summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/llvm/lib/CodeGen/GlobalISel/CallLowering.cpp
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Move tail call disabling code to target independent codeReid Kleckner2020-01-031-1/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When the "disable-tail-calls" attribute was added, checks were added for it in various backends. Now this code has proliferated, and it is something the target is responsible for checking. Move that responsibility back to the ISels (fast, global, and SD). There's no major functionality change, except for targets that never implemented this check. This LLVM attribute was originally added in d9699bc7bdf0362173fcd256690f61a4d47429c2 (2015). Reviewers: echristo, MaskRay Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72118
* [Alignment][NFC] TargetCallingConv::setByValAlignGuillaume Chatelet2019-10-211-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type. See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790 Reviewers: courbet Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69248 llvm-svn: 375410
* [Alignment][NFC] TargetCallingConv::setOrigAlign and ↵Guillaume Chatelet2019-10-211-3/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | TargetLowering::getABIAlignmentForCallingConv Summary: This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type. See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790 Reviewers: courbet Subscribers: sdardis, hiraditya, jrtc27, atanasyan, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69243 llvm-svn: 375407
* [GISel][CallLowering] Enable vector support in argument loweringQuentin Colombet2019-10-111-4/+2
| | | | | | | | | | The exciting code is actually already enough to handle the splitting of vector arguments but we were lacking a test case. This commit adds a test case for vector argument lowering involving splitting and enable the related support in call lowering. llvm-svn: 374589
* [AArch64][GlobalISel] Choose CCAssignFns per-argument for tail call loweringJessica Paquette2019-09-251-6/+12
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When checking for tail call eligibility, we should use the correct CCAssignFn for each argument, rather than just checking if the caller/callee is varargs or not. This is important for tail call lowering with varargs. If we don't check it, then basically any varargs callee with parameters cannot be tail called on Darwin, for one thing. If the parameters are all guaranteed to be in registers, this should be entirely safe. On top of that, not checking for this could potentially make it so that we have the wrong stack offsets when checking for tail call eligibility. Also refactor some of the stuff for CCAssignFnForCall and pull it out into a helper function. Update call-translator-tail-call.ll to show that we can now correctly tail call on Darwin. Also add two extra tail call checks. The first verifies that we still respect the caller's stack size, and the second verifies that we still don't tail call when a varargs function has a memory argument. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67939 llvm-svn: 372897
* [AArch64][GlobalISel] Support sibling calls with outgoing argumentsJessica Paquette2019-09-121-3/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This adds support for lowering sibling calls with outgoing arguments. e.g ``` define void @foo(i32 %a) ``` Support is ported from AArch64ISelLowering's `isEligibleForTailCallOptimization`. The only thing that is missing is a full port of `TargetLowering::parametersInCSRMatch`. So, if we're using swiftself, we'll never tail call. - Rename `analyzeCallResult` to `analyzeArgInfo`, since the function is now used for both outgoing and incoming arguments - Teach `OutgoingArgHandler` about tail calls. Tail calls use frame indices for stack arguments. - Teach `lowerFormalArguments` to set the bytes in the caller's stack argument area. This is used later to check if the tail call's parameters will fit on the caller's stack. - Add `areCalleeOutgoingArgsTailCallable` to perform the eligibility check on the callee's outgoing arguments. For testing: - Update call-translator-tail-call to verify that we can now tail call with outgoing arguments, use G_FRAME_INDEX for stack arguments, and respect the size of the caller's stack - Remove GISel-specific check lines from speculation-hardening.ll, since GISel now tail calls like the other selectors - Add a GISel test line to tailcall-string-rvo.ll since we can tail call in that test now - Add a GISel test line to tailcall_misched_graph.ll since we tail call there now. Add specific check lines for GISel, since the debug output from the machine-scheduler differs with GlobalISel. The dependency still holds, but the output comes out in a different order. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67471 llvm-svn: 371780
* [AArch64][GlobalISel] Fall back on attempts to allocate split types on the ↵Amara Emerson2019-09-111-6/+14
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | stack. First we were asserting that the ValNo of a VA was the wrong value. It doesn't actually make a difference for us in CallLowering but fix that anyway to silence the assert. The bigger issue was that after fixing the assert we were generating invalid MIR because the merging/unmerging of values split across multiple registers wasn't also implemented for memory locs. This happens when we run out of registers and have to pass the split types like i128 -> i64 x 2 on the stack. This is do-able, but for now just fall back. llvm-svn: 371693
* [AArch64][GlobalISel] Support sibling calls with mismatched calling conventionsJessica Paquette2019-09-101-0/+69
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Add support for sibcalling calls whose calling convention differs from the caller's. - Port over `CCState::resultsCombatible` from CallingConvLower.cpp into CallLowering. This is used to verify that the way the caller and callee CC handle incoming arguments matches up. - Add `CallLowering::analyzeCallResult`. This is basically a port of `CCState::AnalyzeCallResult`, but using `ArgInfo` rather than `ISD::InputArg`. - Add `AArch64CallLowering::doCallerAndCalleePassArgsTheSameWay`. This checks that the calling conventions are compatible, and that the caller and callee preserve the same registers. For testing: - Update call-translator-tail-call.ll to show that we can now handle this. - Add a GISel line to tailcall-ccmismatch.ll to show that we will not tail call when the regmasks don't line up. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67361 llvm-svn: 371570
* Recommit "[AArch64][GlobalISel] Teach AArch64CallLowering to handle basic ↵Jessica Paquette2019-09-051-1/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | sibling calls" Recommit basic sibling call lowering (https://reviews.llvm.org/D67189) The issue was that if you have a return type other than void, call lowering will emit COPYs to get the return value after the call. Disallow sibling calls other than ones that return void for now. Also proactively disable swifterror tail calls for now, since there's a similar issue with COPYs there. Update call-translator-tail-call.ll to include test cases for each of these things. llvm-svn: 371114
* Revert rL370996 from llvm/trunk: [AArch64][GlobalISel] Teach ↵Simon Pilgrim2019-09-051-3/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | AArch64CallLowering to handle basic sibling calls This adds support for basic sibling call lowering in AArch64. The intent here is to only handle tail calls which do not change the ABI (hence, sibling calls.) At this point, it is very restricted. It does not handle - Vararg calls. - Calls with outgoing arguments. - Calls whose calling conventions differ from the caller's calling convention. - Tail/sibling calls with BTI enabled. This patch adds - `AArch64CallLowering::isEligibleForTailCallOptimization`, which is equivalent to the same function in AArch64ISelLowering.cpp (albeit with the restrictions above.) - `mayTailCallThisCC` and `canGuaranteeTCO`, which are identical to those in AArch64ISelLowering.cpp. - `getCallOpcode`, which is exactly what it sounds like. Tail/sibling calls are lowered by checking if they pass target-independent tail call positioning checks, and checking if they satisfy `isEligibleForTailCallOptimization`. If they do, then a tail call instruction is emitted instead of a normal call. If we have a sibling call (which is always the case in this patch), then we do not emit any stack adjustment operations. When we go to lower a return, we check if we've already emitted a tail call. If so, then we skip the return lowering. For testing, this patch - Adds call-translator-tail-call.ll to test which tail calls we currently lower, which ones we don't, and which ones we shouldn't. - Updates branch-target-enforcement-indirect-calls.ll to show that we fall back as expected. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67189 ........ This fails on EXPENSIVE_CHECKS builds due to a -verify-machineinstrs test failure in CodeGen/AArch64/dllimport.ll llvm-svn: 371051
