| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
ShadowCallStack on x86_64 suffered from the same racy security issues as
Return Flow Guard and had performance overhead as high as 13% depending
on the benchmark. x86_64 ShadowCallStack was always an experimental
feature and never shipped a runtime required to support it, as such
there are no expected downstream users.
Reviewers: pcc
Reviewed By: pcc
Subscribers: mgorny, javed.absar, hiraditya, jdoerfert, cfe-commits, #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #sanitizers, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59034
llvm-svn: 355624
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45303
llvm-svn: 329614
|
|
|
Summary:
ShadowCallStack does not yet have a runtime provided by compiler-rt, but
this change includes simple tests that make use of a very minimal
runtime in test/shadowcallstack/minimal_runtime.h
Reviewers: pcc, kcc, delcypher, eugenis, filcab
Reviewed By: pcc
Subscribers: kubamracek, mgorny, delcypher, llvm-commits, #sanitizers, kcc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44803
llvm-svn: 329210
|
