| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewers: labath, davide
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: clayborg, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
The qfProcessInfo and qsProcessInfo packets currently don't set the processes' arguments, however the platform process list -v command tries to print it.
In this diff I'm adding the arguments as part of the packet, and now the command shows the arguments just like on mac.
On Mac:
507 1 wallace 1876110778 wallace 1876110778 x86_64-apple-macosx /usr/libexec/secd
503 1 wallace 1876110778 wallace 1876110778 x86_64-apple-macosx /usr/libexec/secinitd
501 1 wallace 1876110778 wallace 1876110778 x86_64-apple-macosx /usr/libexec/languageassetd --firstLogin
497 1 wallace 1876110778 wallace 1876110778 x86_64-apple-macosx /usr/libexec/trustd --agent
496 1 wallace 1876110778 wallace 1876110778 x86_64-apple-macosx /usr/libexec/lsd
494 1 wallace 1876110778 wallace 1876110778 x86_64-apple-macosx /System/Library/Frameworks/CoreTelephony.framework/Support/CommCenter -L
491 1 wallace 1876110778 wallace 1876110778 x86_64-apple-macosx /usr/sbin/distnoted agent
489 1 wallace 1876110778 wallace 1876110778 x86_64-apple-macosx /usr/libexec/UserEventAgent (Aqua)
484 1 wallace 1876110778 wallace 1876110778 x86_64-apple-macosx /usr/sbin/cfprefsd agent
483 1 wallace 1876110778 wallace 1876110778 x86_64-apple-macosx /System/Library/Frameworks/LocalAuthentication.framework/Support/coreauthd
On android:
1561 1016 root 0 0 aarch64-unknown-linux-android /system/bin/ip6tables-restore--noflush -w -v
1805 982 1000 1000 1000 android:drmService
1811 982 10189 10189 10189 com.qualcomm.embms:remote
1999 1 1000 1000 1000 aarch64-unknown-linux-android /system/bin/tlc_serverCCM
2332 982 10038 10038 10038 com.android.systemui
2378 983 1053 1053 1053 webview_zygote
2448 982 5013 5013 5013 com.sec.location.nsflp2
2465 982 10027 10027 10027 com.google.android.gms.persistent
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293
llvm-svn: 375029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
was requested, take 2
Summary:
The previous attempt at making nameless process not match when searching for a
given name failed because the macos implementation was depending on this detail
in its partial matching strategy. Doing partial matching to avoid expensive
lookups is a perfectly valid thing to do, the way it was implemented seems
somewhat unexpected.
This patch implements it differently by providing special
methods in the ProcessInstanceInfoMatch which match only a subset of fields,
and changes mac host code to use those instead.
Then, it re-applies r373925 to get make the ProcessInstanceInfoMatch with a
name *not* match a nameless process.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, teemperor, jingham
Subscribers: wallace, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68631
llvm-svn: 374529
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
name match was requested"
This breaks TestProcessAttach and TestHelloWorld on Darwin.
llvm-svn: 374008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
was requested
Since D68289, a couple of tests on linux started being extremely flaky.
All of them were doing name-based attaching and were failing because
they couldn't find an unambiguous process to attach to.
The patch above changed the process finding logic, so that failure to
find a process name does not constitute an error. This meant that a lot
more transient processes showed up in the process list during the test
suite run. Previously, these processes would not appear as they would be
gone by the time we went to read their executable name, arguments, etc.
Now, this alone should not cause an issue were it not for the fact that
we were considering a process with no name as if it matched by default
(even if we were explicitly searching for a process with a specified
name). This meant that any of the "transient" processes with no name
would make the name match ambiguous. That clearly seems like a bug to me
so I fix that.
llvm-svn: 373925
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Now that `process list` works better on the android platform, the arch aarch64-unknown-linux-android appears quite often.
The existing printed width of the TRIPLE column is not long enough, which doesn't look okay.
E.g.
```
1561 1016 aarch64-unknown-linux-android ip6tables-restore
1999 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android tlc_server
2332 982 com.android.systemui
2378 983 webview_zygote
```
Now, after adding 6 spaces, it looks better
```
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ============================== ============================
...
1561 1016 aarch64-unknown-linux-android ip6tables-restore
1999 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android tlc_server
2332 982 com.android.systemui
2378 983 webview_zygote
2448 982 com.sec.location.nsflp2
```
Reviewers: clayborg, labath, xiaobai, aadsm
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: srhines, kristof.beyls, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68291
llvm-svn: 373670
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Don't attempt to print invalid user ids. Previously, these would come
out as UINT32_MAX, or as an assertion failure.
llvm-svn: 369906
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 369880
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 360554
|
|
There are set of classes in Target that describe the parameters of a
process - e.g. it's PID, name, user id, and similar. However, since it
is a bare description of a process and contains no actual functionality,
there's nothing specifically that makes this appropriate for being in
Target -- it could just as well be describing a process on the host, or
some hypothetical virtual process that doesn't even exist.
To cement this, I'm moving these classes to Utility. It's possible that
we can find a better place for it in the future, but as it is neither
Host specific nor Target specific, Utility seems like the most appropriate
place for the time being.
After this there is only 2 remaining references to Target from Host,
which I'll address in a followup.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58842
llvm-svn: 355342
|