* [AArch64][GlobalISel] Teach AArch64CallLowering to handle basic sibling callsJessica Paquette2019-09-041-1/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This adds support for basic sibling call lowering in AArch64. The intent here is to only handle tail calls which do not change the ABI (hence, sibling calls.) At this point, it is very restricted. It does not handle - Vararg calls. - Calls with outgoing arguments. - Calls whose calling conventions differ from the caller's calling convention. - Tail/sibling calls with BTI enabled. This patch adds - `AArch64CallLowering::isEligibleForTailCallOptimization`, which is equivalent to the same function in AArch64ISelLowering.cpp (albeit with the restrictions above.) - `mayTailCallThisCC` and `canGuaranteeTCO`, which are identical to those in AArch64ISelLowering.cpp. - `getCallOpcode`, which is exactly what it sounds like. Tail/sibling calls are lowered by checking if they pass target-independent tail call positioning checks, and checking if they satisfy `isEligibleForTailCallOptimization`. If they do, then a tail call instruction is emitted instead of a normal call. If we have a sibling call (which is always the case in this patch), then we do not emit any stack adjustment operations. When we go to lower a return, we check if we've already emitted a tail call. If so, then we skip the return lowering. For testing, this patch - Adds call-translator-tail-call.ll to test which tail calls we currently lower, which ones we don't, and which ones we shouldn't. - Updates branch-target-enforcement-indirect-calls.ll to show that we fall back as expected. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67189 llvm-svn: 370996
* [GlobalISel][CallLowering] Add support for splitting types according to ↵Amara Emerson2019-09-031-27/+140
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | calling conventions. On AArch64, s128 types have to be split into s64 GPRs when passed as arguments. This change adds the generic support in call lowering for dealing with multiple registers, for incoming and outgoing args. Support for splitting for return types not yet implemented. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66180 llvm-svn: 370822
* [AArch64][GlobalISel] Fall back when translating musttail callsJessica Paquette2019-08-281-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | These are currently translated as normal functions calls in AArch64. Until we have proper tail call lowering, we shouldn't translate these. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66842 llvm-svn: 370225
* GlobalISel: pack various parameters for lowerCall into a struct.Tim Northover2019-08-091-11/+11
| | | | | | | | | I've now needed to add an extra parameter to this call twice recently. Not only is the signature getting extremely unwieldy, but just updating all of the callsites and implementations is a pain. Putting the parameters in a struct sidesteps both issues. llvm-svn: 368408
* [GlobalISel][CallLowering] Rename isArgumentHandler() -> ↵Amara Emerson2019-08-051-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | isIncomingArgumentHandler() Previous name and comment incorrectly implied it was just for formal arg handlers, which is not true. llvm-svn: 367945
* GlobalISel: support swiftself attributeTim Northover2019-08-021-3/+0
| | | | llvm-svn: 367683
* [GISel] Pass MD_callees metadata down in call lowering.Mark Lacey2019-07-311-1/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: This will make it possible to improve IPRA by taking into account register usage in indirect calls. NFC yet; this is just laying the groundwork to start building up patches to take advantage of the information for improved register allocation. Reviewers: aditya_nandakumar, volkan, qcolombet, arsenm, rovka, aemerson, paquette Subscribers: sdardis, wdng, javed.absar, hiraditya, jrtc27, atanasyan, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65488 llvm-svn: 367476
* GlobalISel: Add overload of handleAssignments with CCStateMatt Arsenault2019-07-161-2/+11
| | | | | | | | | | | AMDGPU needs to allocate special argument registers separately from the user function argument list, so needs direct control over the CCState. The ArgLocs argument is only really necessary because CCState doesn't allow access to it. llvm-svn: 366279
* GlobalISel: Use RegisterMatt Arsenault2019-07-111-5/+5
| | | | llvm-svn: 365780
* [GlobalISel] Accept multiple vregs for lowerCall's argsDiana Picus2019-06-271-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Change the interface of CallLowering::lowerCall to accept several virtual registers for each argument, instead of just one. This is a follow-up to D46018. CallLowering::lowerReturn was similarly refactored in D49660 and lowerFormalArguments in D63549. With this change, we no longer pack the virtual registers generated for aggregates into one big lump before delegating to the target. Therefore, the target can decide itself whether it wants to handle them as separate pieces or use one big register. ARM and AArch64 have been updated to use the passed in virtual registers directly, which means we no longer need to generate so many merge/extract instructions. NFCI for AMDGPU, Mips and X86. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63551 llvm-svn: 364512
* [GlobalISel] Accept multiple vregs for lowerCall's resultDiana Picus2019-06-271-2/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Change the interface of CallLowering::lowerCall to accept several virtual registers for the call result, instead of just one. This is a follow-up to D46018. CallLowering::lowerReturn was similarly refactored in D49660 and lowerFormalArguments in D63549. With this change, we no longer pack the virtual registers generated for aggregates into one big lump before delegating to the target. Therefore, the target can decide itself whether it wants to handle them as separate pieces or use one big register. ARM and AArch64 have been updated to use the passed in virtual registers directly, which means we no longer need to generate so many merge/extract instructions. NFCI for AMDGPU, Mips and X86. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63550 llvm-svn: 364511
* [GlobalISel] Accept multiple vregs in lowerFormalArgsDiana Picus2019-06-271-0/+42
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Change the interface of CallLowering::lowerFormalArguments to accept several virtual registers for each formal argument, instead of just one. This is a follow-up to D46018. CallLowering::lowerReturn was similarly refactored in D49660. lowerCall will be refactored in the same way in follow-up patches. With this change, we forward the virtual registers generated for aggregates to CallLowering. Therefore, the target can decide itself whether it wants to handle them as separate pieces or use one big register. We also copy the pack/unpackRegs helpers to CallLowering to facilitate this. ARM and AArch64 have been updated to use the passed in virtual registers directly, which means we no longer need to generate so many merge/extract instructions. AArch64 seems to have had a bug when lowering e.g. [1 x i8*], which was put into a s64 instead of a p0. Added a test-case which illustrates the problem more clearly (it crashes without this patch) and fixed the existing test-case to expect p0. AMDGPU has been updated to unpack into the virtual registers for kernels. I think the other code paths fall back for aggregates, so this should be NFC. Mips doesn't support aggregates yet, so it's also NFC. x86 seems to have code for dealing with aggregates, but I couldn't find the tests for it, so I just added a fallback to DAGISel if we get more than one virtual register for an argument. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63549 llvm-svn: 364510
* [GlobalISel] Allow multiple VRegs in ArgInfo. NFCDiana Picus2019-06-271-4/+10
| | | | | | | | | | | Allow CallLowering::ArgInfo to contain more than one virtual register. This is useful when passes split aggregates into several virtual registers, but need to also provide information about the original type to the call lowering. Used in follow-up patches. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63548 llvm-svn: 364509
* GlobalISel: Remove unsigned variant of SrcOpMatt Arsenault2019-06-241-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | Force using Register. One downside is the generated register enums require explicit conversion. llvm-svn: 364194
* CodeGen: Introduce a class for registersMatt Arsenault2019-06-241-3/+3
| | | | | | | | | Avoids using a plain unsigned for registers throughoug codegen. Doesn't attempt to change every register use, just something a little more than the set needed to build after changing the return type of MachineOperand::getReg(). llvm-svn: 364191
* Reapply: IR: add optional type to 'byval' function parametersTim Northover2019-05-301-1/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When we switch to opaque pointer types we will need some way to describe how many bytes a 'byval' parameter should occupy on the stack. This adds a (for now) optional extra type parameter. If present, the type must match the pointee type of the argument. The original commit did not remap byval types when linking modules, which broke LTO. This version fixes that. Note to front-end maintainers: if this causes test failures, it's probably because the "byval" attribute is printed after attributes without any parameter after this change. llvm-svn: 362128
* Revert "IR: add optional type to 'byval' function parameters"Tim Northover2019-05-291-4/+1
