| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 371880
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Freestanding is *weird*. The standard allows it to differ in a bunch of odd
manners from regular C++, and the committee would like to improve that
situation. I'd like to make libc++ behave better with what freestanding should
be, so that it can be a tool we use in improving the standard. To do that we
need to try stuff out, both with "freestanding the language mode" and
"freestanding the library subset".
Let's start with the super basic: run the libc++ tests in freestanding, using
clang as the compiler, and see what works. The easiest hack to do this:
In utils/libcxx/test/config.py add:
self.cxx.compile_flags += ['-ffreestanding']
Run the tests and they all fail.
Why? Because in freestanding `main` isn't special. This "not special" property
has two effects: main doesn't get mangled, and main isn't allowed to omit its
`return` statement. The first means main gets mangled and the linker can't
create a valid executable for us to test. The second means we spew out warnings
(ew) and the compiler doesn't insert the `return` we omitted, and main just
falls of the end and does whatever undefined behavior (if you're luck, ud2
leading to non-zero return code).
Let's start my work with the basics. This patch changes all libc++ tests to
declare `main` as `int main(int, char**` so it mangles consistently (enabling us
to declare another `extern "C"` main for freestanding which calls the mangled
one), and adds `return 0;` to all places where it was missing. This touches 6124
files, and I apologize.
The former was done with The Magic Of Sed.
The later was done with a (not quite correct but decent) clang tool:
https://gist.github.com/jfbastien/793819ff360baa845483dde81170feed
This works for most tests, though I did have to adjust a few places when e.g.
the test runs with `-x c`, macros are used for main (such as for the filesystem
tests), etc.
Once this is in we can create a freestanding bot which will prevent further
regressions. After that, we can start the real work of supporting C++
freestanding fairly well in libc++.
<rdar://problem/47754795>
Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, arphaman, miyuki, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57624
llvm-svn: 353086
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
After rL319736 for D28253 (which fixes PR28929), gcc cannot compile `<memory>` anymore in pre-C+11 modes, complaining:
```
In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/memory:648:0,
from test.cpp:1:
/usr/include/c++/v1/memory: In static member function 'static std::__1::shared_ptr<_Tp> std::__1::shared_ptr<_Tp>::make_shared(_A0&, _A1&, _A2&)':
/usr/include/c++/v1/memory:4365:5: error: wrong number of template arguments (4, should be at least 1)
static_assert((is_constructible<_Tp, _A0, _A1, _A2>::value), "Can't construct object in make_shared" );
^
In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/memory:649:0,
from test.cpp:1:
/usr/include/c++/v1/type_traits:3198:29: note: provided for 'template<class _Tp, class _A0, class _A1> struct std::__1::is_constructible'
struct _LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS is_constructible
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/memory:648:0,
from test.cpp:1:
/usr/include/c++/v1/memory:4365:5: error: template argument 1 is invalid
static_assert((is_constructible<_Tp, _A0, _A1, _A2>::value), "Can't construct object in make_shared" );
^
/usr/include/c++/v1/memory: In static member function 'static std::__1::shared_ptr<_Tp> std::__1::shared_ptr<_Tp>::allocate_shared(const _Alloc&, _A0&, _A1&, _A2&)':
/usr/include/c++/v1/memory:4444:5: error: wrong number of template arguments (4, should be at least 1)
static_assert((is_constructible<_Tp, _A0, _A1, _A2>::value), "Can't construct object in allocate_shared" );
^
In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/memory:649:0,
from test.cpp:1:
/usr/include/c++/v1/type_traits:3198:29: note: provided for 'template<class _Tp, class _A0, class _A1> struct std::__1::is_constructible'
struct _LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS is_constructible
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/memory:648:0,
from test.cpp:1:
/usr/include/c++/v1/memory:4444:5: error: template argument 1 is invalid
static_assert((is_constructible<_Tp, _A0, _A1, _A2>::value), "Can't construct object in allocate_shared" );
^
```
This is also reported in https://bugs.freebsd.org/224946 (FreeBSD is apparently one of the very few projects that regularly builds programs against libc++ with gcc).
The reason is that the static assertions are invoking `is_constructible` with three arguments, while gcc does not have the built-in `is_constructible` feature, and the pre-C++11 `is_constructible` wrappers in `<type_traits>` only provide up to two arguments.
I have added additional wrappers for three arguments, modified the `is_constructible` entry point to take three arguments instead, and added a simple test to is_constructible.pass.cpp.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: krytarowski, cfe-commits, emaste
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41805
llvm-svn: 321963
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 309464
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
is_constructible.pass.cpp.
This happens when using Clang with MSVC's STL, so there are no actual uses of this variable.
Fixes D31966.
llvm-svn: 300079
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch overhalls the libc++ test format/configuration in order to fully support modules. By "fully support" I mean get almost all of the tests passing. The main hurdle for doing this is handling tests that `#define _LIBCPP_FOO` macros to test a different configuration. This patch deals with these tests in the following ways:
1. For tests that define single `_LIBCPP_ABI_FOO` macros have been annotated with `// MODULES_DEFINES: _LIBCPP_ABI_FOO`. This allows the test suite to define the macro on the command line so it uses a different set of modules.
2. Tests for libc++'s debug mode (which define custom `_LIBCPP_ASSERT`) are automatically detected by the test suite and are compiled and run with modules disabled.
This patch also cleans up how the `CXXCompiler` helper class handles enabling/disabling language features.
NOTE: This patch uses `LIT` features which were only committed to LLVM today. If this patch breaks running the libc++ tests you probably need to update LLVM.
llvm-svn: 288728
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
operators.
Previously __libcpp_is_constructible checked the validity of reference
construction using 'eat<To>(declval<From>())' but this doesn't consider
From's explicit conversion operators. This patch teaches __libcpp_is_constructible
how to handle these cases. To do this we need to check the validity
using 'static_cast<To>(declval<From>())'. Unfortunately static_cast allows
additional base-to-derived and lvalue-to-rvalue conversions, which have to be
checked for and manually rejected.
While implementing these changes I discovered that Clang incorrectly
rejects `static_cast<int&&>(declval<float&>())` even though
`int &&X(declval<float&>())` is well formed. In order to tolerate this bug
the `__eat<T>(...)` needs to be left in-place. Otherwise it could be replaced
entirely with the new static_cast implementation.
Thanks to Walter Brown for providing the test cases.
llvm-svn: 285786
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
checked 'unqualified void'. This was brought up by LWG#2738
llvm-svn: 283161
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
clang/apple-clang.
llvm-svn: 276200
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There is a bug in Clang's __is_constructible builtin that causes it
to return true for function types; ex [T = void()].
llvm-svn: 276092
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The previous implementation relied highly on specializations to handle
special cases. This new implementation lets the compiler do the work when possible.
llvm-svn: 276084
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 274882
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
http://lab.llvm.org:8080/green/job/clang-stage1-cmake-RA-expensive/244/
llvm-svn: 274651
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
no more
llvm-svn: 274605
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
TEST_STD_VER.
This is a huge cleanup that helps make the libc++ test suite more portable.
Patch from STL@microsoft.com. Thanks STL!
llvm-svn: 272716
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 271435
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since they're scheduled to be updated soon, we'll just comment out this test for
the moment, and re-commit when the bots are updated.
llvm-svn: 261661
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 261653
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
uncovered a couple bugs in the _v type traits. Fixed those, too
llvm-svn: 252612
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 252406
|
|
|
llvm-svn: 224658
|
