| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| ... | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Added statistics for the number of SMLAD instructions created, and
als renamed the pass name to -arm-parallel-dsp.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48971
llvm-svn: 336441
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This adds the Armv8.4-A Trace synchronization barrier (TSB) instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48918
llvm-svn: 336418
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Resolves:
Unsupported ARM Neon intrinsics in Target-specific DAG combine
function for VLDDUP
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38031
Related diff: D48439
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48920
llvm-svn: 336325
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We were miscompiling i8 loads, so reject them as unsupported narrow operations
for now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48944
llvm-svn: 336319
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Support for negative immediates was implemented in
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL298380, however few instruction options were missing.
This change adds negative immediates support and respective tests
for the following:
ADD
ADDS
ADDS.W
AND.W
ANDS
BIC.W
BICS
BICS.W
SUB
SUBS
SUBS.W
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48649
llvm-svn: 336286
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 336223
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
With a view to support parallel operations that have their results
stored to memory, refactor the consecutive access helper out so it
could support stores instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48872
llvm-svn: 336195
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewers: efriedma, rogfer01, javed.absar
Reviewed By: efriedma, rogfer01
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, chrib, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48846
llvm-svn: 336144
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a simple implementation of the unroll-and-jam classical loop
optimisation.
The basic idea is that we take an outer loop of the form:
for i..
ForeBlocks(i)
for j..
SubLoopBlocks(i, j)
AftBlocks(i)
Instead of doing normal inner or outer unrolling, we unroll as follows:
for i... i+=2
ForeBlocks(i)
ForeBlocks(i+1)
for j..
SubLoopBlocks(i, j)
SubLoopBlocks(i+1, j)
AftBlocks(i)
AftBlocks(i+1)
Remainder Loop
So we have unrolled the outer loop, then jammed the two inner loops into
one. This can lead to a simpler inner loop if memory accesses can be shared
between the now jammed loops.
To do this we have to prove that this is all safe, both for the memory
accesses (using dependence analysis) and that ForeBlocks(i+1) can move before
AftBlocks(i) and SubLoopBlocks(i, j).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41953
llvm-svn: 336062
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Initial patch adding assembly support for Armv8.4-A.
Besides adding v8.4 as a supported architecture to the usual places, this also
adds target features for the different crypto algorithms. Armv8.4-A introduced
new crypto algorithms, made them optional, and allows different combinations:
- none of the v8.4 crypto functions are supported, which is independent of the
implementation of the Armv8.0 SHA1 and SHA2 instructions.
- the v8.4 SHA512 and SHA3 support is implemented, in this case the Armv8.0
SHA1 and SHA2 instructions must also be implemented.
- the v8.4 SM3 and SM4 support is implemented, which is independent of the
implementation of the Armv8.0 SHA1 and SHA2 instructions.
- all of the v8.4 crypto functions are supported, in this case the Armv8.0 SHA1
and SHA2 instructions must also be implemented.
The v8.4 crypto instructions are added to AArch64 only, and not AArch32,
and are made optional extensions to Armv8.2-A.
The user-facing Clang options will map on these new target features, their
naming will be compatible with GCC and added in follow-up patches.
The Armv8.4-A instruction sets can be downloaded here:
https://developer.arm.com/products/architecture/a-profile/exploration-tools
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48625
llvm-svn: 335953
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We don't ever check these again (unless you're using
-fno-integrated-as), so make sure the extracted bits are well-defined.
I don't think it's possible to trigger any of the assertions on trunk,
but it's difficult to prove. (The first one depends on DAGCombine to
minimize the number of set bits in AND masks; I think the others are
mathematically impossible to hit.)
llvm-svn: 335931
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Mostly just adding checks for Thumb2 instructions which correspond to
ARM instructions which already had diagnostics. While I'm here, also fix
ARM-mode strd to check the input registers correctly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48610
llvm-svn: 335909
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes -Wpedantic warning.
llvm-svn: 335901
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add NoTrapAfterNoreturn target option which skips emission of traps
behind noreturn calls even if TrapUnreachable is enabled.
Enable the feature on Mach-O to save code size; Comments suggest it is
not possible to enable it for the other users of TrapUnreachable.
rdar://41530228
DifferentialRevision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48674
llvm-svn: 335877
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Armv6 introduced instructions to perform 32-bit SIMD operations. The purpose of
this pass is to do some straightforward IR pattern matching to create ACLE DSP
intrinsics, which map on these 32-bit SIMD operations.
Currently, only the SMLAD instruction gets recognised. This instruction
performs two multiplications with 16-bit operands, and stores the result in an
accumulator. We will follow this up with patches to recognise SMLAD in more
cases, and also to generate other DSP instructions (like e.g. SADD16).
Patch by: Sam Parker and Sjoerd Meijer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48128
llvm-svn: 335850
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 335831
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These are all benign races and only visible in !NDEBUG. tsan complains
about it, but a simple atomic bool is sufficient to make it happy.
llvm-svn: 335823
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch adds support for the q versions of the dup
(load-to-all-lanes) NEON intrinsics, such as vld2q_dup_f16() for
example.
Currently, non-q versions of the dup intrinsics are implemented
in clang by generating IR that first loads the elements of the
structure into the first lane with the lane (to-single-lane)
intrinsics, and then propagating it other lanes. There are at
least two problems with this approach. First, there are no
double-spaced to-single-lane byte-element instructions. For
example, there is no such instruction as 'vld2.8 { d0[0], d2[0]
}, [r0]'. That means we cannot rely on the to-single-lane
intrinsics and instructions to implement the q versions of the
dup intrinsics. Note that to-all-lanes instructions do support
all sizes of data items, including bytes.
The second problem with the current approach is that we need a
separate vdup instruction to propagate the structure to each
lane. So for vld4q_dup_f16() we would need four vdup instructions
in addition to the initial vld instruction.
This patch introduces dup LLVM intrinsics and reworks handling of
the currently supported (non-q) NEON dup intrinsics to expand
them into those LLVM intrinsics, thus eliminating the need for
using to-single-lane intrinsics and instructions.
Additionally, this patch adds support for u64 and s64 dup NEON
intrinsics. These are marked as Arch64-only in the ARM NEON
Reference, but it seems there are no reasons to not support them
in AArch32 mode. Please correct, if that is wrong.
That's what we generate with this patch applied:
vld2q_dup_f16:
vld2.16 {d0[], d2[]}, [r0]
vld2.16 {d1[], d3[]}, [r0]
vld3q_dup_f16:
vld3.16 {d0[], d2[], d4[]}, [r0]
vld3.16 {d1[], d3[], d5[]}, [r0]
vld4q_dup_f16:
vld4.16 {d0[], d2[], d4[], d6[]}, [r0]
vld4.16 {d1[], d3[], d5[], d7[]}, [r0]
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48439
llvm-svn: 335733
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
If a routine with no stack frame makes a sibling call, we need to
preserve the stack space check even if the local stack frame is empty,
since the call target could be a "no-split" function (in which case
the linker needs to be able to fix up the prolog sequence in order to
switch to a larger stack).
This fixes PR37807.
Reviewers: cherry, javed.absar
Subscribers: srhines, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48444
llvm-svn: 335604
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When the condition code for an IT instruction is "AL" we get strange "15"
predicates on subsequent instructions. These are dealt with for most
instructions by treating them as "ARMCC::AL", but VFP takes a different path
which didn't have this code.
llvm-svn: 335594
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
IT instructions are allowed to have the 'AL' predicate, but it must never
result in an 'NV' predicated instruction. Essentially this means that all
branches must be 't' rather than 'e' if the predicate is 'AL'.
This patch adds a diagnostic for this during assembly (error because parsing
hits an assertion if allowed to continue) and an annotation during disassembly.
llvm-svn: 335593
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 335331
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 335328
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This sets target feature FeatureStrictAlign for Armv6-m and Armv8-m.baseline,
because it has no support for unaligned accesses.
It looks like we always pass target feature "+strict-align" from
Clang, so this is not a user facing problem, but querying the subtarget
(in e.g. llc) for unaligned access support is incorrect.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48437
llvm-svn: 335326
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This option allows codegen (such as DAGCombine or MI scheduling) to use alias
analysis information, which can help with the codegen on in-order cpu's,
especially machine scheduling. Here I have done things the same way as AArch64,
adding a subtarget feature to enable this for specific cores, and enabled it for
the R52 where we have a schedule to make use of it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48074
llvm-svn: 335249
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Thumb has more 16-bit encoding space dedicated to ADD than ORR, allowing both a
3-address encoding and a wider range of immediates. So, particularly when
optimizing for code size (but it doesn't make things worse elsewhere) it's
beneficial to select an OR operation to an ADD if we know overflow won't occur.
This is made even better by LLVM's penchant for putting operations in canonical
form by converting the other way.
llvm-svn: 335119
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
to support BFC on ARM.
So far, we've only handled special cases of PatFrag like ImmLeaf. This patch
adds support for the remaining cases using similar mechanisms.
Like most C++ code from SelectionDAG, GISel and DAGISel expect to operate on
different types and representations and as such the code is not compatible
between the two. It's therefore necessary to add an alternative implementation
in the GISelPredicateCode field.
The target test for this feature could easily be done with IntImmLeaf and this
would save on a little boilerplate. The reason I've chosen to implement this
using PatFrag.GISelPredicateCode and not IntImmLeaf is because I was unable to
find a rule that was blocked solely by lack of support for PatFrag predicates. I
found that the ones I investigated as being likely candidates for the test
were further blocked by other things.
llvm-svn: 334871
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47831
llvm-svn: 334553
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(PR33744)
As discussed on PR33744, this patch relaxes ShuffleKind::SK_Alternate which requires shuffle masks to only match an alternating pattern from its 2 sources:
e.g. v4f32: <0,5,2,7> or <4,1,6,3>
This seems far too restrictive as most SIMD hardware which will implement it using a general blend/bit-select instruction, so replaces it with SK_Select, permitting elements from either source as long as they are inline:
e.g. v4f32: <0,5,2,7>, <4,1,6,3>, <0,1,6,7>, <4,1,2,3> etc.
This initial patch just updates the name and cost model shuffle mask analysis, later patch reviews will update SLP to better utilise this - it still limits itself to SK_Alternate style patterns.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47985
llvm-svn: 334513
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We currently support them only in AArch64. The NEON Reference,
however, says they are 'ARMv7, ARMv8' intrinsics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47447
llvm-svn: 334361
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It looks like this got left in by accident in r289794; I can't think of
any reason this check would be necessary. (Maybe it was meant to be a
check that the AND has one use? But we check that a few lines earlier.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47921
llvm-svn: 334322
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Create a separate feature set for Exynos M4 and add test cases.
llvm-svn: 334115
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Make TII isCopyInstr() return MachineOperands through pointer to pointer
instead via reference.
Patch by Nikola Prica.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47364
llvm-svn: 334105
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
On targets like Arm some relaxations may only be performed when certain
architectural features are available. As functions can be compiled with
differing levels of architectural support we must make a judgement on
whether we can relax based on the MCSubtargetInfo for the function. This
change passes through the MCSubtargetInfo for the function to
fixupNeedsRelaxation so that the decision on whether to relax can be made
per function. In this patch, only the ARM backend makes use of this
information. We must also pass the MCSubtargetInfo to applyFixup because
some fixups skip error checking on the assumption that relaxation has
occurred, to prevent code-generation errors applyFixup must see the same
MCSubtargetInfo as fixupNeedsRelaxation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44928
llvm-svn: 334078
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When the branch target of a Thumb2 unconditional or conditonal branch is
resolved at assembly time, no range checking is performed on the result
leading to incorrect immediates. This change adds a range check:
+- 16 Megabytes for unconditional branches, +- 1 Megabyte for the
conditional branch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46306
llvm-svn: 333997
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The Thumb BL range is + or - either 16 Megabytes or 4 Megabytes depending
on whether the CPU supports Thumb2 or the v8-m baseline ops. The existing
check for BL range is incorrectly set at +- 32 Megabytes. This change
corrects the higher range and uses the lower range if the featurebits
don't have the necessary support for it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46305
llvm-svn: 333991
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We currently support them only in AArch64. The NEON Reference,
however, says they are 'ARMv7, ARMv8' intrinsics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47120
llvm-svn: 333825
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The LLVM part was committed instead of the Clang part.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47121
llvm-svn: 333824
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We currently support them only in AArch64. The NEON Reference,
however, says they are 'ARMv7, ARMv8' intrinsics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47121
llvm-svn: 333819
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
call and fixing bugs exposed
Reviewers: aemerson, qcolombet
Reviewed By: qcolombet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46339
llvm-svn: 333663
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: This code is now dead as the ARM backend uses ADDCARRY/SUBCARRY/SETCCCARRY .
Reviewers: rogfer01, efriedma, rengolin, javed.absar
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, chrib, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47413
llvm-svn: 333544
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We've had Thumb1 support for ARMISD::SUBE for a while now, so this just
works. Reduces codesize a bit for 64-bit integer comparisons.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47387
llvm-svn: 333445
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
I'm guessing the tests reply on the ARM backend being built.
llvm-svn: 333359
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a simple implementation of the unroll-and-jam classical loop
optimisation.
The basic idea is that we take an outer loop of the form:
for i..
ForeBlocks(i)
for j..
SubLoopBlocks(i, j)
AftBlocks(i)
Instead of doing normal inner or outer unrolling, we unroll as follows:
for i... i+=2
ForeBlocks(i)
ForeBlocks(i+1)
for j..
SubLoopBlocks(i, j)
SubLoopBlocks(i+1, j)
AftBlocks(i)
AftBlocks(i+1)
Remainder
So we have unrolled the outer loop, then jammed the two inner loops into
one. This can lead to a simpler inner loop if memory accesses can be shared
between the now-jammed loops.
To do this we have to prove that this is all safe, both for the memory
accesses (using dependence analysis) and that ForeBlocks(i+1) can move before
AftBlocks(i) and SubLoopBlocks(i, j).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41953
llvm-svn: 333358
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This property is needed in order to follow values movement between
registers. This property is used in TII to implement method that
returns true if simple copy like instruction is recognized, along
with source and destination machine operands.
Patch by Nikola Prica.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45204
llvm-svn: 333093
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Also bringing ARMRegisterBankInfo::getRegBankFromRegClass
implementation up to speed with the *.td-definition.
Reviewed By: qcolombet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43982
llvm-svn: 333056
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
writer. NFCI.
With this we gain a little flexibility in how the generic object
writer is created.
Part of PR37466.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47045
llvm-svn: 332868
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
MCObjectWriter. NFCI.
To make this work I needed to add an endianness field to MCAsmBackend
so that writeNopData() implementations know which endianness to use.
Part of PR37466.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47035
llvm-svn: 332857
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Chances are we'll be asked again after type legalization, but before that point
it's better to claim misaligned accesses aren't allowed than to assert.
llvm-svn: 332840
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
NFCI.
The idea is that a client that wants split dwarf would create a
specific kind of object writer that creates two files, and use it to
create the streamer.
Part of PR37466.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47050
llvm-svn: 332749
|