| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY
Summary:
We never actually mean to always inline a function -- all the uses of
the macro I could find are actually attempts to control the visibility
of symbols. This is better described by _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY, which
is actually always defined the same.
This change is orthogonal to the decision of what we're actually going
to do with _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY -- it just simplifies things by
having one canonical way of doing things.
Note that this commit had originally been applied in r336369 and then
reverted in r336382 because of unforeseen problems. Both of these problems
have now been fixed.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, erikvanderpoel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48892
llvm-svn: 336866
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY"
This reverts commit r336369. The commit had two problems:
1. __pbump was marked as _LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE_INLINE_VISIBILITY instead of
_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY, which lead to two symbols being added in the
dylib and the check-cxx-abilist failing.
2. The LLDB tests started failing because they undefine
`_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY`. I need to figure out why they do that and
fix the tests before we can go forward with this change.
llvm-svn: 336382
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
We never actually mean to always inline a function -- all the uses of
the macro I could find are actually attempts to control the visibility
of symbols. This is better described by _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY, which
is actually always defined the same.
This change is orthogonal to the decision of what we're actually going
to do with _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY -- it just simplifies things by
having one canonical way of doing things.
Reviewers: EricWF
Subscribers: christof, llvm-commits, dexonsmith, erikvanderpoel, mclow.lists
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48892
llvm-svn: 336369
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This prevent leaking warnings to the user about use of C++11
extensions in C++03.
llvm-svn: 309917
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33370
llvm-svn: 305469
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously <locale> used std::unique_ptr<remove_ptr<locale_t>, locale-mgmt-function>
as a scope guard for (A) creating new locales, and (B) setting the thread specific locale
in RAII safe manner.
However using unique_ptr has some problems, first it requires that locale_t is a pointer
type, which may not be the case (Windows will need a non-pointer locale_t type that emulates _locale_t).
The second problem is that users of the guards had to supply the locale management function to the custom
deleter at every call site. However these locale management functions don't exist natively Windows, making
a good Windows implementation of locale more difficult.
This patch creates distinct and simply RAII guards that replace unique_ptr. These guards handle calling
the correct locale management function so that callers don't have too. This simplification will
aid in upcoming Windows fixes.
llvm-svn: 302474
|
|
|
Instead of checking _LIBCPP_LOCALE_L_EXTENSIONS all over, instead check it
once, and define the various *_l symbols once. The private redirector symbol
names are all prefixed with _libcpp_* so that they won't conflict with user
symbols, and so they won't conflict with future C library symbols. In
particular, glibc likes providing private symbols such as __locale_t, so we
should follow a different naming pattern (like _libcpp_*) to avoid problems
on that front.
Tested on Linux with glibc. Hoping for the best on OSX and the various BSDs.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D17456
llvm-svn: 263016
|
