| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is the conclusion of an effort to get LLDB's Python code
structured into a bona-fide Python package. This has a number
of benefits, but most notably the ability to more easily share
Python code between different but related pieces of LLDB's Python
infrastructure (for example, `scripts` can now share code with
`test`).
llvm-svn: 251532
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 251444
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Per discussions on the mailing list, I have implemented a decorator which annotates individual
test methods with categories. I have used this framework to replace the '-a' and '+a'
command-line switches (now '-G pyapi' and '--skip-category pyapi') and the @python_api_test
decorator (now @add_test_categories('pyapi')). The test suite now gives an error message
suggesting the new options if the user specifies the deprecated +/-a switches. If the general
direction is good, I will follow this up with other switches.
Reviewers: tberghammer, tfiala, granata.enrico, zturner
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14020
llvm-svn: 251277
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Apparently there were tons of instances I missed last time, I
guess I accidentally ran 2to3 non-recursively. This should be
every occurrence of a print statement fixed to use a print function
as well as from __future__ import print_function being added to
every file.
After this patch print statements will stop working everywhere in
the test suite, and the print function should be used instead.
llvm-svn: 251121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is necessary in order to allow third party modules to be
located under lldb/third_party rather than under the test
folder directly.
Since we're already touching every test file anyway, we also
go ahead and delete the unittest2 import and main block wherever
possible. The ability to run a test as a standalone file has
already been broken for some time, and if we decide we want this
back, we should use unittest instead of unittest2.
A few places could not have the import of unittest2 removed,because
they depend on the unittest2.expectedFailure or skip decorators.
Removing all those was orthogonal in spirit to the purpose of this
CL, so the import of unittest2 remains in those files that were
using it for its test decorators. Those can be addressed
separately.
llvm-svn: 251055
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently most of the test files have a separate dwarf and a separate
dsym test with almost identical content (only the build step is
different). With adding dwo symbol file handling to the test suit it
would increase this to a 3-way duplication. The purpose of this change
is to eliminate this redundancy with generating 2 test case (one dwarf
and one dsym) for each test function specified (dwo handling will be
added at a later commit).
Main design goals:
* There should be no boilerplate code in each test file to support the
multiple debug info in most of the tests (custom scenarios are
acceptable in special cases) so adding a new test case is easier and
we can't miss one of the debug info type.
* In case of a test failure, the debug symbols used during the test run
have to be cleanly visible from the output of dotest.py to make
debugging easier both from build bot logs and from local test runs
* Each test case should have a unique, fully qualified name so we can
run exactly 1 test with "-f <test-case>.<test-function>" syntax
* Test output should be grouped based on test files the same way as it
happens now (displaying dwarf/dsym results separately isn't
preferable)
Proposed solution (main logic in lldbtest.py, rest of them are test
cases fixed up for the new style):
* Have only 1 test fuction in the test files what will run for all
debug info separately and this test function should call just
"self.build(...)" to build an inferior with the right debug info
* When a class is created by python (the class object, not the class
instance), we will generate a new test method for each debug info
format in the test class with the name "<test-function>_<debug-info>"
and remove the original test method. This way unittest2 see multiple
test methods (1 for each debug info, pretty much as of now) and will
handle the test selection and the failure reporting correctly (the
debug info will be visible from the end of the test name)
* Add new annotation @no_debug_info_test to disable the generation of
multiple tests for each debug info format when the test don't have an
inferior
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13028
llvm-svn: 248883
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm.org/pr24778
llvm-svn: 247460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If the function is a template then the return type is part of the
function name. This CL fixes the parsing of these function names in
the case when the return type contains ':'.
The name of free functions in C++ don't have context part. Fix the
logic geting the function name without arguments out from a full
function name to handle this case.
Change the handling of step-in-avoid-regexp to match the value against
the function name without it's arguments and return value. This is
required because the default regex ("^std::") would match any template
function returning an std object.
Fifferential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11461
llvm-svn: 243099
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9828
llvm-svn: 237921
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 237515
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
- add decorator functions to xfail and skip test on specific os, architecture and version of comipler
- xfail failing test with gcc-4.9.2 on linux
- add one usage of skipIf function
Test Plan:
Run tests with different archs, and version of compilers to verify decorator function working as expected
Run tests with gcc-4.9.2 and no failure reported
Reviewers: sivachandra, ovyalov, vharron, chaoren
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8851
llvm-svn: 235368
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
lldbtest.getPlatform() returns the "OS" of the selected platform's triple. This is "macosx" for desktop macosx and "ios" for iOS. It used to be "darwin".
There was a lot of code that was checking "if self.getPlatform() == 'darwin'" which is not correct. I fixed this by adding a:
lldbtest.platformIsDarwin()
which returns true if the current platform's OS is "macosx", "ios" or "darwin". These three valid darwin are now returned by a static function:
lldbtest.getDarwinOSTriples()
Fixed up all places that has 'if self.getPlatform() == "darwin":' with "if self.platformIsDarwin()" and all instances of 'if self.getPlatform() != "darwin":' with "if not self.platformIsDarwin()". I also fixed some darwin decorator functions to do the right thing as well.
llvm-svn: 233933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(remote target platform)
Uses target platform when determining which platform specific behavior to use
or expect in tests. TestHelp.py was unchanged because this is asserting
behavior of the local lldb binary.
Test Plan:
Run tests on different remote os. Several previously failing tests now pass:
TestArrayTypes.py
TestInferiorChanged.py
TestInferiorCrashing.py
TestIvarProtocols.py
TestProcessIO.py
TestPublicAPIHeaders.py
TestRecursiveInferior.py
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8747
llvm-svn: 233805
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
against remote platform.
Adds @skipIfPlatform and @skipUnlessPlatform decorators which will skip if /
unless the target platform is in the provided platform list.
Test Plan:
ninja check-lldb shows no regressions.
When running cross platform, tests which cannot run on the target platform are
skipped.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8665
llvm-svn: 233547
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(<rdar://problem/16363195>).
llvm-svn: 204254
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
and remote targets.
llvm-svn: 197266
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
"mydir" inside each test case.
This has led to many test suite failures because of copy and paste where new test cases were based off of other test cases and the "mydir" variable wasn't updated.
Now you can call your superclasses "compute_mydir()" function with "__file__" as the sole argument and the relative path will be computed for you.
llvm-svn: 196985
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm.org/pr15261 missing size for static arrays
llvm.org/pr15278 expressions generating signals
llvm.org/pr15824 thread states aren't properly maintained
llvm.org/pr16696 threaded inferior debugging not yet on FreeBSD
llvm.org/pr17214 inline stepping fails on FreeBSD
llvm.org/pr17225 Clang assertion failure
llvm.org/pr17226 frame info lost after failed expression evaluation
llvm.org/pr17228 test timeout
The first three are existing Linux issues that also affect FreeBSD.
llvm-svn: 190698
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 187730
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
is not reproducible anymore.
llvm-svn: 185579
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
claims
functions start at the line with the "{" character, whereas clang uses the first line
with source code. As such, this test case will only work with clang.
llvm-svn: 175808
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
and they are not done, then we aren't done either.
<rdar://problem/12259124>
llvm-svn: 163572
|
|
llvm-svn: 163436
|