| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
All of this is code that is unreferenced. Removing as much of
this as possible makes it more easy to determine what functionality
is missing and/or shared between LLVM and LLDB's DWARF interfaces.
llvm-svn: 356509
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Most of these are Dump functions that are never called, but there
is one instance of entire unused classes (DWARFDebugMacinfo and
DWARFDebugMacinfoEntry) which are also unreferenced in the codebase).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59276
llvm-svn: 356490
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The goal here is to improve our error handling and error recovery while
parsing DWARF, while at the same time getting us closer to being able to
merge LLDB's DWARF parser with LLVM's. To this end, I've udpated several
of the low-level parsing functions in LLDB to return llvm::Error and
llvm::Expected.
For now, this only updates LLDB parsing functions and not LLVM. In some
ways, this actually gets us *farther* from parity with the two
interfaces, because prior to this patch, at least the parsing interfaces
were the same (i.e. they all just returned bools, and now with this
patch they're diverging). But, I chose to do this for two primary
reasons.
LLDB has error logging code engrained deep within some of its parsing
functions. We don't want to lose this logging information, but obviously
LLVM has no logging mechanism at all. So if we're to merge the
interfaces, we have to find a way to still allow LLDB to properly report
parsing errors while not having the reporting code be inside of LLVM.
LLDB (and indeed, LLVM) overload the meaning of the false return value
from all of these extraction functions to mean both "We reached the null
entry at the end of a list of items, therefore everything was
successful" as well as "something bad and unrecoverable happened during
parsing". So you would have a lot code that would do something like:
while (foo.extract(...)) {
...
}
But when the loop stops, why did it stop? Did it stop because it
finished parsing, or because there was an error? Because of this, in
some cases we don't always know whether it is ok to proceed, or how to
proceed, but we were doing it anyway.
In this patch, I solve the second problem by introducing an
enumeration called DWARFEnumState which has two values MoreItems and
Complete. Both of these indicate success, but the latter indicates
that we reached the null entry. Then, I return this value instead of
bool, and convey parsing failure separately.
To solve the first problem (and convey parsing failure) these
functions now return either llvm::Error or llvm::Expected<DWARFEnumState>.
Having this extra bit of information allows us to properly convey all 3 of
"error, bail out", "success, call this function again", and "success,
don't call this function again".
In subsequent patches I plan to extend this pattern to the rest of the
parsing interfaces, which will ultimately get all of the log statements
and error reporting out of the low level parsing code and into the high
level parsing code (e.g. SymbolFileDWARF, DWARFASTParserClang, etc).
Eventually, these same changes will have to be backported to LLVM's
DWARF parser, but diverging in the short term is the easiest way to
converge in the long term.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59370
llvm-svn: 356190
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
LLDB does not support this DWARF5 form atm.
At least gcc emits it in some cases when doing optimization
for abbreviations.
As far I can tell, clang does not support it yet, though
the rest LLVM code already knows about it.
The patch adds the support.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52689
llvm-svn: 344328
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Simplification by removing excessive DWARFCompileUnit references for D40466 .
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42613
llvm-svn: 323586
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:
Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):
find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;
The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.
Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.
llvm-svn: 280751
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 203292
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Review: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2007
llvm-svn: 193368
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Major fixed to allow reading files that are over 4GB. The main problems were that the DataExtractor was using 32 bit offsets as a data cursor, and since we mmap all of our object files we could run into cases where if we had a very large core file that was over 4GB, we were running into the 4GB boundary.
So I defined a new "lldb::offset_t" which should be used for all file offsets.
After making this change, I enabled warnings for data loss and for enexpected implicit conversions temporarily and found a ton of things that I fixed.
Any functions that take an index internally, should use "size_t" for any indexes and also should return "size_t" for any sizes of collections.
llvm-svn: 173463
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
find the hotspots in our code when indexing the DWARF. A combination of
using SmallVector to avoid collection allocations, using fixed form
sizes when possible, and optimizing the hot loops contributed to the
speedup.
llvm-svn: 113961
|
|
|
llvm-svn: 105619
|
