| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
setup
Reviewers: zturner, labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60440
llvm-svn: 358044
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 346999
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 346780
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Instead of every test creating a client-server combo, do that in the
SetUp method of the test fixture. This also means that we can rely on
gtest to not run the test if the SetUp method fails and delete the
if(HasFailure) calls.
llvm-svn: 306013
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This renames the LLDB error class to Status, as discussed
on the lldb-dev mailing list.
A change of this magnitude cannot easily be done without
find and replace, but that has potential to catch unwanted
occurrences of common strings such as "Error". Every effort
was made to find all the obvious things such as the word "Error"
appearing in a string, etc, but it's possible there are still
some lingering occurences left around. Hopefully nothing too
serious.
llvm-svn: 302872
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This support was landed in r300579, and reverted in r300669 due to failures on the bots.
The failures were caused by sockets not being properly closed, and this updated version of the patches should resolve that.
Summary from the original change:
This patch adds IPv6 support to LLDB/Host's TCP socket implementation. Supporting IPv6 involved a few significant changes to the implementation of the socket layers, and I have performed some significant code cleanup along the way.
This patch changes the Socket constructors for all types of sockets to not create sockets until first use. This is required for IPv6 support because the socket type will vary based on the address you are connecting to. This also has the benefit of removing code that could have errors from the Socket subclass constructors (which seems like a win to me).
The patch also slightly changes the API and behaviors of the Listen/Accept pattern. Previously both Listen and Accept calls took an address specified as a string. Now only listen does. This change was made because the Listen call can result in opening more than one socket. In order to support listening for both IPv4 and IPv6 connections we need to open one AF_INET socket and one AF_INET6 socket. During the listen call we construct a map of file descriptors to addrin structures which represent the allowable incoming connection address. This map removes the need for taking an address into the Accept call.
This does have a change in functionality. Previously you could Listen for connections based on one address, and Accept connections from a different address. This is no longer supported. I could not find anywhere in LLDB where we actually used the APIs in that way. The new API does still support AnyAddr for allowing incoming connections from any address.
The Listen implementation is implemented using kqueue on FreeBSD and Darwin, WSAPoll on Windows and poll(2) everywhere else.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D31823
llvm-svn: 301492
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The break the linux bots (and probably any other machine which would
run the test suite in a massively parallel way). The problem is that it
can happen that we only successfully create an IPv6 listening socket
(because the relevant IPv4 port is used by another process) and then the
connecting side attempts to connect to the IPv4 port and fails.
It's not very obvious how to fix this problem, so I am reverting this
until we come up with a solution.
llvm-svn: 300669
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This patch adds IPv6 support to LLDB/Host's TCP socket implementation. Supporting IPv6 involved a few significant changes to the implementation of the socket layers, and I have performed some significant code cleanup along the way.
This patch changes the Socket constructors for all types of sockets to not create sockets until first use. This is required for IPv6 support because the socket type will vary based on the address you are connecting to. This also has the benefit of removing code that could have errors from the Socket subclass constructors (which seems like a win to me).
The patch also slightly changes the API and behaviors of the Listen/Accept pattern. Previously both Listen and Accept calls took an address specified as a string. Now only listen does. This change was made because the Listen call can result in opening more than one socket. In order to support listening for both IPv4 and IPv6 connections we need to open one AF_INET socket and one AF_INET6 socket. During the listen call we construct a map of file descriptors to addrin structures which represent the allowable incoming connection address. This map removes the need for taking an address into the Accept call.
This does have a change in functionality. Previously you could Listen for connections based on one address, and Accept connections from a different address. This is no longer supported. I could not find anywhere in LLDB where we actually used the APIs in that way. The new API does still support AnyAddr for allowing incoming connections from any address.
The Listen implementation is implemented using kqueue on FreeBSD and Darwin, WSAPoll on Windows and poll(2) everywhere else.
Reviewers: zturner, clayborg
Subscribers: jasonmolenda, labath, lldb-commits, emaste
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31823
llvm-svn: 300579
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Prior to MSVC 2015 we had to manually include this header any
time we were going to include <thread> or <future> due to a
bug in MSVC's STL implementation. This has been fixed in MSVC
for some time now, and we require VS 2015 minimum, so we can
remove this across all subprojects.
llvm-svn: 296906
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:
Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):
find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;
The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.
Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.
llvm-svn: 280751
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 278918
|
|
|
class
Summary:
When saving/restoring registers the GDBRemoteRegisterContext class was manually constructing
the register save/restore packets. This creates appropriate helper functions in
GDBRemoteCommunicationClient, and switches the class to use those. It also removes what a
duplicate packet send in some of those functions, a thing that I can only attribute to a bad
merge artefact.
I also add a test framework for testing gdb-remote client functionality and add tests for the new
functions I introduced. I'd like to be able to test the register context changes in isolation as
well, but currently there doesn't seem to be a way to reasonably construct a standalone register
context object, so we'll have to rely on the end-to-end tests to verify that.
Reviewers: clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23553
llvm-svn: 278915
|