| | | | | | | The IRLinker doesn't delve into the new byval attribute when mapping types, and this breaks LTO. llvm-svn: 362029
* IR: add optional type to 'byval' function parametersTim Northover2019-05-291-1/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | When we switch to opaque pointer types we will need some way to describe how many bytes a 'byval' parameter should occupy on the stack. This adds a (for now) optional extra type parameter. If present, the type must match the pointee type of the argument. Note to front-end maintainers: if this causes test failures, it's probably because the "byval" attribute is printed after attributes without any parameter after this change. llvm-svn: 362012
* GlobalISel: support swifterror attribute on AArch64.Tim Northover2019-05-241-6/+8
| | | | | | | | swifterror marks an argument as a register pretending to be a pointer, so we need a guaranteed mem2reg-like analysis of its uses. Fortunately most of the infrastructure can be reused from the DAG world. llvm-svn: 361608
* [GlobalISel] Fix a crash when handling an invalid MVT during call lowering.Amara Emerson2019-04-121-1/+1
| | | | | | | | This crash was introduced in r358032 as we try to construct an EVT from an MVT in order to find the register type for the calling conv. Fall back instead of trying to do this with an invalid MVT coming from i256. llvm-svn: 358314
* [GlobalISel][AArch64] Allow CallLowering to handle types which are normallyAmara Emerson2019-04-091-8/+46
| | | | | | | | | | | required to be passed as different register types. E.g. <2 x i16> may need to be passed as a larger <2 x i32> type, so formal arg lowering needs to be able truncate it back. Likewise, when dealing with returns of these types, they need to be widened in the appropriate way back. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60425 llvm-svn: 358032
* Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepoChandler Carruth2019-01-191-4/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | to reflect the new license. We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach. Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and repository. llvm-svn: 351636
* Add vtable anchor to classes.Richard Trieu2018-12-291-0/+4
| | | | llvm-svn: 350142
* [GISel]: Remove an incorrect assert in CallLoweringAditya Nandakumar2018-09-281-1/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | https://reviews.llvm.org/D51147 Asserting if any extend of vectors should be up to the target's legalizer/target specific code not in CallLowering. reviewed by : dsanders. llvm-svn: 343325
* [GlobalISel] Fall back to SDISel for swifterror/swiftself attributes.Amara Emerson2018-07-261-0/+3
| | | | | | We don't currently support these, fall back until we do. llvm-svn: 337994
* MachineFunction: Return reference from getFunction(); NFCMatthias Braun2017-12-151-1/+1
| | | | | | The Function can never be nullptr so we can return a reference. llvm-svn: 320884
* Fix a bunch more layering of CodeGen headers that are in TargetDavid Blaikie2017-11-171-1/+1
| | | | | | | | All these headers already depend on CodeGen headers so moving them into CodeGen fixes the layering (since CodeGen depends on Target, not the other way around). llvm-svn: 318490
* [GISel]: Fix generation of illegal COPYs during CallLoweringAditya Nandakumar2017-10-091-3/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | We end up creating COPY's that are either truncating/extending and this should be illegal. https://reviews.llvm.org/D37640 Patch for X86 and ARM by igorb, rovka llvm-svn: 315240
* [IR] Abstract away ArgNo+1 attribute indexing as much as possibleReid Kleckner2017-05-031-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: Do three things to help with that: - Add AttributeList::FirstArgIndex, which is an enumerator currently set to 1. It allows us to change the indexing scheme with fewer changes. - Add addParamAttr/removeParamAttr. This just shortens addAttribute call sites that would otherwise need to spell out FirstArgIndex. - Remove some attribute-specific getters and setters from Function that take attribute list indices. Most of these were only used from BuildLibCalls, and doesNotAlias was only used to test or set if the return value is malloc-like. I'm happy to split the patch, but I think they are probably easier to review when taken together. This patch should be NFC, but it sets the stage to change the indexing scheme to this, which is more convenient when indexing into an array: 0: func attrs 1: retattrs 2...: arg attrs Reviewers: chandlerc, pete, javed.absar Subscribers: david2050, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32811 llvm-svn: 302060
