| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is the conclusion of an effort to get LLDB's Python code
structured into a bona-fide Python package. This has a number
of benefits, but most notably the ability to more easily share
Python code between different but related pieces of LLDB's Python
infrastructure (for example, `scripts` can now share code with
`test`).
llvm-svn: 251532
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 251444
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Per discussions on the mailing list, I have implemented a decorator which annotates individual
test methods with categories. I have used this framework to replace the '-a' and '+a'
command-line switches (now '-G pyapi' and '--skip-category pyapi') and the @python_api_test
decorator (now @add_test_categories('pyapi')). The test suite now gives an error message
suggesting the new options if the user specifies the deprecated +/-a switches. If the general
direction is good, I will follow this up with other switches.
Reviewers: tberghammer, tfiala, granata.enrico, zturner
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14020
llvm-svn: 251277
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Apparently there were tons of instances I missed last time, I
guess I accidentally ran 2to3 non-recursively. This should be
every occurrence of a print statement fixed to use a print function
as well as from __future__ import print_function being added to
every file.
After this patch print statements will stop working everywhere in
the test suite, and the print function should be used instead.
llvm-svn: 251121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is necessary in order to allow third party modules to be
located under lldb/third_party rather than under the test
folder directly.
Since we're already touching every test file anyway, we also
go ahead and delete the unittest2 import and main block wherever
possible. The ability to run a test as a standalone file has
already been broken for some time, and if we decide we want this
back, we should use unittest instead of unittest2.
A few places could not have the import of unittest2 removed,because
they depend on the unittest2.expectedFailure or skip decorators.
Removing all those was orthogonal in spirit to the purpose of this
CL, so the import of unittest2 remains in those files that were
using it for its test decorators. Those can be addressed
separately.
llvm-svn: 251055
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 250896
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: This change fixes pr24916. As associated test has been added.
Reviewers: clayborg
Subscribers: zturner, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13224
llvm-svn: 249629
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
TestDiamond and TestSBValueCast were due to a bug in clang. That
bug has been fixed, so xfail is removed. However fixing that bug
exposed another bug in clang, which is not yet fixed. That bug
causes one test to start crashing, and another to fail unexpectedly
so the status of those tests is updated as well.
llvm-svn: 249208
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently most of the test files have a separate dwarf and a separate
dsym test with almost identical content (only the build step is
different). With adding dwo symbol file handling to the test suit it
would increase this to a 3-way duplication. The purpose of this change
is to eliminate this redundancy with generating 2 test case (one dwarf
and one dsym) for each test function specified (dwo handling will be
added at a later commit).
Main design goals:
* There should be no boilerplate code in each test file to support the
multiple debug info in most of the tests (custom scenarios are
acceptable in special cases) so adding a new test case is easier and
we can't miss one of the debug info type.
* In case of a test failure, the debug symbols used during the test run
have to be cleanly visible from the output of dotest.py to make
debugging easier both from build bot logs and from local test runs
* Each test case should have a unique, fully qualified name so we can
run exactly 1 test with "-f <test-case>.<test-function>" syntax
* Test output should be grouped based on test files the same way as it
happens now (displaying dwarf/dsym results separately isn't
preferable)
Proposed solution (main logic in lldbtest.py, rest of them are test
cases fixed up for the new style):
* Have only 1 test fuction in the test files what will run for all
debug info separately and this test function should call just
"self.build(...)" to build an inferior with the right debug info
* When a class is created by python (the class object, not the class
instance), we will generate a new test method for each debug info
format in the test class with the name "<test-function>_<debug-info>"
and remove the original test method. This way unittest2 see multiple
test methods (1 for each debug info, pretty much as of now) and will
handle the test selection and the failure reporting correctly (the
debug info will be visible from the end of the test name)
* Add new annotation @no_debug_info_test to disable the generation of
multiple tests for each debug info format when the test don't have an
inferior
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13028
llvm-svn: 248883
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Suppose we have the UTF-16 string:
char16_t[] s = u"hello";
Before this patch, evaluating the string in lldb would get:
(char16_t [6]) $0 = ([0] = U+0068 u'h', [1] = U+0065 u'e', [2] = U+006c u'l', [3] = U+006c u'l', [4] = U+006f u'o', [5] = U+0000 u'\0')
After applying the patch, we now get:
(char16_t [6]) $0 = u"hello"
Patch from evgeny.leviant@gmail.com
Reviewed by: granata.enrico
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13053
llvm-svn: 248555
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewers: chying
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13147
llvm-svn: 248547
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewers: dblaikie, clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13143
llvm-svn: 248541
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewers: chying
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13111
llvm-svn: 248416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
ClassTypesTestCase::test_with_dwarf_and_constructor_name
llvm.org/pr14540
llvm-svn: 248411
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
With this change DWARFASTParserClang::CompleteTypeFromDWARF returns false if
DWARFASTParserClang::ParseChildMembers returns false. Similarly, it returns
false if any base class is of an incomplete type. This helps in cases like
these:
class Foo
{
public:
std::string str;
};
...
Foo f;
If a file with the above code is compiled with a modern clang but without
the -fno-limit-debug-info (or similar) option, then the DWARF has only
a forward declration for std::string. In which case, the type for
"class Foo" cannot be completed. If LLDB does not detect that a child
member has incomplete type, then it wrongly conveys to clang (the LLDB
compiler) that "class Foo" is complete, and consequently crashes due to
an assertion failure in clang when running commands like "p f" or
"frame var f".
Reviewers: clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13066
llvm-svn: 248401
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 247863
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Works for gcc-4.8. A bug in gcc perhaps.
llvm-svn: 247855
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
inside namespaces
Summary: Supports the parsing of the "using namespace XXX" and "using XXX::XXX" directives. Added ambiguity errors when it two decls with the same name are encountered (see comments in TestCppNsImport). Fixes using directives being duplicated for anonymous namespaces. Fixes GetDeclForUID for specification DIEs.
Reviewers: sivachandra, chaoren, clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12897
llvm-svn: 247836
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This test seems to be working now, probably due to r244764.
llvm-svn: 247830
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
that we can read the global when specified with the global namespace and test that we can read "Imported::imported" correctly. The commented out test should be testing for ambiguity when just "imported" is evaluated as an expression, but that doesn't work yet.
llvm-svn: 247764
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: SymbolFileDWARF now creates VarDecl and BlockDecl and adds them to the Decl tree. Then, in ClangExpressionDeclMap it uses the Decl tree to search for a variable. This fixes lots of variable scoping problems.
Reviewers: sivachandra, chaoren, spyffe, clayborg
Subscribers: tberghammer, jingham, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12658
llvm-svn: 247746
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 247602
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
TestCallStdStringFunction
TestCallWithTimeout
TestConstVariables
TestClassTypes
llvm-svn: 247576
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm.org/pr21765
llvm-svn: 247456
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
http://llvm.org/pr24764
llvm-svn: 247455
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We had 2 tests named TestCPPBreakpoints.py. If one of those tests
failed, both of them would be reported as failures and contribute
to the failure count. There may be other examples of duplicate
test names, and we should fix those as we find them.
llvm-svn: 247173
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 246669
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 245749
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
clang-cl does not yet support C++ exceptions, so these tests will
not even compile.
Re-enabling these tests is tracked by llvm.org/pr24538
llvm-svn: 245747
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This has known issues on Windows. Fixing this is tracked by
http://llvm.org/pr21765
llvm-svn: 245630
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 245515
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 245508
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 245505
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 245418
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 245412
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 245407
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 245381
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 245380
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Name lookup doesn't work properly with Windows targets. This is
most likely due to issues with name mangling, although there is at
least one set of debug info related issues as well, since some of
the name lookup requests appear to be failing on types rather than
symbols.
Specifically, this patch XFAILS the following set of tests:
TestChar1632T.py
TestRdar12991846.py
TestConstVariables.py
TestCallCPPFunction.py
TestCallStopAndContinue.py
TestCallUserDefinedFunction.py
TestCModules.py
TestCPPThis.py
TestExprs2.py
TestOverloadedFunctions.py
TestRvalueReferences.py
And fixing the underlying issue is tracked in http://llvm.org/pr24489
llvm-svn: 245338
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
that a *single character* whose value is 0 is actually a valid thing to print out
llvm-svn: 242572
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
with all the other assertion messages.
llvm-svn: 241212
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
SUMMARY
Flakey tests get two chances to pass
Also, switched a bunch of tests to use new decorator.
TEST PLAN
Add one of these decorators to a test
Edit a test to pass on the first invocation, confirm test appears as pass
Edit a test to pass on the first invocation, pass on the second, confirm test appears as xfail
Edit a test to fail on two consecutive runs, confirm test appears in results as fail/error
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10721
llvm-svn: 240789
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 239830
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
rdar://21299888
llvm-svn: 239777
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Test Plan: dotest.py -p TestNamespace
Reviewers: sivachandra
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10076
llvm-svn: 238368
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Before:
AssertionError: False is not True : Process is launched successfully
After:
AssertionError: False is not True : Command 'run a.out' failed.
>>> error: invalid target, create a target using the 'target create' command
>>> Process could not be launched successfully
Reviewers: clayborg
Reviewed By: clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits, vharron
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9948
llvm-svn: 238363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For some reason this happens only when running the full test suite
(e.g., via ninja check-lldb), but not when running the
TestStaticVariables.py tests in isolation. XFAIL for now while
investigating, in an attempt to bring the bot to green and reduce noise.
llvm.org/pr20550
llvm-svn: 236993
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
If 'i' is an rvalue reference to an 'int', evaluating it with the
'expression' command will return an 'int' value and not an 'int &&'.
Before this patch, an 'int &&' type was expected.
Enabled the test for clang and gcc as all parts of the test now pass
when the testcase is compiled with them.
Test Plan: dotest.py -C <gcc|clang> -p TestRvalueReferences
Reviewers: spyffe, chaoren
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9005
llvm-svn: 235036
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Remove @skipIfGcc from a test in TestSTL as that test passes with GCC
now. Also, mark one of the dsym tests with @skipUnlessDarwin in TestSTL.
Test Plan: dotest.py -C gcc -p TestSTL
Reviewers: vharron
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8793
llvm-svn: 234243
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
lldbtest.getPlatform() returns the "OS" of the selected platform's triple. This is "macosx" for desktop macosx and "ios" for iOS. It used to be "darwin".
There was a lot of code that was checking "if self.getPlatform() == 'darwin'" which is not correct. I fixed this by adding a:
lldbtest.platformIsDarwin()
which returns true if the current platform's OS is "macosx", "ios" or "darwin". These three valid darwin are now returned by a static function:
lldbtest.getDarwinOSTriples()
Fixed up all places that has 'if self.getPlatform() == "darwin":' with "if self.platformIsDarwin()" and all instances of 'if self.getPlatform() != "darwin":' with "if not self.platformIsDarwin()". I also fixed some darwin decorator functions to do the right thing as well.
llvm-svn: 233933
|