summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/lldb/test/python_api/debugger
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Move lldb/test to lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test.Zachary Turner2015-10-281-40/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | This is the conclusion of an effort to get LLDB's Python code structured into a bona-fide Python package. This has a number of benefits, but most notably the ability to more easily share Python code between different but related pieces of LLDB's Python infrastructure (for example, `scripts` can now share code with `test`). llvm-svn: 251532
* Port the python api decorator to use test categoriesPavel Labath2015-10-261-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: Per discussions on the mailing list, I have implemented a decorator which annotates individual test methods with categories. I have used this framework to replace the '-a' and '+a' command-line switches (now '-G pyapi' and '--skip-category pyapi') and the @python_api_test decorator (now @add_test_categories('pyapi')). The test suite now gives an error message suggesting the new options if the user specifies the deprecated +/-a switches. If the general direction is good, I will follow this up with other switches. Reviewers: tberghammer, tfiala, granata.enrico, zturner Subscribers: lldb-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14020 llvm-svn: 251277
* Merge dwarf and dsym testsTamas Berghammer2015-09-301-1/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently most of the test files have a separate dwarf and a separate dsym test with almost identical content (only the build step is different). With adding dwo symbol file handling to the test suit it would increase this to a 3-way duplication. The purpose of this change is to eliminate this redundancy with generating 2 test case (one dwarf and one dsym) for each test function specified (dwo handling will be added at a later commit). Main design goals: * There should be no boilerplate code in each test file to support the multiple debug info in most of the tests (custom scenarios are acceptable in special cases) so adding a new test case is easier and we can't miss one of the debug info type. * In case of a test failure, the debug symbols used during the test run have to be cleanly visible from the output of dotest.py to make debugging easier both from build bot logs and from local test runs * Each test case should have a unique, fully qualified name so we can run exactly 1 test with "-f <test-case>.<test-function>" syntax * Test output should be grouped based on test files the same way as it happens now (displaying dwarf/dsym results separately isn't preferable) Proposed solution (main logic in lldbtest.py, rest of them are test cases fixed up for the new style): * Have only 1 test fuction in the test files what will run for all debug info separately and this test function should call just "self.build(...)" to build an inferior with the right debug info * When a class is created by python (the class object, not the class instance), we will generate a new test method for each debug info format in the test class with the name "<test-function>_<debug-info>" and remove the original test method. This way unittest2 see multiple test methods (1 for each debug info, pretty much as of now) and will handle the test selection and the failure reporting correctly (the debug info will be visible from the end of the test name) * Add new annotation @no_debug_info_test to disable the generation of multiple tests for each debug info format when the test don't have an inferior Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13028 llvm-svn: 248883
* Massive test suite cleanup to stop everyone from manually having to compute ↵Greg Clayton2013-12-101-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | "mydir" inside each test case. This has led to many test suite failures because of copy and paste where new test cases were based off of other test cases and the "mydir" variable wasn't updated. Now you can call your superclasses "compute_mydir()" function with "__file__" as the sole argument and the relative path will be computed for you. llvm-svn: 196985
* Added SBDebugger's log callbacks to Python-landFilipe Cabecinhas2012-08-251-6/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Tweaked a parameter name in SBDebugger.h so my typemap will catch it; - Added a SBDebugger.Create(bool, callback, baton) to the swig interface; - Added SBDebugger.SetLoggingCallback to the swig interface; - Added a callback utility function for log callbacks; - Guard against Py_None on both callback utility functions; - Added a FIXME to the SBDebugger API test; - Added a __del__() stub for SBDebugger. We need to be able to get both the log callback and baton from an SBDebugger if we want to protect against memory leaks (or make the user responsible for holding another reference to the callback). Additionally, it's impossible to revert from a callback-backed log mechanism to a file-backed log mechanism. llvm-svn: 162633
* rdar://problem/10216227Johnny Chen2011-12-231-0/+8
| | | | | | | | | LLDB (python bindings) Crashing in lldb::SBDebugger::DeleteTarget(lldb::SBTarget&) Need to check the validity of (SBTarget&)target passed to SBDebugger::DeleteTarget() before calling target->Destroy(). llvm-svn: 147213
* Work in progress for:Johnny Chen2011-12-191-0/+30
rdar://problem/10577182 Audit lldb API impl for places where we need to perform a NULL check Add NULL checks for SBDebugger APIs. llvm-svn: 146917
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud