summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/libcxx/docs/DesignDocs/VisibilityMacros.rst
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* [libc++] Make sure we can build libc++ with -fvisibility=hiddenLouis Dionne2018-10-251-4/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: When building with -fvisibility=hidden, some symbols do not get exported from libc++.dylib. This means that some entities are not explicitly given default visibility in the source code, and that we rely on the fact -fvisibility=default is the default. This commit explicitly gives default visibility to those symbols to avoid being dependent on the command line flags used. The commit also remove symbols from the dylib -- those symbols do not actually need to be exported from the dylib and this should not be an ABI break. Finally, in the future, we may want to mark the whole std:: namespace as having hidden visibility (to switch from opt-out to opt-in), in which case the changes done in this commit will be required. Reviewers: EricWF Subscribers: mgorny, christof, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52662 llvm-svn: 345260
* fix some typos in the docSylvestre Ledru2018-09-201-3/+3
| | | | llvm-svn: 342628
* [libcxx] By default, do not use internal_linkage to hide symbols from the ABILouis Dionne2018-08-161-3/+36
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49240 led to symbol size problems in Chromium, and we expect this may be the case in other projects built in debug mode too. Instead, unless users explicitly ask for internal_linkage, we use always_inline like we used to. In the future, when we have a solution that allows us to drop always_inline without falling back on internal_linkage, we can replace always_inline by that. Note that this commit introduces a change in contract for existing libc++ users: by default, libc++ used to guarantee that TUs built with different versions of libc++ could be linked together. With the introduction of the _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI_PER_TU macro, the default behavior is that TUs built with different libc++ versions are not guaranteed to link. This is a change in contract but not a change in behavior, since the current implementation still allows linking TUs built with different libc++ versions together. Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists, dexonsmith, hans, rnk Subscribers: christof, cfe-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50652 llvm-svn: 339874
* [libc++] Add the _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI_AFTER_V1 macroLouis Dionne2018-08-061-9/+15
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: This macro allows hiding symbols from the ABI when the library is built with an ABI version after ABI v1, which is currently the only stable ABI. This commit defines `_LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE_INLINE_VISIBILITY` to be `_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI_AFTER_V1`, meaning that symbols that were only exported by the library for historical reasons are not exported anymore in the unstable ABI. Because of that, this commit is an ABI break for ABI v2. This ABI version is not stable, however, so this should not be a problem. Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, cfe-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49914 llvm-svn: 339012
* [libc++] Introduce _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI to replace _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITYLouis Dionne2018-07-271-1/+17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: This commit introduces a new macro, _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI, whose goal is to mark functions that shouldn't be part of libc++'s ABI. It marks the functions as being hidden for dylib visibility purposes, and as having internal linkage using Clang's __attribute__((internal_linkage)) when available, and __always_inline__ otherwise. It replaces _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY, which was always using __always_inline__ to achieve similar goals, but suffered from debuggability and code size problems. The full proposal, along with more background information, can be found here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2018-July/058419.html This commit does not rename uses of _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY to _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI: this wide reaching but mechanical change can be done later when we've confirmed we're happy with the new macro. In the future, it would be nice if we could optionally allow dropping any internal_linkage or __always_inline__ attribute, which could result in code size improvements. However, this is currently impossible for reasons explained here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2018-July/058450.html Reviewers: EricWF, dexonsmith, mclow.lists Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, llvm-commits, mclow.lists Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49240 llvm-svn: 338122
* [libc++] Take 2: Replace uses of _LIBCPP_ALWAYS_INLINE by ↵Louis Dionne2018-07-111-4/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY Summary: We never actually mean to always inline a function -- all the uses of the macro I could find are actually attempts to control the visibility of symbols. This is better described by _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY, which is actually always defined the same. This change is orthogonal to the decision of what we're actually going to do with _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY -- it just simplifies things by having one canonical way of doing things. Note that this commit had originally been applied in r336369 and then reverted in r336382 because of unforeseen problems. Both of these problems have now been fixed. Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, erikvanderpoel Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48892 llvm-svn: 336866
* Revert "[libc++] Replace uses of _LIBCPP_ALWAYS_INLINE by ↵Louis Dionne2018-07-051-4/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY" This reverts commit r336369. The commit had two problems: 1. __pbump was marked as _LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE_INLINE_VISIBILITY instead of _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY, which lead to two symbols being added in the dylib and the check-cxx-abilist failing. 2. The LLDB tests started failing because they undefine `_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY`. I need to figure out why they do that and fix the tests before we can go forward with this change. llvm-svn: 336382
* [libc++] Replace uses of _LIBCPP_ALWAYS_INLINE by _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITYLouis Dionne2018-07-051-4/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: We never actually mean to always inline a function -- all the uses of the macro I could find are actually attempts to control the visibility of symbols. This is better described by _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY, which is actually always defined the same. This change is orthogonal to the decision of what we're actually going to do with _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY -- it just simplifies things by having one canonical way of doing things. Reviewers: EricWF Subscribers: christof, llvm-commits, dexonsmith, erikvanderpoel, mclow.lists Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48892 llvm-svn: 336369
* [libc++] class template -> template class. NFCShoaib Meenai2017-07-131-1/+1
| | | | llvm-svn: 307972
* [libc++] Mark string operator+ _LIBCPP_FUNC_VISShoaib Meenai2017-07-131-1/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | It has an extern template instantiation declaration in the headers and a corresponding instantiation definition in the library, so we must mark it with _LIBCPP_FUNC_VIS to make it available outside the library. This doesn't cause any ABI changes as-is since we don't build libc++ with hidden visibility (so the function is exported anyway). It's needed for building libc++ with hidden visibility, however. Clarify the Windows behavior for extern function templates while I'm here, since this exercises that behavior. llvm-svn: 307966
* [libc++] Use proper template terminology. NFCShoaib Meenai2017-07-131-3/+3
| | | | | | | It's supposed to be "class template" and "function template" instead of "template class" and "template function". llvm-svn: 307954
* [libc++] Make _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS export membersShoaib Meenai2017-03-021-6/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: Most classes annotated with _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS need to have at least some of their members exported, otherwise we have a lot of link errors when linking against a libc++ built with hidden visibility. This also makes _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS be consistent across platforms, since on Windows it already exports members. With this change made, any template methods of a class marked _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS will also get default visibility when instantiatied, which is not desirable for clients of libc++ headers who wish to control their visibility; this is the same issue as PR30642. Annotate all problematic methods with an explicit visibility specifier to avoid this. The problematic methods were found by running bad-visibility-finder [1] against the libc++ headers after making the _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS change. The small methods were marked for inlining; the larger ones hidden. [1] https://github.com/smeenai/bad-visibility-finder Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF Subscribers: cfe-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25208 llvm-svn: 296732
* [libc++] Make _LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE_TYPE_VIS export membersShoaib Meenai2017-03-021-0/+29
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When building libc++ with hidden visibility, we want explicit template instantiations to export members. This is consistent with existing Windows behavior, and is necessary for clients to be able to link against a hidden visibility built libc++ without running into lots of missing symbols. An unfortunate side effect, however, is that any template methods of a class with an explicit instantiation will get default visibility when instantiated, unless the methods are explicitly marked inline or hidden visibility. This is not desirable for clients of libc++ headers who wish to control their visibility, and led to PR30642. Annotate all problematic methods with an explicit visibility specifier to avoid this. The problematic methods were found by running https://github.com/smeenai/bad-visibility-finder against the libc++ headers after making the _LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE_TYPE_VIS change. The methods were marked with the new _LIBCPP_METHOD_TEMPLATE_IMPLICIT_INSTANTIATION_VIS macro, which was created for this purpose. It should be noted that _LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE_TYPE_VIS was originally intended to expand to default visibility, and was changed to expanding to default type visibility to fix PR30642. The visibility macro documentation was not updated accordingly, however, so this change makes the macro consistent with its documentation again, while explicitly fixing the methods which resulted in that PR. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29157 llvm-svn: 296731
* [libc++] Introduce _LIBCPP_EXTERN_VIS to fix __libcpp_debug_function link errorsEric Fiselier2017-01-161-0/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: On Windows tests that use `_LIBCPP_ASSERT` fail to link because the assertion handler function isn't correctly exported from the libc++ dylib. This patch fixes the dll import/export issues by introducing a new visibility macro `_LIBCPP_EXTERN_VIS` for use on external variables. Reviewers: compnerd, smeenai, EricWF Reviewed By: EricWF Subscribers: cfe-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28728 llvm-svn: 292158
* [libc++] Correct macro name in documenationShoaib Meenai2017-01-071-1/+1
| | | | | | | The macro is named `_LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS`, not `_LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_ONLY`. No functional change. llvm-svn: 291330
* Fix Sphinx build error caused by bad indentationEric Fiselier2017-01-051-1/+1
| | | | llvm-svn: 291039
* [NFC] Rename _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY to _LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VISEric Fiselier2017-01-041-6/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | | | The name _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY is no longer accurate because both _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS and _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY expand to __attribute__((__type_visibility__)) with Clang. The only remaining difference is that _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY can be applied to templates whereas _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS cannot (due to dllimport/dllexport not being allowed on templates). This patch renames _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY to _LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS. llvm-svn: 291035
* [libc++] Introduce `_LIBCPP_OVERRIDABLE_FUNC_VIS`Shoaib Meenai2016-11-161-14/+12
| | | | | | | | | | This is a generalization of `_LIBCPP_NEW_DELETE_VIS`; the new macro name captures the semantics better, and also allows us to get rid of the `_WIN32` check in `include/new`. No functional change. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26702 llvm-svn: 287164
* Fix _LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE_INLINE_VISIBILITY to always have default visibility.Eric Fiselier2016-10-311-6/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | This prevent the symbols from being both externally available and hidden, which causes them to be linked incorrectly. This is only a problem when the address of the function is explicitly taken since it will always be inlined otherwise. This patch fixes the issues that caused r285456 to be reverted, and can now be reapplied. llvm-svn: 285531
* [libc++] Correct explanation of _LIBCPP_NEW_DELETE_VISShoaib Meenai2016-10-121-8/+9
| | | | | | | | | | The behavior of this macro actually needs to apply universally on Windows and not just when using the Microsoft CRT. Update the macro definition and documentation accordingly. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25145 llvm-svn: 284016
* [libc++] Clarify _LIBCPP_NEW_DELETE_VIS for WindowsShoaib Meenai2016-09-281-0/+13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Replace a stale reference to cxx_EXPORTS with _LIBCPP_BUILDING_LIBRARY, and clarify why the operator new and delete family of functions are marked dllexport when building but *not* dllimport when including the header externally. The new code is identical to the intent of the old code (and would be functionally equivalent were cxx_EXPORTS still defined when building libc++). The overall behavior is not ideal, since Microsoft's operator new and delete functions will get called instead of libc++'s, but I think consistently calling msvcrt's functions is better than either calling msvcrt's or libc++'s functions depending on header inclusion. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25042 llvm-svn: 282644
* [libc++] Fix extern template visibility for WindowsShoaib Meenai2016-09-191-0/+20
| | | | | | | | | | On Windows, marking an `extern template class` declaration as exported actually forces an instantiation, which is not the desired behavior. Instead, the actual explicit instantiations need to be exported. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24679 llvm-svn: 281925
* Update _LIBCPP_EXCEPTION_ABI doc with @mclow's feedbackEric Fiselier2016-09-161-2/+3
| | | | llvm-svn: 281695
* [libc++] Add _LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE_INLINE_VISIBILITY to support GCC ABI ↵Eric Fiselier2016-09-161-0/+10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | compatibility Summary: GCC and Clang handle visibility attributes on the out-of-line definition of externally instantiated templates differently. For example in the reproducer below Clang will emit both 'foo' and 'bar' with default visibility while GCC only emits a non-hidden 'foo'. ``` // RUN: g++ -std=c++11 -shared -O3 test.cpp && sym_extract.py a.out // RUN: clang++ -std=c++11 -shared -O3 test.cpp && sym_extract.py a.out #define INLINE_VISIBILITY __attribute__((visibility("hidden"), always_inline)) template <class T> struct Foo { void foo(); void bar(); }; template <class T> void Foo<T>::foo() {} template <class T> inline INLINE_VISIBILITY void