summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/lldb/source/Plugins/Process/Utility/lldb-x86-register-enums.h
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* [lldb] [Process/NetBSD] Add register info for missing register setsMichał Górny2019-11-041-1/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Add info for all register sets supported in NetBSD, particularly for all registers 'expected' by LLDB. This is necessary in order to fix python_api/lldbutil/iter/TestRegistersIterator.py test that currently fails due to missing names of register sets (None). This copies fpreg descriptions from Linux, and combines Linux' AVX and MPX registers into a single XState group, to fit NetBSD register group design. Technically, we do not support MPX registers at the moment but gdb-remote insists on passing their errors anyway, and if we do not include it in any group, they end up in a separate anonymous group that breaks the test. While at it, swap the enums for XState and DBRegs to match register set ordering. This also adds a few consts to the lldb-x86-register-enums.h to provide more consistency between user registers and debug registers. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69667
* [NFC] Remove ASCII lines from commentsJonas Devlieghere2019-04-101-4/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | A lot of comments in LLDB are surrounded by an ASCII line to delimit the begging and end of the comment. Its use is not really consistent across the code base, sometimes the lines are longer, sometimes they are shorter and sometimes they are omitted. Furthermore, it looks kind of weird with the 80 column limit, where the comment actually extends past the line, but not by much. Furthermore, when /// is used for Doxygen comments, it looks particularly odd. And when // is used, it incorrectly gives the impression that it's actually a Doxygen comment. I assume these lines were added to improve distinguishing between comments and code. However, given that todays editors and IDEs do a great job at highlighting comments, I think it's worth to drop this for the sake of consistency. The alternative is fixing all the inconsistencies, which would create a lot more churn. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60508 llvm-svn: 358135
* Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepoChandler Carruth2019-01-191-4/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | to reflect the new license. We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach. Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and repository. llvm-svn: 351636
* Fix for rL280668, Intel(R) Memory Protection Extensions (Intel(R) MPX) support.Valentina Giusti2016-09-081-2/+30
| | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: Signed-off-by: Valentina Giusti <valentina.giusti@intel.com> Reviewers: dvlahovski, granata.enrico, clayborg, labath Subscribers: lldb-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24255 llvm-svn: 280942
* *** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source codeKate Stone2016-09-061-266/+266
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
* Revert "Intel(R) Memory Protection Extensions (Intel(R) MPX) support."Dimitar Vlahovski2016-09-061-28/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This reverts commit rL280668 because the register tests fail on i386 Linux. I investigated a little bit what causes the failure - there are missing registers when running 'register read -a'. This is the output I got at the bottom: """ ... Memory Protection Extensions: bnd0 = {0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000} bnd1 = {0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000} bnd2 = {0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000} bnd3 = {0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000} unknown: 2 registers were unavailable. """ Also looking at the packets exchanged between the client and server: """ ... history[308] tid=0x7338 < 19> send packet: $qRegisterInfo4a#d7 history[309] tid=0x7338 < 130> read packet: $name:bnd0;bitsize:128;offset:1032;encoding:vector;format:vector-uint64;set:Memory Protection Extensions;ehframe:101;dwarf:101;#48 history[310] tid=0x7338 < 19> send packet: $qRegisterInfo4b#d8 history[311] tid=0x7338 < 130> read packet: $name:bnd1;bitsize:128;offset:1048;encoding:vector;format:vector-uint64;set:Memory Protection Extensions;ehframe:102;dwarf:102;#52 history[312] tid=0x7338 < 19> send packet: $qRegisterInfo4c#d9 history[313] tid=0x7338 < 130> read packet: $name:bnd2;bitsize:128;offset:1064;encoding:vector;format:vector-uint64;set:Memory Protection Extensions;ehframe:103;dwarf:103;#53 history[314] tid=0x7338 < 19> send packet: $qRegisterInfo4d#da history[315] tid=0x7338 < 130> read packet: $name:bnd3;bitsize:128;offset:1080;encoding:vector;format:vector-uint64;set:Memory Protection Extensions;ehframe:104;dwarf:104;#54 history[316] tid=0x7338 < 19> send packet: $qRegisterInfo4e#db history[317] tid=0x7338 < 76> read packet: $name:bndcfgu;bitsize:64;offset:1096;encoding:vector;format:vector-uint8;#99 history[318] tid=0x7338 < 19> send packet: $qRegisterInfo4f#dc history[319] tid=0x7338 < 78> read packet: $name:bndstatus;bitsize:64;offset:1104;encoding:vector;format:vector-uint8;#8e ... """ The bndcfgu and bndstatus registers don't have the 'Memory Protections Extension' set. I looked at the code and it seems that that is set correctly. So I'm not sure what's the problem or where does it come from. Also there is a second failure related to something like this in the tests: """ registerSet.GetName().lower() """ For some reason the registerSet.GetName() returns None. llvm-svn: 280703
* Intel(R) Memory Protection Extensions (Intel(R) MPX) support.Valentina Giusti2016-09-051-2/+28
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: The Intel(R) Memory Protection Extensions (Intel(R) MPX) associates pointers to bounds, against which the software can check memory references to prevent out of bound memory access. This patch allows accessing the MPX registers: * bnd0-3: 128-bit registers to hold the bound values, * bndcfgu, bndstatus: 64-bit configuration registers, This patch also adds read/write tests for the MPX registers in the register command tests and adds a new subdirectory for MPX specific tests. Signed-off-by: Valentina Giusti <valentina.giusti@intel.com> Reviewers: labath, granata.enrico, lldb-commits, clayborg Subscribers: lldb-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24187 llvm-svn: 280668
* Fixing TestRegisters on Linux with LLGSVince Harron2015-01-231-2/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch fixes TestRegisters on Linux with LLGS Introduce GetUserRegisterCount on RegisterInfoInterface to distinguish lldb internal registers (e.g.: DR0-DR7) during register counting. Update GDBRemoteCommunicationServer to skip lldb internal registers on read/write register and on discover register. Submitted for Tamas Berghammer llvm-svn: 226959
* Rename lldb registers to contain lldb_ prefix.Zachary Turner2014-11-211-230/+231
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | LLDB supports many different register numbering schemes, and these are typically prefixed with an indicator that lets the user know what numbering scheme is used. The gcc numbering scheme is prefixed with gcc, and there are similar ones for dwarf, gdb, and gcc_dwarf. LLDB also contains its own internal numbering scheme, but the enum for LLDB's numbering scheme was prefixed differently. This patch changes the names of these enums to use the same naming scheme for the enum values as the rest of the register kinds by removing gpr_ and fpu_ prefixes, and instead using lldb_ prefixes for all enum values. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6351 Reviewed by: Greg Clayton llvm-svn: 222495
* Add lldb-gdbserver support for Linux x86_64.Todd Fiala2014-06-301-0/+292
This change brings in lldb-gdbserver (llgs) specifically for Linux x86_64. (More architectures coming soon). Not every debugserver option is covered yet. Currently the lldb-gdbserver command line can start unattached, start attached to a pid (process-name attach not supported yet), or accept lldb attaching and launching a process or connecting by process id. The history of this large change can be found here: https://github.com/tfiala/lldb/tree/dev-tfiala-native-protocol-linux-x86_64 Until mid/late April, I was not sharing the work and continued to rebase it off of head (developed via id tfiala@google.com). I switched over to user todd.fiala@gmail.com in the middle, and once I went to github, I did merges rather than rebasing so I could share with others. llvm-svn: 212069
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud