| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is the conclusion of an effort to get LLDB's Python code
structured into a bona-fide Python package. This has a number
of benefits, but most notably the ability to more easily share
Python code between different but related pieces of LLDB's Python
infrastructure (for example, `scripts` can now share code with
`test`).
llvm-svn: 251532
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 251444
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Apparently there were tons of instances I missed last time, I
guess I accidentally ran 2to3 non-recursively. This should be
every occurrence of a print statement fixed to use a print function
as well as from __future__ import print_function being added to
every file.
After this patch print statements will stop working everywhere in
the test suite, and the print function should be used instead.
llvm-svn: 251121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is necessary in order to allow third party modules to be
located under lldb/third_party rather than under the test
folder directly.
Since we're already touching every test file anyway, we also
go ahead and delete the unittest2 import and main block wherever
possible. The ability to run a test as a standalone file has
already been broken for some time, and if we decide we want this
back, we should use unittest instead of unittest2.
A few places could not have the import of unittest2 removed,because
they depend on the unittest2.expectedFailure or skip decorators.
Removing all those was orthogonal in spirit to the purpose of this
CL, so the import of unittest2 remains in those files that were
using it for its test decorators. Those can be addressed
separately.
llvm-svn: 251055
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently most of the test files have a separate dwarf and a separate
dsym test with almost identical content (only the build step is
different). With adding dwo symbol file handling to the test suit it
would increase this to a 3-way duplication. The purpose of this change
is to eliminate this redundancy with generating 2 test case (one dwarf
and one dsym) for each test function specified (dwo handling will be
added at a later commit).
Main design goals:
* There should be no boilerplate code in each test file to support the
multiple debug info in most of the tests (custom scenarios are
acceptable in special cases) so adding a new test case is easier and
we can't miss one of the debug info type.
* In case of a test failure, the debug symbols used during the test run
have to be cleanly visible from the output of dotest.py to make
debugging easier both from build bot logs and from local test runs
* Each test case should have a unique, fully qualified name so we can
run exactly 1 test with "-f <test-case>.<test-function>" syntax
* Test output should be grouped based on test files the same way as it
happens now (displaying dwarf/dsym results separately isn't
preferable)
Proposed solution (main logic in lldbtest.py, rest of them are test
cases fixed up for the new style):
* Have only 1 test fuction in the test files what will run for all
debug info separately and this test function should call just
"self.build(...)" to build an inferior with the right debug info
* When a class is created by python (the class object, not the class
instance), we will generate a new test method for each debug info
format in the test class with the name "<test-function>_<debug-info>"
and remove the original test method. This way unittest2 see multiple
test methods (1 for each debug info, pretty much as of now) and will
handle the test selection and the failure reporting correctly (the
debug info will be visible from the end of the test name)
* Add new annotation @no_debug_info_test to disable the generation of
multiple tests for each debug info format when the test don't have an
inferior
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13028
llvm-svn: 248883
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 247602
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 245687
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This change also adds the infrastructure required to specify the API
levels for which tests should be skipped.
Reviewers: chying, labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: tberghammer, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10282
llvm-svn: 239183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Running "kill -l" on nexus player (i386) device results in this:
1 HUP Hangup 33 33 Signal 33
2 INT Interrupt 34 34 Signal 34
3 QUIT Quit 35 35 Signal 35
4 ILL Illegal instruction 36 36 Signal 36
5 TRAP Trap 37 37 Signal 37
6 ABRT Aborted 38 38 Signal 38
7 BUS Bus error 39 39 Signal 39
8 FPE Floating point exception 40 40 Signal 40
9 KILL Killed 41 41 Signal 41
10 USR1 User signal 1 42 42 Signal 42
11 SEGV Segmentation fault 43 43 Signal 43
12 USR2 User signal 2 44 44 Signal 44
13 PIPE Broken pipe 45 45 Signal 45
14 ALRM Alarm clock 46 46 Signal 46
15 TERM Terminated 47 47 Signal 47
16 STKFLT Stack fault 48 48 Signal 48
17 CHLD Child exited 49 49 Signal 49
18 CONT Continue 50 50 Signal 50
19 STOP Stopped (signal) 51 51 Signal 51
20 TSTP Stopped 52 52 Signal 52
21 TTIN Stopped (tty input) 53 53 Signal 53
22 TTOU Stopped (tty output) 54 54 Signal 54
23 URG Urgent I/O condition 55 55 Signal 55
24 XCPU CPU time limit exceeded 56 56 Signal 56
25 XFSZ File size limit exceeded 57 57 Signal 57
26 VTALRM Virtual timer expired 58 58 Signal 58
27 PROF Profiling timer expired 59 59 Signal 59
28 WINCH Window size changed 60 60 Signal 60
29 IO I/O possible 61 61 Signal 61
30 PWR Power failure 62 62 Signal 62
31 SYS Bad system call 63 63 Signal 63
32 32 Signal 32 64 64 Signal 64
The signals from 33-64 are missing symbolic names.
Test Plan: dotest.py -p TestRaise on Android
Reviewers: labath
Subscribers: tberghammer, aemerson, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9944
llvm-svn: 238039
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: This enables correct handling of real time signals by lldb.
Test Plan: Added a test that verifies handling of SIGRTMIN
Reviewers: tberghammer, ovyalov
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9911
llvm-svn: 238009
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 237887
|
|
Summary:
Previously, NPL tried to reinject SIGSTOP into the inferior in an attempt to get the process to
start in the group-stop state. This was:
a) wrong (reinjection should be controlled by "process handle" lldb setting)
b) racy (it should use Resume for transparent resuming instead of RequestResume)
c) broken (llgs crashed on inferior SIGSTOP)
With this change, SIGSTOP is handled just like any other signal delivered to the inferior: we
stop all threads and report signal reception to lldb. SIGSTOP reinjection does not behave the
same way as it would outside the debugger, but simulating this is a hard problem and is not
normally necessary.
Test Plan: I have added a test which verifies we get SIGSTOP reports and we do not crash.
Reviewers: ovyalov, chaoren
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9852
llvm-svn: 237880
|