| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This change only removes libFuzzer tests and CMake machinery,
the source copy temporarily remains at the old location.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36980
llvm-svn: 311405
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
reduce_inputs=1 they are now fast enough even w/o this
llvm-svn: 308553
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
cases where libFuzzer is run w/o initial corpus or with a corpus of very small items.
llvm-svn: 305521
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line with a #include and let it re-sort things according to the precise
LLVM rules for include ordering baked into clang-format these days.
I've reverted a number of files where the results of sorting includes
isn't healthy. Either places where we have legacy code relying on
particular include ordering (where possible, I'll fix these separately)
or where we have particular formatting around #include lines that
I didn't want to disturb in this patch.
This patch is *entirely* mechanical. If you get merge conflicts or
anything, just ignore the changes in this patch and run clang-format
over your #include lines in the files.
Sorry for any noise here, but it is important to keep these things
stable. I was seeing an increasing number of patches with irrelevant
re-ordering of #include lines because clang-format was used. This patch
at least isolates that churn, makes it easy to skip when resolving
conflicts, and gets us to a clean baseline (again).
llvm-svn: 304787
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18705
llvm-svn: 265174
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
int instead of void. The actual return value is not *yet* used (and expected to be 0). This change is API breaking, so the fuzzers will need to be updated.
llvm-svn: 249214
|
|
Summary:
Add a test for a data followed by 4-byte hash value.
I use a slightly modified Jenkins hash function,
as described in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jenkins_hash_function
The modification is to ensure that hash(zeros) != 0.
Reviewers: kcc
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12648
llvm-svn: 247076
|