| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
document it
This function is just setting the layout for the given RecordDecl so
the current name is not very descriptive. Also add some documentation for it.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Now CVType and CVSymbol are effectively type-safe wrappers around
ArrayRef<uint8_t>. Make the kind() accessor load it from the
RecordPrefix, which is the same for types and symbols.
Reviewers: zturner, aganea
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60018
llvm-svn: 357658
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This patch makes virtual bases to be added in the correct order to the bases
list. It is important because `VTableContext` (`MicrosoftVTableContext` in our
case) uses then the order of virtual bases in the list to restore the virtual
table indexes. These indexes are used then to resolve the layout of the virtual
bases.
We haven't enough information about offsets of virtual bases regarding to the
object (moreover, in a common case we can't rely on such information, see the
example here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53506#1272306 ), but there should be
enough information to restore the layout of the virtual bases from the indexes
in runtime. After D53506 this information is used whenever possible, so there
should be no problems with virtual bases' fields reading.
Reviewers: zturner, rnk, stella.stamenova
Subscribers: abidh, teemperor, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56904
llvm-svn: 353806
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This patch adds the basic support of methods reconstruction by native PDB
plugin. It contains only most obvious changes (it processes LF_ONEMETHOD and
LF_METHOD records), some things still remain unsolved:
- mangled names retrieving;
- support of template methods.
Reviewers: zturner, labath, lemo, stella.stamenova
Reviewed by: zturner
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56126
llvm-svn: 352464
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously the code that parsed debug info to create lldb's Symbol
objects such as Variable, Type, Function, etc was tightly coupled
to the AST reconstruction code. This made it difficult / impossible
to implement functions such as ParseDeclsForContext() that were only
supposed to be operating on clang AST's. By splitting these apart,
the logic becomes much cleaner and we have a clear separation of
responsibilities.
llvm-svn: 349383
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Originally we created our 64-bit UID scheme by using the first byte as
sort of a "tag" to represent what kind of symbol this was, and we
re-used the PDB_SymType enumeration for this. For native pdb support,
this is not really the right abstraction layer, because what we really
want is something that tells us *how* to find the symbol. This means,
specifically, is in the globals stream / public stream / module stream /
TPI stream / etc, and for whichever one it is in, where is it within
that stream?
A good example of why the old namespacing scheme was insufficient is
that it is more or less impossible to create a uid for a field list
member of a class/struction/union/enum that tells you how to locate
the original record.
With this new scheme, the first byte is no longer a PDB_SymType enum
but a new enum created specifically to identify where in the PDB
this record lives. This gives us much better flexibility in
what kinds of symbols the uids can identify.
llvm-svn: 347018
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bitfields are represented as LF_MEMBER records whose TypeIndex
points to an LF_BITFIELD record that describes the bit width,
bit offset, and underlying type of the bitfield. All we need to
do is resolve these when resolving record types.
llvm-svn: 346511
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
redundant parameter which can be calculated from other parameter.
rdar://problem/43822994
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54003
llvm-svn: 346428
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We currently had a 2-step process where we had to call
SetBaseClassesForType and DeleteBaseClasses. Every single caller
followed this exact 2-step process, and there was manual memory
management going on with raw pointers. We can do better than this
by storing a vector of unique_ptrs and passing this around.
This makes for a cleaner API, and we only need to call one method
so there is no possibility of a user forgetting to call
DeleteBaseClassSpecifiers.
In addition to this, it also makes for a *simpler* API. Part of
why I wanted to do this is because when I was implementing the native
PDB interface I had to spend some time understanding exactly what I
was deleting and why. ClangAST has significant mental overhead
associated with it, and reducing the API surface can go along
way to making it simpler for people to understand.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53590
llvm-svn: 345312
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 345055
|
|
|
This adds support to LLDB for named types (class, struct, union, and
enum). This is true cross platform support, and hits the PDB file
directly without a dependency on Windows. Tests are added which
compile a program with certain interesting types and then use
load the target in LLDB and use "type lookup -- <TypeName>" to
dump the layout of the type in LLDB without a running process.
Currently only fields are parsed -- we do not parse methods. Also
we don't deal with bitfields or virtual bases correctly. Those
will make good followups.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53511
llvm-svn: 345047
|
