| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
ARM EHABI unwinding tables only store the start address of each function, so the
last function is assumed to cover the entire address space after it. The test
picks an address on the stack assuming that it's in no function, but because of
the above it's actually resolved to the last function. Fix this by using address
0 instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68387
llvm-svn: 373628
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If unwind info is not available at the current IP, unw_get_proc_info should
return a zero-filled structure rather than the info of the previous IP.
This change also makes unw_get_proc_info return UNW_ENOINFO instead of
UNW_ESUCCESS.
Patch by Amanieu d'Antras!
llvm-svn: 372407
|
|
|
This commit fixes the unw_step() for ARM EHABI. However, this commit
also changes the implementation details for ARM EHABI.
The first change is that the personality function should call
__gnu_unwind_frame() for default (or de facto) frame unwinding based on
the ARM-defined unwind opcode. The function __gnu_unwind_frame() will
in turn calls unw_step() which actually unwinds the frame.
The second change is that the implementation _Unwind_Backtrace() should
no longer calls unw_step() to unwind the frame; since according to ARM
EHABI, the personality function should unwind the frame for us.
Special thanks to Anton for helpful suggestion on the initial version of
this patch.
llvm-svn: 238560
|
