bcm5719-llvm - Project Ortega BCM5719 LLVM

	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Age	Files	Lines
*	Remove autoconf support	Chris Bieneman	2016-01-26	1	-2/+0
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	Summary: This patch is provided in preparation for removing autoconf on 1/26. The proposal to remove autoconf on 1/26 was discussed on the llvm-dev thread here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-January/093875.html "I felt a great disturbance in the [build system], as if millions of [makefiles] suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced. I fear something [amazing] has happened." - Obi Wan Kenobi Reviewers: chandlerc, grosbach, bob.wilson, tstellarAMD, echristo, whitequark Subscribers: chfast, simoncook, emaste, jholewinski, tberghammer, jfb, danalbert, srhines, arsenm, dschuff, jyknight, dsanders, joker.eph, llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16471 llvm-svn: 258861
*	configure: when performing a compiler feature test for a -Wno-foo flag, attempt	Richard Smith	2013-02-08	1	-1/+1
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	to use -Wfoo instead of -Wno-foo. This works around a bug in some versions of gcc, where it will silently accept an unknown -Wno-foo option, but will generate an error for a compile which uses -Wno-foo if that compile also triggers any warnings. llvm-svn: 174770
*	Enable -Wcovered-switch-default again, but add -Werror to the checks to make	Rafael Espindola	2012-02-28	1	-1/+1
\| \| \| \| \| \|	sure we don't use it with compilers that don't support it. llvm-svn: 151665
*	Add an autoconf test to check for optional compiler flags like	Julien Lerouge	2009-10-26	1	-0/+2
	-Wno-missing-field-initializers or -Wno-variadic-macros. llvm-svn: 85147