summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/lldb/test/Shell/SymbolFile/Breakpad
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* lldb/breakpad: add suppport for the "x86_64h" architecturePavel Labath2019-11-051-1/+1
|
* minidump: Create memory regions from the sections of loaded modulesPavel Labath2019-10-311-0/+133
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: Not all minidumps contain information about memory permissions. However, it is still important to know which regions of memory contain potentially executable code. This is particularly important for unwinding on win32, as the default unwind method there relies on scanning the stack for things which "look like" code pointers. This patch enables ProcessMinidump to reconstruct the likely permissions of memory regions using the sections of loaded object files. It only does this if we don't have a better source (memory info list stream, or linux /proc/maps) for this information, and only if the information in the object files does not conflict with the information in the minidump. Theoretically that last bit could be improved, since the permissions obtained from the MemoryList streams is also only a very rough guess, but it did not seem worthwhile to complicate the implementation because of that because there will generally be no overlap in practice as the MemoryList will contain the stack contents and not any module data. The patch adds a test checking that the module section permissions are entered into the memory region list, and also a test which demonstrate that now the unwinder is able to correctly find return addresses even in minidumps without memory info list streams. There's one TODO left in this patch, which is that the "memory region" output does not give any indication about the "don't know" values of memory region permissions (it just prints them as if they permission bit was set). I address this in a follow up. Reviewers: amccarth, clayborg Subscribers: mgrang, lldb-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69105
* Add REQUIRES: x86 to more tests which need the x86 llvm target builtPavel Labath2019-10-182-0/+4
| | | | llvm-svn: 375234
* unwind-via-stack-win.yaml: update for changes in yaml formatPavel Labath2019-10-101-1/+15
| | | | llvm-svn: 374353
* Re-land "[test] Split LLDB tests into API, Shell & Unit"Jonas Devlieghere2019-10-0927-0/+636
| | | | | | | The original patch got reverted because it broke `check-lldb` on a clean build. This fixes that. llvm-svn: 374201
* Revert [test] Split LLDB tests into API, Shell & UnitAdrian Prantl2019-10-0927-636/+0
| | | | | | | | as it appears to have broken check-lldb. This reverts r374184 (git commit 22314179f0660c172514b397060fd8f34b586e82) llvm-svn: 374187
* [test] Split LLDB tests into API, Shell & UnitJonas Devlieghere2019-10-0927-0/+636
LLDB has three major testing strategies: unit tests, tests that exercise the SB API though dotest.py and what we currently call lit tests. The later is rather confusing as we're now using lit as the driver for all three types of tests. As most of this grew organically, the directory structure in the LLDB repository doesn't really make this clear. The 'lit' tests are part of the root and among these tests there's a Unit and Suite folder for the unit and dotest-tests. This layout makes it impossible to run just the lit tests. This patch changes the directory layout to match the 3 testing strategies, each with their own directory and their own configuration file. This means there are now 3 directories under lit with 3 corresponding targets: - API (check-lldb-api): Test exercising the SB API. - Shell (check-lldb-shell): Test exercising command line utilities. - Unit (check-lldb-unit): Unit tests. Finally, there's still the `check-lldb` target that runs all three test suites. Finally, this also renames the lit folder to `test` to match the LLVM repository layout. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68606 llvm-svn: 374184
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud