summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_solaris.cc
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* compiler-rt: Rename .cc file in lib/sanitizer_common to .cppNico Weber2019-07-311-230/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | See https://reviews.llvm.org/D58620 for discussion, and for the commands I ran. In addition I also ran for f in $(svn diff | diffstat | grep .cc | cut -f 2 -d ' '); do rg $f . ; done and manually updated (many) references to renamed files found by that. llvm-svn: 367463
* [Sanitizers] Remove obsolete OpenFile from sanitizer_solaris.ccRainer Orth2019-07-021-5/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | I noticed that the instance of OpenFile in sanitizer_solaris.cc is no longer needed. Removed as follows, tested on x86_64-pc-solaris2.11. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63764 llvm-svn: 364892
* [Sanitizers] Provide __internal_dup on SolarisRainer Orth2019-04-051-0/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Both LLVM 8.0.0 and current trunk fail to link libclang_rt.ubsan.standalone-*.so on Solaris 11/x86 with GCC 8.1.0: Undefined first referenced symbol in file Scanning dependencies of target clang_rt.asan_cxx-x86_64 __sanitizer::internal_dup(int) ../sanitizer_common/CMakeFiles/RTSanitizerCommon.i386.dir/sanitizer_posix.cc.o ld: fatal: symbol referencing errors collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [projects/compiler-rt/lib/ubsan/CMakeFiles/clang_rt.ubsan_standalone-dynamic-i386.dir/build.make:233: lib/clang/9.0.0/lib/sunos/libclang_rt.ubsan_standalone-i386.so] Error 1 Fixed by providing an implementation, which allowed the i386-pc-solaris2.11 build to finish. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60045 llvm-svn: 357753
* Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepoChandler Carruth2019-01-191-2/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | to reflect the new license. We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach. Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and repository. llvm-svn: 351636
* [sanitizer] Support running without fd 0,1,2.Evgeniy Stepanov2018-12-201-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: Support running with no open file descriptors (as may happen to "init" process on linux). * Remove a check that writing to stderr succeeds. * When opening a file (ex. for log_path option), dup the new fd out of [0, 2] range to avoid confusing the program. (2nd attempt, this time without the sanitizer_rtems change) Reviewers: pcc, vitalybuka Subscribers: kubamracek, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55801 llvm-svn: 349817
* Revert "[sanitizer] Support running without fd 0,1,2."Ilya Biryukov2018-12-201-2/+2
| | | | | | | | This reverts commit r349699. Reason: the commit breaks compilation of sanitizer_rtems.cc when building for RTEMS. llvm-svn: 349745
* [sanitizer] Support running without fd 0,1,2.Evgeniy Stepanov2018-12-191-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: Support running with no open file descriptors (as may happen to "init" process on linux). * Remove a check that writing to stderr succeeds. * When opening a file (ex. for log_path option), dup the new fd out of [0, 2] range to avoid confusing the program. Reviewers: pcc, vitalybuka Subscribers: kubamracek, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55801 llvm-svn: 349699
* [Sanitizers] Solaris largefile fixesRainer Orth2018-11-051-17/+28
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | While testing the Solaris libsanitizer port on GCC mainline, I found that I'd messed up the largefile checks in various ways, some of which showed as compile failures (wrong structure sizes and member offsets), others at runtime, some of those only on sparc as a big-endian target. This patch fixes all of them: - OFF_T is now correctly defined for 32-bit largefile and traditional environments, and 64-bit. - The definition of __sanitizer_dirent now checks the correct conditionals. - sanitizer_procmaps_solaris.cc undefines _FILE_OFFSET_BITS: before Solaris 11.4 <procfs.h> doesn't even compile with largefile support enabled, but the use at hand doesn't need it anyway while g++ 9 will define _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 out of the box. - With full largefile support enabled, one needs to use e.g. mmap64 instead of mmap; this is hidden behind macros. With this patch I could bootstrap gcc mainline on both sparc-sun-solaris2.11 and i386-pc-solaris2.11. In addition, I've successfully built llvm on i386-pc-solaris2.11. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54101 llvm-svn: 346153
* [Sanitizers] Basic sanitizer Solaris support (PR 33274)Kamil Rytarowski2017-12-141-0/+219
Summary: This is the first mostly working version of the Sanitizer port to 32-bit Solaris/x86. It is currently based on Solaris 11.4 Beta. This part was initially developed inside libsanitizer in the GCC tree and should apply to both. Subsequent parts will address changes to clang, the compiler-rt build system and testsuite. I'm not yet sure what the right patch granularity is: if it's profitable to split the patch up, I'd like to get guidance on how to do so. Most of the changes are probably straightforward with a few exceptions: * The Solaris syscall interface isn't stable, undocumented and can change within an OS release. The stable interface is the libc interface, which I'm using here, if possible using the internal _-prefixed names. * While the patch primarily target 32-bit x86, I've left a few sparc changes in. They cannot currently be used with clang due to a backend limitation, but have worked fine inside the gcc tree. * Some functions (e.g. largefile versions of functions like open64) only exist in 32-bit Solaris, so I've introduced a separate SANITIZER_SOLARIS32 to check for that. The patch (with the subsequent ones to be submitted shortly) was tested on i386-pc-solaris2.11. Only a few failures remain, some of them analyzed, some still TBD: AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos :: TestCases/Posix/concurrent_overflow.cc AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos :: TestCases/init-order-atexit.cc AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos :: TestCases/log-path_test.cc AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos :: TestCases/malloc-no-intercept.c AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos-dynamic :: TestCases/Posix/concurrent_overflow.cc AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos-dynamic :: TestCases/Posix/start-deactivated.cc AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos-dynamic :: TestCases/default_options.cc AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos-dynamic :: TestCases/init-order-atexit.cc AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos-dynamic :: TestCases/log-path_test.cc AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos-dynamic :: TestCases/malloc-no-intercept.c SanitizerCommon-Unit :: ./Sanitizer-i386-Test/MemoryMappingLayout.DumpListOfModules SanitizerCommon-Unit :: ./Sanitizer-i386-Test/SanitizerCommon.PthreadDestructorIterations Maybe this is good enough the get the ball rolling. Reviewers: kcc, alekseyshl Reviewed By: alekseyshl Subscribers: srhines, jyknight, kubamracek, krytarowski, fedor.sergeev, llvm-commits, #sanitizers Tags: #sanitizers Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40898 llvm-svn: 320740
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud