| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is the conclusion of an effort to get LLDB's Python code
structured into a bona-fide Python package. This has a number
of benefits, but most notably the ability to more easily share
Python code between different but related pieces of LLDB's Python
infrastructure (for example, `scripts` can now share code with
`test`).
llvm-svn: 251532
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 251444
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Apparently there were tons of instances I missed last time, I
guess I accidentally ran 2to3 non-recursively. This should be
every occurrence of a print statement fixed to use a print function
as well as from __future__ import print_function being added to
every file.
After this patch print statements will stop working everywhere in
the test suite, and the print function should be used instead.
llvm-svn: 251121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is necessary in order to allow third party modules to be
located under lldb/third_party rather than under the test
folder directly.
Since we're already touching every test file anyway, we also
go ahead and delete the unittest2 import and main block wherever
possible. The ability to run a test as a standalone file has
already been broken for some time, and if we decide we want this
back, we should use unittest instead of unittest2.
A few places could not have the import of unittest2 removed,because
they depend on the unittest2.expectedFailure or skip decorators.
Removing all those was orthogonal in spirit to the purpose of this
CL, so the import of unittest2 remains in those files that were
using it for its test decorators. Those can be addressed
separately.
llvm-svn: 251055
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently most of the test files have a separate dwarf and a separate
dsym test with almost identical content (only the build step is
different). With adding dwo symbol file handling to the test suit it
would increase this to a 3-way duplication. The purpose of this change
is to eliminate this redundancy with generating 2 test case (one dwarf
and one dsym) for each test function specified (dwo handling will be
added at a later commit).
Main design goals:
* There should be no boilerplate code in each test file to support the
multiple debug info in most of the tests (custom scenarios are
acceptable in special cases) so adding a new test case is easier and
we can't miss one of the debug info type.
* In case of a test failure, the debug symbols used during the test run
have to be cleanly visible from the output of dotest.py to make
debugging easier both from build bot logs and from local test runs
* Each test case should have a unique, fully qualified name so we can
run exactly 1 test with "-f <test-case>.<test-function>" syntax
* Test output should be grouped based on test files the same way as it
happens now (displaying dwarf/dsym results separately isn't
preferable)
Proposed solution (main logic in lldbtest.py, rest of them are test
cases fixed up for the new style):
* Have only 1 test fuction in the test files what will run for all
debug info separately and this test function should call just
"self.build(...)" to build an inferior with the right debug info
* When a class is created by python (the class object, not the class
instance), we will generate a new test method for each debug info
format in the test class with the name "<test-function>_<debug-info>"
and remove the original test method. This way unittest2 see multiple
test methods (1 for each debug info, pretty much as of now) and will
handle the test selection and the failure reporting correctly (the
debug info will be visible from the end of the test name)
* Add new annotation @no_debug_info_test to disable the generation of
multiple tests for each debug info format when the test don't have an
inferior
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13028
llvm-svn: 248883
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
with all the other assertion messages.
llvm-svn: 241212
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Before:
AssertionError: False is not True : Process is launched successfully
After:
AssertionError: False is not True : Command 'run a.out' failed.
>>> error: invalid target, create a target using the 'target create' command
>>> Process could not be launched successfully
Reviewers: clayborg
Reviewed By: clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits, vharron
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9948
llvm-svn: 238363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
against remote platform.
Adds @skipIfPlatform and @skipUnlessPlatform decorators which will skip if /
unless the target platform is in the provided platform list.
Test Plan:
ninja check-lldb shows no regressions.
When running cross platform, tests which cannot run on the target platform are
skipped.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8665
llvm-svn: 233547
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
"mydir" inside each test case.
This has led to many test suite failures because of copy and paste where new test cases were based off of other test cases and the "mydir" variable wasn't updated.
Now you can call your superclasses "compute_mydir()" function with "__file__" as the sole argument and the relative path will be computed for you.
llvm-svn: 196985
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
place that depended explicitly
on the output of "break set". Please don't do this sort of thing!!!!!
llvm-svn: 164433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
exclude tests decorated with
either @dsym_test or @dwarf_test to be executed during the testsuite run. There are still lots of
Test*.py files which have not been decorated with the new decorator.
An example:
# From TestMyFirstWatchpoint.py ->
class HelloWatchpointTestCase(TestBase):
mydir = os.path.join("functionalities", "watchpoint", "hello_watchpoint")
@dsym_test
def test_hello_watchpoint_with_dsym_using_watchpoint_set(self):
"""Test a simple sequence of watchpoint creation and watchpoint hit."""
self.buildDsym(dictionary=self.d)
self.setTearDownCleanup(dictionary=self.d)
self.hello_watchpoint()
@dwarf_test
def test_hello_watchpoint_with_dwarf_using_watchpoint_set(self):
"""Test a simple sequence of watchpoint creation and watchpoint hit."""
self.buildDwarf(dictionary=self.d)
self.setTearDownCleanup(dictionary=self.d)
self.hello_watchpoint()
# Invocation ->
[17:50:14] johnny:/Volumes/data/lldb/svn/ToT/test $ ./dotest.py -N dsym -v -p TestMyFirstWatchpoint.py
LLDB build dir: /Volumes/data/lldb/svn/ToT/build/Debug
LLDB-137
Path: /Volumes/data/lldb/svn/ToT
URL: https://johnny@llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/lldb/trunk
Repository Root: https://johnny@llvm.org/svn/llvm-project
Repository UUID: 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Revision: 154133
Node Kind: directory
Schedule: normal
Last Changed Author: gclayton
Last Changed Rev: 154109
Last Changed Date: 2012-04-05 10:43:02 -0700 (Thu, 05 Apr 2012)
Session logs for test failures/errors/unexpected successes will go into directory '2012-04-05-17_50_49'
Command invoked: python ./dotest.py -N dsym -v -p TestMyFirstWatchpoint.py
compilers=['clang']
Configuration: arch=x86_64 compiler=clang
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Collected 2 tests
1: test_hello_watchpoint_with_dsym_using_watchpoint_set (TestMyFirstWatchpoint.HelloWatchpointTestCase)
Test a simple sequence of watchpoint creation and watchpoint hit. ... skipped 'dsym tests'
2: test_hello_watchpoint_with_dwarf_using_watchpoint_set (TestMyFirstWatchpoint.HelloWatchpointTestCase)
Test a simple sequence of watchpoint creation and watchpoint hit. ... ok
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 2 tests in 1.138s
OK (skipped=1)
Session logs for test failures/errors/unexpected successes can be found in directory '2012-04-05-17_50_49'
[17:50:50] johnny:/Volumes/data/lldb/svn/ToT/test $
llvm-svn: 154154
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
children were not recalculated when necessary, causing them to get out of sync with live data
2) providing an updated list of tagged pointers values for the objc_runtime module - hopefully this one is final
3) changing ValueObject::DumpValueObject to use an Options class instead of providing a bulky list of parameters to pass around
this change had been laid out previously, but some clients of DumpValueObject() were still using the old prototype and some arguments
were treated in a special way and passed in directly instead of through the Options class
4) providing new GetSummaryAsCString() and GetValueAsCString() calls in ValueObject that are passed a formatter object and a destination string
and fill the string by formatting themselves using the formatter argument instead of the default for the current ValueObject
5) removing the option to have formats and summaries stick to a variable for the current stoppoint
after some debate, we are going with non-sticky: if you say frame variable --format hex foo, the hex format will only be applied to the current command execution and not stick when redisplaying foo
the other option would be full stickiness, which means that foo would be formatted as hex for its whole lifetime
we are open to suggestions on what feels "natural" in this regard
llvm-svn: 151801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
./dotest.py -v -f DataFormatterTestCase.test_with_dsym_and_run_command
will not end up running 14 tests.
llvm-svn: 138399
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
might be a breaking change for those who have summaries defined.
llvm-svn: 138331
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
summary add moved from -s to -o (this is a preliminary step in moving the short option for --summary-string from -f to -s) ; Accordingly updated the test suite
llvm-svn: 138315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- Summaries for char*, const char* and char[] are loaded at startup as
system-wide summaries. This means you cannot delete them unless you use
the -a option to type summary delete/clear
- You can add your own system-wide summaries by using the -w option to type
summary add
Several code improvements for the Python summaries feature
llvm-svn: 135326
|
|
- you can use a Python script to write a summary string for data-types, in one of
three ways:
-P option and typing the script a line at a time
-s option and passing a one-line Python script
-F option and passing the name of a Python function
these options all work for the "type summary add" command
your Python code (if provided through -P or -s) is wrapped in a function
that accepts two parameters: valobj (a ValueObject) and dict (an LLDB
internal dictionary object). if you use -F and give a function name,
you're expected to define the function on your own and with the right
prototype. your function, however defined, must return a Python string
- test case for the Python summary feature
- a few quirks:
Python summaries cannot have names, and cannot use regex as type names
both issues will be fixed ASAP
major redesign of type summary code:
- type summary working with strings and type summary working with Python code
are two classes, with a common base class SummaryFormat
- SummaryFormat classes now are able to actively format objects rather than
just aggregating data
- cleaner code to print descriptions for summaries
the public API now exports a method to easily navigate a ValueObject hierarchy
New InputReaderEZ and PriorityPointerPair classes
Several minor fixes and improvements
llvm-svn: 135238
|