Foo<T>::bar() {} template struct Foo<int>; ``` This difference creates ABI incompatibilities between Clang and GCC built dylibs. Specifically GCC built dylibs lack definitions for various member functions of `basic_string`, `basic_istream`, `basic_ostream`, `basic_iostream`, and `basic_streambuf` (All of these types are externally instantiated). Surprisingly these missing symbols don't cause many problems because the functions are marked `always_inline` therefore the dylib definition is rarely needed. However when an out-of-line definition is required then GCC built dylibs will fail to link. For example [GCC built dylibs cannot build Clang](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/39454262/clang-build-errors). This patch works around this issue by adding `_LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE_INLINE_VISIBILITY` which is used to mark externally instantiated member functions as always inline. When building the library `_LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE_INLINE_VISIBILITY` sets the symbol's visibility to "default" instead of "hidden", otherwise it acts exactly the same as `_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY`. After applying this patch GCC dylibs now contain: * `_ZNSt3__115basic_streambufIcNS_11char_traitsIcEEE7sungetcEv` * `_ZNSt3__115basic_streambufIwNS_11char_traitsIwEEE5gbumpEi` * `_ZNSt3__115basic_streambufIwNS_11char_traitsIwEEE7sungetcEv` * `_ZNSt3__115basic_streambufIcNS_11char_traitsIcEEE9sputbackcEc` * `_ZNSt3__113basic_istreamIwNS_11char_traitsIwEEE3getERNS_15basic_streambufIwS2_EE` * `_ZNSt3__113basic_ostreamIwNS_11char_traitsIwEEElsEPFRNS_9basic_iosIwS2_EES6_E` * `_ZNSt3__115basic_streambufIcNS_11char_traitsIcEEE4setpEPcS4_` * `_ZNSt3__113basic_ostreamIwNS_11char_traitsIwEEEC1EPNS_15basic_streambufIwS2_EE` * `_ZNSt3__115basic_streambufIcNS_11char_traitsIcEEE6snextcEv` * `_ZNSt3__113basic_istreamIcNS_11char_traitsIcEEE4swapERS3_` * `_ZNSt3__113basic_istreamIwNS_11char_traitsIwEEE4swapERS3_` * `_ZNSt3__112basic_stringIcNS_11char_traitsIcEENS_9allocatorIcEEE6__initEPKcm` * `_ZNSt3__113basic_istreamIcNS_11char_traitsIcEEErsEPFRNS_8ios_baseES5_E` * `_ZNSt3__115basic_streambufIcNS_11char_traitsIcEEE9pubsetbufEPcl` * `_ZNSt3__115basic_streambufIcNS_11char_traitsIcEEE10pubseekoffExNS_8ios_base7seekdirEj` * `_ZNSt3__113basic_istreamIwNS_11char_traitsIwEEErsEPFRNS_9basic_iosIwS2_EES6_E` * `_ZNSt3__115basic_streambufIwNS_11char_traitsIwEEE5pbumpEi` * `_ZNSt3__113basic_ostreamIcNS_11char_traitsIcEEE5seekpENS_4fposI11__mbstate_tEE` * `_ZNSt3__113basic_istreamIcNS_11char_traitsIcEEE7getlineEPcl` * `_ZNSt3__115basic_streambufIcNS_11char_traitsIcEEE5sgetcEv` * `_ZNSt3__113basic_istreamIcNS_11char_traitsIcEEE3getERNS_15basic_streambufIcS2_EE` * `_ZNSt3__113basic_ostreamIcNS_11char_traitsIcEEElsEPFRNS_8ios_baseES5_E` * `_ZNSt3__115basic_streambufIcNS_11char_traitsIcEEE8in_availEv` * `_ZNSt3__113basic_istreamIwNS_11char_traitsIwEEErsEPFRNS_8ios_baseES5_E` * `_ZNSt3__115basic_streambufIcNS_11char_traitsIcEEE6sbumpcEv` * `_ZNSt3__113basic_ostreamIcNS_11char_traitsIcEEElsEPFRNS_9basic_iosIcS2_EES6_E` * `_ZNSt3__113basic_istreamIcNS_11char_traitsIcEEE3getERc` * `_ZNSt3__115basic_streambufIwNS_11char_traitsIwEEE6snextcEv` * `_ZNSt3__112basic_stringIwNS_11char_traitsIwEENS_9allocatorIwEEE6__initEmw` * `_ZNSt3__113basic_istreamIwNS_11char_traitsIwEEE7getlineEPwl` * `_ZNSt3__113basic_ostreamIcNS_11char_traitsIcEEE5tellpEv` * `_ZNSt3__113basic_istreamIwNS_11char_traitsIwEEE3getERw` * `_ZNSt3__112basic_stringIcNS_11char_traitsIcEENS_9allocatorIcEEE6__initEmc` * `_ZNSt3__115basic_streambufIcNS_11char_traitsIcEEE7pubsyncEv` * `_ZNSt3__113basic_istreamIcNS_11char_traitsIcEEE3getEPcl` * `_ZNSt3__113basic_istreamIcNS_11char_traitsIcEEEC2EPNS_15basic_streambufIcS2_EE` * `_ZNSt3__113basic_istreamIcNS_11char_traitsIcEEErsEPFRNS_9basic_iosIcS2_EES6_E` * `_ZNSt3__115basic_streambufIwNS_11char_traitsIwEEE7pubsyncEv` * `_ZNSt3__115basic_streambufIcNS_11char_traitsIcEEE5sputcEc` * `_ZNSt3__113basic_ostreamIwNS_11char_traitsIwEEE5seekpExNS_8ios_base7seekdirE` * `_ZNKSt3__115basic_streambufIcNS_11char_traitsIcEEE6getlocEv` * `_ZNSt3__115basic_streambufIcNS_11char_traitsIcEEE5gbumpEi` * `_ZNSt3__114basic_iostreamIcNS_11char_traitsIcEEE4swapERS3_` * `_ZNSt3__113basic_ostreamIwNS_11char_traitsIwEEE5seekpENS_4fposI11__mbstate_tEE` * `_ZNSt3__113basic_ostreamIwNS_11char_traitsIwEEE5tellpEv` * `_ZNSt3__113basic_ostreamIwNS_11char_traitsIwEEElsEPFRS3_S4_E` * `_ZNSt3__113basic_istreamIwNS_11char_traitsIwEEE3getEPwl` * `_ZNSt3__113basic_istreamIwNS_11char_traitsIwEEEC2EPNS_15basic_streambufIwS2_EE` * `_ZNSt3__113basic_ostreamIcNS_11char_traitsIcEEElsEPFRS3_S4_E` * `_ZNSt3__115basic_streambufIcNS_11char_traitsIcEEE4setgEPcS4_S4_` * `_ZNSt3__112basic_stringIwNS_11char_traitsIwEENS_9allocatorIwEEE6__initEPKwmm` * `_ZNSt3__115basic_streambufIwNS_11char_traitsIwEEE4setgEPwS4_S4_` * `_ZNSt3__113basic_istreamIwNS_11char_traitsIwEEEC1EPNS_15basic_streambufIwS2_EE` * `_ZNSt3__115basic_streambufIcNS_11char_traitsIcEEE8pubimbueERKNS_6localeE` * `_ZNSt3__113basic_ostreamIcNS_11char_traitsIcEEE4swapERS3_` * `_ZNSt3__113basic_ostreamIwNS_11char_traitsIwEEEC2EPNS_15basic_streambufIwS2_EE` * `_ZNSt3__115basic_streambufIwNS_11char_traitsIwEEE10pubseekposENS_4fposI11__mbstate_tEEj` * `_ZNSt3__115basic_streambufIcNS_11char_traitsIcEEE5pbumpEi` * `_ZNSt3__115basic_streambufIwNS_11char_traitsIwEEE5sgetcEv` * `_ZNSt3__113basic_ostreamIwNS_11char_traitsIwEEE4swapERS3_` * `_ZNSt3__115basic_streambufIcNS_11char_traitsIcEEE10pubseekposENS_4fposI11__mbstate_tEEj` * `_ZNSt3__115basic_streambufIcNS_11char_traitsIcEEE5sputnEPKcl` * `_ZNSt3__113basic_ostreamIcNS_11char_traitsIcEEE5seekpExNS_8ios_base7seekdirE` * `_ZNSt3__115basic_streambufIwNS_11char_traitsIwEEE5sgetnEPwl` * `_ZNSt3__113basic_ostreamIwNS_11char_traitsIwEEElsEPFRNS_8ios_baseES5_E` * `_ZNSt3__115basic_streambufIwNS_11char_traitsIwEEE4setpEPwS4_` * `_ZNSt3__115basic_streambufIcNS_11char_traitsIcEEE5sgetnEPcl` * `_ZNKSt3__115basic_streambufIwNS_11char_traitsIwEEE6getlocEv` * `_ZNSt3__114basic_iostreamIcNS_11char_traitsIcEEEC2EPNS_15basic_streambufIcS2_EE` * `_ZNSt3__115basic_streambufIwNS_11char_traitsIwEEE8pubimbueERKNS_6localeE` * `_ZNSt3__114basic_iostreamIcNS_11char_traitsIcEEEC1EPNS_15basic_streambufIcS2_EE` * `_ZNSt3__115basic_streambufIwNS_11char_traitsIwEEE8in_availEv` * `_ZNSt3__113basic_istreamIcNS_11char_traitsIcEEEC1EPNS_15basic_streambufIcS2_EE` * `_ZNSt3__112basic_stringIcNS_11char_traitsIcEENS_9allocatorIcEEE6__initEPKcmm` * `_ZNSt3__115basic_streambufIwNS_11char_traitsIwEEE6sbumpcEv` * `_ZNSt3__115basic_streambufIwNS_11char_traitsIwEEE10pubseekoffExNS_8ios_base7seekdirEj` * `_ZNSt3__113basic_ostreamIcNS_11char_traitsIcEEEC2EPNS_15basic_streambufIcS2_EE` * `_ZNSt3__113basic_istreamIwNS_11char_traitsIwEEErsEPFRS3_S4_E` * `_ZNSt3__115basic_streambufIwNS_11char_traitsIwEEE9sputbackcEw` * `_ZNSt3__112basic_stringIwNS_11char_traitsIwEENS_9allocatorIwEEE6__initEPKwm` * `_ZNSt3__115basic_streambufIwNS_11char_traitsIwEEE5sputnEPKwl` * `_ZNSt3__113basic_istreamIcNS_11char_traitsIcEEErsEPFRS3_S4_E` * `_ZNSt3__113basic_ostreamIcNS_11char_traitsIcEEEC1EPNS_15basic_streambufIcS2_EE` * `_ZNSt3__115basic_streambufIwNS_11char_traitsIwEEE9pubsetbufEPwl` * `_ZNSt3__115basic_streambufIwNS_11char_traitsIwEEE5sputcEw` This patch has no effect on Clang based builds. Reviewers: mclow.lists, eugenis, danalbert, jroelofs, EricWF Subscribers: beanz, cfe-commits, mgorny Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24600 llvm-svn: 281681
* [libc++] Fix and document visibility attributes for Clang, GCC and Windows.Eric Fiselier2016-09-151-0/+85
Summary: This patch fixes a number of problems with the visibility macros across GCC (on Unix) and Windows (DLL import/export semantics). All of the visibility macros are now documented under `DesignDocs/VisibilityMacros.rst`. Now I'll no longer forget the subtleties of each! This patch adds two new visibility macros: * `_LIBCPP_ENUM_VIS` for controlling the typeinfo of enum types. Only Clang supports this. * `_LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE_TYPE_VIS` for redefining visibility on explicit instantiation declarations. Clang and Windows require this. After applying this patch GCC only emits one -Wattribute warning opposed to 30+. Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF Subscribers: beanz, mgorny, cfe-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24602 llvm-svn: 281673
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud