| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There are still a bunch of dependencies on the plug-in, but this helps to
identify them.
There are also a few more bits we need to move (and abstract, for example the
ClangPersistentVariables).
llvm-svn: 248612
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
that lldb currently vends.
Before we had:
ClangFunction
ClangUtilityFunction
ClangUserExpression
and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression
base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds:
FunctionCaller
UtilityFunction
UserExpression
You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage.
The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches
the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it.
Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way,
I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper
that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types.
Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs.
The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller
to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a
FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions.
Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common
JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency
but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary.
llvm-svn: 247720
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
lldb implementation
llvm-svn: 226162
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 212411
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
top-of-tree. Removed all local patches and llvm.zip.
The intent is that fron now on top-of-tree will
always build against LLVM/Clang top-of-tree, and
that problems building will be resolved as they
occur. Stable release branches of LLDB can be
constructed as needed and linked to specific release
branches of LLVM/Clang.
llvm-svn: 164563
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
several patches. These patches fix a problem
where templated types were not being completed the
first time they were used, and fix a variety of
minor issues I discovered while fixing that problem.
One of the previous local patches was resolved in
the most recent Clang, so I removed it. The others
will be removed in due course.
llvm-svn: 144984
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch fixes all of the warnings due to unordered initialization lists.
Patch by Marco Minutoli.
llvm-svn: 129290
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 127634
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- Sema is now exported (and there was much rejoicing.)
- Storage classes are now centrally defined.
Also fixed some bugs that the new LLVM picked up.
llvm-svn: 114622
|
|
|
The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data
belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients
to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled
function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser
state.
Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and
used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from
ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring
are:
- reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that
declares methods that any client must expose to the
expression parser,
- moving the code specific to implementing the "expr"
command from ClangExpression and
CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression,
a new class,
- moving the common parser interaction code from
ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new
class, and
- making ClangFunction rely only on
ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the
internal implementation of ClangExpression.
Side effects include:
- the compiler interaction code has been factored
out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass
(ASTStructExtractor),
- the header file for ClangFunction is now fully
documented,
- several bugs that only popped up when Clang was
deallocated (which never happened, since the
lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite)
are now fixed, and
- the developer-only "call" command has been
disabled.
I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C
step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and
ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they
work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or
poor documentation.
llvm-svn: 112249
|
