| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We make the assumption in most of our constant folding code that a fp2int will target an integer of 128-bits or less, calling the APFloat::convertToInteger with only uint64_t[2] of raw bits for the result.
Fuzz testing (PR24662) showed that we don't handle other cases at all, resulting in stack overflows and all sorts of crashes.
This patch uses the APSInt version of APFloat::convertToInteger instead to better handle such cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31074
llvm-svn: 298226
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Folding instructions when selecting can cause them to become dead.
Don't select these dead instructions (if they don't have other side
effects, and don't define physical registers).
Preserve existing tests by adding COPYs.
In some tests, the G_CONSTANT vregs never get constrained to a class:
the only use of the vreg was folded into another instruction, so the
G_CONSTANT, now dead, never gets selected.
llvm-svn: 298224
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 298221
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The MIR printer dumps a string that describe the register mask of a function.
A static predefined list of register masks matches a static list of strings.
However when the register mask is not from the static predefined list, there is no descriptor string and the printer fails.
This patch adds support to custom register mask printing and dumping.
Also the list of callee saved registers (describing the registers that must be preserved for the caller) might be dynamic.
As such this data needs to be dumped and parsed back to the Machine Register Info.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30971
llvm-svn: 298207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Let targets specialize the pass with the register class so we can get a
parameterless default constructor and can put the pass into the pass
registry to enable testing with -run-pass=.
llvm-svn: 298184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Normalize ExeDepsFix, execution-fix, ExecutionDependencyFix and
ExecutionDepsFix to the last one.
llvm-svn: 298183
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 298182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewers: mkuper, rnk
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, jyknight, aemerson, llvm-commits, rengolin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27050
llvm-svn: 298179
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 298178
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is an ELF-specific thing that adds SHF_LINK_ORDER to the global's section
pointing to the metadata argument's section. The effect of that is a reverse dependency
between sections for the linker GC.
!associated does not change the behavior of global-dce. The global
may also need to be added to llvm.compiler.used.
Since SHF_LINK_ORDER is per-section, !associated effectively enables
fdata-sections for the affected globals, the same as comdats do.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29104
llvm-svn: 298157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Handle TokenFactors more aggressively in
SDValue::reachesChainWithoutSideEffects. This isn't really a
very effective change anymore because of other changes to
chain handling, but it's a cheap check, and the expanded
comments are still useful.
It might be possible to loosen the hasOneUse() requirement with a
deeper analysis, but a naive implementation of that check would be
expensive.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29845
llvm-svn: 298156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Instead of just looking for a load which is mergable with Ext to form ExtLoad, trying to promote Exts as long as the cost is acceptable. This change is not a NFC as it continue promoting Exts even after finding a load during promotions; the change in arm64-codegen-prepare-extload.ll described in 2.b might show the case.
This change was motivated from D26524. Based on this change, I will move the transformation performed in aarch64-type-promotion into CGP.
Reviewers: jmolloy, qcolombet, mcrosier, javed.absar
Reviewed By: qcolombet
Subscribers: rengolin, llvm-commits, aemerson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27853
llvm-svn: 298114
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 298108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- This fixes a bug where subregister incompatible with the vregs register
class where used.
- Implement the case where multiple copies are necessary to cover a
given lanemask.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30438
llvm-svn: 298025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This fixes two problems when VirtRegMap encounters bundles:
- When substituting a vreg subregister def with an actual register the
internal read flag must be cleared.
- Removing an identity COPY from a bundle needs to use
removeFromBundle() and a newly introduced function to update
SlotIndexes.
No testcase here, because none of the in-tree targets trigger this,
however an upcoming commit of mine will need this and the testcase there
will trigger this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30925
llvm-svn: 298024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
associated command line options and functions - it's currently unused
in all of llvm and clang other than being set and reset.
llvm-svn: 298023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Users often call getArgumentList().size(), which is a linear way to get
the number of function arguments. arg_size(), on the other hand, is
constant time.
In general, the fact that arguments are stored in an iplist is an
implementation detail, so I've removed it from the Function interface
and moved all other users to the argument container APIs (arg_begin(),
arg_end(), args(), arg_size()).
Reviewed By: chandlerc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31052
llvm-svn: 298010
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 297976
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Looks like this expression was accidentally using 32-bit arithmetic.
llvm-svn: 297969
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 297967
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
NFC.
llvm-svn: 297966
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Citing http://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32288
The DWARF generated by LLVM includes this location:
0x55 0x93 0x04 DW_OP_reg5 DW_OP_piece(4) When GCC's DWARF is simply
0x55 (DW_OP_reg5) without the DW_OP_piece. I believe it's reasonable
to assume the DWARF consumer knows which part of a register
logically holds the value (low bytes, high bytes, how many bytes,
etc) for a primitive value like an integer.
This patch gets rid of the redundant DW_OP_piece when a subregister is
at offset 0. It also adds previously missing subregister masking when
a subregister is followed by another operation.
(This reapplies r297960 with two additional testcase updates).
rdar://problem/31069390
https://reviews.llvm.org/D31010
llvm-svn: 297965
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit 2bf453116889a576956892ea9683db4fcd96e30e while investigating buildbot breakage.
llvm-svn: 297962
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Citing http://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32288
The DWARF generated by LLVM includes this location:
0x55 0x93 0x04 DW_OP_reg5 DW_OP_piece(4) When GCC's DWARF is simply
0x55 (DW_OP_reg5) without the DW_OP_piece. I believe it's reasonable
to assume the DWARF consumer knows which part of a register
logically holds the value (low bytes, high bytes, how many bytes,
etc) for a primitive value like an integer.
This patch gets rid of the redundant DW_OP_piece when a subregister is
at offset 0. It also adds previously missing subregister masking when
a subregister is followed by another operation.
rdar://problem/31069390
https://reviews.llvm.org/D31010
llvm-svn: 297960
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 297932
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Don't scalarize VSELECT->SETCC when operands/results needs to be widened,
or when the type of the SETCC operands are different from those of the VSELECT.
(VSELECT SETCC) and (VSELECT (AND/OR/XOR (SETCC,SETCC))) are handled.
The previous splitting of VSELECT->SETCC in DAGCombiner::visitVSELECT() is
no longer needed and has been removed.
Updated tests:
test/CodeGen/ARM/vuzp.ll
test/CodeGen/NVPTX/f16x2-instructions.ll
test/CodeGen/X86/2011-10-19-widen_vselect.ll
test/CodeGen/X86/2011-10-21-widen-cmp.ll
test/CodeGen/X86/psubus.ll
test/CodeGen/X86/vselect-pcmp.ll
Review: Eli Friedman, Simon Pilgrim
https://reviews.llvm.org/D29489
llvm-svn: 297930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This produces a 1% speedup on an important internal Google benchmark
(protocol buffers), with no other regressions in google or in the llvm
test-suite. Only 5 targets in the entire llvm test-suite are affected,
and on those 5 targets the size increase is 0.027%
llvm-svn: 297925
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
comment that indicated we were using it when we really use a depth-first search. NFC
llvm-svn: 297904
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 297903
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 297898
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Fixes pr32278
Reviewers: igorb, craig.topper, RKSimon, spatel, hfinkel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30978
llvm-svn: 297878
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently, we create a G_CONSTANT for every "synthetic" integer
constant operand (for instance, for the G_GEP offset).
Instead, share the G_CONSTANTs we might have created by going through
the ValueToVReg machinery.
When we're emitting synthetic constants, we do need to get Constants from
the context. One could argue that we shouldn't modify the context at
all (for instance, this means that we're going to use a tad more memory
if the constant wasn't used elsewhere), but constants are mostly
harmless. We currently do this for extractvalue and all.
For constant fcmp, this does mean we'll emit an extra COPY, which is not
necessarily more optimal than an extra materialized constant.
But that preserves the current intended design of uniqued G_CONSTANTs,
and the rematerialization problem exists elsewhere and should be
resolved with a single coherent solution.
llvm-svn: 297875
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If we got unlucky with register allocation and actual constpool placement, we
could end up producing a tTBB_JT with an index that's already been clobbered.
Technically, we might be able to fix this situation up with a MOV, but I think
the constant islands pass is complex enough without having to deal with more
weird edge-cases.
llvm-svn: 297871
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Now that we preserve the IR layout, we would end up with all the newly
synthesized switch comparison blocks at the end of the function.
Instead, use a hopefully more reasonable layout, with the comparison
blocks immediately following the switch comparison blocks.
llvm-svn: 297869
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It makes the output function layout more predictable; the layout has
an effect on performance, we don't want it to be at the mercy of the
translator's visitation order and such.
The predictable output is also easier to digest.
getOrCreateBB isn't appropriately named anymore, as it never needs to
create anything. Rename it and extract the MBB creation logic out of it.
