| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is the conclusion of an effort to get LLDB's Python code
structured into a bona-fide Python package. This has a number
of benefits, but most notably the ability to more easily share
Python code between different but related pieces of LLDB's Python
infrastructure (for example, `scripts` can now share code with
`test`).
llvm-svn: 251532
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 251444
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Apparently there were tons of instances I missed last time, I
guess I accidentally ran 2to3 non-recursively. This should be
every occurrence of a print statement fixed to use a print function
as well as from __future__ import print_function being added to
every file.
After this patch print statements will stop working everywhere in
the test suite, and the print function should be used instead.
llvm-svn: 251121
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is necessary in order to allow third party modules to be
located under lldb/third_party rather than under the test
folder directly.
Since we're already touching every test file anyway, we also
go ahead and delete the unittest2 import and main block wherever
possible. The ability to run a test as a standalone file has
already been broken for some time, and if we decide we want this
back, we should use unittest instead of unittest2.
A few places could not have the import of unittest2 removed,because
they depend on the unittest2.expectedFailure or skip decorators.
Removing all those was orthogonal in spirit to the purpose of this
CL, so the import of unittest2 remains in those files that were
using it for its test decorators. Those can be addressed
separately.
llvm-svn: 251055
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently most of the test files have a separate dwarf and a separate
dsym test with almost identical content (only the build step is
different). With adding dwo symbol file handling to the test suit it
would increase this to a 3-way duplication. The purpose of this change
is to eliminate this redundancy with generating 2 test case (one dwarf
and one dsym) for each test function specified (dwo handling will be
added at a later commit).
Main design goals:
* There should be no boilerplate code in each test file to support the
multiple debug info in most of the tests (custom scenarios are
acceptable in special cases) so adding a new test case is easier and
we can't miss one of the debug info type.
* In case of a test failure, the debug symbols used during the test run
have to be cleanly visible from the output of dotest.py to make
debugging easier both from build bot logs and from local test runs
* Each test case should have a unique, fully qualified name so we can
run exactly 1 test with "-f <test-case>.<test-function>" syntax
* Test output should be grouped based on test files the same way as it
happens now (displaying dwarf/dsym results separately isn't
preferable)
Proposed solution (main logic in lldbtest.py, rest of them are test
cases fixed up for the new style):
* Have only 1 test fuction in the test files what will run for all
debug info separately and this test function should call just
"self.build(...)" to build an inferior with the right debug info
* When a class is created by python (the class object, not the class
instance), we will generate a new test method for each debug info
format in the test class with the name "<test-function>_<debug-info>"
and remove the original test method. This way unittest2 see multiple
test methods (1 for each debug info, pretty much as of now) and will
handle the test selection and the failure reporting correctly (the
debug info will be visible from the end of the test name)
* Add new annotation @no_debug_info_test to disable the generation of
multiple tests for each debug info format when the test don't have an
inferior
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13028
llvm-svn: 248883
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These tests work when run locally. They had been occasionally failing
on the FreeBSD buildbot due to pexpect issues. That buildbot is
currently down, and I expect the replacement will not have this issue.
llvm.org/pr22784
llvm-svn: 246490
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewers: vharron, zturner
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10340
llvm-svn: 239414
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The lldb executable was referenced through the code by 7 different
(effectively) global variables.
global lldbExecutablePath
global lldbExecutable
os.environ['LLDB_EXEC']
os.environ['LLDB_TEST']
dotest.lldbExec
dotest.lldbHere
lldbtest.lldbExec
This change uses one global variable lldbtest_config.lldbExec to
replace them all.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9817
llvm-svn: 237600
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I'm not yet sure what's wrong with pexpect and I cannot reproduce this
problem locally. XFAIL these tests for now to reduce buildbot noise so
I can track down the remaining buildbot failures.
llvm.org/pr22784
llvm-svn: 236857
|
|
|
class.
Why? Debugger::FormatPrompt() would run through the format prompt every time and parse it and emit it piece by piece. It also did formatting differently depending on which key/value pair it was parsing.
The new code improves on this with the following features:
1 - Allow format strings to be parsed into a FormatEntity::Entry which can contain multiple child FormatEntity::Entry objects. This FormatEntity::Entry is a parsed version of what was previously always done in Debugger::FormatPrompt() so it is more efficient to emit formatted strings using the new parsed FormatEntity::Entry.
2 - Allows errors in format strings to be shown immediately when setting the settings (frame-format, thread-format, disassembly-format
3 - Allows auto completion by implementing a new OptionValueFormatEntity and switching frame-format, thread-format, and disassembly-format settings over to using it.
4 - The FormatEntity::Entry for each of the frame-format, thread-format, disassembly-format settings only replaces the old one if the format parses correctly
5 - Combines all consecutive string values together for efficient output. This means all "${ansi.*}" keys and all desensitized characters like "\n" "\t" "\0721" "\x23" will get combined with their previous strings
6 - ${*.script:} (like "${var.script:mymodule.my_var_function}") have all been switched over to use ${script.*:} "${script.var:mymodule.my_var_function}") to make the format easier to parse as I don't believe anyone was using these format string power user features.
7 - All key values pairs are defined in simple C arrays of entries so it is much easier to add new entries.
These changes pave the way for subsequent modifications where we can modify formats to do more (like control the width of value strings can do more and add more functionality more easily like string formatting to control the width, printf formats and more).
llvm-svn: 228207
|
