| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
options. NFC
Also change some options that have different semantics (cause confusion) in llvm-readelf mode:
-s => -S
-t => --symbols
-sd => --section-data
llvm-svn: 359651
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Archives created with ThinLTO are bitcodes, they also need to be searched for excluded symbols.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48857
llvm-svn: 336826
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There seems to be no reason to collect this list of symbols.
Also fix a bug where --exclude-libs would apply to all symbols that
appear in an archive's symbol table, even if the relevant archive
member was not added to the link.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43369
llvm-svn: 325380
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
**Problem**
`--exclude-libs` does not work for static libraries affected by the `--whole-archive` option.
**Description**
`--exclude-libs` creates a list of static library paths and does library lookups in this list.
`--whole-archive` splits the static libraries that follow it into separate objects. As a result, lld no longer sees static libraries among linked files and does no `--exclude-libs` lookups.
**Solution**
The proposed solution is to make `--exclude-libs` consider object files too. When lld finds an object file it checks whether this file originates from an archive and, if so, looks the archive up in the `--exclude-libs` list.
Reviewers: ruiu, rafael
Reviewed By: ruiu
Subscribers: asl, ikudrin, llvm-commits, emaste
Tags: #lld
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39353
llvm-svn: 316998
|
|
|
The --exclude-libs option is not a popular option, but at least some
programs in Android depend on it, so it's worth to support it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34422
llvm-svn: 305920
|
