| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Recently, yaml2obj has been turned into a library. This means we can use
it from our unit tests directly, instead of shelling out to an external
process. This patch does just that.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, aadsm, espindola, jdoerfert
Subscribers: emaste, mgorny, arichardson, MaskRay, jhenderson, abrachet, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65949
llvm-svn: 369374
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
It is much easier to test this functionality via lldb-test.
llvm-svn: 368289
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Instead of having SymbolVendor coordinate Symtab construction between
Symbol and Object files, make the SymbolVendor function a passthrough,
and put all of the logic into the SymbolFile.
Reviewers: clayborg, JDevlieghere, jingham, espindola
Subscribers: emaste, mgorny, arichardson, MaskRay, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65208
llvm-svn: 367086
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Checking this in for Antonio Afonso:
This diff changes the function LineEntry::GetSameLineContiguousAddressRange so that it also includes function calls that were inlined at the same line of code.
My motivation is to decrease the step over time of lines that heavly rely on inlined functions. I have multiple examples in the code base I work that makes a step over stop 20 or mote times internally. This can easly had up to step overs that take >500ms which I was able to lower to 25ms with this new strategy.
The reason the current code is not extending the address range beyond an inlined function is because when we resolve the symbol at the next address of the line entry we will get the entry line corresponding to where the original code for the inline function lives, making us barely extend the range. This then will end up on a step over having to stop multiple times everytime there's an inlined function.
To check if the range is an inlined function at that line I also get the block associated with the next address and check if there is a parent block with a call site at the line we're trying to extend.
To check this I created a new function in Block called GetContainingInlinedBlockWithCallSite that does exactly that. I also added a new function to Declaration for convinence of checking file/line named CompareFileAndLine.
To avoid potential issues when extending an address range I added an Extend function that extends the range by the AddressRange given as an argument. This function returns true to indicate sucess when the rage was agumented, false otherwise (e.g.: the ranges are not connected). The reason I do is to make sure that we're not just blindly extending complete_line_range by whatever GetByteSize() we got. If for some reason the ranges are not connected or overlap, or even 0, this could be an issue.
I also added a unit tests for this change and include the instructions on the test itself on how to generate the yaml file I use for testing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61292
llvm-svn: 360071
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
pcm files can end up being processed by lldb with relocations to be
made for the .debug_info section. When a R_AARCH64_ABS64 relocation
was required lldb would hit an `assert(false)` and die.
Add R_AARCH64_ABS64 relocations to the S+A 64 bit width code path. Add
a test for R_AARCH64_ABS64 and R_AARCH64_ABS32 .rela.debug_info
relocations in a pcm file.
Reviewers: sas, xiaobai, davide, javed.absar, espindola
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: labath, zturner, emaste, mgorny, arichardson, kristof.beyls
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51566
llvm-svn: 346171
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The new test checks that we are actually able to read data from these
kinds of elf headers correctly instead of just that we read the section
number correctly. It is also easier to figure out what's going on in the
test.
llvm-svn: 337459
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
ObjectFileELF::GetModuleSpecifications contained a lot of tip-toing code
which was trying to avoid loading the full object file into memory. It
did this by trying to load data only up to the offset if was accessing.
However, in practice this was useless, as 99% of object files we
encounter have section headers at the end, so we would load the whole
file as soon as we start parsing the section headers.
In fact, this would break as soon as we encounter a file which does
*not* have section headers at the end (yaml2obj produces these), as the
access to .strtab (which we need to get the section names) was not
guarded by this offset check.
As this strategy was completely ineffective anyway, I do not attempt to
proliferate it further by guarding the .strtab accesses. Instead I just
lead the full file as soon as we are reasonably sure that we are indeed
processing an elf file.
If we really care about the load size here, we would need to reimplement
this to just load the bits of the object file we need, instead of
loading everything from the start of the object file to the given
offset. However, given that the OS will do this for us for free when
using mmap, I think think this is really necessary.
For testing this I check a (tiny) SO file instead of yaml2obj-ing it
because the fact that they come out first is an implementation detail of
yaml2obj that can change in the future.
llvm-svn: 324254
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Fetching an input file required about five lines of code, and this was
repeated in multiple unit tests, with slight variations. Add a helper
function for doing that into the lldbUtilityMocks module (which I rename
to lldbUtilityHelpers to commemorate the fact it includes more than
mocks)
Reviewers: zturner, eugene
Subscribers: emaste, mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34683
llvm-svn: 306668
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
If we have symbol information in a separate file, we need to be very
careful about presenting a unified section view of module to the rest of
the debugger. ObjectFileELF had code to handle that, but it was being
overly cautious -- the section->GetFileSize()!=0 meant that the
unification would fail for sections which do not occupy any space in the
object file (e.g., .bss). In my case, that manifested itself as not
being able to display the values of .bss variables properly as the
section associated with the variable did not have it's load address set
(because it was not present in the unified section list).
I test this by making sure the unified section list and the variables
refer to the same section.
Reviewers: eugene, zturner
Subscribers: tberghammer, lldb-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32434
llvm-svn: 301917
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 294372
|
|
|
Summary:
Problem:
There are three filelds in the ELF header - e_phnum, e_shnum, and e_shstrndx -
that could be bigger than 64K and therefore do not fit in 16 bits reserved for
them in the header. If this happens, pretty often there is a special section at
index 0 which contains their real values for these fields in the section header
in the fields sh_info, sh_size, and sh_link respectively.
Fix:
- Rename original fields in the header declaration. We want to have them around
just in case.
- Reintroduce these fields as 32-bit members at the end of the header. By default
they are initialized from the header in Parse() method.
- In Parse(), detect the situation when the header might have been extended into
section info #0 and try to read it from the same data source.
- ObjectFileELF::GetModuleSpecifications accesses some of these fields but the
original parse uses too small data source. Re-parse the header if necessary
using bigger data source.
- ProcessElfCore::CreateInstance uses header with potentially sentinel values,
but it does not access these fields, so a comment here is enough.
Reviewers: labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: davidb, lldb-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29095
Author: Eugene Birukov <eugenebi@hotmail.com>
llvm-svn: 293714
|
