| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This adds a `-max-configs-per-opcode` option to limit the number of
configs per opcode.
Reviewers: gchatelet
Subscribers: tschuett, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68642
llvm-svn: 374054
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: Removed excess new lines from documentations. As far as I can tell, it seems as though restructured text is agnostic to new lines, the use of new lines was inconsistent and had no effect on how the files were being displayed.
Reviewers: jhenderson, rupprecht, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: jhenderson
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63971
llvm-svn: 365105
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Sphinx allows for definitions of command-line options using
`.. option <name>` and references to those options via `:option:<name>`.
However, it looks like there is no scoping of these options by default,
meaning that links can end up pointing to incorrect documents. See for
example the llvm-mca document, which contains references to -o that,
prior to this patch, pointed to a different document. What's worse is
that these links appear to be non-deterministic in which one is picked
(on my machine, some references end up pointing to opt, whereas on the
live docs, they point to llvm-dwarfdump, for example).
The fix is to add the .. program <name> tag. This essentially namespaces
the options (definitions and references) to the named program, ensuring
that the links are kept correct.
Reviwed by: andreadb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63873
llvm-svn: 364538
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: llvm-commits, bdb
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60317
llvm-svn: 357769
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This is an alternative to D59539.
Let's suppose we have measured 4 different opcodes, and got: `0.5`, `1.0`, `1.5`, `2.0`.
Let's suppose we are using `-analysis-clustering-epsilon=0.5`.
By default now we will start processing the `0.5` point, find that `1.0` is it's neighbor, add them to a new cluster.
Then we will notice that `1.5` is a neighbor of `1.0` and add it to that same cluster.
Then we will notice that `2.0` is a neighbor of `1.5` and add it to that same cluster.
So all these points ended up in the same cluster.
This may or may not be a correct implementation of dbscan clustering algorithm.
But this is rather horribly broken for the reasons of comparing the clusters with the LLVM sched data.
Let's suppose all those opcodes are currently in the same sched cluster.
If i specify `-analysis-inconsistency-epsilon=0.5`, then no matter
the LLVM values this cluster will **never** match the LLVM values,
and thus this cluster will **always** be displayed as inconsistent.
The solution is obviously to split off some of these opcodes into different sched cluster.
But how do i do that? Out of 4 opcodes displayed in the inconsistency report,
which ones are the "bad ones"? Which ones are the most different from the checked-in data?
I'd need to go in to the `.yaml` and look it up manually.
The trivial solution is to, when creating clusters, don't use the full dbscan algorithm,
but instead "pick some unclustered point, pick all unclustered points that are it's neighbor,
put them all into a new cluster, repeat". And just so as it happens, we can arrive
at that algorithm by not performing the "add neighbors of a neighbor to the cluster" step.
But that won't work well once we teach analyze mode to operate in on-1D mode
(i.e. on more than a single measurement type at a time), because the clustering would
depend on the order of the measurements.
Instead, let's just create a single cluster per opcode, and put all the points of that opcode into said cluster.
And simultaneously check that every point in that cluster is a neighbor of every other point in the cluster,
and if they are not, the cluster (==opcode) is unstable.
This is //yet another// step to bring me closer to being able to continue cleanup of bdver2 sched model..
Fixes [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40880 | PR40880 ]].
Reviewers: courbet, gchatelet
Reviewed By: courbet
Subscribers: tschuett, jdoerfert, RKSimon, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59820
llvm-svn: 357152
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This eps param is used for two distinct things:
* initial point clusterization
* checking clusters against the llvm values
What if one wants to only look at highly different clusters, without changing
the clustering itself? In particular, this helps to weed out noisy measurements
(since the clusterization epsilon is still small, so there is a better chance
that noisy measurements from the same opcode will go into different clusters)
By splitting it into two params it is now possible.
This is nearly-free performance-wise:
Old:
```
$ perf stat -r 25 ./bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-latency-1.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-old.html
no exegesis target for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, using default
Parsed 10099 benchmark points
Printing sched class consistency analysis results to file '/tmp/clusters-old.html'
...
Performance counter stats for './bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-latency-1.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-old.html' (25 runs):
390.01 msec task-clock # 0.998 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.25% )
12 context-switches # 31.735 M/sec ( +- 27.38% )
0 cpu-migrations # 0.000 K/sec
4745 page-faults # 12183.732 M/sec ( +- 0.54% )
1562711900 cycles # 4012303.327 GHz ( +- 0.24% ) (82.90%)
185567822 stalled-cycles-frontend # 11.87% frontend cycles idle ( +- 0.52% ) (83.30%)
392106234 stalled-cycles-backend # 25.09% backend cycles idle ( +- 1.31% ) (33.79%)
1839236666 instructions # 1.18 insn per cycle
# 0.21 stalled cycles per insn ( +- 0.15% ) (50.37%)
407035764 branches # 1045074878.710 M/sec ( +- 0.12% ) (66.80%)
10896459 branch-misses # 2.68% of all branches ( +- 0.17% ) (83.20%)
0.390629 +- 0.000972 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.25% )
```
```
$ perf stat -r 9 ./bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-latency.yml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-old.html
no exegesis target for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, using default
Parsed 50572 benchmark points
Printing sched class consistency analysis results to file '/tmp/clusters-old.html'
...
Performance counter stats for './bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-latency.yml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-old.html' (9 runs):
6803.36 msec task-clock # 0.999 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.96% )
262 context-switches # 38.546 M/sec ( +- 23.06% )
0 cpu-migrations # 0.065 M/sec ( +- 76.03% )
13287 page-faults # 1953.206 M/sec ( +- 0.32% )
27252537904 cycles # 4006024.257 GHz ( +- 0.95% ) (83.31%)
1496314935 stalled-cycles-frontend # 5.49% frontend cycles idle ( +- 0.97% ) (83.32%)
16128404524 stalled-cycles-backend # 59.18% backend cycles idle ( +- 0.30% ) (33.37%)
17611143370 instructions # 0.65 insn per cycle
# 0.92 stalled cycles per insn ( +- 0.05% ) (50.04%)
3894906599 branches # 572537147.437 M/sec ( +- 0.03% ) (66.69%)
116314514 branch-misses # 2.99% of all branches ( +- 0.20% ) (83.35%)
6.8118 +- 0.0689 seconds time elapsed ( +- 1.01%)
```
New:
```
$ perf stat -r 25 ./bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-latency-1.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-new.html
no exegesis target for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, using default
Parsed 10099 benchmark points
Printing sched class consistency analysis results to file '/tmp/clusters-new.html'
...
Performance counter stats for './bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-latency-1.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-new.html' (25 runs):
400.14 msec task-clock # 0.998 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.66% )
12 context-switches # 29.429 M/sec ( +- 25.95% )
0 cpu-migrations # 0.100 M/sec ( +-100.00% )
4714 page-faults # 11796.496 M/sec ( +- 0.55% )
1603131306 cycles # 4011840.105 GHz ( +- 0.66% ) (82.85%)
199538509 stalled-cycles-frontend # 12.45% frontend cycles idle ( +- 2.40% ) (83.10%)
402249109 stalled-cycles-backend # 25.09% backend cycles idle ( +- 1.19% ) (34.05%)
1847783963 instructions # 1.15 insn per cycle
# 0.22 stalled cycles per insn ( +- 0.18% ) (50.64%)
407162722 branches # 1018925730.631 M/sec ( +- 0.12% ) (67.02%)
10932779 branch-misses # 2.69% of all branches ( +- 0.51% ) (83.28%)
0.40077 +- 0.00267 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.67% )
lebedevri@pini-pini:/build/llvm-build-Clang-release$ perf stat -r 9 ./bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-latency.yml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-new.html
no exegesis target for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, using default
Parsed 50572 benchmark points
Printing sched class consistency analysis results to file '/tmp/clusters-new.html'
...
Performance counter stats for './bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-latency.yml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-new.html' (9 runs):
6947.79 msec task-clock # 1.000 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.90% )
217 context-switches # 31.236 M/sec ( +- 36.16% )
1 cpu-migrations # 0.096 M/sec ( +- 50.00% )
13258 page-faults # 1908.389 M/sec ( +- 0.34% )
27830796523 cycles # 4006032.286 GHz ( +- 0.89% ) (83.30%)
1504554006 stalled-cycles-frontend # 5.41% frontend cycles idle ( +- 2.10% ) (83.32%)
16716574843 stalled-cycles-backend # 60.07% backend cycles idle ( +- 0.65% ) (33.38%)
17755545931 instructions # 0.64 insn per cycle
# 0.94 stalled cycles per insn ( +- 0.09% ) (50.04%)
3897255686 branches # 560980426.597 M/sec ( +- 0.06% ) (66.70%)
117045395 branch-misses # 3.00% of all branches ( +- 0.47% ) (83.34%)
6.9507 +- 0.0627 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.90% )
```
I.e. it's +2.6% slowdown for one whole sweep, or +2% for 5 whole sweeps.
Within noise i'd say.
Should help with [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40787 | PR40787 ]].
Reviewers: courbet, gchatelet
Reviewed By: courbet
Subscribers: tschuett, RKSimon, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58476
llvm-svn: 354767
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Given an instruction `Opcode`, we can make benchmarks (measurements) of the
instruction characteristics/performance. Then, to facilitate further analysis
we group the benchmarks with *similar* characteristics into clusters.
Now, this is all not entirely deterministic. Some instructions have variable
characteristics, depending on their arguments. And thus, if we do several
benchmarks of the same instruction `Opcode`, we may end up with *different*
performance characteristics measurements. And when we then do clustering,
these several benchmarks of the same instruction `Opcode` may end up being
clustered into *different* clusters. This is not great for further analysis.
We shall find every `Opcode` with benchmarks not in just one cluster, and move
*all* the benchmarks of said `Opcode` into one new unstable cluster per `Opcode`.
I have solved this by making `ClusterId` a bit field, adding a `IsUnstable` bit,
and introducing `-analysis-display-unstable-clusters` switch to toggle between
displaying stable-only clusters and unstable-only clusters.
The reclusterization is deterministically stable, produces identical reports
between runs. (Or at least that is what i'm seeing, maybe it isn't)
Timings/comparisons:
old (current trunk/head) {F8303582}
```
$ perf stat -r 25 ./bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -analysis-epsilon=0.5 -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-inverse_throughput.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-old.html
no exegesis target for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, using default
Parsed 43970 benchmark points
Printing sched class consistency analysis results to file '/tmp/clusters-old.html'
...
no exegesis target for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, using default
Parsed 43970 benchmark points
Printing sched class consistency analysis results to file '/tmp/clusters-old.html'
Performance counter stats for './bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -analysis-epsilon=0.5 -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-inverse_throughput.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-old.html' (25 runs):
6624.73 msec task-clock # 0.999 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.53% )
172 context-switches # 25.965 M/sec ( +- 29.89% )
0 cpu-migrations # 0.042 M/sec ( +- 56.54% )
31073 page-faults # 4690.754 M/sec ( +- 0.08% )
26538711696 cycles # 4006230.292 GHz ( +- 0.53% ) (83.31%)
2017496807 stalled-cycles-frontend # 7.60% frontend cycles idle ( +- 0.93% ) (83.32%)
13403650062 stalled-cycles-backend # 50.51% backend cycles idle ( +- 0.33% ) (33.37%)
19770706799 instructions # 0.74 insn per cycle
# 0.68 stalled cycles per insn ( +- 0.04% ) (50.04%)
4419821812 branches # 667207369.714 M/sec ( +- 0.03% ) (66.69%)
121741669 branch-misses # 2.75% of all branches ( +- 0.28% ) (83.34%)
6.6283 +- 0.0358 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.54% )
```
patch, with reclustering but without filtering (i.e. outputting all the stable *and* unstable clusters) {F8303586}
```
$ perf stat -r 25 ./bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -analysis-epsilon=0.5 -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-inverse_throughput.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-new-all.html
no exegesis target for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, using default
Parsed 43970 benchmark points
Printing sched class consistency analysis results to file '/tmp/clusters-new-all.html'
...
no exegesis target for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, using default
Parsed 43970 benchmark points
Printing sched class consistency analysis results to file '/tmp/clusters-new-all.html'
Performance counter stats for './bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -analysis-epsilon=0.5 -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-inverse_throughput.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-new-all.html' (25 runs):
6475.29 msec task-clock # 0.999 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.31% )
213 context-switches # 32.952 M/sec ( +- 23.81% )
1 cpu-migrations # 0.130 M/sec ( +- 43.84% )
31287 page-faults # 4832.057 M/sec ( +- 0.08% )
25939086577 cycles # 4006160.279 GHz ( +- 0.31% ) (83.31%)
1958812858 stalled-cycles-frontend # 7.55% frontend cycles idle ( +- 0.68% ) (83.32%)
13218961512 stalled-cycles-backend # 50.96% backend cycles idle ( +- 0.29% ) (33.37%)
19752995402 instructions # 0.76 insn per cycle
# 0.67 stalled cycles per insn ( +- 0.04% ) (50.04%)
4417079244 branches # 682195472.305 M/sec ( +- 0.03% ) (66.70%)
121510065 branch-misses # 2.75% of all branches ( +- 0.19% ) (83.34%)
6.4832 +- 0.0229 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.35% )
```
Funnily, *this* measurement shows that said reclustering actually improved performance.
patch, with reclustering, only the stable clusters {F8303594}
```
$ perf stat -r 25 ./bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -analysis-epsilon=0.5 -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-inverse_throughput.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-new-stable.html
no exegesis target for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, using default
Parsed 43970 benchmark points
Printing sched class consistency analysis results to file '/tmp/clusters-new-stable.html'
...
no exegesis target for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, using default
Parsed 43970 benchmark points
Printing sched class consistency analysis results to file '/tmp/clusters-new-stable.html'
Performance counter stats for './bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -analysis-epsilon=0.5 -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-inverse_throughput.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-new-stable.html' (25 runs):
6387.71 msec task-clock # 0.999 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.13% )
133 context-switches # 20.792 M/sec ( +- 23.39% )
0 cpu-migrations # 0.063 M/sec ( +- 61.24% )
31318 page-faults # 4903.256 M/sec ( +- 0.08% )
25591984967 cycles # 4006786.266 GHz ( +- 0.13% ) (83.31%)
1881234904 stalled-cycles-frontend # 7.35% frontend cycles idle ( +- 0.25% ) (83.33%)
13209749965 stalled-cycles-backend # 51.62% backend cycles idle ( +- 0.16% ) (33.36%)
19767554347 instructions # 0.77 insn per cycle
# 0.67 stalled cycles per insn ( +- 0.04% ) (50.03%)
4417480305 branches # 691618858.046 M/sec ( +- 0.03% ) (66.68%)
118676358 branch-misses # 2.69% of all branches ( +- 0.07% ) (83.33%)
6.3954 +- 0.0118 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.18% )
```
Performance improved even further?! Makes sense i guess, less clusters to print.
patch, with reclustering, only the unstable clusters {F8303601}
```
$ perf stat -r 25 ./bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -analysis-epsilon=0.5 -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-inverse_throughput.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-new-unstable.html -analysis-display-unstable-clusters
no exegesis target for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, using default
Parsed 43970 benchmark points
Printing sched class consistency analysis results to file '/tmp/clusters-new-unstable.html'
...
no exegesis target for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, using default
Parsed 43970 benchmark points
Printing sched class consistency analysis results to file '/tmp/clusters-new-unstable.html'
Performance counter stats for './bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -analysis-epsilon=0.5 -benchmarks-file=/home/lebedevri/PileDriver-Sched/benchmarks-inverse_throughput.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters-new-unstable.html -analysis-display-unstable-clusters' (25 runs):
6124.96 msec task-clock # 1.000 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.20% )
194 context-switches # 31.709 M/sec ( +- 20.46% )
0 cpu-migrations # 0.039 M/sec ( +- 49.77% )
31413 page-faults # 5129.261 M/sec ( +- 0.06% )
24536794267 cycles # 4006425.858 GHz ( +- 0.19% ) (83.31%)
1676085087 stalled-cycles-frontend # 6.83% frontend cycles idle ( +- 0.46% ) (83.32%)
13035595603 stalled-cycles-backend # 53.13% backend cycles idle ( +- 0.16% ) (33.36%)
18260877653 instructions # 0.74 insn per cycle
# 0.71 stalled cycles per insn ( +- 0.05% ) (50.03%)
4112411983 branches # 671484364.603 M/sec ( +- 0.03% ) (66.68%)
114066929 branch-misses # 2.77% of all branches ( +- 0.11% ) (83.32%)
6.1278 +- 0.0121 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.20% )
```
This tells us that the actual `-analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=` outputting only takes ~0.4 sec for 43970 benchmark points (3 whole sweeps)
(Also, wow this is fast, it used to take several minutes originally)
Fixes [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40715 | PR40715 ]].
Reviewers: courbet, gchatelet
Reviewed By: courbet
Subscribers: tschuett, jdoerfert, llvm-commits, RKSimon
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58355
llvm-svn: 354441
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewers: courbet, gchatelet
Reviewed By: courbet, gchatelet
Subscribers: tschuett, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54895
llvm-svn: 354250
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Up until the point i have looked in the source, i didn't even understood that
i can disable 'cluster' output. I have always silenced it via ` &> /dev/null`.
(And hoped it wasn't contributing much of the run time.)
While i expect that it has it's use-cases i never once needed it so far.
If i forget to silence it, console is completely flooded with that output.
How about not expecting users to opt-out of analyses,
but to explicitly specify the analyses that should be performed?
Reviewers: courbet, gchatelet
Reviewed By: courbet
Subscribers: tschuett, RKSimon, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57648
llvm-svn: 353021
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This just uses the latency benchmark runner on the parallel uops snippet
generator.
Fixes PR37698.
Reviewers: gchatelet
Subscribers: tschuett, RKSimon, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57000
llvm-svn: 352632
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
The pfm counters are now in the ExegesisTarget rather than the
MCSchedModel (PR39165).
This also compresses the pfm counter tables (PR37068).
Reviewers: RKSimon, gchatelet
Subscribers: mgrang, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52932
llvm-svn: 345243
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
We try to recover gracefully on instructions that would crash the
program.
This includes some refactoring of runMeasurement() implementations.
Reviewers: gchatelet
Subscribers: tschuett, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53371
llvm-svn: 344695
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 343215
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-exegesis.rst was using invalid indentation for bullet points.
llvm-svn: 342948
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This is a step towards fixing PR38048.
Note that right now the measurements are given per instruction. We'll
need to give measurements a per code snippet and update the analysis (PR38731).
Reviewers: gchatelet
Subscribers: tschuett, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52041
llvm-svn: 342947
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 334976
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: See PR37602.
Reviewers: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits, tschuett
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48267
llvm-svn: 334932
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 333759
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: And update docs.
Reviewers: gchatelet
Subscribers: tschuett, craig.topper, RKSimon, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47254
llvm-svn: 333169
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 332980
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
- Better flag names.
- Fix flag reference in doc.
- Add usage examples in doc.
Fixes PR37497.
Reviewers: gchatelet
Subscribers: llvm-commits, tschuett
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47015
llvm-svn: 332708
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixed to depend on and initialize the native target instead of X86.
llvm-svn: 329169
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Breaks a bunch of bots.
llvm-svn: 329157
|
|
|
Summary:
[llvm-exegesis][RFC] Automatic Measurement of Instruction Latency/Uops
This is the code corresponding to the RFC "llvm-exegesis Automatic Measurement of Instruction Latency/Uops".
The RFC is available on the LLVM mailing lists as well as the following document
for easier reading:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QidaJMJUyQdRrFKD66vE1_N55whe0coQ3h1GpFzz27M/edit?usp=sharing
Subscribers: mgorny, gchatelet, orwant, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44519
llvm-svn: 329156
|
