c main.c : ~5.3 seconds
clang -O3 -mcpu=native call.c main.c -mno-invariant-function-descriptors : ~4 seconds
(looks like we'd benefit from additional loop unrolling here, as a first
guess, because this is faster with the extra loads)
The -mno-invariant-function-descriptors will be added to Clang shortly.
llvm-svn: 226207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Patch by Kit Barton.
Support for the ICBT instruction is currently present, but limited to
embedded processors. This change adds a new FeatureICBT that can be used
to identify whether the ICBT instruction is available on a specific processor.
Two new tests are added:
* Positive test to ensure the icbt instruction is present when using
-mcpu=pwr8
* Negative test to ensure the icbt instruction is not generated when
using -mcpu=pwr7
Both test cases use the Prefetch opcode in LLVM. They are based on the
ppc64-prefetch.ll test case.
llvm-svn: 226033
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Newer POWER cores, and the A2, support the cmpb instruction. This instruction
compares its operands, treating each of the 8 bytes in the GPRs separately,
returning a 'mask' result of 0 (for false) or -1 (for true) in each byte.
Code generation support is added, in the form of a PPCISelDAGToDAG
DAG-preprocessing routine, that recognizes patterns close to what the
instruction computes (either exactly, or related by a constant masking
operation), and generates the cmpb instruction (along with any necessary
constant masking operation). This can be expanded if use cases arise.
llvm-svn: 225106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This was missed last time around, for the P8 Instruction Scheduling
changes (223257). This will hook the P8Model entry in so those
changes will actually be used.
llvm-svn: 224452
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 223751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
unbreak bots.
CodeGen/PowerPC/vsx-p8.ll was failing.
'+power8-vector' is not a recognized feature for this target (ignoring feature)
llvm/test/CodeGen/PowerPC/vsx-p8.ll:33:14: error: expected string not found in input
; CHECK-REG: lxvw4x 34, 0, 3
^
<stdin>:50:2: note: scanning from here
.align 3
^
<stdin>:61:2: note: possible intended match here
lvx 3, 0, 3
^
llvm-svn: 223729
|