| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
letter
This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote
using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the
source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual
post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against
lld's code base.
Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style:
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html
In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable
naming scheme change, and this patch does that.
I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that
is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter.
Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld
repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts
because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But
there's a remedy.
clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your
downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to
a commit after the mass renaming:
1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming,
2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and
3. rebase again to the head.
Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and
for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and
disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by
hand, but that shouldn't be too many.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121
llvm-svn: 365595
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 316733
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
New lld's files are spread under lib subdirectory, and it isn't easy
to find which files are actually maintained. This patch moves maintained
files to Common subdirectory.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37645
llvm-svn: 314719
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It broke selfhosting.
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-with-lto-ubuntu/builds/4896
llvm-svn: 313731
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
EhSectionPiece used to have a pointer to a section, but that pointer was
mostly redundant because we almost always know what the section is without
using that pointer. This patch removes the pointer from the struct.
This patch also use uint32_t/int32_t instead of size_t to represent
offsets that are hardly be larger than 4 GiB. At the moment, I think it is
OK even if we cannot handle .eh_frame sections larger than 4 GiB.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38012
llvm-svn: 313697
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 308297
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Removing this template is not a big win by itself, but opens the way
for removing more templates.
llvm-svn: 295923
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26914
llvm-svn: 287750
|
|
|
llvm-svn: 270526
|
