| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
libunwind defines the _Unwind_* ABI used by libc++abi. This ABI is a
stable quasi-standard common between multiple implementations such as
LLVM and GNU. The _U* symbol name space is also safely within the symbol
name space that standard C & C++ reserve for the implementation.
Futhermore, libunwind also defines several unw_* symbols, and references
these from the _Unwind_* entry points so the standard/reserved part of
the ABI is dependent on the unw_* part of the ABI. This is not OK for a
C or C++ implementation. The unw_* symbols are reserved for C and extern
"C" used by application code.
This change renames each unw_* function to __unw* and adds a weak alias
unw_* to keep the public <libunwind.h> ABI unchanged for backwards
compatibility. Every reference to unw_* in the implementation has been
changed to use __unw* so that if other unw_* definitions are in force
because nothing uses <libunwind.h> in a particular program, no _Unwind*
code path depends on any unw_* symbol. Furthemore, __unw_* symbols are
hidden, which saves PLT overhead in the shared library case.
In the future, we should cconsider untangling the unw_* API/ABI from the
_Unwind_* API/ABI. The internal API backing the _Unwind_* ABI
implementation should not rely on any nonstandard symbols not in the
implementation-reserved name space. This would then allow separating the
_Unwind_* API/ABI from unw_* entirely, but that's a more substantial
change that's going to require more significant refactoring.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59921
llvm-svn: 357640
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
While Clang automatically generates the code for placement new,
g++ doesn't do that so we need to provide our own definition.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57455
llvm-svn: 352966
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We haven't eliminated C++ library dependency altogether in D57251,
UnwindCursor.hpp had an unused dependency on <algorithm> which was
pulling in other C++ headers. Removing that dependency also revealed
(correctly) that we need our own global placement new declaration. Now
libunwind should be independent of the C++ library.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57262
llvm-svn: 352553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
inline"
This reverts commit r352384: this broke on ARM as UnwindCursor.hpp
still has some C++ library dependencies.
llvm-svn: 352427
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We haven't eliminated C++ library dependency altogether in D57251,
UnwindCursor.hpp had an unused dependency on <algorithm> which was
pulling in other C++ headers. Removing that dependency also revealed
(correctly) that we need our own global placement new declaration. Now
libunwind should be independent of the C++ library.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57262
llvm-svn: 352384
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56984
llvm-svn: 351888
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56985
llvm-svn: 351878
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Either adjust the format string to use a more exact type, or add casts
(for cases when printing pointers to structs/objects with a %p
format specifier).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56982
llvm-svn: 351876
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This doesn't yet implement inspecting the .pdata/.xdata to find the
LSDA pointer (in UnwindCursor::getInfoFromSEH), but normal C++
exception handling seems to run just fine without it. (The only
place I can see where it's even referenced is in
unwind_phase2_forced, and I can't find a codepath where libcxxabi
would end up calling that.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55674
llvm-svn: 349532
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
calling RtlUnwindEx
This fixes PR39935.
llvm-svn: 348836
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Even though SEH for ARM is incomplete, make what code already exists
at least compile correctly.
The _LIBUNWIND_CURSOR_SIZE wasn't correct.
ARM (and AArch64) have a DISPATCHER_CONTEXT field named TargetPc
instead of TargetIp.
For the libunwind.h UNW_* constants, there is no UNW_ARM_PC, only
UNW_ARM_IP.
Don't use 'r' as loop variable when 'r' already is a Registers_arm
member.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51530
llvm-svn: 341217
|
|
Summary:
I've tested this implementation on x86-64 to ensure that it works. All
`libc++abi` tests pass, as do all `libc++` exception-related tests. ARM
still remains to be implemented (@compnerd?).
Special thanks to KJK::Hyperion for his excellent series of articles on
how EH works on x86-64 Windows. (Seriously, check it out. It's awesome.)
I'm actually not sure if this should go in as is. I particularly don't
like that I duplicated the UnwindCursor class for this special case.
Reviewers: mstorsjo, rnk, compnerd, smeenai, javed.absar
Subscribers: mgorny, kristof.beyls, christof, chrib, cfe-commits, compnerd, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50564
llvm-svn: 341125
|