| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The original patch got reverted because it broke `check-lldb` on a clean
build. This fixes that.
llvm-svn: 374201
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
as it appears to have broken check-lldb.
This reverts r374184 (git commit 22314179f0660c172514b397060fd8f34b586e82)
llvm-svn: 374187
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
LLDB has three major testing strategies: unit tests, tests that exercise
the SB API though dotest.py and what we currently call lit tests. The
later is rather confusing as we're now using lit as the driver for all
three types of tests. As most of this grew organically, the directory
structure in the LLDB repository doesn't really make this clear.
The 'lit' tests are part of the root and among these tests there's a
Unit and Suite folder for the unit and dotest-tests. This layout makes
it impossible to run just the lit tests.
This patch changes the directory layout to match the 3 testing
strategies, each with their own directory and their own configuration
file. This means there are now 3 directories under lit with 3
corresponding targets:
- API (check-lldb-api): Test exercising the SB API.
- Shell (check-lldb-shell): Test exercising command line utilities.
- Unit (check-lldb-unit): Unit tests.
Finally, there's still the `check-lldb` target that runs all three test
suites.
Finally, this also renames the lit folder to `test` to match the LLVM
repository layout.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68606
llvm-svn: 374184
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 360554
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
stop-hook-threads.cpp uses C++11 features, so ask for C++11 explicitely.
This isn't broken on mainstream because clang defaults to a newer C++
version now, but it breaks if testing against an older compiler.
llvm-svn: 359349
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Disable it for now till I can figure out what's going wrong.
llvm-svn: 355992
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This test is also no longer reliably failing or passing on Windows and it is hanging every few runs.
llvm-svn: 355448
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add a convenience 'expectedFailureNetBSD' decorator and mark all tests
currently failing on NetBSD with it. Also skip a few tests that hang
the test suite. This should establish a baseline for the test suite
and get us closer to enabling tests on buildbot. This will help us
catch regressions while we still have a lot of work to do to get tests
working.
It seems that there are also some flaky tests. I am going to address
them later on.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58527
llvm-svn: 355320
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This stanza was removed in r355213, but it seems that patch did not
fully fix the problem, as the test still fails sporadically
(particularly under heavy load) on linux.
llvm-svn: 355276
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When the debugger is run in sync mode, you need to
be able to tell whether a hijacked resume is for some
special purpose (like waiting for the SIGSTOP on attach)
or just to perform a synchronous resume. Target::Launch was doing
that wrong, and that caused stop-hooks on process launch
in source files to behave incorrectly.
<rdar://problem/48115661>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58727
llvm-svn: 355213
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
The revert in r354711 wasn't complete. Finish the job.
llvm-svn: 354766
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 354711
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
They aren't designed to nest recursively, so this will prevent that.
Also add a --auto-continue flag, putting "continue" in the stop hook makes
the stop hooks fight one another in multi-threaded programs.
Also allow more than one -o options so you can make more complex stop hooks w/o
having to go into the editor.
<rdar://problem/48115661>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58394
llvm-svn: 354706
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
ExecControl/StopHook/stop-hook-threads.test is flaky on Linux (it's
consistently failing on my machine, but doesn't fail on a co-worker's).
I'm seeing the following assertion failure:
```
CommandObject.cpp:145: bool lldb_private::CommandObject::CheckRequirements(lldb_private::CommandReturnObject&): Assertion `m_exe_ctx.GetTargetPtr() == NULL' failed.
```
Interestingly, this doesn't happen when typing the same commands in
interactive mode. The cause seems to be that, in synchronous execution
mode continue waits until the process stops again, and that includes
running any stop-hooks for that later stop, so we end with a stack trace
like this (lots of frames omitted for clarity):
```
abort()
CommandObject::CheckRequirements() <-- this is again the same instance of CommandObjectProcessContinue, fails assertion because the previous continue command hasn't finished.
Target::RunStopHooks()
CommandObjectProcessContinue::DoExecute()
Target::RunStopHooks()
```
In general, it seems like using process control commands inside
stop-hooks does not have very well defined semantics. You don't even
need multiple threads to make that assertion fail, you can build
```
int main() {
printf("1\n"); // break1
printf("2\n"); // break2
}
```
and then on lldb
```
target stop-hook add -o continue
break set -f stop-hook-simple.cpp -p "break1"
break set -f stop-hook-simple.cpp -p "break2"
run
```
In this case it's even worse because the presence of multiple threads
makes it prone to race conditions. In some tests I ran with a simpler
version of this test case, I was hitting either the previous assertion
failure or the following issue:
1. Two threads reach a breakpoint
2. First stop-hook does a process continue
3. Threads end
4. Second stop-hook runs, complains about process not existing.
This change disables the test on Linux. It's already marked as XFAIL on
Windows, so maybe we should just delete it until it's clear what should
be the expected behavior in these cases. Or maybe try to come up with a
way to write a similar multithreaded test without calling continue from
a stop hook, I don't know.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58257
llvm-svn: 354149
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The new LLVM header is one line shorter than the old one, which lead to
some test failures. Ideally tests should rely on line numbers for
breakpoints or output, but that's a different discussion. Hopefully this
turns the bots green again.
llvm-svn: 351779
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This test is now marked as unsupported on Windows - it is not technically "unsupported" on Windows, but it fails because "expr ptr" does not evaluate correctly. However, the error message contains the expected string, so the test "passes" despite the fact that the commands failed
The following bug has been opened for it: llvm.org/pr40119
llvm-svn: 349784
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
These tests are not able to pass on Windows as written as they don't even build
llvm-svn: 347321
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Recently I tried to port LLDB's lit configuration files over to use a
on the surface, but broke some cases that weren't broken before and also
exposed some additional problems with the old approach that we were just
getting lucky with.
When we set up a lit environment, the goal is to make it as hermetic as
possible. We should not be relying on PATH and enabling the use of
arbitrary shell commands. Instead, only whitelisted commands should be
allowed. These are, generally speaking, the lit builtins such as echo,
cd, etc, as well as anything for which substitutions have been
explicitly set up for. These substitutions should map to the build
output directory, but in some cases it's useful to be able to override
this (for example to point to an installed tools directory).
This is, of course, how it's supposed to work. What was actually
happening is that we were bringing in PATH and LD_LIBRARY_PATH and then
just running the given run line as a shell command. This led to problems
such as finding the wrong version of clang-cl on PATH since it wasn't
even a substitution, and flakiness / non-determinism since the
environment the tests were running in would change per-machine. On the
other hand, it also made other things possible. For example, we had some
tests that were explicitly running cl.exe and link.exe instead of
clang-cl and lld-link and the only reason it worked at all is because it
was finding them on PATH. Unfortunately we can't entirely get rid of
these tests, because they support a few things in debug info that
clang-cl and lld-link don't (notably, the LF_UDT_MOD_SRC_LINE record
which makes some of the tests fail.
The high level changes introduced in this patch are:
1. Removal of functionality - The lit test suite no longer respects
LLDB_TEST_C_COMPILER and LLDB_TEST_CXX_COMPILER. This means there is no
more support for gcc, but nobody was using this anyway (note: The
functionality is still there for the dotest suite, just not the lit test
suite). There is no longer a single substitution %cxx and %cc which maps
to <arbitrary-compiler>, you now explicitly specify the compiler with a
substitution like %clang or %clangxx or %clang_cl. We can revisit this
in the future when someone needs gcc.
2. Introduction of the LLDB_LIT_TOOLS_DIR directory. This does in spirit
what LLDB_TEST_C_COMPILER and LLDB_TEST_CXX_COMPILER used to do, but now
more friendly. If this is not specified, all tools are expected to be
the just-built tools. If it is specified, the tools which are not
themselves being tested but are being used to construct and run checks
(e.g. clang, FileCheck, llvm-mc, etc) will be searched for in this
directory first, then the build output directory.
3. Changes to core llvm lit files. The use_lld() and use_clang()
functions were introduced long ago in anticipation of using them in
lldb, but since they were never actually used anywhere but their
respective problems, there were some issues to be resolved regarding
generality and ability to use them outside their project.
4. Changes to .test files - These are all just replacing things like
clang-cl with %clang_cl and %cxx with %clangxx, etc.
5. Changes to lit.cfg.py - Previously we would load up some system
environment variables and then add some new things to them. Then do a
bunch of work building out our own substitutions. First, we delete the
system environment variable code, making the environment hermetic. Then,
we refactor the substitution logic into two separate helper functions,
one which sets up substitutions for the tools we want to test (which
must come from the build output directory), and another which sets up
substitutions for support tools (like compilers, etc).
6. New substitutions for MSVC -- Previously we relied on location of
MSVC by bringing in the entire parent's PATH and letting
subprocess.Popen just run the command line. Now we set up real
substitutions that should have the same effect. We use PATH to find
them, and then look for INCLUDE and LIB to construct a substitution
command line with appropriate /I and /LIBPATH: arguments. The nice thing
about this is that it opens the door to having separate %msvc-cl32 and
%msvc-cl64 substitutions, rather than only requiring the user to run
vcvars first. Because we can deduce the path to 32-bit libraries from
64-bit library directories, and vice versa. Without these substitutions
this would have been impossible.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54567
llvm-svn: 347216
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Because of different shell quoting rules, and the fact that LLDB
commands often contain spaces, -O is not portable for writing command
lines. Instead, we should use explicit lldbinit files.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54680
llvm-svn: 347213
|
|
|
Those tests were using pexpect and being flaky on some of ours bots.
This patch reimplmeents the tests usinf FileCheck, and it also
extends the test coverage to a few more stop-hook options.
llvm-svn: 347109
|
