| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Those tests fail when linking against a new dylib but running against
macosx10.7. I believe this is caused by a duplicate definition of the
RTTI for exception classes in libc++.dylib and libc++abi.dylib, but
this matter still needs some investigation.
This issue was not caught previously because all the tests always linked
against the same dylib used for running (because LIT made it impossible
to do otherwise before r349171).
rdar://problem/46809586
llvm-svn: 354940
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Freestanding is *weird*. The standard allows it to differ in a bunch of odd
manners from regular C++, and the committee would like to improve that
situation. I'd like to make libc++ behave better with what freestanding should
be, so that it can be a tool we use in improving the standard. To do that we
need to try stuff out, both with "freestanding the language mode" and
"freestanding the library subset".
Let's start with the super basic: run the libc++ tests in freestanding, using
clang as the compiler, and see what works. The easiest hack to do this:
In utils/libcxx/test/config.py add:
self.cxx.compile_flags += ['-ffreestanding']
Run the tests and they all fail.
Why? Because in freestanding `main` isn't special. This "not special" property
has two effects: main doesn't get mangled, and main isn't allowed to omit its
`return` statement. The first means main gets mangled and the linker can't
create a valid executable for us to test. The second means we spew out warnings
(ew) and the compiler doesn't insert the `return` we omitted, and main just
falls of the end and does whatever undefined behavior (if you're luck, ud2
leading to non-zero return code).
Let's start my work with the basics. This patch changes all libc++ tests to
declare `main` as `int main(int, char**` so it mangles consistently (enabling us
to declare another `extern "C"` main for freestanding which calls the mangled
one), and adds `return 0;` to all places where it was missing. This touches 6124
files, and I apologize.
The former was done with The Magic Of Sed.
The later was done with a (not quite correct but decent) clang tool:
https://gist.github.com/jfbastien/793819ff360baa845483dde81170feed
This works for most tests, though I did have to adjust a few places when e.g.
the test runs with `-x c`, macros are used for main (such as for the filesystem
tests), etc.
Once this is in we can create a freestanding bot which will prevent further
regressions. After that, we can start the real work of supporting C++
freestanding fairly well in libc++.
<rdar://problem/47754795>
Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, arphaman, miyuki, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57624
llvm-svn: 353086
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 309464
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 287829
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These tests are of the form
try {
action-that-may-throw
assert(!exceptional-condition)
assert(some-other-facts)
} catch (relevant-exception) {
assert(exceptional-condition)
}
Under libcpp-no-exceptions there is still value in verifying
some-other-facts while avoiding the exceptional case. So for these tests
just conditionally check some-other-facts if exceptional-condition is
false. When exception are supported make sure that a true
exceptional-condition throws an exception
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26136
llvm-svn: 285697
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 285011
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
would wait for these to be voted upon at a committee meeting (November), but the current draft standard is broken, and this should fix it. (And if it doesn't, we want to know about it soonest)
llvm-svn: 282342
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 280779
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
test cases for append/insert/assign/replace while we're at it, and fix a similar bug in insert.
llvm-svn: 280643
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D21459
llvm-svn: 276238
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 267947
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
vs. basic_string::assign
llvm-svn: 263042
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
r258281.
llvm-svn: 258291
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
are disabled
llvm-svn: 258279
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
strong exception safety guarantee'. This turned out to be a pervasive problem in <string>, which required a fair amount of rework. Add in an optimization for when iterators provide noexcept increment/comparison/assignment/dereference (which covers many of the iterators in libc++). Reviewed as http://reviews.llvm.org/D15862
llvm-svn: 257682
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes a small omission in libcxx that prevents libcxx being built when
-DLIBCXX_ENABLE_EXCEPTIONS=0 is specified.
This patch adds XFAILS to all those tests that are currently failing
on the new -fno-exceptions library variant. Follow-up patches will
update the tests (progressively) to cope with the new library variant.
Change-Id: I4b801bd8d8e4fe7193df9e55f39f1f393a8ba81a
llvm-svn: 252598
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
generated pages
llvm-svn: 249325
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
match what was in the standard. Added these includes to the tests. No changes to the library or test results.
llvm-svn: 225541
|
|
|
llvm-svn: 224658
|
