| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
unwind plans
This patch adds an implementation of unwinding using PE EH info. It allows to
get almost ideal call stacks on 64-bit Windows systems (except some epilogue
cases, but I believe that they can be fixed with unwind plan disassembly
augmentation in the future).
To achieve the goal the CallFrameInfo abstraction was made. It is based on the
DWARFCallFrameInfo class interface with a few changes to make it less
DWARF-specific.
To implement the new interface for PECOFF object files the class PECallFrameInfo
was written. It uses the next helper classes:
- UnwindCodesIterator helps to iterate through UnwindCode structures (and
processes chained infos transparently);
- EHProgramBuilder with the use of UnwindCodesIterator constructs EHProgram;
- EHProgram is, by fact, a vector of EHInstructions. It creates an abstraction
over the low-level unwind codes and simplifies work with them. It contains
only the information that is relevant to unwinding in the unified form. Also
the required unwind codes are read from the object file only once with it;
- EHProgramRange allows to take a range of EHProgram and to build an unwind row
for it.
So, PECallFrameInfo builds the EHProgram with EHProgramBuilder, takes the ranges
corresponding to every offset in prologue and builds the rows of the resulted
unwind plan. The resulted plan covers the whole range of the function except the
epilogue.
Reviewers: jasonmolenda, asmith, amccarth, clayborg, JDevlieghere, stella.stamenova, labath, espindola
Reviewed By: jasonmolenda
Subscribers: leonid.mashinskiy, emaste, mgorny, aprantl, arichardson, MaskRay, lldb-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67347
llvm-svn: 374528
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This is the next step in avoiding funneling all SymbolFile calls through
the SymbolVendor. Right now, it is just a convenience function, but it
allows us to update all calls to SymbolVendor functions to access the
SymbolFile directly. Once all call sites have been updated, we can
remove the GetSymbolVendor member function.
This patch just updates the calls to GetSymbolVendor, which were calling
it just so they could fetch the underlying symbol file. Other calls will
be done in follow-ups.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, clayborg, jingham
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65435
llvm-svn: 367664
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
some unwind formats are specific to a single symbol file and so it does
not make sense for their parsing code live in the general Symbol library
(as is the case with eh_frame for instance). This is the case for the
unwind information in breakpad files, but the same will probably be true
for PDB unwind info (once we are able to parse that).
This patch adds the ability to fetch an unwind plan provided by a symbol
file plugin, as discussed in the RFC at
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/2019-February/014703.html>.
I've kept the set of changes to a minimum, as there is no way to test
them until we have a symbol file which implements this API -- that is
comming in a follow-up patch, which will also implicitly test this
change.
The interesting part here is the introduction of the
"RegisterInfoResolver" interface. The reason for this is that breakpad
needs to be able to resolve register names (which are present as strings
in the file) into register enums so that it can construct the unwind
plan. This is normally done via the RegisterContext class, handing this
over to the SymbolFile plugin would mean that it has full access to the
debugged process, which is not something we want it to have. So instead,
I create a facade, which only provides the ability to query register
names, and hide the RegisterContext behind the facade.
Also note that this only adds the ability to dump the unwind plan
created by the symbol file plugin -- the plan is not used for unwinding
yet -- this will be added in a third patch, which will add additional
tests which makes sure the unwinding works as a whole.
Reviewers: jasonmolenda, clayborg
Subscribers: markmentovai, amccarth, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61732
llvm-svn: 360409
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This is a preparatory step to enable adding of unwind plans by symbol
file plugins.
Although at the surface it seems that currently symbol files have
nothing to do with unwinding, this isn't entirely correct even now. The
mere act of adding a symbol file can have the effect of making more
sections (typically .debug_frame) available to the unwinding machinery,
so that it can have more unwind strategies to choose from.
Up until now, we've had a bug, which went largely unnoticed, where
unwind info in the manually added symbols files (target symbols add) was
being ignored during unwinding. Reinitializing the UnwindTable fixes
that bug too.
Reviewers: clayborg, jasonmolenda, alexshap
Subscribers: jdoerfert, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58347
llvm-svn: 356361
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This is a preparatory step to enable adding extra unwind strategies by
symbol file plugins. This has been discussed on the lldb-dev mailing
list: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/2019-February/014703.html>.
Reviewers: jasonmolenda, clayborg, espindola
Subscribers: lemo, emaste, lldb-commits, arichardson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58129
llvm-svn: 354033
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
instead of returning the architecture through by-ref argument and a
boolean value indicating success, we can just return the ArchSpec
directly. Since the ArchSpec already has an invalid state, it can be
used to denote the failure without the additional bool.
Reviewers: clayborg, zturner, espindola
Subscribers: emaste, arichardson, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56129
llvm-svn: 350291
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is intended as a clean up after the big clang-format commit
(r280751), which unfortunately resulted in many of the comment
paragraphs in LLDB being very hard to read.
FYI, the script I used was:
import textwrap
import commands
import os
import sys
import re
tmp = "%s.tmp"%sys.argv[1]
out = open(tmp, "w+")
with open(sys.argv[1], "r") as f:
header = ""
text = ""
comment = re.compile(r'^( *//) ([^ ].*)$')
special = re.compile(r'^((([A-Z]+[: ])|([0-9]+ )).*)|(.*;)$')
for line in f:
match = comment.match(line)
if match and not special.match(match.group(2)):
# skip intentionally short comments.
if not text and len(match.group(2)) < 40:
out.write(line)
continue
if text:
text += " " + match.group(2)
else:
header = match.group(1)
text = match.group(2)
continue
if text:
filled = textwrap.wrap(text, width=(78-len(header)),
break_long_words=False)
for l in filled:
out.write(header+" "+l+'\n')
text = ""
out.write(line)
os.rename(tmp, sys.argv[1])
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46144
llvm-svn: 331197
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
instead of using a boolean to differentiate between the two section
types, use an enum to make the intent clearer.
I also remove the RegisterKind argument from the constructor, as this
can be deduced from the Type argument.
Reviewers: clayborg, jasonmolenda
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34681
llvm-svn: 306521
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This is a beefed-up version of D33504, which adds support for dwarf 4
debug_frame section format.
The main difference here is that the decision whether to use eh_frame or
debug_frame is done on a per-function basis instead of per-object file.
This is necessary because one module can contain both sections (for
example, the start files added by the linker will typically pull in
eh_frame), but we want to be able to access both, for maximum
information.
I also add unit test for parsing various CFI formats (eh_frame,
debug_frame v3 and debug_frame v4).
Reviewers: jasonmolenda, clayborg
Subscribers: mgorny, aprantl, abidh, lldb-commits, tatyana-krasnukha
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34613
llvm-svn: 306397
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit r303847 as it introduces a number of regressions.
Investigation has showed that we are parsing the CIE entries in the
debug_frame section incorrectly -- we are parsing them the same way as
eh_frame, but the entries in debug_frame have a couple of extra entries
which have not been taken into account.
llvm-svn: 303854
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There are some differences between eh_frame and debug_frame formats that
are not considered by DWARFCallFrameInfo::GetFDEIndex. An FDE entry
contains CIE_pointer in debug_frame in same place as cie_id in eh_frame.
As described in dwarf standard (section 6.4.1), CIE_pointer is an
"offset into the .debug_frame section". So, variable cie_offset should
be equal cie_id for debug_frame.
FDE entries with zeroth CIE pointer (which is actually placed in cie_id
variable) shouldn't be ignored also.
I have also added a little change which allow to use debug_info section
when eh_frame is absent. This case really can take place on some platforms.
Patch from tatyana-krasnukha.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D33504
llvm-svn: 303847
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:
Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):
find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;
The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.
Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.
llvm-svn: 280751
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 270024
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
should not be used for this module -- for use when an ObjectFile
knows that it does not have meaningful or accurate function start
addresses.
More commonly, it is not clear that function start addresses are
missing in a module. There are certain cases on Mac OS X where we
can tell that a Mach-O binary has been stripped of this essential
information, and the unwinder can end up emulating many megabytes
of instructions for a single "function" in the binary.
When a Mach-O binary is missing both an LC_FUNCTION_STARTS load
command (very unusual) and an eh_frame section, then we will assume
it has also been stripped of symbols and that instruction emulation
will not be useful on this module.
<rdar://problem/25988067>
llvm-svn: 268475
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
.ARM.exidx/.ARM.extab sections contain unwind information used on ARM
architecture from unwinding from an exception.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13245
llvm-svn: 248903
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
for eh_frame and stabs register numberings. This is not
complete but it's a step in the right direction. It's almost
entirely mechanical.
lldb informally uses "gcc register numbering" to mean eh_frame.
Why? Probably because there's a notorious bug with gcc on i386
darwin where the register numbers in eh_frame were incorrect.
In all other cases, eh_frame register numbering is identical to
dwarf.
lldb informally uses "gdb register numbering" to mean stabs.
There are no official definitions of stabs register numbers
for different architectures, so the implementations of gdb
and gcc are the de facto reference source.
There were some incorrect uses of these register number types
in lldb already. I fixed the ones that I saw as I made
this change.
This commit changes all references to "gcc" and "gdb" register
numbers in lldb to "eh_frame" and "stabs" to make it clear
what is actually being represented.
lldb cannot parse the stabs debug format, and given that no
one is using stabs any more, it is unlikely that it ever will.
A more comprehensive cleanup would remove the stabs register
numbers altogether - it's unnecessary cruft / complication to
all of our register structures.
In ProcessGDBRemote, when we get register definitions from
the gdb-remote stub, we expect to see "gcc:" (qRegisterInfo)
or "gcc_regnum" (qXfer:features:read: packet to get xml payload).
This patch changes ProcessGDBRemote to also accept "ehframe:"
and "ehframe_regnum" from these remotes.
I did not change GDBRemoteCommunicationServerLLGS or debugserver
to send these new packets. I don't know what kind of interoperability
constraints we might be working under. At some point in the future
we should transition to using the more descriptive names.
Throughout lldb we're still using enum names like "gcc_r0" and "gdb_r0",
for eh_frame and stabs register numberings. These should be cleaned
up eventually too.
The sources link cleanly on macosx native with xcode build. I
don't think we'll see problems on other platforms but please let
me know if I broke anyone.
llvm-svn: 245141
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
section for x86_64 and i386 targets on Darwin systems. Currently only the
compact unwind encoding for normal frame-using functions is supported but it
will be easy handle frameless functions when I have a bit more free time to
test it. The LSDA and personality routines for functions are also retrieved
correctly for functions from the compact unwind section.
This new code is very fresh -- it passes the lldb testsuite and I've done
by-hand inspection of many functions and am getting correct behavior for all
of them. There may need to be some bug fixing over the next couple weeks as
I exercise and test it further. But I think it's fine right now so I'm
committing it.
<rdar://problem/13220837>
llvm-svn: 223625
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
to modify the same UnwindTable object simultaneously. Fix
HistoryThread and HistoryUnwind's mutex lock acqusition to
retain the lock for the duration of the operation instead of
releasing the temporary immediately.
<rdar://problem/17055023>
llvm-svn: 211241
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
and sharing it with all of its FuncUnwinders, have each FuncUnwinder
create an AssemblyProfiler on demand as needed. I was worried that
the cost of creating the llvm disassemblers would be high for this
approach but it's not supposed to be an expensive operation, and it
means we don't need to add locks around this section of code.
<rdar://problem/16992332>
llvm-svn: 209493
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 209492
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
to its unwind assembly profiler to all of the FuncUnwinders (one
per symbol) under it. If lldb is running multiple targets, you
could get two different FuncUnwinders in the same Module trying
to use the same llvm disassembler simultaneously and that may be
a re-entrancy problem.
Instead, the UnwindTable has the unwind assembly profiler and when
the FuncUnwinders want to use it, they get exclusive access to
the assembly profiler until they're done using it.
<rdar://problem/16992332>
llvm-svn: 209488
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Patch by Robert Matusewicz
llvm-svn: 206713
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
RegisterContextPOSIX_x86
llvm-svn: 192332
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Also added a similar function for modules:
std::string
Module::GetSpecificationDescription () const;
This returns the module as "/usr/lib/libfoo.dylib" for normal files (calls "std::string FileSpec::GetPath()" on m_file) but it also might include the object name in case the module is for a .o file in a BSD archive ("/usr/lib/libfoo.a(bar.o)"). Cleaned up necessary logging code to use it.
llvm-svn: 180717
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- use macros from inttypes.h for format strings instead of OS-specific types
Patch from Matt Kopec!
llvm-svn: 168945
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
UnwindPlans for a function. This specifically does not use any
previously-generated UnwindPlans so if any logging is performed
while creating the UnwindPlans, it will be repeated. This is
useful for when an lldb stack trace is not correct and you want
to gather diagnostic information from the user -- they can do
log enable -v lldb unwind, image show-unwind of the function, and
you'll get the full logging as the UnwindPlans are recreated.
llvm-svn: 160095
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This was done in SBTarget:
lldb::SBInstructionList
lldb::SBTarget::ReadInstructions (lldb::SBAddress base_addr, uint32_t count);
Also cleaned up a few files in the LLDB.framework settings.
llvm-svn: 152152
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 130156
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
in a Utility directory.
llvm-svn: 130135
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
inline contexts when the deepest most block is not inlined.
Added source path remappings to the lldb_private::Target class that allow it
to remap paths found in debug info so we can find source files that are elsewhere
on the current system.
Fixed disassembly by function name to disassemble inline functions that are
inside other functions much better and to show enough context before the
disassembly output so you can tell where things came from.
Added the ability to get more than one address range from a SymbolContext
class for the case where a block or function has discontiguous address ranges.
llvm-svn: 130044
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch fixes all of the warnings due to unordered initialization lists.
Patch by Marco Minutoli.
llvm-svn: 129290
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
now, in addition to cpu type/subtype and architecture flavor, contains:
- byte order (big endian, little endian)
- address size in bytes
- llvm::Triple for true target triple support and for more powerful plug-in
selection.
llvm-svn: 125602
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
was being searched and sorted using a shared pointer as the value which means
the pointer value was what was being searched for. This means that anytime
you did a stack backtrace, the collection of FuncUnwinders doubled and then
the array or shared pointer got sorted (by pointer value), so you had an ever
increasing collection of shared pointer where a match was never found. This
means we had a ton of duplicates in this table and would cause issues after
one had been debugging for a long time.
llvm-svn: 123045
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
FuncUnwinders object if the eh_frame section was missing
from an objfile. Worked fine on x86_64 but on i386 where
eh_frame is unusual, that resulted in the arch default
UnwindPlan being used all the time instead of picking up
an assembly profile based unwindplan.
llvm-svn: 118467
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RegisterContextLLDB holds a reference to the SymbolContext
in the vector of Cursors that UnwindLLDB maintains. Switch
UnwindLLDB to hold a vector of shared pointers of Cursors
so this reference doesn't become invalid.
Correctly falling back from the "fast" UnwindPlan to the
"full" UnwindPlan when additional registers need to be
retrieved.
llvm-svn: 118218
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 114616
|
|
|
The Unwind and RegisterContext subclasses still need
to be finished; none of this code is used by lldb at
this point (unless you call into it by hand).
The ObjectFile class now has an UnwindTable object.
The UnwindTable object has a series of FuncUnwinders
objects (Function Unwinders) -- one for each function
in that ObjectFile we've backtraced through during this
debug session.
The FuncUnwinders object has a few different UnwindPlans.
UnwindPlans are a generic way of describing how to find
the canonical address of a given function's stack frame
(the CFA idea from DWARF/eh_frame) and how to restore the
caller frame's register values, if they have been saved
by this function.
UnwindPlans are created from different sources. One source is the
eh_frame exception handling information generated by the compiler
for unwinding an exception throw. Another source is an assembly
language inspection class (UnwindAssemblyProfiler, uses the Plugin
architecture) which looks at the instructions in the funciton
prologue and describes the stack movements/register saves that are
done.
Two additional types of UnwindPlans that are worth noting are
the "fast" stack UnwindPlan which is useful for making a first
pass over a thread's stack, determining how many stack frames there
are and retrieving the pc and CFA values for each frame (enough
to create StackFrameIDs). Only a minimal set of registers is
recovered during a fast stack walk.
The final UnwindPlan is an architectural default unwind plan.
These are provided by the ArchDefaultUnwindPlan class (which uses
the plugin architecture). When no symbol/function address range can
be found for a given pc value -- when we have no eh_frame information
and when we don't have a start address so we can't examine the assembly
language instrucitons -- we have to make a best guess about how to
unwind. That's when we use the architectural default UnwindPlan.
On x86_64, this would be to assume that rbp is used as a stack pointer
and we can use that to find the caller's frame pointer and pc value.
It's a last-ditch best guess about how to unwind out of a frame.
There are heuristics about when to use one UnwindPlan versues the other --
this will all happen in the still-begin-written UnwindLLDB subclass of
Unwind which runs the UnwindPlans.
llvm-svn: 113581
|
