| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
These two register contexts were identical, so this shouldn't cause any
regressions, but I'd appreciate it if you can check that this at least compiles.
Reviewers: emaste, sas
Subscribers: aemerson, rengolin, lldb-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27126
llvm-svn: 296335
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:
Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):
find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;
The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.
Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.
llvm-svn: 280751
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewers: jingham, clayborg
Subscribers: jaydeep, bhushan, mohit.bhakkad, slthakur, lldb-commits, emaste, nemanjai, labath, sdardis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D20357
llvm-svn: 277343
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14985
llvm-svn: 254152
|
|
|
Patch by Andrew Turner, with minor edits. XCode changes are mine; please
update if necessary.
llvm-svn: 235305
|
