| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
These classes describe the details of the process we are about to
launch, and so they are naturally used by the launching code in the Host
module. Previously they were present in Target because that is the most
important (but by far not the only) user of the launching code.
Since the launching code has other customers, must of which do not care
about Targets, it makes sense to move these classes to the Host layer,
next to the launching code.
This move reduces the number of times that Target is included from host
to 8 (it used to be 14).
Reviewers: zturner, clayborg, jingham, davide, teemperor
Subscribers: emaste, mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56602
llvm-svn: 353047
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 331180
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
The issue was that we were parsing the registers into 64-bit integers
and the calling swapByteOrder without regard for the actual size of the
register. This switches the test to use the RegisterValue class which
tracks the register size, and knows how to initialize itself from a
piece of memory (so we don't need to swap byte order ourselves).
Reviewers: eugene, davide
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43376
llvm-svn: 325511
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Right now the test client is not parsing register values correctly,
which is manifesting itself in one test failing on 32-bit architectures
(pr36013). This parses the information from the qRegisterInfo packets
and stores it in the client, which will enable fixing the parsing in a
follow up commit.
I am also adding a new templated SendMessage overload, which enables one
to send a message get a parsed response in a single call.
Reviewers: eugene, davide
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43076
llvm-svn: 324722
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Make sure we propagate environment when starting debugserver with a pre-loaded
inferior. AFAIK, RNBRunLoopLaunchInferior is only called in pre-loaded inferior
scenario, so we can just pick up the debugserver environment instead of trying
to construct an envp from the (empty) context.
This makes debugserver pass an test added for an equivalent lldb-server fix.
Reviewers: jasonmolenda, clayborg
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41352
llvm-svn: 321355
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This makes StopReply class abstract, so that we can represent different
types of stop replies such as StopReplyStop and StopReplyExit (there
should also be a StopReplySignal, but I don't need that right now so I
haven't implemented it yet).
This prepares the ground for a new test I'm writing.
Reviewers: eugene, zturner
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41067
llvm-svn: 320820
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Adding a new test would require one to duplicate a significant part of
the existing test that we have. This attempts to reduce that by moving
some part of that code to the test fixture. The StandardStartupTest
fixture automatically starts up the server and connects it to the
client. I also add a more low-level TestBase fixture, which allows one
to start up the client and server in a custom way (I am going to need
this for the test I am writing).
Reviewers: eugene, zturner
Subscribers: lldb-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41066
llvm-svn: 320809
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The rationale here is that ArchSpec is used throughout the codebase,
including in places which should not depend on the rest of the code in
the Core module.
This commit touches many files, but most of it is just renaming of
#include lines. In a couple of cases, I removed the #include ArchSpec
line altogether, as the file was not using it. In one or two places,
this necessitated adding other #includes like lldb-private-defines.h.
llvm-svn: 318048
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
These tests used to log the error message and return plain bool mainly
because at the time they we written, we did not have a nice way to
assert on llvm::Error values. That is no longer true, so replace this
pattern with a more idiomatic approach.
As a part of this patch, I also move the formatting of
GDBRemoteCommunication::PacketResult values out of the test code, as
that can be useful elsewhere.
Reviewers: zturner, eugene
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39790
llvm-svn: 317795
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This adds support for running the lldb-server test suite (currently consisting
of only one test) against the debugserver. Currently, the choice which binary
to test is based on the host system. This will need to be replaced by something
more elaborate if/when lldb-server starts supporting debugging on darwin.
I need to make a couple of tweaks to the test client to work with debugserver:
- debugserver has different command-line arguments - launching code adjusted to
handle that
- debugserver sends duplicate "medata" fields in the stop reply packet -
adjusted stop-reply parsing code to handle that
- debugserver replies to the k packet instead of just dropping the connection -
stopping code adjusted, although we should probably consider aligning the
behavior of the two stubs in this case
Reviewers: jmajors, beanz
Subscribers: srhines, mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35311
llvm-svn: 316010
|
|
|
Summary:
This is a new C++ test framework based on Google Test, and one working
example test.
The intention is to replace the existing tests in
packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/tools/lldb-server/ with this suite
and use this framework for all new client server tests.
Reviewers: labath, beanz
Reviewed By: labath, beanz
Subscribers: beanz, emaste, zturner, tberghammer, takuto.ikuta, krytarowski, mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32930
Patch by Jason Majors <jmajors@google.com>
llvm-svn: 304793
|