* Re-land r301697 "[IR] Make add/remove Attributes use AttrBuilder instead of ↵Reid Kleckner2017-05-021-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | AttributeList" This time, I fixed, built, and tested clang. This reverts r301712. llvm-svn: 301981
* Revert r301697 "[IR] Make add/remove Attributes use AttrBuilder instead of ↵Hans Wennborg2017-04-281-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | AttributeList" This broke the Clang build. (Clang-side patch missing?) Original commit message: > [IR] Make add/remove Attributes use AttrBuilder instead of > AttributeList > > This change cleans up call sites and avoids creating temporary > AttributeList objects. > > NFC llvm-svn: 301712
* [IR] Make add/remove Attributes use AttrBuilder instead of AttributeListReid Kleckner2017-04-281-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | This change cleans up call sites and avoids creating temporary AttributeList objects. NFC llvm-svn: 301697
* Make getParamAlignment use argument numbersReid Kleckner2017-04-281-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The method is called "get *Param* Alignment", and is only used for return values exactly once, so it should take argument indices, not attribute indices. Avoids confusing code like: IsSwiftError = CS->paramHasAttr(ArgIdx, Attribute::SwiftError); Alignment = CS->getParamAlignment(ArgIdx + 1); Add getRetAlignment to handle the one case in Value.cpp that wants the return value alignment. This is a potentially breaking change for out-of-tree backends that do their own call lowering. llvm-svn: 301682
* Rename AttributeSet to AttributeListReid Kleckner2017-03-211-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: This class is a list of AttributeSetNodes corresponding the function prototype of a call or function declaration. This class used to be called ParamAttrListPtr, then AttrListPtr, then AttributeSet. It is typically accessed by parameter and return value index, so "AttributeList" seems like a more intuitive name. Rename AttributeSetImpl to AttributeListImpl to follow suit. It's useful to rename this class so that we can rename AttributeSetNode to AttributeSet later. AttributeSet is the set of attributes that apply to a single function, argument, or return value. Reviewers: sanjoy, javed.absar, chandlerc, pete Reviewed By: pete Subscribers: pete, jholewinski, arsenm, dschuff, mehdi_amini, jfb, nhaehnle, sbc100, void, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31102 llvm-svn: 298393
* [GlobalISel] Use the correct calling conv for callsDiana Picus2017-03-201-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | This commit adds a parameter that lets us pass in the calling convention of the call to CallLowering::lowerCall. This allows us to handle situations where the calling convetion of the callee is different from that of the caller. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31039 llvm-svn: 298254
* [GlobalISel] Use ImmutableCallSite instead of templates. NFC.Ahmed Bougacha2017-03-101-19/+8
| | | | | | ImmutableCallSite abstracts away CallInst and InvokeInst. Use it! llvm-svn: 297426
* [ARM] GlobalISel: Lower double precision FP argsDiana Picus2017-02-161-2/+10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | For the hard float calling convention, we just use the D registers. For the soft-fp calling convention, we use the R registers and move values to/from the D registers by means of G_SEQUENCE/G_EXTRACT. While doing so, we make sure to honor the endianness of the target, since the CCAssignFn doesn't do that for us. For pure soft float targets, we still bail out because we don't support the libcalls yet. llvm-svn: 295295
* GlobalISel: merge invoke and call translation paths.Tim Northover2017-01-311-1/+12
| | | | | | | | Well, sort of. But the lower-level code that invoke used to be using completely botched the handling of varargs functions, which hopefully won't be possible if they're using the same code. llvm-svn: 293670
* GlobalISel: correctly handle varargsTim Northover2017-01-171-3/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | Some platforms (notably iOS) use a different calling convention for unnamed vs named parameters in varargs functions, so we need to keep track of this information when translating calls. Since not many platforms are involved, the guts of the special handling is in the ValueHandler class (with a generic implementation that should work for most targets). llvm-svn: 292283
* [GlobalISel] Move extendRegister where it belongs. NFCIDiana Picus2016-12-131-0/+29
| | | | | | Apparently I missed this one when I moved ValueHandler back in r288658. Sorry! llvm-svn: 289528
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud