| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In resent times asan and valgrind have found way more memory management bugs
in llvm than the special purpose leak detector.
llvm-svn: 224703
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This gives us better leak detection messages, like `Value` has.
This also has the side effect of papering over a problem where
`MachineInstr`s are added as garbage to the leak detector and then
deleted without being removed. If `MDNode::getTemporary()` allocates an
`MDNodeFwdDecl` in the same spot, the leak detector asserts. By
separating `MDNode`s into their own container we lose that assertion.
Since `MachineInstr` is required to have a trivial destructor, its usage
of `LeakDetector` at all is pretty suspect. I'll be sending a patch
soon to strip that out.
llvm-svn: 224060
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
source file had already been moved. Also move the unittest into the IR
unittest library.
This may seem an odd thing to put in the IR library but we only really
use this with instructions and it needs the LLVM context to work, so it
is intrinsically tied to the IR library.
llvm-svn: 202842
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
into their new header subdirectory: include/llvm/IR. This matches the
directory structure of lib, and begins to correct a long standing point
of file layout clutter in LLVM.
There are still more header files to move here, but I wanted to handle
them in separate commits to make tracking what files make sense at each
layer easier.
The only really questionable files here are the target intrinsic
tablegen files. But that's a battle I'd rather not fight today.
I've updated both CMake and Makefile build systems (I think, and my
tests think, but I may have missed something).
I've also re-sorted the includes throughout the project. I'll be
committing updates to Clang, DragonEgg, and Polly momentarily.
llvm-svn: 171366
|
|
|
Aside from moving the actual files, this patch only updates the build
system and the source file comments under lib/... that are relevant.
I'll be updating other docs and other files in smaller subsequnet
commits.
While I've tried to test this, but it is entirely possible that there
will still be some build system fallout.
Also, note that I've not changed the library name itself: libLLVMCore.a
is still the library name. I'd be interested in others' opinions about
whether we should rename this as well (I think we should, just not sure
what it might break)
llvm-svn: 171359
|
