| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 215355
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
In a Clang bootstrap, the size of this vector was always 6.
llvm-svn: 215335
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Follow up to r214266. Add missing case in ScalarizeVectorResult() for
cttz_zero_undef.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4813
llvm-svn: 215330
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
floating point exceptions, added use of flag to fold potentially exception
raising floating point math in selection DAG. No functionality change, as
targets have to explicitly ask for this behavior and none does today.
llvm-svn: 215222
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Patch provided by Andrey Kuharev.
Sorry, r170537 was obviously wrong.
llvm-svn: 215190
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
__stack_chk_guard.
Handle the case where the pointer operand of the load instruction that loads the
stack guard is not a global variable but instead a bitcast.
%StackGuard = load i8** bitcast (i64** @__stack_chk_guard to i8**)
call void @llvm.stackprotector(i8* %StackGuard, i8** %StackGuardSlot)
Original test case provided by Ana Pazos.
This fixes PR20558.
llvm-svn: 215167
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
be deleted. This will be reapplied as soon as possible and before
the 3.6 branch date at any rate.
Approved by Jim Grosbach, Lang Hames, Rafael Espindola.
This reverts commits r215111, 215115, 215116, 215117, 215136.
llvm-svn: 215154
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I am sure we will be finding bits and pieces of dead code for years to
come, but this is a good start.
Thanks to Lang Hames for making MCJIT a good replacement!
llvm-svn: 215111
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Allow vector fabs operations on bitcasted constant integer values to be optimized
in the same way that we already optimize scalar fabs.
So for code like this:
%bitcast = bitcast i64 18446744069414584320 to <2 x float> ; 0xFFFF_FFFF_0000_0000
%fabs = call <2 x float> @llvm.fabs.v2f32(<2 x float> %bitcast)
%ret = bitcast <2 x float> %fabs to i64
Instead of generating something like this:
movabsq (constant pool loadi of mask for sign bits)
vmovq (move from integer register to vector/fp register)
vandps (mask off sign bits)
vmovq (move vector/fp register back to integer return register)
We should generate:
mov (put constant value in return register)
I have also removed a redundant clause in the first 'if' statement:
N0.getOperand(0).getValueType().isInteger()
is the same thing as:
IntVT.isInteger()
Testcases for x86 and ARM added to existing files that deal with vector fabs.
One existing testcase for x86 removed because it is no longer ideal.
For more background, please see:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D4770
And:
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20354
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4785
llvm-svn: 214892
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
shorter/easier and have the DAG use that to do the same lookup. This
can be used in the future for TargetMachine based caching lookups from
the MachineFunction easily.
Update the MIPS subtarget switching machinery to update this pointer
at the same time it runs.
llvm-svn: 214838
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This code is completely wrong. It is also dead, as if it were to *ever*
run, it would crash. Fortunately, after my work to the combiner, it is
at least *possible* to reach the code, and llvm-stress has found a test
case. Thanks to Patrick for reporting.
It would be really good if anyone who remembers how this code works and
what it was intended to do could add some more obvious test coverage
instead of my completely contrived and reduced test case. My test case
was so brittle I left a bread crumb comment in it to help the next
person to stumble on it and not know what it was actually testing for.
llvm-svn: 214785
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
information and update all callers. No functional change.
llvm-svn: 214781
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
combines) until they are legal.
Doing it the old way could, when the stars align *just* right, cause
a node to get into the combine set prior to being legalized. Then, when
the same node showed up as an operand to another node later on (but not
so much later on that it had been deleted as dead) we would fail to add
it back to the worklist thinking it had already been combined. This
would in turn cause it to not be legalized. Fortunately, we can also
walk the operands looking for uncombined (and thus potentially
un-legalized) nodes late. It will still ensure that we walk all operands
of all nodes and send all of them through both the legalizer without
changes and the combiner at least once. (Which was the original goal of
this).
I have a test case for this bug, but it is terribly brittle. For
example, it will stop finding the bug the moment I enable the new
shuffle lowering. I don't yet have any test case that reliably exercises
this bug, and it isn't clear that it will be possible to craft one. It
is entirely possible that with the new shuffle lowering the two forms of
doing this are precisely equivalent. That doesn't mean we shouldn't take
the more conservative approach of insisting on things in the combined
set having survived the legalizer.
llvm-svn: 214673
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is intended to be the minimal change needed to fix PR20354 ( http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20354 ). The check for a vector operation was wrong; we need to check that the fabs itself is not a vector operation.
This patch will not generate the optimal code. A constant pool load and 'and' op will be generated instead of just returning a value that we can calculate in advance (as we do for the scalar case). I've put a 'TODO' comment for that here and expect to have that patch ready soon.
There is a very similar optimization that we can do in visitFNEG, so I've put another 'TODO' there and expect to have another patch for that too.
llvm-svn: 214670
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
vector load is not a good transform when paired loads are available.
The combiner was creating Q-register loads and stores, which then had to be spilled because there are no callee-save Q registers!
llvm-svn: 214634
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
so using a single helper which adds operands back onto the worklist.
Several places didn't rigorously do this but a couple already did.
Factoring them together and doing it rigorously is important to delete
things recursively early on in the combiner and get a chance to see
accurate hasOneUse values. While no existing test cases change, an
upcoming patch to add DAG combining logic for PSHUFB requires this to
work correctly.
llvm-svn: 214623
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
constant-folded
during DAGCombine in certain circumstances. Unfortunately, the circumstances required
to trigger the issue seem to require a pretty specific interaction of DAGCombines,
and I haven't been able to find a testcase that reproduces on X86, ARM, or AArch64.
The functionality added here is replicated in essentially every other DAG combine,
so it seems pretty obviously correct.
llvm-svn: 214622
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These two lines have been commented out for over 4 years. They aren't
helping anyone.
llvm-svn: 214615
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
fromulation of the node, which isn't really the desired behavior from
within the combiner or legalizer, but is necessary within ISel. I've
added a hopefully helpful comment and fixed the only two places where
this took place.
Yet another step toward the combiner and legalizer not needing to use
update listeners with virtual calls to manage the worklists behind
legalization and combining.
llvm-svn: 214574
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This lifts the (very few) places the legalizer would delete dead nodes
into the outer loop around the legalizer. This is significantly simpler
because it doesn't require the legalizer itself to manage the iterator
validity, and it doesn't require the legalizer to be a DAG update
listener in order to remove things from the legalized set. It also makes
the interface much less contrived for the case of the legalizer running
inside the last phase of DAG combining.
I'm working on centralizing the deletion of nodes during both legalizing
and combining as much as possible. My hope is to remove the need for DAG
update listeners from the combiner next, which would remove a costly
virtual dispatch chain on every deletion. This in turn should allow us
to more aggressively delete DAG nodes during combining which will in
turn allow us to combine more aggressively by exposing the actual nodes
which have single users to the combine phases.
llvm-svn: 214546
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
regular loads
Altivec vector loads on PowerPC have an interesting property: They always load
from an aligned address (by rounding down the address actually provided if
necessary). In order to generate an actual unaligned load, you can generate two
load instructions, one with the original address, one offset by one vector
length, and use a special permutation to extract the bytes desired.
When this was originally implemented, I generated these two loads using regular
ISD::LOAD nodes, now marked as aligned. Unfortunately, there is a problem with
this:
The alignment of a load does not contribute to its identity, and SDNodes
are uniqued. So, imagine that we have some unaligned load, L1, that is not
aligned. The routine will create two loads, L1(aligned) and (L1+16)(aligned).
Further imagine that there had already existed a load (L1+16)(unaligned) with
the same chain operand as the load L1. When (L1+16)(aligned) is created as part
of the lowering of L1, this load *is* also the (L1+16)(unaligned) node, just
now marked as aligned (because the new alignment overwrites the old). But the
original users of (L1+16)(unaligned) now get the data intended for the
permutation yielding the data for L1, and (L1+16)(unaligned) no longer exists
to get its own permutation-based expansion. This was PR19991.
A second potential problem has to do with the MMOs on these loads, which can be
used by AA during instruction scheduling to break chain-based dependencies. If
the new "aligned" loads get the MMO from the original unaligned load, this does
not represent the fact that it will load data from below the original address.
Normally, this would not matter, but this load might be combined with another
load pair for a previous vector, and then the dependency on the otherwise-
ignored lower bytes can matter.
To fix both problems, instead of generating the necessary loads using regular
ISD::LOAD instructions, ppc_altivec_lvx intrinsics are used instead. These are
provided with MMOs with a conservative address range.
