| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is the conclusion of an effort to get LLDB's Python code
structured into a bona-fide Python package. This has a number
of benefits, but most notably the ability to more easily share
Python code between different but related pieces of LLDB's Python
infrastructure (for example, `scripts` can now share code with
`test`).
llvm-svn: 251532
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 251444
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Apparently there were tons of instances I missed last time, I
guess I accidentally ran 2to3 non-recursively. This should be
every occurrence of a print statement fixed to use a print function
as well as from __future__ import print_function being added to
every file.
After this patch print statements will stop working everywhere in
the test suite, and the print function should be used instead.
llvm-svn: 251121
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is necessary in order to allow third party modules to be
located under lldb/third_party rather than under the test
folder directly.
Since we're already touching every test file anyway, we also
go ahead and delete the unittest2 import and main block wherever
possible. The ability to run a test as a standalone file has
already been broken for some time, and if we decide we want this
back, we should use unittest instead of unittest2.
A few places could not have the import of unittest2 removed,because
they depend on the unittest2.expectedFailure or skip decorators.
Removing all those was orthogonal in spirit to the purpose of this
CL, so the import of unittest2 remains in those files that were
using it for its test decorators. Those can be addressed
separately.
llvm-svn: 251055
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently most of the test files have a separate dwarf and a separate
dsym test with almost identical content (only the build step is
different). With adding dwo symbol file handling to the test suit it
would increase this to a 3-way duplication. The purpose of this change
is to eliminate this redundancy with generating 2 test case (one dwarf
and one dsym) for each test function specified (dwo handling will be
added at a later commit).
Main design goals:
* There should be no boilerplate code in each test file to support the
multiple debug info in most of the tests (custom scenarios are
acceptable in special cases) so adding a new test case is easier and
we can't miss one of the debug info type.
* In case of a test failure, the debug symbols used during the test run
have to be cleanly visible from the output of dotest.py to make
debugging easier both from build bot logs and from local test runs
* Each test case should have a unique, fully qualified name so we can
run exactly 1 test with "-f <test-case>.<test-function>" syntax
* Test output should be grouped based on test files the same way as it
happens now (displaying dwarf/dsym results separately isn't
preferable)
Proposed solution (main logic in lldbtest.py, rest of them are test
cases fixed up for the new style):
* Have only 1 test fuction in the test files what will run for all
debug info separately and this test function should call just
"self.build(...)" to build an inferior with the right debug info
* When a class is created by python (the class object, not the class
instance), we will generate a new test method for each debug info
format in the test class with the name "<test-function>_<debug-info>"
and remove the original test method. This way unittest2 see multiple
test methods (1 for each debug info, pretty much as of now) and will
handle the test selection and the failure reporting correctly (the
debug info will be visible from the end of the test name)
* Add new annotation @no_debug_info_test to disable the generation of
multiple tests for each debug info format when the test don't have an
inferior
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13028
llvm-svn: 248883
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 242979
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Target and breakpoints options were added:
breakpoint set --language lang --name func
settings set target.language pascal
These specify the Language to use when interpreting the breakpoint's
expression (note: currently only implemented for breakpoints on
identifiers). If the breakpoint language is not set, the target.language
setting is used.
This support is required by Pascal, for example, to set breakpoint at 'ns.foo'
for function 'foo' in namespace 'ns'.
Tests on the language were also added to Module::PrepareForFunctionNameLookup
for efficiency.
Reviewed by: clayborg
Subscribers: jingham, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11119
llvm-svn: 242844
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
with all the other assertion messages.
llvm-svn: 241212
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Before:
AssertionError: False is not True : Process is launched successfully
After:
AssertionError: False is not True : Command 'run a.out' failed.
>>> error: invalid target, create a target using the 'target create' command
>>> Process could not be launched successfully
Reviewers: clayborg
Reviewed By: clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits, vharron
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9948
llvm-svn: 238363
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch initially was committed in r237460 but later it was reverted (r237479) due to 4 new failures:
* TestExitDuringStep.py
* TestNumThreads.py
* TestThreadExit.py
* TestThreadStates.py
This patch also fixes these tests.
llvm-svn: 237566
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
TestExitDuringStep.py
TestNumThreads.py
TestThreadExit.py
TestThreadStates.py
llvm-svn: 237479
|
|
|
Summary:
This option forces to only set a source line breakpoint when there is an exact-match
This patch includes the following commits:
# Add the -m/--exact-match option in "breakpoint set" command
## Add exact_match arg in BreakpointResolverFileLine ctor
## Add m_exact_match field in BreakpointResolverFileLine
## Add exact_match arg in BreakpointResolverFileRegex ctor
## Add m_exact_match field in BreakpointResolverFileRegex
## Add exact_match arg in Target::CreateSourceRegexBreakpoint
## Add exact_match arg in Target::CreateBreakpoint
## Add -m/--exact-match option in "breakpoint set" command
# Add target.exact-match option to skip BP if source line doesn't match
## Add target.exact-match global option
## Add Target::GetExactMatch
## Refactor Target::CreateSourceRegexBreakpoint to accept LazyBool exact_match (was bool)
## Refactor Target::CreateBreakpoint to accept LazyBool exact_match (was bool)
# Add target.exact-match test in SettingsCommandTestCase
# Add BreakpointOptionsTestCase tests to test --skip-prologue/--exact-match options
# Fix a few typos in lldbutil.check_breakpoint_result func
# Rename --exact-match/m_exact_match/exact_match/GetExactMatch to --move-to-nearest-code/m_move_to_nearest_code/move_to_nearest_code/GetMoveToNearestCode
# Add exact_match field in BreakpointResolverFileLine::GetDescription and BreakpointResolverFileRegex::GetDescription, for example:
was:
```
1: file = '/Users/IliaK/p/llvm/tools/lldb/test/functionalities/breakpoint/breakpoint_command/main.c', line = 12, locations = 1, resolved = 1, hit count = 2
1.1: where = a.out`main + 20 at main.c:12, address = 0x0000000100000eb4, resolved, hit count = 2
```
now:
```
1: file = '/Users/IliaK/p/llvm/tools/lldb/test/functionalities/breakpoint/breakpoint_command/main.c', line = 12, exact_match = 0, locations = 1, resolved = 1, hit count = 2
1.1: where = a.out`main + 20 at main.c:12, address = 0x0000000100000eb4, resolved, hit count = 2
```
Test Plan:
./dotest.py -v --executable $BUILDDIR/bin/lldb functionalities/breakpoint/
./dotest.py -v --executable $BUILDDIR/bin/lldb settings/
./dotest.py -v --executable $BUILDDIR/bin/lldb tools/lldb-mi/breakpoint/
Reviewers: jingham, clayborg
Reviewed By: clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits, clayborg, jingham
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9273
llvm-svn: 237460
|
