| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I think it is clear by now that the new linker is viable.
llvm-svn: 262158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These functions are "constructors" of the LinkingContexts. We already
have auxiliary classes and functions for ELFLinkingContext in the header.
They fall in the same category.
llvm-svn: 234082
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
What we are doing in ELFTarget.h was dubious. In the file, we define
partial classes of <Arch>LinkingContexts to declare only static member
functions. We have different (complete) class definitions in other files.
They would conflict if they exist in the same compilation unit (because
the ones defined in ELFTarget.h has only static member functions).
I don't think this was valid C++.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D8797
llvm-svn: 234039
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
<Arch>ELFLinkingContext.
registerRelocationNames() function is called to register all known
ELF relocation types to the central registry. Since we have separate
LinkingContext class for each ELF machine type, we need to call the
function for each LinkingContext.
However, the function belonged to TargetHandler instead of LinkingContext.
So we needed to do ctx.getTargetHandler().registerRelocationNames().
This patch removes that redundant getTargetHandler call by moving the
function from TargetHandler to LinkingContext.
Conceptually this patch is small, but in reality it's not that small.
It's because the same code is copied to each architecture.
Most of this patch is just repetition. We need to merge them, but
that cannot be done in this patch.
llvm-svn: 233883
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 233863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In r233772, I removed an empty class, DefaultTargetHandler, from
the class hierarchy by merging the class with TargetHandler. I then
found that TargetHandler and its base class, TargetHandlerBase,
are also almost the same.
We need to go deeper.
In this patch, I merged TargetHandlerBase with TargetHandler.
The only difference between them is the existence (or absense)
of a pure virtual function registerRelocationName(). I added that
function to the (new) TargetHandler.
One more thing is that TargetHandler was templated for no reason.
I made it non-templated class.
llvm-svn: 233773
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
lldELF is used by each ELF backend. lldELF's ELFLinkingContext
also held a reference to each backend, creating a link-time
cycle. This patch moves the backend references to lldDriver.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7119
llvm-svn: 226976
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit 6a3f545b44cea46321e025d9ab773786af86cb51.
llvm-svn: 226928
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
lldELF is used by each ELF backend. lldELF's ELFLinkingContext
also held a reference to each backend, creating a link-time
cycle. This patch moves the backend references to lldDriver.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7119
llvm-svn: 226922
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This would permit the ELF reader to check the architecture that is being
selected by the linking process.
This patch also sorts the include files according to LLVM conventions.
llvm-svn: 220129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The main changes are in:
include/lld/Core/Reference.h
include/lld/ReaderWriter/Reader.h
Everything else is details to support the main change.
1) Registration based Readers
Previously, lld had a tangled interdependency with all the Readers. It would
have been impossible to make a streamlined linker (say for a JIT) which
just supported one file format and one architecture (no yaml, no archives, etc).
The old model also required a LinkingContext to read an object file, which
would have made .o inspection tools awkward.
The new model is that there is a global Registry object. You programmatically
register the Readers you want with the registry object. Whenever you need to
read/parse a file, you ask the registry to do it, and the registry tries each
registered reader.
For ease of use with the existing lld code base, there is one Registry
object inside the LinkingContext object.
2) Changing kind value to be a tuple
Beside Readers, the registry also keeps track of the mapping for Reference
Kind values to and from strings. Along with that, this patch also fixes
an ambiguity with the previous Reference::Kind values. The problem was that
we wanted to reuse existing relocation type values as Reference::Kind values.
But then how can the YAML write know how to convert a value to a string? The
fix is to change the 32-bit Reference::Kind into a tuple with an 8-bit namespace
(e.g. ELF, COFFF, etc), an 8-bit architecture (e.g. x86_64, PowerPC, etc), and
a 16-bit value. This tuple system allows conversion to and from strings with
no ambiguities.
llvm-svn: 197727
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 193480
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 193435
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 192261
|
|
Also change some local variable names: "ti" -> "context" and
"_targetInfo" -> "_context".
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1301
llvm-svn: 187823
|