| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Now X86ISelLowering doesn't depend on many IR analyses.
llvm-svn: 375320
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Support sub-register code-gen for XADD is like supporting any other Load
and Store patterns.
No new instruction is introduced.
lock *(u32 *)(r1 + 0) += w2
has exactly the same underlying insn as:
lock *(u32 *)(r1 + 0) += r2
BPF_W width modifier has guaranteed they behave the same at runtime. This
patch merely teaches BPF back-end that BPF_W width modifier could work
GPR32 register class and that's all needed for sub-register code-gen
support for XADD.
test/CodeGen/BPF/xadd.ll updated to include sub-register code-gen tests.
A new testcase test/CodeGen/BPF/xadd_legal.ll is added to make sure the
legal case could pass on all code-gen modes. It could also test dead Def
check on GPR32. If there is no proper handling like what has been done
inside BPFMIChecking.cpp:hasLivingDefs, then this testcase will fail.
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
llvm-svn: 355126
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
BPF XADD semantics require all Defs of XADD are dead, meaning any result of
XADD insn is not used.
However, BPF backend hasn't enabled sub-register liveness track, so when
the source and destination operands of XADD are GPR32, there is no
sub-register dead info. If we rely on the generic
MachineInstr::allDefsAreDead, then we will raise false alarm on GPR32 Def.
This was fine as there was no sub-register code-gen support for XADD which
will be added by the next patch.
To support GPR32 Def, ideally we could just enable sub-registr liveness
track on BPF backend, then allDefsAreDead could work on GPR32 Def. This
requires implementing TargetSubtargetInfo::enableSubRegLiveness on BPF.
However, sub-register liveness tracking module inside LLVM is actually
designed for the situation where one register could be split into more
than one sub-registers for which case each sub-register could have their
own liveness and kill one of them doesn't kill others. So, tracking
liveness for each make sense.
For BPF, each 64-bit register could only have one 32-bit sub-register. This
is exactly the case which LLVM think brings no benefits for doing
sub-register tracking, because the live range of sub-register must always
equal to its parent register, therefore liveness tracking is disabled even
the back-end has implemented enableSubRegLiveness. The detailed information
is at r232695:
Author: Matthias Braun <matze@braunis.de>
Date: Thu Mar 19 00:21:58 2015 +0000
Do not track subregister liveness when it brings no benefits
Hence, for BPF, we enhance MachineInstr::allDefsAreDead. Given the solo
sub-register always has the same liveness as its parent register, LLVM is
already attaching a implicit 64-bit register Def whenever the there is
a sub-register Def. The liveness of the implicit 64-bit Def is available.
For example, for "lock *(u32 *)(r0 + 4) += w9", the MachineOperand info
could be:
$w9 = XADDW32 killed $r0, 4, $w9(tied-def 0),
implicit killed $r9, implicit-def dead $r9
Even though w9 is not marked as Dead, the parent register r9 is marked as
Dead correctly, and it is safe to use such information or our purpose.
v1 -> v2:
- Simplified code logic inside hasLiveDefs. (Yonghong)
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
llvm-svn: 355124
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
|
|
|
Currently, BPF has XADD (locked add) insn support and the
asm looks like:
lock *(u32 *)(r1 + 0) += r2
lock *(u64 *)(r1 + 0) += r2
The instruction itself does not have a return value.
At the source code level, users often use
__sync_fetch_and_add()
which eventually translates to XADD. The return value of
__sync_fetch_and_add() is supposed to be the old value
in the xadd memory location. Since BPF::XADD insn does not
support such a return value, this patch added a PreEmit
phase to check such a usage. If such an illegal usage
pattern is detected, a fatal error will be reported like
line 4: Invalid usage of the XADD return value
if compiled with -g, or
Invalid usage of the XADD return value
if compiled without -g.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
llvm-svn: 342692
|