A couple tests were sensitive to the order. Update them.
llvm-svn: 297868
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch replaces ORs with getHighBits/getLowBits etc. with setLowBits/setHighBits/setBitsFrom.
In a few of the places we weren't ORing, but the KnownZero/KnownOne vectors were already initialized to zero. We exploit this in most places already there were just some that were inconsistent.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30965
llvm-svn: 297860
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 297855
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
module ID.
Using the module ID here is wrong for a couple of reasons:
1) The module ID is not persisted, so we can end up with different
object file contents given the same input file (for example if the same
file is accessed via different paths).
2) With ThinLTO the module ID field may contain the path to a bitcode file,
which is incorrect, as the .file argument is supposed to contain the path to
a source file.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30584
llvm-svn: 297853
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
SelectionDAG::ComputeNumSignBits (PR32273)
llvm-svn: 297852
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 297816
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 297808
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: D25742 improved the precision of debug locations for PGO by removing debug locations from common tail when tail-merging. However, if identical insturctions that are merged into a common tail have the same debug locations, there's no need to remove them. This patch creates a merged debug location of identical instructions across SameTails and assign it to the instruction in the common tail, so that the debug locations are maintained if they are same across identical instructions.
Reviewers: aprantl, probinson, MatzeB, rob.lougher
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: andreadb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30226
llvm-svn: 297805
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
On MachO platforms that use subsections-via-symbols dead code stripping will
drop prefix data. Unfortunately there is no great way to convey the relationship
between a function and its prefix data to the linker. We are forced to use a bit
of a hack: we give the prefix data it’s own symbol, and mark the actual function
entry an .alt_entry.
Patch by Moritz Angermann!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30770
llvm-svn: 297804
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
<1 x Ty> is not a legal vector type in LLT, we shouldn’t build G_MERGE_VALUES
instruction for them.
Reviewers: qcolombet, aditya_nandakumar, dsanders, t.p.northover, ab, javed.absar
Reviewed By: qcolombet
Subscribers: dberris, rovka, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30948
llvm-svn: 297792
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Adds a new kind of MachineOperand: MO_Placeholder.
This operand must not appear in the MIR and only exists as a way of
creating an 'uninitialized' operand until a matcher function overwrites it.
Depends on D30046, D29712
Reviewers: t.p.northover, ab, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, javed.absar, qcolombet
Reviewed By: qcolombet
Subscribers: dberris, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30089
llvm-svn: 297782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reduced version of D26357 - based on the discussion on llvm-dev about canonicalization of UMIN/UMAX/SMIN/SMAX as well as ABS I've reduced that patch to just the ABS ISD node (with x86/sse support) to improve basic combines and lowering.
ARM/AArch64, Hexagon, PowerPC and NVPTX all have similar instructions allowing us to make this a generic opcode and move away from the hard coded tablegen patterns which makes it tricky to match more complex patterns.
At the moment this patch doesn't attempt legalization as we only create an ABS node if its legal/custom.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29639
llvm-svn: 297780
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is the backend counterpart to:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL297390
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL297409
and follow-up to:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL297384
It surprised me that we need to duplicate the check in FoldConstantArithmetic and FoldConstantVectorArithmetic,
but one or the other doesn't catch all of the test cases. There is an existing code comment about merging those
someday.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30826
llvm-svn: 297762
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 297729
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Create nodes for smulwb and smulwt and move their selection from
DAGToDAG to DAG combine. smlawb and smlawt can then be selected
using tablegen. Added some helper functions to detect shift patterns
as well as a wrapper around SimplifyDemandBits. Added a couple of
extra tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30708
llvm-svn: 297716
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Each Calling convention (CC) defines a static list of registers that should be preserved by a callee function. All other registers should be saved by the caller.
Some CCs use additional condition: If the register is used for passing/returning arguments – the caller needs to save it - even if it is part of the Callee Saved Registers (CSR) list.
The current LLVM implementation doesn’t support it. It will save a register if it is part of the static CSR list and will not care if the register is passed/returned by the callee.
The solution is to dynamically allocate the CSR lists (Only for these CCs). The lists will be updated with actual registers that should be saved by the callee.
Since we need the allocated lists to live as long as the function exists, the list should reside inside the Machine Register Info (MRI) which is a property of the Machine Function and managed by it (and has the same life span).
The lists should be saved in the MRI and populated upon LowerCall and LowerFormalArguments.
The patch will also assist to implement future no_caller_saved_regsiters attribute intended for interrupt handler CC.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28566
llvm-svn: 297715
|