Unfortunately, I no longer have a failing test case (since PR19991 was
reported, other changes in CodeGen have forced this bug back into hiding it
again). Nevertheless, this should fix the underlying problem.
llvm-svn: 214481
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 214455
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently when DAGCombine converts loads feeding a switch into a switch of
addresses feeding a load the new load inherits the isInvariant flag of the left
side. This is incorrect since invariant loads can be reordered in cases where it
is illegal to reoarder normal loads.
This patch adds an isInvariant parameter to getExtLoad() and updates all call
sites to pass in the data if they have it or false if they don't. It also
changes the DAGCombine to use that data to make the right decision when
creating the new load.
llvm-svn: 214449
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
target addresses.
This fixes a mistake where I accidentially dropped the upper 32bit of a
64bit pointer during FastISel lowering of the patchpoint intrinsic.
llvm-svn: 214367
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
DAGCombine may choose to rewrite graphs where two loads feed a select into
graphs where a select of two addresses feed a load. While it sanity checks the
loads to make sure they are broadly equivalent it currently just uses the
alignment restriction of the left node. In cases where the right node has
stronger alignment requiresment this may lead to bad codegen, such as generating
an aligned load where an unaligned load is required. This patch makes the
combine generate a load with an alignment that is the same as whichever is more
restrictive of the two alignments.
Tests included.
rdar://17762530
llvm-svn: 214322
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix the missing case in ScalarizeVectorResult() that was exposed with
libclcore.bc in Android.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4645
llvm-svn: 214266
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We need to make sure we use the softened version of all appropriate operands in
the libcall, or things go horribly wrong. This may entail actually executing a
1-stage softening.
llvm-svn: 214175
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
inspection in the proccess, and shuffle the logging in the DAG combiner
around a bit.
With this it is much easier to follow what the legalizer is doing. It
should even accurately present most of the strange legalization
operations where a single node is replaced by multiple nodes, etc. There
is still some information lost (we log SDNodes not SDValues so we don't
log which result is used for which thing), but I think this is much
closer to a usable system. Notably, this will make it *much* more
apparant when legalization is actually happening inside the combiner, or
when there is a cycle caused by interactions of the legalizer and the
combiner.
The "bug" I fixed here I'm not sure is remotely possible to trigger. We
were only adding one of the nodes in a replacement to the updated set
rather than all of the nodes in the replacement. Realistically, the
worst result of this are nodes not getting back onto the worklist in the
DAG combiner. I doubt it is possible to trigger this today, and
I certainly don't have any ideas about how, but this at least brings the
code into alignment with the principled operation of the routine.
llvm-svn: 214105
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Rename to allowsMisalignedMemoryAccess.
On R600, 8 and 16 byte accesses are mostly OK with 4-byte alignment,
and don't need to be split into multiple accesses. Vector loads with
an alignment of the element type are not uncommon in OpenCL code.
llvm-svn: 214055
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
replacing nodes in the legalizer.
This caught a number of bugs for me during development.
llvm-svn: 214022
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
a missing transfer of debug information (without which tests fail).
llvm-svn: 214021
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
over each node in the worklist prior to combining.
This allows the combiner to produce new nodes which need to go back
through legalization. This is particularly useful when generating
operands to target specific nodes in a post-legalize DAG combine where
the operands are significantly easier to express as pre-legalized
operations. My immediate use case will be PSHUFB formation where we need
to build a constant shuffle mask with a build_vector node.
This also refactors the relevant functionality in the legalizer to
support this, and updates relevant tests. I've spoken to the R600 folks
and these changes look like improvements to them. The avx512 change
needs to be investigated, I suspect there is a disagreement between the
legalizer and the DAG combiner there, but it seems a minor issue so
leaving it to be re-evaluated after this patch.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4564
llvm-svn: 214020
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is the first commit in a series that add an @llvm.assume intrinsic which
can be used to provide the optimizer with a condition it may assume to be true
(when the control flow would hit the intrinsic call). Some basic properties are added here:
- llvm.invariant(true) is dead.
- llvm.invariant(false) is unreachable (this directly corresponds to the
documented behavior of MSVC's __assume(0)), so is llvm.invariant(undef).
The intrinsic is tagged as writing arbitrarily, in order to maintain control
dependencies. BasicAA has been updated, however, to return NoModRef for any
particular location-based query so that we don't unnecessarily block code
motion.
llvm-svn: 213973
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
address of the stack guard was being spilled to the stack.
Previously the address of the stack guard would get spilled to the stack if it
was impossible to keep it in a register. This patch introduces a new target
independent node and pseudo instruction which gets expanded post-RA to a
sequence of instructions that load the stack guard value. Register allocator
can now just remat the value when it can't keep it in a register.
<rdar://problem/12475629>
llvm-svn: 213967
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
doesn't actually correspond to an SDValue at all. Fixes most of the
remaining asserts on out-of-range SDValue result numbers.
llvm-svn: 213930
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 213928
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
with a result number outside the range of results for the node.
I don't know how we managed to not really check this very basic
invariant for so long, but the code is *very* broken at this point.
I have over 270 test failures with the assert enabled. I'm committing it
disabled so that others can join in the cleanup effort and reproduce the
issues. I've also included one of the obvious fixes that I already
found. More fixes to come.
llvm-svn: 213926
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
which have successfully round-tripped through the combine phase, and use
this to ensure all operands to DAG nodes are visited by the combiner,
even if they are only added during the combine phase.
This is critical to have the combiner reach nodes that are *introduced*
during combining. Previously these would sometimes be visited and
sometimes not be visited based on whether they happened to end up on the
worklist or not. Now we always run them through the combiner.
This fixes quite a few bad codegen test cases lurking in the suite while
also being more principled. Among these, the TLS codegeneration is
particularly exciting for programs that have this in the critical path
like TSan-instrumented binaries (although I think they engineer to use
a different TLS that is faster anyways).
I've tried to check for compile-time regressions here by running llc
over a merged (but not LTO-ed) clang bitcode file and observed at most
a 3% slowdown in llc. Given that this is essentially a worst case (none
of opt or clang are running at this phase) I think this is tolerable.
The actual LTO case should be even less costly, and the cost in normal
compilation should be negligible.
With this combining logic, it is possible to re-legalize as we combine
which is necessary to implement PSHUFB formation on x86 as
a post-legalize DAG combine (my ultimate goal).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4638
llvm-svn: 213898
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
vector operation legalization with support for custom target lowering
and fallback to expand when it fails, and use this to implement sext and
anyext load lowering for x86 in a more principled way.
Previously, the x86 backend relied on a target DAG combine to "combine
away" sextload and extload nodes prior to legalization, or would expand
them during legalization with terrible code. This is particularly
problematic because the DAG combine relies on running over non-canonical
DAG nodes at just the right time to match several common and important
patterns. It used a combine rather than lowering because we didn't have
good lowering support, and to expose some tricks being employed to more
combine phases.
With this change it becomes a proper lowering operation, the backend
marks that it can lower these nodes, and I've added support for handling
the canonical forms that don't have direct legal representations such as
sextload of a v4i8 -> v4i64 on AVX1. With this change, our test cases
for this behavior continue to pass even after the DAG combiner beigns
running more systematically over every node.
There is some noise caused by this in the test suite where we actually
use vector extends instead of subregister extraction. This doesn't
really seem like the right thing to do, but is unlikely to be a critical
regression. We do regress in one case where by lowering to the
target-specific patterns early we were able to combine away extraneous
legal math nodes. However, this regression is completely addressed by
switching to a widening based legalization which is what I'm working
toward anyways, so I've just switched the test to that mode.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4654
llvm-svn: 213897
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In order to enable the preservation of noalias function parameter information
after inlining, and the representation of block-level __restrict__ pointer
information (etc.), additional kinds of aliasing metadata will be introduced.
This metadata needs to be carried around in AliasAnalysis::Location objects
(and MMOs at the SDAG level), and so we need to generalize the current scheme
(which is hard-coded to just one TBAA MDNode*).
This commit introduces only the necessary refactoring to allow for the
introduction of other aliasing metadata types, but does not actually introduce
any (that will come in a follow-up commit). What it does introduce is a new
AAMDNodes structure to hold all of the aliasing metadata nodes associated with
a particular memory-accessing instruction, and uses that structure instead of
the raw MDNode* in AliasAnalysis::Location, etc.
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 213859
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 213811
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 213809
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Constant fold the lanes of the input constant build_vector individually
so we correctly handle when the vector elements are not all the same
constant value.
PR20394
llvm-svn: 213798
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The target-independent DAGcombiner will generate:
asr w1, X, #31 w1 = splat sign bit.
add X, X, w1, lsr #28 X = X + 0 or pow2-1
asr w0, X, asr #4 w0 = X/pow2
However, the add + shifts is expensive, so generate:
add w0, X, 15 w0 = X + pow2-1
cmp X, wzr X - 0
csel X, w0, X, lt X = (X < 0) ? X + pow2-1 : X;
asr w0, X, asr 4 w0 = X/pow2
llvm-svn: 213758
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
insertions.
The old behavior could cause arbitrarily bad memory usage in the DAG
combiner if there was heavy traffic of adding nodes already on the
worklist to it. This commit switches the DAG combine worklist to work
the same way as the instcombine worklist where we null-out removed
entries and only add new entries to the worklist. My measurements of
codegen time shows slight improvement. The memory utilization is
unsurprisingly dominated by other factors (the IR and DAG itself
I suspect).
This change results in subtle, frustrating churn in the particular order
in which DAG combines are applied which causes a number of minor
regressions where we fail to match a pattern previously matched by
accident. AFAICT, all of these should be using AddToWorklist to directly
or should be written in a less brittle way. None of the changes seem
drastically bad, and a few of the changes seem distinctly better.
A major change required to make this work is to significantly harden the
way in which the DAG combiner handle nodes which become dead
(zero-uses). Previously, we relied on the ability to "priority-bump"
them on the combine worklist to achieve recursive deletion of these
nodes and ensure that the frontier of remaining live nodes all were
added to the worklist. Instead, I've introduced a routine to just
implement that precise logic with no indirection. It is a significantly
simpler operation than that of the combiner worklist proper. I suspect
this will also fix some other problems with the combiner.
I think the x86 changes are really minor and uninteresting, but the
avx512 change at least is hiding a "regression" (despite the test case
being just noise, not testing some performance invariant) that might be
looked into. Not sure if any of the others impact specific "important"
code paths, but they didn't look terribly interesting to me, or the
changes were really minor. The consensus in review is to fix any
regressions that show up after the fact here.
Thanks to the other reviewers for checking the output on other
architectures. There is a specific regression on ARM that Tim already
has a fix prepped to commit.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4616
llvm-svn: 213727
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
DAG into a helper function.
This adds a trip through the (very minimal) verification logic in
a bunch of places that were missing it, but shouldn't have any other
impact outside of refactoring. I'm hoping to use this to do more clever
things when DAG nodes are inserted into the graph.
llvm-svn: 213612
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
a bug in 2010 when they were added but are adding no value today.
In fact, they are utter lies. NodeAllocator is used to allocate almost
all of these node types. I don't know what we were trying to assert
here, and the docs don't give any answer. Until we once again stumble
upon a bug needing help, let's clear the path for improvements.
llvm-svn: 213610
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We should update the usages to all of the results;
otherwise, we might get assertion failure or SEGV during
the type legalization of ATOMIC_CMP_SWAP_WITH_SUCCESS
with two or more illegal types.
For example, in the following sequence, both i8 and i1
might be illegal in some target, e.g. armv5, mipsel, mips64el,
%0 = cmpxchg i8* %ptr, i8 %desire, i8 %new monotonic monotonic
%1 = extractvalue { i8, i1 } %0, 1
Since both i8 and i1 should be legalized, the corresponding
ATOMIC_CMP_SWAP_WITH_SUCCESS dag will be checked/replaced/updated
twice.
If we don't update the usage to *ALL* of the results in the
first round, the DAG for extractvalue might be processed earlier.
The GetPromotedInteger() will result in assertion failure,
because its operand (i.e. the success bit of cmpxchg) is not
promoted beforehand.
llvm-svn: 213569
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
iterator ranges."
This reverts commit r213474 (and r213475), which causes a miscompile on
a stage2 LTO build. I'll reply on the list in a moment.
llvm-svn: 213562
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This makes the first stage DAG for @llvm.convert.to.fp16 an fptrunc,
and correspondingly @llvm.convert.from.fp16 an fpext. The legalisation
path is now uniform, regardless of the input IR:
fptrunc -> FP_TO_FP16 (if f16 illegal) -> libcall
fpext -> FP16_TO_FP (if f16 illegal) -> libcall
Each target should be able to select the version that best matches its
operations and not be required to duplicate patterns for both fptrunc
and FP_TO_FP16 (for example).
As a result we can remove some redundant AArch64 patterns.
llvm-svn: 213507
|
