| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Instead of asserting that the shift count is != 0 we just bail out
as it's not profitable trying to optimize a node which will be
removed anyway.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26098
llvm-svn: 285480
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
-1)) combine for splatted vectors
llvm-svn: 285129
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
SelectionDAG::SignBitIsZero (via SelectionDAG::computeKnownBits) has supported vectors since rL280927
llvm-svn: 285123
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
SelectionDAG::SignBitIsZero (via SelectionDAG::computeKnownBits) has supported vectors since rL280927
llvm-svn: 285118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Do *not* perform combines such as:
vector_shuffle<4,1,2,3>(build_vector(Ud, C0, C1 C2), scalar_to_vector(X))
->
build_vector(X, C0, C1, C2)
Keeping the shuffle allows lowering the constant build_vector to a materialized
constant vector (such as a vector-load from the constant-pool or some other idiom).
Reviewers: delena, igorb, spatel, mkuper, andreadb, RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25524
llvm-svn: 285063
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 284949
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
0 - X --> 0, if the sub is NUW
0 - X --> 0, if X is 0 or the minimum signed value and the sub is NSW
0 - X --> X, if X is 0 or the minimum signed value
This is the DAG equivalent of:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL284649
plus the fold for the NUW case which already existed in InstSimplify.
Note that we miss a vector fold because of a deficiency in the DAG version of
computeKnownBits().
llvm-svn: 284844
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As discussed in D24815, let's start the process of killing off the broken fast-math global
state housed in TargetOptions and eliminate the need for function-level fast-math attributes.
Here we enable two similar folds that are possible when we don't care about signed-zero:
fadd nsz x, 0 --> x
fsub nsz 0, x --> -x
Note that although the test cases include a 'sin' function call, I'm side-stepping the
FMF-on-calls question (and lack of support in the DAG) for now. It's not needed for these
tests - isNegatibleForFree/GetNegatedExpression just look through a ISD::FSIN node.
Also, when we create an FNEG node and propagate the Flags of the FSUB to it, this doesn't
actually do anything today because Flags are silently dropped for any node that is not a
binary operator.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25297
llvm-svn: 284824
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a retry of r284495 which was reverted at r284513 due to use-after-scope bugs
caused by faulty usage of StringRef.
This version also renames a pair of functions:
getRecipEstimateDivEnabled()
getRecipEstimateSqrtEnabled()
as suggested by Eric Christopher.
original commit msg:
[Target] remove TargetRecip class; move reciprocal estimate isel functionality to TargetLowering
This is a follow-up to https://reviews.llvm.org/D24816 - where we changed reciprocal estimates to be function attributes
rather than TargetOptions.
This patch is intended to be a structural, but not functional change. By moving all of the
TargetRecip functionality into TargetLowering, we can remove all of the reciprocal estimate
state, shield the callers from the string format implementation, and simplify/localize the
logic needed for a target to enable this.
If a function has a "reciprocal-estimates" attribute, those settings may override the target's
default reciprocal preferences for whatever operation and data type we're trying to optimize.
If there's no attribute string or specific setting for the op/type pair, just use the target
default settings.
As noted earlier, a better solution would be to move the reciprocal estimate settings to IR
instructions and SDNodes rather than function attributes, but that's a multi-step job that
requires infrastructure improvements. I intend to work on that, but it's not clear how long
it will take to get all the pieces in place.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25440
llvm-svn: 284746
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(and x, cst2)
We already supported scalar constant / splatted constant vector - now accepts any (non opaque) constant scalar / vector
llvm-svn: 284717
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 284616
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
-> (add (shl x, c2), c1 << c2)
We already supported scalar constant / splatted constant vector - now accepts any (non opaque) constant scalar / vector
llvm-svn: 284613
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
-> (and x, (shl -1, c1))
We already supported scalar constant / splatted constant vector - now accepts any (non opaque) constant scalar / vector
llvm-svn: 284608
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
-> (mul x, c1 << c2)
We already supported scalar constant / splatted constant vector - now accepts any (non opaque) constant scalar / vector
llvm-svn: 284607
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This will get the same ConstantSDNode scalar or vector splat value as the current separate dyn_cast<ConstantSDNode> / isVector() approach.
llvm-svn: 284578
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
non-opaque constant or constant vector
llvm-svn: 284574
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There's something wrong with the StringRef usage while parsing the attribute string.
llvm-svn: 284513
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
functionality to TargetLowering
This is a follow-up to D24816 - where we changed reciprocal estimates to be function attributes
rather than TargetOptions.
This patch is intended to be a structural, but not functional change. By moving all of the
TargetRecip functionality into TargetLowering, we can remove all of the reciprocal estimate
state, shield the callers from the string format implementation, and simplify/localize the
logic needed for a target to enable this.
If a function has a "reciprocal-estimates" attribute, those settings may override the target's
default reciprocal preferences for whatever operation and data type we're trying to optimize.
If there's no attribute string or specific setting for the op/type pair, just use the target
default settings.
As noted earlier, a better solution would be to move the reciprocal estimate settings to IR
instructions and SDNodes rather than function attributes, but that's a multi-step job that
requires infrastructure improvements. I intend to work on that, but it's not clear how long
it will take to get all the pieces in place.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25440
llvm-svn: 284495
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
>>u (log2(pow2)+y)
llvm-svn: 284491
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 284478
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As noted in:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D25685
This is the next-to-smallest step needed to enable the ComputeNumSignBits fix in that patch.
In a minor attempt to keep some structure, we're pulling the FP helper over along with its
integer sibling, but clearly we can and should do more refactoring of the similar helper
functions in DAGCombiner and SelectionDAG to simplify and not duplicate functionality.
llvm-svn: 284421
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This came up as part of:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D25485
Note that the vector case is missed because ComputeNumSignBits() is deficient for vectors.
llvm-svn: 284395
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Eli noted this potential bug in the post-commit thread for:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL284239
...but I'm not sure how to trigger it, so there's no test case yet.
llvm-svn: 284268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The same folds exist in InstCombine already.
This came up as part of:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D25485
llvm-svn: 284239
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Extracted from D25313, as suggested by Justin Bogner.
llvm-svn: 284220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
vectors are less than half of the output vector size.
This will be needed by a future commit to support sign/zero extending from v8i8 to v8i64 which requires a sign/zero_extend_vector_inreg to be created which requires v8i8 to be concatenated upto v64i8 and goes through this code.
llvm-svn: 284204
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 284170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
UseAA is enabled."
This reverts commit r284151 which appears to be triggering a LTO
failures on Hexagon
llvm-svn: 284157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
enabled.
Retrying after upstream changes.
Simplify Consecutive Merge Store Candidate Search
Now that address aliasing is much less conservative, push through
simplified store merging search which only checks for parallel stores
through the chain subgraph. This is cleaner as the separation of
non-interfering loads/stores from the store-merging logic.
Whem merging stores, search up the chain through a single load, and
finds all possible stores by looking down from through a load and a
TokenFactor to all stores visited. This improves the quality of the
output SelectionDAG and generally the output CodeGen (with some
exceptions).
Additional Minor Changes:
1. Finishes removing unused AliasLoad code
2. Unifies the the chain aggregation in the merged stores across
code paths
3. Re-add the Store node to the worklist after calling
SimplifyDemandedBits.
4. Increase GatherAllAliasesMaxDepth from 6 to 18. That number is
arbitrary, but seemed sufficient to not cause regressions in
tests.
This finishes the change Matt Arsenault started in r246307 and
jyknight's original patch.
Many tests required some changes as memory operations are now
reorderable. Some tests relying on the order were changed to use
volatile memory operations
Noteworthy tests:
CodeGen/AArch64/argument-blocks.ll -
It's not entirely clear what the test_varargs_stackalign test is
supposed to be asserting, but the new code looks right.
CodeGen/AArch64/arm64-memset-inline.lli -
CodeGen/AArch64/arm64-stur.ll -
CodeGen/ARM/memset-inline.ll -
The backend now generates *worse* code due to store merging
succeeding, as we do do a 16-byte constant-zero store efficiently.
CodeGen/AArch64/merge-store.ll -
Improved, but there still seems to be an extraneous vector insert
from an element to itself?
CodeGen/PowerPC/ppc64-align-long-double.ll -
Worse code emitted in this case, due to the improved store->load
forwarding.
CodeGen/X86/dag-merge-fast-accesses.ll -
CodeGen/X86/MergeConsecutiveStores.ll -
CodeGen/X86/stores-merging.ll -
CodeGen/Mips/load-store-left-right.ll -
Restored correct merging of non-aligned stores
CodeGen/AMDGPU/promote-alloca-stored-pointer-value.ll -
Improved. Correctly merges buffer_store_dword calls
CodeGen/AMDGPU/si-triv-disjoint-mem-access.ll -
Improved. Sidesteps loading a stored value and
merges two stores
CodeGen/X86/pr18023.ll -
This test has been removed, as it was asserting incorrect
behavior. Non-volatile stores *CAN* be moved past volatile loads,
and now are.
CodeGen/X86/vector-idiv.ll -
CodeGen/X86/vector-lzcnt-128.ll -
It's basically impossible to tell what these tests are actually
testing. But, looks like the code got better due to the memory
operations being recognized as non-aliasing.
CodeGen/X86/win32-eh.ll -
Both loads of the securitycookie are now merged.
CodeGen/AMDGPU/vgpr-spill-emergency-stack-slot-compute.ll -
This test appears to work but no longer exhibits the spill behavior.
Reviewers: arsenm, hfinkel, tstellarAMD, jyknight, nhaehnle
Subscribers: wdng, nhaehnle, nemanjai, arsenm, weimingz, niravd, RKSimon, aemerson, qcolombet, dsanders, resistor, tstellarAMD, t.p.northover, spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D14834
llvm-svn: 284151
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Y) style combines
llvm-svn: 284122
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 284117
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Improves commutation potential
llvm-svn: 284113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add a number of helper functions to match scalar or vector equivalent constant/splat values to allow most of the combine patterns to be used by vectors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25374
llvm-svn: 284015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
disabled
This combiner breaks debug experience and should not be run when optimizations are disabled.
For example:
int main() {
int j = 0;
j += 2;
if (j == 2)
return 0;
return 5;
}
When debugging this code compiled in /O0, it should be valid to break at line "j+=2;" and edit the value of j. It should change the return value of the function.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D19268
llvm-svn: 284014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes a crash in the build_vector -> vector_shuffle combine
when the first vector input is twice as wide as the output,
and the second input vector is even wider.
llvm-svn: 283953
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This enhances the fold added with:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL283900
llvm-svn: 283905
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The non-obvious motivation for adding this fold (which already happens in InstCombine)
is that we want to canonicalize IR towards select instructions and canonicalize DAG
nodes towards boolean math. So we need to recreate some folds in the DAG to handle that
change in direction.
An interesting implementation difference for cases like this is that InstCombine
generally works top-down while the DAG goes bottom-up. That means we need to detect
different patterns. In this case, the SimplifyDemandedBits fold prevents us from
performing a zext to sext fold that would then be recognized as a negation of a sext.
llvm-svn: 283900
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 283885
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 283884
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 283878
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Rename variables, simplify logic.
Not clear yet why we don't handle a target with ZeroOrNegativeOneBooleanContent too.
llvm-svn: 283613
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We're missing at least 3 other similar folds based on what we have in InstCombine.
llvm-svn: 283596
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24435
llvm-svn: 283505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This generalizes the build_vector -> vector_shuffle combine to support any
number of inputs. The idea is to create a binary tree of shuffles, where
the first layer performs pairwise shuffles of the input vectors placing each
input element into the correct lane, and the rest of the tree blends these
shuffles together.
This doesn't try to be smart and create any sort of "optimal" shuffles.
The assumption is that even a "poor" shuffle sequence is better than extracting
and inserting the elements one by one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24683
llvm-svn: 283480
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 283115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
UseAA is enabled."
This reverts commit r282600 due to test failues with MCJIT
llvm-svn: 282604
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
enabled.
Simplify Consecutive Merge Store Candidate Search
Now that address aliasing is much less conservative, push through
simplified store merging search which only checks for parallel stores
through the chain subgraph. This is cleaner as the separation of
non-interfering loads/stores from the store-merging logic.
Whem merging stores, search up the chain through a single load, and
finds all possible stores by looking down from through a load and a
TokenFactor to all stores visited. This improves the quality of the
output SelectionDAG and generally the output CodeGen (with some
exceptions).
Additional Minor Changes:
1. Finishes removing unused AliasLoad code
2. Unifies the the chain aggregation in the merged stores across
code paths
3. Re-add the Store node to the worklist after calling
SimplifyDemandedBits.
4. Increase GatherAllAliasesMaxDepth from 6 to 18. That number is
arbitrary, but seemed sufficient to not cause regressions in
tests.
This finishes the change Matt Arsenault started in r246307 and
jyknight's original patch.
Many tests required some changes as memory operations are now
reorderable. Some tests relying on the order were changed to use
volatile memory operations
Noteworthy tests:
CodeGen/AArch64/argument-blocks.ll -
It's not entirely clear what the test_varargs_stackalign test is
supposed to be asserting, but the new code looks right.
CodeGen/AArch64/arm64-memset-inline.lli -
CodeGen/AArch64/arm64-stur.ll -
CodeGen/ARM/memset-inline.ll -
The backend now generates *worse* code due to store merging
succeeding, as we do do a 16-byte constant-zero store efficiently.
CodeGen/AArch64/merge-store.ll -
Improved, but there still seems to be an extraneous vector insert
from an element to itself?
CodeGen/PowerPC/ppc64-align-long-double.ll -
Worse code emitted in this case, due to the improved store->load
forwarding.
CodeGen/X86/dag-merge-fast-accesses.ll -
CodeGen/X86/MergeConsecutiveStores.ll -
CodeGen/X86/stores-merging.ll -
CodeGen/Mips/load-store-left-right.ll -
Restored correct merging of non-aligned stores
CodeGen/AMDGPU/promote-alloca-stored-pointer-value.ll -
Improved. Correctly merges buffer_store_dword calls
CodeGen/AMDGPU/si-triv-disjoint-mem-access.ll -
Improved. Sidesteps loading a stored value and merges two stores
CodeGen/X86/pr18023.ll -
This test has been removed, as it was asserting incorrect
behavior. Non-volatile stores *CAN* be moved past volatile loads,
and now are.
CodeGen/X86/vector-idiv.ll -
CodeGen/X86/vector-lzcnt-128.ll -
It's basically impossible to tell what these tests are actually
testing. But, looks like the code got better due to the memory
operations being recognized as non-aliasing.
CodeGen/X86/win32-eh.ll -
Both loads of the securitycookie are now merged.
CodeGen/AMDGPU/vgpr-spill-emergency-stack-slot-compute.ll -
This test appears to work but no longer exhibits the spill
behavior.
Reviewers: arsenm, hfinkel, tstellarAMD, nhaehnle, jyknight
Subscribers: wdng, nhaehnle, nemanjai, arsenm, weimingz, niravd, RKSimon, aemerson, qcolombet, resistor, tstellarAMD, t.p.northover, spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D14834
llvm-svn: 282600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This check currently doesn't seem to do anything useful on any in-tree target:
On non-x86, it always evaluates to false, so we never hit the code path that
creates the shuffle with zero.
On x86, it just forwards to isShuffleMaskLegal(), which is a reasonable thing to
query in general, but doesn't make sense if only restricted to zero blends.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24625
llvm-svn: 282567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It is a trivial change which could make the testcase easier to be reused
for the store splitting in CodeGenPrepare.
llvm-svn: 281846
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 281493
|