| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is the conclusion of an effort to get LLDB's Python code
structured into a bona-fide Python package. This has a number
of benefits, but most notably the ability to more easily share
Python code between different but related pieces of LLDB's Python
infrastructure (for example, `scripts` can now share code with
`test`).
llvm-svn: 251532
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 251444
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Apparently there were tons of instances I missed last time, I
guess I accidentally ran 2to3 non-recursively. This should be
every occurrence of a print statement fixed to use a print function
as well as from __future__ import print_function being added to
every file.
After this patch print statements will stop working everywhere in
the test suite, and the print function should be used instead.
llvm-svn: 251121
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is necessary in order to allow third party modules to be
located under lldb/third_party rather than under the test
folder directly.
Since we're already touching every test file anyway, we also
go ahead and delete the unittest2 import and main block wherever
possible. The ability to run a test as a standalone file has
already been broken for some time, and if we decide we want this
back, we should use unittest instead of unittest2.
A few places could not have the import of unittest2 removed,because
they depend on the unittest2.expectedFailure or skip decorators.
Removing all those was orthogonal in spirit to the purpose of this
CL, so the import of unittest2 remains in those files that were
using it for its test decorators. Those can be addressed
separately.
llvm-svn: 251055
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently most of the test files have a separate dwarf and a separate
dsym test with almost identical content (only the build step is
different). With adding dwo symbol file handling to the test suit it
would increase this to a 3-way duplication. The purpose of this change
is to eliminate this redundancy with generating 2 test case (one dwarf
and one dsym) for each test function specified (dwo handling will be
added at a later commit).
Main design goals:
* There should be no boilerplate code in each test file to support the
multiple debug info in most of the tests (custom scenarios are
acceptable in special cases) so adding a new test case is easier and
we can't miss one of the debug info type.
* In case of a test failure, the debug symbols used during the test run
have to be cleanly visible from the output of dotest.py to make
debugging easier both from build bot logs and from local test runs
* Each test case should have a unique, fully qualified name so we can
run exactly 1 test with "-f <test-case>.<test-function>" syntax
* Test output should be grouped based on test files the same way as it
happens now (displaying dwarf/dsym results separately isn't
preferable)
Proposed solution (main logic in lldbtest.py, rest of them are test
cases fixed up for the new style):
* Have only 1 test fuction in the test files what will run for all
debug info separately and this test function should call just
"self.build(...)" to build an inferior with the right debug info
* When a class is created by python (the class object, not the class
instance), we will generate a new test method for each debug info
format in the test class with the name "<test-function>_<debug-info>"
and remove the original test method. This way unittest2 see multiple
test methods (1 for each debug info, pretty much as of now) and will
handle the test selection and the failure reporting correctly (the
debug info will be visible from the end of the test name)
* Add new annotation @no_debug_info_test to disable the generation of
multiple tests for each debug info format when the test don't have an
inferior
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13028
llvm-svn: 248883
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
http://reviews.llvm.org/D11962
llvm-svn: 245357
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Name lookup doesn't work properly with Windows targets. This is
most likely due to issues with name mangling, although there is at
least one set of debug info related issues as well, since some of
the name lookup requests appear to be failing on types rather than
symbols.
Specifically, this patch XFAILS the following set of tests:
TestChar1632T.py
TestRdar12991846.py
TestConstVariables.py
TestCallCPPFunction.py
TestCallStopAndContinue.py
TestCallUserDefinedFunction.py
TestCModules.py
TestCPPThis.py
TestExprs2.py
TestOverloadedFunctions.py
TestRvalueReferences.py
And fixing the underlying issue is tracked in http://llvm.org/pr24489
llvm-svn: 245338
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
the expression parser.
<rdar://problem/21395220>
llvm-svn: 241917
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We don't need to do the fancy dance with checking whether the iterator
represents a #define -- in fact, that's the wrong thing to do. The thing to do
is check whether the highest-priority module that did something to the module
#defined or #undefd it. If it #defined it, then the MacroInfo* will be non-NULL
and we're good to go.
llvm-svn: 241651
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
with all the other assertion messages.
llvm-svn: 241212
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Before:
AssertionError: False is not True : Process is launched successfully
After:
AssertionError: False is not True : Command 'run a.out' failed.
>>> error: invalid target, create a target using the 'target create' command
>>> Process could not be launched successfully
Reviewers: clayborg
Reviewed By: clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits, vharron
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9948
llvm-svn: 238363
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Added missing SBLanguageRuntime.h to lldb.xcodeproj, set to Public (fixed compile error in TestPublicAPIHeaders)
Removed reference to (temporarily) missing gtest.xcodeproj
Fixed TestDeadStrip compile error
XFAIL TestPublicAPIHeaders - test passes but teardown command 'settings remove target.env-vars DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH' fails
XFAIL TestCModules - use of undeclared identifier 'MIN'
XFAIL TestModulesAutoImport - clang: error: unknown argument: '-gmodules'
XFAIL TestObjCNewSyntax - expr -- @((char*)"Hello world" + 6) cannot box a string value because NSString has not been declared
http://reviews.llvm.org/D9643
llvm-svn: 237085
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: I've removed the secret skip and added expectedFailureLinux
Test Plan: run tests
Reviewers: flackr
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9615
llvm-svn: 236914
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Some have been marked as skipIfLinux for years.
The seem to be passing so I've enabled them.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9428
llvm-svn: 236403
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
all the macros from the modules the user has loaded.
These macros are currently imported textually into
the expression's source code, which turns out not to
impose the horrific string processing overhead that
I thought it would, but I still plan to look into
performance improvements.
Also modified TestCModules to test that this works.
llvm-svn: 234922
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
relocations. We used to do GEP on a pointer to
the result type, which is wrong. We should be doing
GEP on a pointer to char, which allows us to offset
correctly.
This fixes the C modules testcase, so it's no longer
ExpectFail.
llvm-svn: 234918
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
because the OS X builders aren't happy with them.
<rdar://problem/20416388>
llvm-svn: 234028
|
|
|
DWARF types and types from modules can coexist even
if they have the same name and refer to two different
things.
<rdar://problem/18805055>
llvm-svn: 233988
|
